logo
Gov. Hochul has only herself to blame for NY's looming Medicaid crisis

Gov. Hochul has only herself to blame for NY's looming Medicaid crisis

New York Post01-05-2025

As New York's Medicaid costs spiral out of control, Gov. Kathy Hochul would like you to think she has nothing to do with it.
In January, she implicitly laid the blame on Washington.
'We will need to take action alongside the federal government to manage [Medicaid] growth,' she said — which, she admitted, 'isn't sustainable for New York taxpayers on its current trajectory.'
Advertisement
But now that Congress is actually trying to slow Medicaid spending at the federal level, Hochul is blaming Republicans in New York's House delegation for allowing that to happen.
'They have the power to stop these reckless federal cuts,' she charged this week. 'They must find the political will to stand up to this administration and fight for the people they represent.'
Hochul's helplessness is just a pose, of course.
Advertisement
Although the feds pick up half or more of the cost of the safety-net health plan, each state is in charge of managing it — with broad discretion over how many people to cover, what benefits to provide and how generously to compensate providers.
That means the whole nation's taxpayers end up footing much of the bill for New York's Medicaid choices.
And Hochul happens to be in charge of the most extravagant state Medicaid program of all, spending $3,100 per resident compared to a national average of $1,800.
Advertisement
As such, she has more power to control Medicaid costs than anyone else.
Psst, governor: The Medicaid bucks stop with you.
Traditionally, governors of both parties in every state have taken it as their duty to try to keep Medicaid spending in reasonable check, or at least to make a show of it.
Hochul has mostly avoided this chore, opting instead to minimize political friction with the health-care industry, Albany's most powerful special interest.
Advertisement
She has done little to initiate cost-cutting proposals of her own, and has failed to follow through on those she inherited — like a package of reforms, including tighter eligibility restrictions for long-term home health care, passed in early 2020.
Those limits were put on hold during the federal pandemic emergency. But that ended in 2023.
Almost two years later, Hochul has made no visible sign of implementing them, even though home care remains one of Medicaid's chief cost drivers.
Instead, one of her few big initiatives — the consolidation of the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program under a single statewide contractor — will only realize minor savings, but will bring major benefits to 1199 SEIU, the powerful health-care union.
Meanwhile, Hochul has sponsored or acceded to policies that directly increase Medicaid costs.
Last year the state opened the program to illegal immigrants over age 65 — and more than 19,000 of them signed up in the first three months.
Her current budget proposal would boost fees for hospitals, long-term-care facilities and other providers by hundreds of millions of dollars, building on several previous rounds of hikes.
Advertisement
She's even used Medicaid funds to reward political supporters, including bail-outs for 1199-affiliated benefit funds and grants to a Bronx medical group operated by campaign donors — spending that's far from the mission of caring for the indigent or disabled.
Thanks to this blank-check management, the state-supported share of Medicaid costs jumped 36% over Hochul's first three budgets — and it's on track to grow at least 17% in fiscal 2025-26.
In just four years, she's surpassed the combined total of increases Andrew Cuomo racked up in his 11-year term.
Advertisement
On Monday, almost a month into the state's new fiscal year, Hochul announced a 'general agreement' on the budget. The highlights she listed included $3 billion in 'inflation refunds' to taxpayers.
But she made no mention of the rising state share of Medicaid, from $38 billion to $44 billion, an increase that accounts for 60% of new state spending in the year ahead.
Perhaps she didn't want to emphasize that the best-funded health-care system in the country is getting more additional money than every other state program combined.
Although the economy has soured and Congress is readying a slowdown in federal Medicaid funding, Hochul acknowledged the budget deal makes no adjustment for those realities.
Advertisement
Instead, she warned that she and the Legislature might have to reopen the budget within months — meaning spending cuts, tax increases or both could be around the corner, with Hochul reportedly seeking unilateral authority to cut as much as $2 billion on her own in a revenue 'emergency.'
If such drastic measures become necessary — as seems likely — the governor will undoubtedly try to blame Republicans in Washington, two of whom may challenge her re-election in 2026.
But voters should make no mistake: Hochul is in the driver's seat on New York's Medicaid spending.
Advertisement
And she is steering the state straight toward a cliff — and gunning the engine.
Bill Hammond is the senior fellow for health policy at the Empire Center.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats fend off GOP in San Antonio mayor runoff election
Democrats fend off GOP in San Antonio mayor runoff election

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Democrats fend off GOP in San Antonio mayor runoff election

Former Biden administration official Gina Ortiz Jones has won a runoff election in San Antonio's mayoral race, fending off a Republican opponent that the GOP hoped could pull off an upset, Decision Desk HQ projects. Jones defeated former Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos in an officially nonpartisan election that still in practice played out as a partisan election as Jones is a registered Democrat and Pablos is a registered Republican. The two candidates had advanced from the first round of the election in which many competed on the same ballot. Since no candidate received a majority of the vote in that round last month, the top two performing candidates advanced to face each other in the runoff. The city of San Antonio hasn't elected a Republican mayor in more than 20 years, and the past two elections for outgoing Mayor Ron Nirenberg, who has served since 2017, haven't been close. Nirenberg is term-limited from running again after serving four two-year terms. But Republicans had hope that they could notch a win with Pablos, who served as secretary of state for about two years under Gov. Greg Abbott (R). The GOP made some gains in the city in November after three presidential races in a row in which the city swung toward Democrats, though former Vice President Harris still comfortably won the area. Pablos also had a significant fundraising advantage, outraising Jones by a margin of 1.5 to 1, while outside spending from PACs contributed more than triple the amount in favor of Pablos compared to Jones, according to DDHQ. That includes a PAC with ties to Abbott and San Antonio's police union, The Texas Tribune reported. Pablos also picked up an endorsement from the editorial board of the San Antonio Express-News, uncommon for a Republican. But Jones was still the favorite in the Democratic-leaning city, even despite the gains that President Trump and the GOP has made with Hispanic voters recently. She finished first in the first round of voting in May, receiving 27.2 percent of the vote in a crowded field to Pablos's 16.6 percent. Jones previously served as undersecretary of the Air Force during the Biden administration from 2021 to 2023. Before that, she was the Democratic nominee for the House seat in Texas's 23rd Congressional District in 2018 and 2020, losing narrowly both times. She will be San Antonio's third female mayor and the first person to serve a four-year term after voters in the city approved a measure in November extending the mayor's term from two years to four. She will also be the city's first openly lesbian mayor.

Trump Issues Jaw-Dropping Authoritarian Threat to Elon Musk
Trump Issues Jaw-Dropping Authoritarian Threat to Elon Musk

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Issues Jaw-Dropping Authoritarian Threat to Elon Musk

As President Donald Trump works through the seven stages of grief that come with a big break-up, he's embracing anger—and directing at it his former ally Elon Musk. After two days of snapping at each other online, a historic public feud that pitted two of the world's most powerful men against each other, Trump decided to turn up the heat Saturday. Speaking with NBC News' Kristen Welker, he promised 'serious consequences' if Tesla billionaire Musk were to fund Democratic candidates in attempts to sabotage Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The threat came after Musk begged Congress to vote down the legislation, which is estimated to add some $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit, calling it 'ugly' and 'pork filled.' 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News in a phone interview. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences.' Musk, the world's richest man, claimed Thursday that he was the reason for Trump's re-election, having donating $288 million to his presidential campaign. He called the president out for 'such ingratitude.' The intense clash escalated so much that the former 'First Buddy' dropped a bombshell alleging that Trump 'is in the Epstein files.' He has since scrubbed the post from his page, although it originally told readers: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' (Trump dismissed the allegations about his connection with the now-deceased Jeffrey Epstein. 'That's called 'old news,' that's been old news, that has been talked about for years,' Trump said on Saturday. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.') But while Musk's move to delete the post could be a sign that he'd consider backing off, Trump has decided instead to launch a new assault. Trump told NBC that he had no desire to repair his relationship with Musk. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' he said, adding, 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' And when asked if the four-month bromance was completely over, a sullen Trump said: 'I would assume so, yeah.' Trump had previously suggested that his once-close adviser had developed 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot,' he said at the time. 'He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it.' On Saturday Trump told NBC that Musk was 'disrespectful to the office of the President.' 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President,' he added. Trump's ominous suggestion of 'serious consequences' isn't the first threat he's launched against Musk. On Thursday he warned that he was contemplating cutting the SpaceX CEO's government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' he posted on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' On Saturday, he said that the move was still on the table: 'I'd be allowed to do that,' he said, 'but I have, I haven't given it any thought.' Trump also suggested that it was Musk who was reeling from the toxic breakup. 'I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken,' he said.

Don't underestimate Donald Trump — he and his goals will survive without Elon Musk
Don't underestimate Donald Trump — he and his goals will survive without Elon Musk

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Don't underestimate Donald Trump — he and his goals will survive without Elon Musk

Among other things last week, President Trump played host to Germany's chancellor in the Oval Office, issued a travel ban against 12 countries whose citizens routinely violate their visas, had a 'very positive' conversation about tariffs with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and twisted arms to push his 'one big beautiful bill' across the congressional finish line. Meanwhile, a stream of good economic news sent stock markets higher, with a jobs report beating expectations while inflation fell and wages rose. Oh, and Trump also had a brutal falling out with Elon Musk. Advertisement 3 Elon Musk attends news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. AP No need to guess which of the above dominated the news. Bad news travels fast and predictions of calamity win eyeballs, but I've learned a few things knowing and covering Trump for a decade. Rule No. 1 is always to remember to take a deep breath when it feels as if the end of his days is near. Advertisement Whatever the sensational event of the moment, the smart play has been to realize that this too shall pass — and to feel sorry for cats because they only have nine lives. Rule No. 2 is to be prepared for the next big end of days event, which is coming soon, and to expect another one after that. The 47th president is a human machine full of pride and plans, but only rookies still attempt to define him by a single event. If a stream of nasty Democrat prosecutions and threats of jail didn't derail him, the end of a partnership with the world's richest man won't either. Advertisement While Trump often appears to be courting disaster, reports of his imminent political demise still remain premature. That's not to say he is impervious, only that he is the closest thing to it on the American scene today. The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on. Advertisement So long, Elon, it was nice knowing ya. Need for speed Another thing to remember about Trump is that he's in a hurry to get big things done and is determined not to get sidetracked by anything. He's well aware of how Dems used the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax to win the House in the middle of the first term and showed no compunction about impeaching him over a nothing-burger phone call. He's not going to squander his second chance with a GOP-controlled Congress to engage in wild goose chases or pout over setbacks, even when they involve an important ally such as Musk. The clock in his head is always ticking. 3 The Musk-Trump feud sparked the day after the DOGE head left the White House. NY Post Despite his occasional talk of a possible third term, he knows that's not going to happen. Besides the constitutional prohibition, the reality is that he turns 79 next Saturday, and the last thing Trump wants to do is stay too long at the party and repeat Joe Biden's decrepit decline in office. Thus, Trump's need for speed is what makes the Musk divorce important. It ends, or at least interrupts, an iconic alliance that was good for both men and was paying big dividends to America. Whether Musk is right that his support and his extensive financial contributions made the difference in last year's campaign is impossible to know. But there is no doubt that the addition of Musk, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard to the Trump train broadened his appeal well beyond traditional GOP circles and MAGA diehards. Advertisement Consider, for example, that Kamala Harris foolishly tried to counter Trump's moves by adding former Republican Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz Cheney to her team and claiming they were evidence she had bipartisan appeal. The advantage to Trump wasn't a close call. As for Musk, most critical was his commitment to DOGE and to the idea that spending cuts are not only possible but essential to the nation's future. He used his soapbox to set a new standard for Washington, even if the results fell short of the promise. Advertisement Whatever started his break with Trump, it was complete when he attacked the tax cut and spending legislation the president helped to craft, saying at one point, 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both.' No damage to agenda The oddity is that the break came after Musk officially left his temporary DOGE post, complete with a happy sendoff in the Oval Office where Trump praised him and gave him a ceremonial key to the White House. Given the nasty nature of the rupture, attempts by others to forge a reconciliation are not likely to succeed. Yet even if the break is final, I don't believe it will do serious damage to the president's agenda, despite the hopes of media doomsayers. As even The New York Times ruefully conceded in a Saturday headline, 'Elon Musk May Be Out. But DOGE Is Just Getting Started.' Advertisement 3 President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. AP Another mistake many Trump observers are making is seeing him through the eyes of his chaotic first term. As I have noted before, Trump 2.0 is a very different person. Being on the sideline for four years served him well in that he better understood Washington, and was smarter about what he wanted to achieve and who could help him do that. Advertisement In raw political terms, Biden's spending-palooza that drove inflation to 40-year highs and the inexplicable decision to open the southern border were gifts that helped pave the way to a Trump return. And then came the brush with death from a would-be assassin's bullet in Pennsylvania. 'God spared me' I had previously arranged to interview Trump the next day on his flight to the GOP convention in Milwaukee, and to my everlasting surprise, he kept his schedule. It was during that interview that he first raised the idea of divine intervention, saying, 'I'm not supposed to be here . . . I'm supposed to be dead.' His wry sense of humor remained intact, as he noted that people were already calling the photo of him standing up, pumping his fist and shouting 'fight, fight, fight,' with his face streaked with his own blood, an 'iconic' scene. 'They're right and I didn't die,' Trump said. 'Usually you have to die to have an iconic picture.' Although he was never an especially religious man, Trump began to embrace the idea that 'God spared me for a purpose, and that purpose is to restore America to greatness.' It's a fat target for haters, but the important thing is that Trump himself believes it to be true. One result is that he is a much calmer and more gracious president. Even his demeanor last week reflected a 'what, me worry?' approach, as he demonstrated in a series of quick phone interviews with media outlets, including The Post, where he insisted he was not rattled by the blowup. His explanation was simple: Musk suffers from 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' Woof, woof, and the caravan moves on.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store