logo
Can UAE's smokers learn from 'clean tobacco' loving Sweden?

Can UAE's smokers learn from 'clean tobacco' loving Sweden?

The National14-04-2025

Sweden may have found the best alternative to traditional cigarettes - other than simply quitting. The rise in popularity of 'snus' tobacco pouches placed in the mouth are credited for falling cigarette use and lower deaths. Now, with a new UAE government regulation allowing oral nicotine pouches to be sold for the first time, the Emirates has a fresh weapon in the war on smoking. Can the Emirates, and heavy smoking nations in the Middle East, learn from Sweden's shift? Smoking rates in Sweden are a fraction of their EU counterparts, thanks in part to the use of snus among citizens. In 2018, lung cancer incidence was around 40 cases per 100,000 people in Sweden, compared with the EU average rate of 71 per 100,000 people. Sweden has a long relationship with snus, a tobacco product taken orally and placed between lip and gum for a slow nicotine release. For a decade or so, snus has been modernised and re-developed as a pure nicotine pouch. It has helped people, and women in particular, to quit cigarettes. Nicotine pouches are the electric car to the combustion engine age of tobacco smoking, and have been the driving force behind Sweden's record low cigarette use - and cancer rates. Around 12 per cent of the UAE population smokes, and around 20 per cent in the wider Middle East. Meanwhile, Sweden is well on course to become Europe's first smoke-free nation - defined by the World Health Organisation as a country with an adult smoking rate lower than 5 per cent. 'We have noticed that in Sweden we have less degree of smoke-related diseases compared to other countries and it's because we have fewer people who smoke compared to other countries,' said Dr Josef El-Achkar, a specialist in internal medicine and cardiology in Stockholm, Sweden. 'But the nicotine usage is not a big difference, it's how they take the nicotine. The inhalation and cigarette smoking seems to be the reason for why people get diseases, not the nicotine itself. There's also fewer cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a result of less smoking.' In 2018, lung cancer incidence was around 40 cases per 100,000 people in Sweden, compared with 113 in Hungary and an EU average rate of 71 per 100,000 people. With few nations regulating nicotine pouches to allow them on sale beyond duty-free airports, millions of smokers have been deprived of a less harmful alternative to cigarettes. Zyn - nicotine pouches developed and produced by Swedish Match - are available outside duty-free stores in only a few countries, including the US, UK, Switzerland, Hungary, South Africa, Finland, Poland, Serbia and Pakistan. In 2022, Philip Morris International, makers of Marlboro cigarettes, pushed through a $16 billion takeover of Swedish Match, to expand the company's global smoke-free agenda. The burning of tobacco creates the cancer-causing properties of conventional cigarettes. While nicotine is not entirely risk-free, smokeless products that perform in a similar way to nicotine patches will soon become more widely available. Some pouch users have experienced changes to gum infrastructure and oral health after long-term use, and nicotine itself is highly addictive. Sweden has slashed smoking rates and transitioned towards harm-reduction public health policy on tobacco. However, the country is one of the few nations with more female smokers (6.8 per cent), than males (5.9 per cent) - largely due to the popularity of snus with men. In 20th century industrial workplaces, snus was a familiar stimulant taken by male workers. Rolled up, clay-like balls of tobacco were tucked under the gum, allowing manual workers to free up their hands for labour, while continuing to take their daily nicotine habit. Patrik Strömer, secretary general of the Swedish Snus Manufacturers Association - an organisation that unites producers of snus and nicotine pouches, estimates there are some 1.2 million users in Sweden's population of almost 11 million. 'I think everybody has some kind of relation to snus,' he said. 'When the nicotine pouch entered the market 10 years ago, it was seen with both curiosity and scepticism. In the old-school tobacco users, they wanted to have the real stuff, but at the same time something that was seen as more fresh and contained no brown, wet tobacco.' The industry began to self-regulate products as they came on to the market. That included age limits, health warnings, restricted marketing and industry standards around the use of different kinds of substances. When Sweden's tobacco law came into force in July 2019, a smoking ban was enforced on outdoor restaurants and railway stations, further boosting the popularity of smokeless alternatives, particularly among women. 'Prior to that it was not seen as OK if a woman used nicotine pouches, so many smoked instead - it was a cultural thing,' Mr Strömer told The National. 'The traditional product was a cheap enjoyment for hardworking people. But you have to mould the tobacco and it is not very aesthetic or attractive, and it stains your fingers, so it was not very popular with woman at all. 'When Sweden joined the European Union, it was the only country where women smoked more than men. When you try to explain this rapid reduction in smoking prevalence among Swedish men, the answer is obvious. "When this new pouch entered the market, suddenly something became much more convenient, practical and discreet. From a sociological point of view, we have seen the effects. Now we have two smoke-free generations in Sweden, people aged 15 to 29 and 30 to 44.' Switching towards less harmful nicotine products has cut the number of Swedish-born adult smokers to 4.5 per cent - below the WHO-defined 5 per cent smoke-free threshold. That has contributed to 41 per cent fewer cancers cases than the European average, and 44 per cent fewer tobacco-related deaths. Despite those figures, introducing nicotine pouches in other nations with high smoking levels may not be a global panacea. In 2020, 22.3 per cent of the world's population used tobacco: 36.7 per cent of men and 7.8 per cent of women, and few nations have the same historic links to snus as Sweden, making the transition towards pouches a considerable challenge. Since December 2024, Sweden has enshrined tobacco harm reduction in public health policy, placing it at the vanguard of smoke-free ambition, and introduced a cap on nicotine levels in smokeless products. Limiting the strength of products helps regulate the market, experts say. Samuel Lundell, chairman of the National Association of Snus Users, said Sweden's history of smokeless tobacco has helped increase the wider adoption of nicotine pouches in the country. 'We have been using the products for hundreds of years, so we know a lot about what harm they do and the supporting research,' he said. 'Government agencies inform, but they don't always come from a harm-reduction perspective. 'That's where we have to really emphasise the huge difference you have in the health effects compared with cigarettes. On one hand you have a deadly product and then you have one which isn't deadly, so it should be an easy choice.' Social media links to the potential biohacking properties of nicotine, to improve attention or stimulation, are not scientifically proven but have fuelled a rise in use among young people, particularly in the US. That has reinforced calls for strong enforcement against underage sales. In Sweden, under-18s cannot legally buy snus or nicotine pouches. Potential links with cancer have also been scientifically debunked. A study of 400,000 male snus users by the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm found no association with a greater risk for pancreatic cancer, adding to claims oral nicotine is safer than smoking. 'The more time passes, the more of the old misconceptions we can throw away,' said Mr Lundell. 'I think it's possible to have a similar impact in the Middle East, at least if not in the absolute short term, but in a few years, absolutely. 'For young people, it's about accessing the information already out there. We already have the research, but we need to to get it across to people and that can become a bit tricky. 'A ban might be one of the worst public health decisions that could ever happen in a Middle Eastern country. Once a product has been banned, it's extremely hard to remove it. 'Meanwhile, we see millions of Europeans have lost their lives, it would be awful to see the same mistake elsewhere when there is an alternative.' * A visit to Sweden was facilitated by Philip Morris International

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Operation Chivalrous Knight 3' delivers new medical aid to Gaza via WHO
'Operation Chivalrous Knight 3' delivers new medical aid to Gaza via WHO

Al Etihad

time40 minutes ago

  • Al Etihad

'Operation Chivalrous Knight 3' delivers new medical aid to Gaza via WHO

25 June 2025 13:35 GAZA (WAM)The United Arab Emirates, via 'Operation Chivalrous Knight 3', has delivered a new batch of emergency medical aid to health facilities in the Gaza Strip, in cooperation with the World Health Organisation (WHO).The aid aims to alleviate the worsening health crisis in Gaza, marked by severe shortages of medicines and medical through the Emirati field hospital in southern Gaza, the support included large quantities of essential medicines, urgent medical consumables, and specialised materials for paediatric shipment also included 150 fully equipped medical beds and six field tents intended to establish temporary medical units to relieve pressure on hospitals that have sustained heavy damage or ceased humanitarian intervention comes amid the near-total collapse of Gaza's health system, caused by extensive damage to medical infrastructure and the disruption of pharmaceutical supplies. The situation has placed thousands of patients, including children, the injured, and individuals with chronic illnesses, at risk."Operation Chivalrous Knight 3" prioritises support for Gaza's health sector as one of the key pillars of its humanitarian mission, in line with the directives of the UAE's wise leadership. These directives affirm the UAE's steadfast commitment to supporting the Palestinian people and alleviating their humanitarian suffering, particularly in one of the most affected sectors. This latest shipment is part of a sustained series of Emirati relief efforts under Operation Chivalrous Knight 3, which continues to provide immediate and effective support in light of the dire challenges facing the health sector in Gaza.

Israel demands condemnation from World Health Organisation after hospital strike
Israel demands condemnation from World Health Organisation after hospital strike

Middle East Eye

time6 days ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israel demands condemnation from World Health Organisation after hospital strike

Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz warned that Iran's supreme leader "can no longer be allowed to exist" after a hospital in Israel was hit by an Iranian missile on Thursday. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Iran would "pay a heavy price" for the strike. Soroka Hospital in the southern city of Beersheba was left in flames by a bombardment that Iran said was intended to target a military and intelligence base. Daniel Meron, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, demanded a condemnation from the UN in a video on X filmed outside the World Health Organisation's headquarters. Israel has repeatedly bombed healthcare facilities in Gaza, which include 36 hospitals. WHO said that at least 94 percent of all hospitals in the Gaza Strip are damaged or destroyed.

Bombing hospitals is a red line - unless Israel is doing it
Bombing hospitals is a red line - unless Israel is doing it

Middle East Eye

time6 days ago

  • Middle East Eye

Bombing hospitals is a red line - unless Israel is doing it

On Thursday morning, Iranian missiles struck Soroka hospital in Beersheba, triggering expressions of outrage from Israeli officials. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir likened the Iranian regime to 'Nazis who fire missiles at hospitals, the elderly and children'. President Isaac Herzog evoked imagery of a baby in intensive care and a doctor rushing between beds. Culture Minister Miki Zohar declared on social media that 'only the scum of the earth fires missiles at hospitalized children and elderly people in their sick beds'. The chair of Israel's medical association, Zion Hagay, decried the strike as a war crime and urged the international medical community to condemn it. This swift and unified condemnation by Israeli political and medical leadership underscores a striking contradiction: these same actors not only ignored but openly justified the destruction of Gaza's hospitals over the past two years. Since 7 October 2023, Israeli air strikes and ground invasions have decimated Gaza's healthcare infrastructure. The World Health Organisation has recorded around 700 attacks on healthcare facilities. Major hospitals - al-Shifa, Nasser and the Indonesian hospital, among others - have been besieged, bombed and dismantled. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Israeli officials frame these hospitals as military targets and Hamas 'shields'. Shifa, the largest hospital in Gaza, was placed under siege and then invaded, with the attack hailed by Israeli media as a victory. Meanwhile, the Israeli Medical Association remained silent. In one of its rare statements after a year and a half of Israel's repeated and targeted attacks on hospitals and civilian infrastructure, the association echoed the state's narrative, stating that health facilities and personnel must not be targeted 'unless these are being used as a base for terrorist activities'. Selective moral outrage What is especially striking about this moment is the selective moral outrage from Israeli officials. The same ministers who justified the systematic dismantling of Gaza's healthcare system now describe an attack on an Israeli hospital as a red line, a war crime. Herzog's sentimental imagery of doctors rushing between beds evokes the stark reality in Gaza, where health workers have been shot and shelled in operating rooms, imprisoned, or forced to abandon their patients under fire. International medical voices have played along. While many doctors and health workers have spoken out, many others have remained silent, with no real actions taken to hold Israel accountable. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war It would be a mistake to treat these official statements as being detached from the public mood in Israel. Most Israelis have defended the destruction of Gaza's healthcare infrastructure. Public discourse has normalised the idea that Palestinian hospitals are legitimate military targets, even celebrating their destruction in some cases. This normalisation is not incidental. It is part of a broader dehumanisation of Palestinians, where even a child under anaesthesia in a Gaza operating room is not seen as a victim, but as collateral damage or a 'shield'. The outrage over Soroka thus reveals a deeper truth: in the eyes of many institutions and audiences, some lives are inherently more valuable than others. When Israeli hospitals are struck, the world responds with empathy and urgency. When Palestinian hospitals are dismantled - patients killed in their beds, doctors arrested mid-surgery - the world hesitates, rationalises or remains silent. How can Palestinian medics 'cooperate' with Israeli health bodies during a genocide? Read More » This is not simply a double standard; it reflects an entrenched hierarchy of whose suffering matters. Israeli leaders speak today of moral lines, of civilians and children, of hospitals as sanctuaries. Yet for nearly two years, those very values have been systematically violated in Gaza, with hardly a whisper of regret. This situation reveals not only hypocrisy but also the cynical confidence that comes with impunity. It reflects how the boundaries of Israeli grief and outrage are drawn narrowly around Jewish Israeli lives, grounded in the certainty that Israel will face no consequences. This moment puts the international system to the test. While some medical and humanitarian groups have expressed concern, most international stakeholders have remained silent in the face of the destruction of Gaza's entire health system. Will medical journals, international associations and UN bodies respond to the attack on an Israeli hospital with the kind of swift condemnation and concrete actions they failed to take when hospitals in Gaza were bombed? The world should have acted when the first operating room was hit in Gaza. It should not take an Israeli facility being targeted for them to remember that hospitals are meant to be protected spaces. If an attack on a hospital is a red line, this must be true for all hospitals, not just those serving Israelis. If international law is to mean anything, it must protect everyone, with the same standards applied to every violation. Anything less is not only hypocrisy; it is complicity. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store