logo
Stolen benefits finally may spur shift to new chip cards

Stolen benefits finally may spur shift to new chip cards

Yahoo26-03-2025

BPOSTON (SHNS) – Transitional Assistance Commissioner Jeff McCue told lawmakers Tuesday the administration will be asking for money for EBT cards in a supplemental budget, but it won't be for the replacement of stolen grocery benefits.
Massachusetts and other states have for years been dealing with a rise in criminals deploying skimming devices on ATMs and point-of-sale card readers to steal EBT card numbers and PINs, or scamming benefit recipients out of that information through phishing campaigns to steal the benefits due to that person. The problem has particularly affected the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
For a while, the federal government was reimbursing families who could prove their EBT dollars were wrongfully claimed. As of September, the Department of Transitional Assistance had issued about $9 million in federally funded replacement benefits to about 20,100 Bay State households who were victims of SNAP theft.
Congress did not extend the federal government's replacement of stolen benefits beyond December, and Massachusetts families that have been scammed since are not being reimbursed. Advocates have said doing so could cost the state about $1 million a month and along with some lawmakers have sought to have the state cover what the federal government no longer will.
McCue mentioned the 'ever-evolving criminal enterprise that is targeting our clients and their much-needed assistance' during testimony Tuesday to the Joint Ways and Means Committee at its budget hearing in Worcester. He said DTA is aiming to better deter theft by switching to EBT cards that have chips implanted in them, which allow for tap-to-pay functionality and more.
'We have been informed, and it's been confirmed with us, that in a supplemental budget which will be coming to you before the end of this fiscal year, there will be monies in it that are specifically targeted to enable our agency to be able to install chip card technology, such as the chip cards that you have, many of you may have, on your credit cards, which will effectively be able to promote a higher level protection for our clients,' the commissioner said Tuesday.
When Rep. Sally Kerans misheard the commissioner and later expressed her appreciation for the 'supp budget money for replacement of stolen benefits,' the commissioner made clear that the forthcoming spending request will be to allow for the eventual switch to chip cards, not short-term relief for victims of benefit theft.
'I do want to, just because I think certainly the words matter on this, the supplemental which will be coming before this committee, will be coming back to the Legislature, is about chip cards. It's really about giving us the funds necessary to install chips, because the benefit theft, replacing benefit thefts — and again, I'm not trying to dismiss how important that is and how difficult that is on behalf of clients — chip cards is a much more sustainable and permanent resolution relative to this, and I think that's absolutely the right way to go on that.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hegseth could be ‘on the hook' for hundreds of millions on Qatari jet, says Raskin
Hegseth could be ‘on the hook' for hundreds of millions on Qatari jet, says Raskin

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hegseth could be ‘on the hook' for hundreds of millions on Qatari jet, says Raskin

The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee has warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that he could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions of dollars for having accepted a luxury jet from the Qatari government. In a letter sent Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) argued that Hegseth's formal acceptance of the Boeing 747 jetliner last month – a move made so that the Air Force can upgrade its security measures so it may eventually be used as Air Force One – violates the Constitution emoluments clause. The rule bars federal officials from accepting financial benefits from foreign governments without congressional approval. 'I write now to urge and advise you to promptly mitigate these violations—and your own personal legal exposure—by either returning the plane to the Qatari government or promptly seeking Congress's consent to accept it,' Raskin wrote. The Pentagon announced on May 21 that it had officially accepted the 13-year-old luxury jet previously used by the Qatari royal family, a supposed 'free,' gift that could be used to supplement the aging Air Force One fleet, according to President Trump. The transfer has been criticized by U.S. lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, who say it raises ethical and corruption questions in addition to costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit the plane into a secure and working Air Force One. Others have focused on the national security risks of such a gift, saying the aircraft would have to be swept for listening devices. Some have worried that in Trump's push to use the plane before he leaves office, the Air Force will rush security upgrades and cut corners on protection systems. A former professor of constitutional law and former ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Raskin has focused his criticisms on the ethical issues around accepting the Qatari plane, repeatedly arguing that it requires congressional approval. 'The Constitution is perfectly clear: no present 'of any kind whatever' from a foreign state without Congressional permission,' Raskin wrote on X last month after news of the gift broke. Congress has the authority to block federal officials from receiving gifts from foreign governments, as granted in the Constitution, but the government arm has not held any formal vote to accept the plane or not. Democrats largely have been unsuccessful in stopping Trump from accepting the Qatari jet. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) last month attempted to pass a bill that would bar the use of a foreign jet as Air Force One, but that effort failed. Raskin, along with other Democrat lawmakers, have introduced resolutions to condemn the gift but Republicans have blocked them from being considered on the floor. Making matters more complicated, Democrats, given their status as the minority party, can't convene any oversight hearings that would force government officials to testify on the issue, and their colleagues across the aisle have not called any such hearings themselves. In his letter, Raskin says Hegseth is in violation of the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act, which could prompt the Attorney General to bring civil action and penalties against him. Under that law, government officials can accept certain gifts up to $480 in value, and they cannot 'request or otherwise encourage the tender of a gift or decoration' from another country. In violating the act, Hegseth can face a penalty 'not to exceed the retail value of the gift improperly solicited or received plus $5,000.' 'In other words, you may be on the hook for $400 million (plus $5,000) even for a jumbo jet that you accepted on behalf of the President but do not get to personally enjoy,' Raskin writes, referring to the cost of a new Boeing 747-8 jet. 'If you truly believe that there is nothing untoward about the President asking for and receiving a $400 million 'flying palace' from a foreign power, then you should let Congress and the President's Republican colleagues vote to approve the transaction,' he adds. 'If you're unwilling to do that, you must return the plane to Qatar.'

Trump may win the fight over the tax bill. But Musk is built for the long war.
Trump may win the fight over the tax bill. But Musk is built for the long war.

Boston Globe

time36 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump may win the fight over the tax bill. But Musk is built for the long war.

But while Trump still dominates the short-term politics of the Republican Party, Musk holds a very different kind of power, one that may ultimately outlast Trumpism. He's younger. He's vastly wealthier. And unlike most political rivals, Musk doesn't need a seat in Congress or a friendly Fox News hit to wield influence. He owns the platforms. He runs the systems. And his companies are increasingly intertwined with the United States' future — from space exploration to battlefield communications. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up This feud didn't erupt out of nowhere. Musk had reasons to be angry. First, the 'Big Beautiful Bill' Advertisement This isn't just a policy spat, it's a power struggle. Trump is playing to win the moment. Musk is building for the long haul. Advertisement Let's start with the obvious: Trump tuns 79 next week. Musk turns 54 at the end of June. Trump is focused on one last political chapter. Musk is laying groundwork for the next several decades. That generational difference shapes everything else. Trump's power is political. Musk's is infrastructural. The president can rally public opinion, bend Congress to his will, and weaponize regulatory agencies. But Musk operates on another level — embedding his companies into the very systems the government depends on. SpaceX is now central to NASA and Pentagon operations. Starlink powers military communications in Ukraine and is quietly becoming indispensable for disaster zones and geopolitical hotspots. Even Tesla, for all its recent volatility, helped create the EV market and still shapes infrastructure policy. If Trump wants to punish Musk, he has tools — the SEC, federal contracts, and regulatory pressure. Heck, one Trump ally believes Trump has reason to deport Musk back to his native South Africa. But the irony is that Trump's own administration might need Musk more than Musk needs Trump, particularly in the next moment of crisis. Then there's media. Beyond the powers of the presidency, Trump's strength is performative — rallies, TV hits, the occasional viral clip. Sure, he also has Truth Social, but that is a niche network. Musk, by contrast, owns the algorithm. As the proprietor of the much more mainstream X (formerly Twitter), he doesn't just post. He shapes the feed. He bans journalists, elevates allies, and controls what trends. But their falling-out signals a deeper shift on the American right — a movement once held together by Trump's gravitational pull is now already fragmenting. One can see that just in the fights over the Big Beautiful Bill. Musk represents a rising faction: tech-aligned, anti-woke, post-party, and less interested in governing than in redesigning systems altogether. Advertisement Of course, Musk is no model of discipline. His erratic tweets and ideological zig-zags make him an unreliable political force. But that's precisely what makes him dangerous. He's not a senator. He claims he is not a donor anymore. He's not trying to be president and, well, he is constitutionally ineligible anyway. Instead, he's trying to shape what the presidency needs. Trump still knows how to land a punch. But Musk might is laying claim to the terrain on which the next generation of political power will be fought. So yes, Trump can still win this fight over a tax bill. But Musk is playing a different game. He's not trying to win a news cycle. He's trying to build the operating system for what comes next. James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.

Trump embarks on media tour as Musk feud simmers
Trump embarks on media tour as Musk feud simmers

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump embarks on media tour as Musk feud simmers

12:30 Report is The Hill's midday newsletter. Click here to sign up or subscribe in the box below: Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here Happy Friday! And even more importantly, Happy National Doughnut Day! 🍩 There are several ways to get a free doughnut today, so keep scrolling. If you're in the D.C. area, tomorrow is the WorldPride Parade. In today's Trump-Musk feud edition: As you all know by now, President Trump and his pal Elon Musk had the messiest breakup over social media. This Associated Press lede described it best. Now that they've had a minute to calm down, where do things stand today? Musk offered a tiny peace signal to Trump in the form of a reply to a post on his social media platform X. He responded 'true' to a post that said the two men 'should make peace.' But Trump doesn't seem ready for that. There had been some reporting that Trump and Musk would speak today, but the president shut down those rumors in phone calls with multiple journalists this morning. Trump told ABC News's Jonathan Karl that he is 'not particularly interested in talking to Elon Musk.' 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' he said. The president also told CNN's Dana Bash that he's 'not even thinking about Elon,' adding, 'He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' On Musk's sudden criticism about Trump's bill in Congress, the president told the New York Post on Friday that Musk 'knew the bill as well as anybody.' Trump shrugged off the feud during his call with CBS News's Robert Costa. Costa says Trump wanted to talk about the economy instead. Trump's morning media tour made one thing clear: The White House wants to turn the page on the nasty feud, The Hill's Brett Samuels and Alex Gangitano report. Remember: Exactly one week ago, Trump and Musk held a joint goodbye event in the Oval Office as Musk's time in government came to an end. Trump presented Musk, the face of his administration's cost-cutting effort, a gold key to the White House and the pair pledged to remain in touch. Goodbye, White House Tesla: Trump is either planning to give away or sell the candy apple red electric vehicle he purchased, a senior White House official told NewsNation. ^ All I can think of is the Keith Urban song lyrics, 'And take your cat and leave my sweater 'Cause we have nothing left to weather…' 🎵 How is Tesla stock doing?: Shares of the car company plummeted Thursday, wiping out $152 billion in market value. But they've rebounded a bit this morning. 🗨️ Follow today's live blog 💡 How did we even get here?: It's been less than a year since Trump and Musk became close friends. Musk campaigned with Trump shortly after his first assassination attempt and quickly became one of his closest confidants. Trump created a formal role for Musk within his second administration and Musk even had sleepovers in the White House. But as Trump's legislative agenda stumbled through Congress at a glacial pace, the cracks started to form. Musk detested the price tag of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' — and cuts to the EV tax credit — and became louder about his opposition over the past week. So, yes: What started as disagreements over budgetary policy ended with Musk and Trump verbally ripping each other to shreds on Thursday. Musk alleged that Trump is named in the infamous 'Epstein files' while Trump threatened to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts with Musk's companies. The bromance breakup posts on X have been truly unmatched. Some made me actually laugh out loud. 'This is the first day Elon finally made Twitter great again,' HuffPost's Igor Bobic joked. Here are a few of my favorites — and a few that have gotten the most attention: @Annie_Wu_22: 'if they fight it out, our country's secretary of education can oversee the match.' Remember: Education Secretary Linda McMahon is a co-founder of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE). Plus, Trump wants her to dismantle the Education Department and 'put herself out of a job.' Bravo's Andy Cohen: 'LET ME HOST THE REUNION!' National Review's Dan McLaughlin: 'Hi, I'm Marco Rubio, acting head of DOGE and acting CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and X.' @ItsMattsLaw: 'We're like four or five tweets away from national secrets.' @anothercohen: 'This is Drake vs Kendrick for republicans.' The Bulwark's Sam Stein: 'People may be wondering, are all White Houses this crazy? To which I reply: Obama wore a TAN SUIT!' TV writer Noah Garfinkel: 'One thing I'm proud of as an American is that even during our descent into fascism we have some fun days.' 📹 Comedy Central's 'The Daily Show' 📹 ABC's 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' 📹 NBC's 'Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon' 📹 CBS's 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) told Spectrum 1 News: 'Oh, man, the girls are fighting, aren't they?' 📹 Watch the clip 📸 Today's New York Post cover Fox News's Jesse Watters wants them to make up: He said he thinks Musk and Trump 'are just blowing off steam' because they're 'like roommates.' 'Maybe they can patch things up. I mean, Vance called Trump Hitler, and he was on the ticket,' Watters speculated. 📹 Watch the clip Well played, Mr. Speaker: Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) held his chief of staff's baby while walking by reporters, telling them he hadn't spoken to Musk yet. 📸 Photo From Ye, formerly known as Kanye West: 'Broooos please noooooo 🫂 We love you both so much,' the rapper posted. From a former GOP aide: 'You're telling me Musk was in it to shape government policy to benefit his companies, not because he was a devoted conservative? Knock me over with a feather,' Brendan Buck posted. Throwback — Ah, I forgot about this post: Axios's Alex Thompson reminded us of a post from Musk last February. 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man.' May's jobs report is out. The U.S. added 139,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate held steady at 4.2 percent. For context: This is right in line with economists' expectations. The estimate was roughly 125,000 jobs. With the economic uncertainty surrounding Trump's trade war, this is a good sign for the economy. Inside the jobs report: The health care and hospitality industries had the most employment growth. Employment in other sectors, like construction, manufacturing, etc., remained flat. Not great, but thanks for asking. Read Alexander Bolton's latest reporting on President Trump's legislative agenda in The Hill today. The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court this morning for permission to gut the Education Department after a lower court judge blocked the efforts. As The Hill's Zach Schonfeld pointed out: This is the Trump administration's 19th (!) emergency plea to the Supreme Court since taking office. The House met this morning. The Senate is out. President Trump is in Washington, leaving for New Jersey this afternoon. (All times EST) 1:30 p.m. Trump signs executive orders. 2 p.m. Trump participates in a swearing-in ceremony for the secretary of the Navy. 3 p.m. Trump leaves for Bedminster, N.J., for the weekend. 9:30 p.m. Saturday: Trump attends UFC 316 Dvalishvili vs. O'Malley 2 at the Prudential Center. Sunday morning: Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.) will both appear on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 🍩 Celebrate: Today is National Doughnut Day!! Dunkin' and Krispy Kreme are giving away free doughnuts today! Here's a list of doughnut deals across the country. 🧹 The first trailer for the next Wicked movie!: The first official trailer of 'Wicked: For Good' came out this week. The second half of the movie will be in theaters in November! 📹 Watch the trailer To help you jumpstart your weekend with a laugh, watch what happens when this woman trains her dog. 📺 Miss yesterday's newsletter? Catch up with a 1-minute video. I love hearing from you — send feedback & tips to cmartel@ Check out more newsletters here. See you next week!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store