Did Joe Biden reveal he had cancer in a 2022 speech slip-up? Ex-President faces fresh scrutiny over his health in office
JOE Biden is facing fresh scrutiny over his health in office as a speech slip-up from 2022 resurfaces amid his "aggressive" prostate cancer diagnosis.
The former president, 82, claimed to have had cancer in a public speech three years ago sparking fears for his health.
3
3
Biden's comments came during a speech about "cancer-causing" emissions from oil refineries near his childhood home in Delaware.
He said: "That's why I and so damn many other people I grew up with have cancer and why for the longest time Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation."
Biden's use of the present tense led to speculations that the president was suffering from cancer.
But these were dismissed after it was suggested that the comments were a reference to "non-melanoma skin cancers".
Before assuming the presidency, Biden had a number of "localized, non-melanoma skin cancers" removed by surgery.
In November 2021, Biden had a polyp removed from his colon that was a benign, but potentially pre-cancerous lesion.
And in February 2023, he had a skin lesion removed from his chest that was a basal cell carcinoma, a common form of skin cancer.
Non-melanoma skin cancer typically develops in the areas of the body most exposed to the sun such as the face, ears, hands, shoulders, upper chest, and back.
But Biden is now facing fresh scrutiny over his cancer comments following the announcement of his cancer diagnosis on Sunday.
This comes as Donald Trump took a swipe at his predecessor and said he was "surprised" the public wasn't told long ago about Biden's cancer.
Trump 'surprised public wasn't told long ago' about Biden's prostate cancer as Don takes swipe at when ex-President knew
The US President cast doubt on the timeline of Biden's diagnosis on Monday as he said it usually takes a "long time" to reach such an aggressive stage of cancer.
Trump was backed up by a leading oncologist who claimed that the former president likely had cancer when he took office in 2021.
Dr Zeke Emanuel said: "He had it while he was President.
"He probably had it at the start of his presidency, in 2021."
How could prostate cancer be missed?
By Sam Blanchard
It is likely that Joe Biden's cancer started while he was still serving as president – as recently as January – but impossible to know how long he has had it.
Prostate cancer is widely regarded as the slowest growing form of cancer because it can take years for any sign of it to appear and many men never need treatment.
The former president's office said his cancer is aggressive and has spread to his bones, further confusing the timeline.
PSA blood tests could indicate whether a patient is likely to have cancer but they become less accurate with age, and gold-standard tests involve taking biopsy tissue samples.
There is no guarantee that Mr Biden, 82, was tested during his presidency and, even if he was, the cancer is not certain to have been detected. It may have first formed a long time ago and only recently become aggressive, or started recently and grown very quickly.
Most cancers are found before they spread but a fast-growing one may be harder to catch in time.
Prostate cancers are well-known for not causing many symptoms in the early stages and the NHS says 'there may be no signs for many years'.
The time it takes for a cancer to progress to stage four – known as metastatic, when it has spread to another body part – can vary from a number of months to many years.
Professor Suneil Jain, from Queen's University Belfast, said: 'Every prostate cancer is different and no-one from outside his direct team will have all the information to be specific about President Biden's specific diagnosis or situation.
'In recent years there has been a lot of progress in the management of prostate cancer, with many new therapies becoming available.
'This has significantly extended the average life expectancy by a number of years.'
Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer in males and one in eight men develop it at some stage in their life.
Biden announced his cancer diagnosis in an official statement from his personal office on Sunday.
The statement said that he was seen by doctors last week after suffering urinary symptoms, with a prostate nodule then being found.
He was then diagnosed with prostate cancer on Friday, with the cancer cells having spread to the bone.
The statement read: "Last week, President Joe Biden was seen for a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms.
"On Friday, he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone.
"While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management.
"The President and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians."
A Gleason score of 9 means the cancerous cells "look very abnormal" and that the disease is "likely to grow quickly", according to Cancer Research UK.
Biden served as US president from 2021 to 2025, with his term ending on January 20 when Donald Trump took office.
What are the symptoms every man needs to know?
In most cases, prostate cancer doesn't have any symptoms until the growth is big enough to put pressure on the urethra – that tube you pee through.
Symptoms include:
Needing to urinate more often, especially at night
Needing to rush to the toilet
Difficulty in starting to pee
Weak flow
Straining and taking a long time while peeing
Feeling that your bladder hasn't emptied fully
Many men's prostates get larger as they age because of the non-cancerous conditions, prostate enlargement, and benign prostatic hyperplasia.
In fact, these two conditions are more common than prostate cancer – but that doesn't mean the symptoms should be ignored.
The signs that cancer has SPREAD include bone, back, or testicular pain, loss of appetite, and unexplained weight loss.
3
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trade war resolution may require concessions from all, ECB's Lagarde says
FRANKFURT, June 11 (Reuters) - Coercive trade policies fail to resolve financial imbalances and the risk of mutual economic damage is so great that all sides need to weigh policy adjustments to resolve tensions, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said on Wednesday. The United States set off global economic turmoil in April when it unveiled a raft of tariffs on most nations and trade flows have been disrupted while governments negotiate with the Trump administration. Lagarde, speaking on a rare visit to Beijing, said all countries needed to take responsibility and should tweak policies that have led to either excess supply or excess demand, otherwise trade barriers and their likely retaliation will erode global prosperity. "We have witnessed a sharp rise in the use of industrial policies aimed at boosting domestic capacity," Lagarde said at the People's Bank of China. "Since 2014, subsidy-related interventions that distort global trade have more than tripled globally." China has extensively relied on subsidies for decades, especially in the case of export-focused production, and critics argue this gives its firms an unfair advantage that is used to crowd out production elsewhere. But China is not alone in using subsidies and others, particularly in emerging markets, were resorting to such schemes, Lagarde said. The share of the U.S. in global demand has meanwhile soared in recent years, which partly reflects excessive spending in the public sector, contributing to the imbalances, Lagarde argued. A resolution in the conflict lies in more closely respecting global rules and forging bilateral or regional agreements rooted in mutual benefits, she said.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ex-Biden aide agrees to testify to House committee about president's mental fitness while in office
A former senior adviser to President Joe Biden has agreed to testify before the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door interview as part of its investigation into claims of Biden's cognitive decline while in office. Neera Tanden, who served as a senior adviser, White House Staff Secretary, and Director of the Domestic Policy Council during the Biden administration, is set to testify before the committee on June 24, according to an Oversight Committee aide. Her closed-door testimony will be recorded and reviewed as part of Republican committee members' investigation into Biden's mental acuity and the alleged cover-up by his staff and allies. Republican Representative James Comer, the chairman of the committee, has accused Democrats, the media, and the Biden administration of 'propping up a man who was unfit to lead.' Comer believes the so-called 'cover up' allowed for the utilization of 'autopens' to issue 'blanket pardons' for members of the Biden family. President Donald Trump has made similar claims that the use of the autopen meant someone other than Biden was in charge of the White House during his term. Tanden has acknowledged that the autopen is used in 'a lot' of administrations but has not provided any public comment on Biden's use of it or his cognitive function. Comer had requested Tanden and other former staffers he's accused of engaging in a 'cover-up,' testify to the committee and threatened to subpoena those who do not voluntarily comply. Tanden, 54, is a prominent Democratic political consultant who has worked in the Clinton, Obama and Biden administrations. When Biden took office in 2020, he nominated Tanden to serve as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. However, the nomination was considered controversial due to Tanden's history of name-calling in tweets. The White House eventually withdrew Tanden's nomination and appointed her senior adviser and staff secretary. The testimony will come after a renewed focus on Biden's mental fitness, which was the subject of Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson's book Original Sin. Comer has also requested testimony from Michael Donilon and Anita Dunn, former senior advisers; Bruce Reed, former deputy chief of staff; and Steve Ricchetti, the former counselor to the president. Others subpoenaed include Anthony Bernal, a former senior adviser to First Lady Jill Biden; Ashley Williams, the former deputy director of Oval Office operations; and Annie Tomasini, the former deputy chief of staff. Comer has also subpoenaed Biden's physician, Kevin O'Connor. Biden has maintained that he drove the decision-making during his presidency. There has been no evidence that aides acted on his behalf or that anyone other than Biden used the autopen.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Marco Rubio condemns UK sanctions on Israeli ministers
The US Secretary of State has condemned Sir Keir Starmer for imposing sanctions on two Israeli politicians over their government's war in Gaza. Marco Rubio has criticised Britain and other nations who on Tuesday announced they would break with the US and sanction two far-Right Israeli cabinet ministers. The UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway accused Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich of 'inciting violence against the Palestinian people'. Mr Ben-Gvir hit back on Tuesday night, comparing Sir Keir to Neville Chamberlain, the former British Prime Minister who was accused of effectively appeasing the Nazis. Mr Rubio said the sanctions 'do not advance US- led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war'. He urged the UK 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. Mr Ben-Gvir, who has called for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, responded to Mr Rubio's post on X, saying: 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' Thank you, Mr. Secretary of State! The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. Israel is not afraid — we will continue to fight terrorism! History will judge the… — איתמר בן גביר (@itamarbengvir) June 10, 2025 America's ambassador to the UK said he fully supported Mr Rubio's comments and added that the sanctions 'impede constructive dialogue'. Under the sanctions, Mr Ben-Gvir, Israel's national security minister, and Mr Smotrich, the finance minister, will be banned from entering the UK. All of their financial assets in Britain will also be frozen. Israel faces growing international criticism over the conduct of its war with Hamas. Last week the Prime Minister described its actions in Gaza as 'appalling' as aid groups have accused Israeli of blocking food and medicine from entering the territory despite a growing humanitarian crisis. Foreign Office sources told The Telegraph they hoped sanctioning high-profile members of the Israeli government would make clear that the UK was willing to get tough to allow aid into Gaza and to bring about a ceasefire. The sanctions mark a significant break between No 10 and the White House. Donald Trump has lifted sanctions on Israeli settlers and threatened diplomatic action against the International Criminal Court (ICC) as it seeks to investigate Israel for war crimes. The Foreign Office is understood to have informed the US government that the sanctions were coming on Monday night. However, the State Department was not given a chance to object or veto the decision. In a joint statement, the five countries said Mr Ben Gvir and Mr Smotrich 'have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights.' 'These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account,' they added. Gideon Saar, Israel's foreign minister, slammed the sanctions as 'outrageous'. He added: 'I discussed it earlier today with Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu, and we will hold a special government meeting early next week to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision.' Mr Smotrich once described all the Arab population of the West Bank as 'Nazis'. Last month, he said Gaza should be 'totally destroyed' and its population evacuated. He also said he would not let a 'grain of wheat' into the territory. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, said the pair had used 'horrendous extremist language' and that he would 'encourage the Israeli government to disavow and condemn that language'. He has also described the conduct of the Israeli army as 'monstrous' and condemned the actions of 'extremist' settlers in the West Bank. New Zealand's foreign minister insisted the measures were not directed against the Israeli people or government. 'Rather, the travel bans are targeted at two individuals who are using their leadership positions to actively undermine peace and security and remove prospects for a two-state solution,' Winston Peters said. On Tuesday, the US dropped its support for an independent Palestine. Mike Huckabee, America's ambassador to Israel, said a two-state solution was no longer White House policy. He said: 'Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it.'
