Grandmother discovers her SNAP benefits were stolen on Mother's Day
MIDWEST CITY, Okla. (KFOR) — Another Oklahoman has fallen victim to stolen SNAP benefits, this time, on Mother's Day.
Jonelaine Williams was buying groceries for her family on Sunday when she realized scammers had wiped her benefits right off her card.
'When I seen that on Sunday, it just ruined my Mother's Day totally. It was terrible,' said Williams.
Williams is currently raising her two grandchildren.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: More SNAP benefits stolen; DHS reminds users to lock cards
She normally receives around $400 each month.
'They got it all except $18,' said Williams.
The thieves were able to use Williams' card at a wholesale store in Massachusetts.
'How they got my name and my card numbers is I don't understand,' said Williams.
Williams said she's been using the propel app and blocked out any out of state purchases, however that didn't matter.
The Department of Human Services sent News 4 the following statement:
ConnectEBT is the app that people should use to protect their benefits. As long as their card is locked, their benefits are safe. We recommend individuals keep their card locked except to make purchases and then immediately lock it back.
The Department of Human Services
'I knew the propel one. Their advice to me was to cut that card off and said that I would receive a new card in ten days. What good is that going to be?' said Williams.
Unfortunately, Williams was told there was nothing the state could do.
'DHS suggested that maybe I contact some churches and see if they might pay a bill for me to free up the funds from that,' said Williams.
Williams was forced to buy her family's groceries this month, leaving her in a tough financial situation.
'I'm sitting over $275 overdrawn in my account,' said Williams.
Like many other Oklahomans, Williams is asking for more to be done to protect her benefits.
'We're doing what they tell us to. I thought I was safe, but I wasn't,' said Williams.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
22-Year-Old Leading Terrorism Prevention Center at DHS: Report
A division within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) tasked with preventing terrorism is reportedly being led by a 22-year-old recent college graduate. Thomas Fugate, who graduated magna cum laude with a degree in politics and law from the University of Texas at San Antonio a year ago, is currently spearheading the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships at the DHS, ProPublica reported Tuesday. The center, also known as CP3, is mainly concerned with terrorism prevention and supports nationwide efforts to combat targeted attacks like hate-fueled violence. 'CP3 strengthens our country's ability to prevent targeted violence and terrorism nationwide through funding, education, training, evidence-based resources, increased public awareness, and strategic partnerships across every level of government, the private sector, and in local communities,' reads the center's mission statement on its website. Fugate was reportedly appointed as a 'special assistant' in an immigration office at the DHS in February, according to ProPublica. He then assumed leadership of CP3 in May after its previous director, Bill Braniff, resigned following staff cuts, the outlet adds. Prior to assuming his role at the DHS, Fugate served as an 'advance team member' on President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, per his LinkedIn page. He also interned at several political organizations including The Heritage Foundation, widely known as the think tank behind Project 2025, and the Texas House of Representatives. A DHS agency official told ProPublica that Fugate was 'temporarily' offered a leadership role at CP3 for his 'work ethic and success.' 'Due to his success, he has been temporarily given additional leadership responsibilities in the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships office,' the official told the outlet in an email. 'This is a credit to his work ethic and success on the job.' The DHS did not immediately respond to The Daily Beast's request for comment. One counterterrorism researcher, who worked with CP3 officials for years, told ProPublica that Fugate's appointment 'sounds like putting the intern in charge.' 'Maybe he's a wunderkind. Maybe he's Doogie Howser and has everything at 21 years old, or whatever he is, to lead the office. But that's not likely the case,' the researcher, who was unnamed in the outlet's report, said. The office used to reportedly hold around 80 employees but now has less than 20 following staffing cuts, former employees told ProPublica.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot
A telling moment early in President Donald Trump's second term foreshadowed how the administration is often now operating. Appearing at a Cabinet meeting in late February, Elon Musk said the Department of Government Efficiency had 'accidentally canceled' Ebola prevention programs. 'We will make mistakes. We won't be perfect. But when we make a mistake, we'll fix it very quickly,' Musk said. 'So we restored the Ebola prevention immediately. And there was no interruption.' It wasn't the first time Musk – who has since left the government – had acknowledged he and his team would make mistakes. But it was especially striking given the subject matter. Ebola prevention is literally a matter of life and death, but Musk mentioned it off-hand as if it were just some anecdote about DOGE's growing pains. (Musk's claim that there was 'no interruption' has also been called into question.) In the months since, though, that attitude has become emblematic of the Trump administration's approach to the country's business. Over and over again, it has employed shoot-first mentality with its public pronouncements and actions. Sometimes, that has meant it shot itself in the foot. And sometimes it has wound up contradicting itself. Four examples in recent days drive this home. One of them involves Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Last week, Noem claimed on X that an undocumented immigrant had 'threatened to assassinate President Trump.' The Department of Homeland Security even put out a news release naming the man. Except the claim quickly fell apart. CNN's Whitney Wild and Holmes Lybrand soon reported that authorities believed the immigrant had been set up – and that they had been investigating that possibility even before Noem's social media post. Now Wisconsin state prosecutors have charged another man, who they say admitted to orchestrating the ruse. And a DHS official conceded Wednesday that the man whom Noem and DHS accused is no longer under investigation for the purported threat. (A judge earlier in the day had delayed immigration proceedings.) Despite extensive coverage, neither Noem's post nor the DHS news release were removed or retracted as of Wednesday. Another example Wednesday involved a Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico returning to the US, his legal team told CNN – in what appears to be the first instance of the administration bringing back a migrant as a result of a judge's order. The situation stems from the administration's hasty deportation efforts, which have led to questions about whether the wrong people were deported. In at least three cases, judges have ruled that's exactly what happened, including two in which the migrants were sent to a brutal El Salvador prison. The administration has resisted returning the latter two migrants. A third example involves a somewhat similar case to the Noem example. Interim US attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba last month announced charges against Newark Democratic Mayor Ras Baraka for his actions at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility. Habba said Baraka had 'committed trespass' and 'has willingly chosen to disregard the law. That will not stand in this state. He has been taken into custody. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.' But Habba later announced the charges against Baraka would be dropped 'for the sake of moving forward,' while announcing new charges against a Democratic congresswoman from the Garden State. A magistrate judge issued a strong rebuke, calling the original charge against Baraka a 'a worrisome misstep by your office' and suggested Habba might have been motivated by 'political agendas.' 'An arrest, particularly of a public figure, is not a preliminary investigative tool,' the judge said, calling it 'a severe action, carrying significant reputational and personal consequences.' And Baraka, who's running in next week's gubernatorial primary, is now seizing on that alleged damage to his reputation. On Tuesday he filed suit against Habba, accusing her of false arrest, malicious prosecution and defamation. The other recent example regards the Covid-19 vaccine. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. last week made a major announcement. He said – also on X – that 'the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule.' But just two days later, when the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance, the vaccine was not, in fact, removed from the childhood schedule. It instead was listed under a slightly different designation – recommended based on 'shared clinical decision-making.' In other words, children would still be able to get the shot after consulting with a health care provider. HHS claimed this was not a contradiction, and said on X that the vaccine 'is not recommended for healthy children.' But on the CDC's website, the vaccine is still coded as a 'Recommended vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making.' These are only the most recent examples of statements and actions that have struggled with age: The DOGE effort has involved laying off or firing lots of people, some of whom the administration then sought to rehire because they needed them, and some of whom courts have instructed the administration to keep or rehire because of legal questions. Trump and a number of top administration officials last month leapt to accuse former FBI Director James Comey of threatening to assassinate Trump by posting an Instagram image of shells that spelled out '86 47.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Comey should be jailed. Despite the rhetoric, there is little sign of impending charges against Comey. Comey said he doesn't expect to be charged. And even if Comey had been referring to assassination – which it's not at all clear he was – it's quite possible that speech was First Amendment-protected. Trump has justified his rapid deportations of Venezuelan migrants by arguing that they are members of a gang, Tren de Aragua, that is acting 'directly and at the direction … of the [Nicolás] Maduro regime in Venezuela.' But The New York Times has reported that a US intelligence report undermined that claim. And plenty of reporting suggests the administration has worked to obscure that fact. (ODNI declined to comment to the Times.) Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed he didn't share 'war plans' while discussing strikes in Yemen on the unclassified Signal app with other top administration officials – right before The Atlantic published the texts showing detailed plans for the strikes. The White House offered a lengthy series of conflicting signals about whether it viewed Trump's tariffs as a negotiating tool, before ultimately pushing for a bunch of deals. So what does this all reveal? Some of it is just a reflection of a president with a demonstrated disregard for the truth (see: 30,000-plus false and misleading statements in his first term) and rhetorical consistency. Under Trump's bare-knuckle brand of politics, you can say pretty much anything or level any wild accusation and then, when that doesn't pan out, you just move on to the next provocation. It also seems to be a reflection of the kinds of people he's picked to lead the government. Many of these people don't have anywhere near the kinds of experience of those who usually hold their positions; among their chief qualifications was loyalty to Trump and willingness to do his bidding. But also, these are people whose credibility matters, and their words have consequences. Law enforcement generally isn't supposed to accuse people of things it doesn't intend to prove in court, because those people can be impugned by the mere allegations. It's quite likely that people who would consider the Covid-19 vaccine for their children are confused by the conflicting signals from HHS. Statements about tariff plans – and their staying power – have real-world impacts when it comes to long-term planning for American businesses. If you're a business, do you actually try to move manufacturing to the United States (assuming the tariffs will stay) or just wait things out (hoping they go away)? And talking about massaging US intelligence to fit a political narrative is, as recent history makes clear, an extremely fraught enterprise. But all indications are that this fast-and-loose style is going nowhere.
CNN
6 hours ago
- CNN
Analysis: With its shoot-first style, Trump team often shoots itself in the foot
A telling moment early in President Donald Trump's second term foreshadowed how the administration is often now operating. Appearing at a Cabinet meeting in late February, Elon Musk said the Department of Government Efficiency had 'accidentally canceled' Ebola prevention programs. 'We will make mistakes. We won't be perfect. But when we make a mistake, we'll fix it very quickly,' Musk said. 'So we restored the Ebola prevention immediately. And there was no interruption.' It wasn't the first time Musk – who has since left the government – had acknowledged he and his team would make mistakes. But it was especially striking given the subject matter. Ebola prevention is literally a matter of life and death, but Musk mentioned it off-hand as if it were just some anecdote about DOGE's growing pains. (Musk's claim that there was 'no interruption' has also been called into question.) In the months since, though, that attitude has become emblematic of the Trump administration's approach to the country's business. Over and over again, it has employed shoot-first mentality with its public pronouncements and actions. Sometimes, that has meant it shot itself in the foot. And sometimes it has wound up contradicting itself. Four examples in recent days drive this home. One of them involves Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Last week, Noem claimed on X that an undocumented immigrant had 'threatened to assassinate President Trump.' The Department of Homeland Security even put out a news release naming the man. Except the claim quickly fell apart. CNN's Whitney Wild and Holmes Lybrand soon reported that authorities believed the immigrant had been set up – and that they had been investigating that possibility even before Noem's social media post. Now Wisconsin state prosecutors have charged another man, who they say admitted to orchestrating the ruse. And a DHS official conceded Wednesday that the man whom Noem and DHS accused is no longer under investigation for the purported threat. (A judge earlier in the day had delayed immigration proceedings.) Despite extensive coverage, neither Noem's post nor the DHS news release were removed or retracted as of Wednesday. Another example Wednesday involved a Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico returning to the US, his legal team told CNN – in what appears to be the first instance of the administration bringing back a migrant as a result of a judge's order. The situation stems from the administration's hasty deportation efforts, which have led to questions about whether the wrong people were deported. In at least three cases, judges have ruled that's exactly what happened, including two in which the migrants were sent to a brutal El Salvador prison. The administration has resisted returning the latter two migrants. A third example involves a somewhat similar case to the Noem example. Interim US attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba last month announced charges against Newark Democratic Mayor Ras Baraka for his actions at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility. Habba said Baraka had 'committed trespass' and 'has willingly chosen to disregard the law. That will not stand in this state. He has been taken into custody. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.' But Habba later announced the charges against Baraka would be dropped 'for the sake of moving forward,' while announcing new charges against a Democratic congresswoman from the Garden State. A magistrate judge issued a strong rebuke, calling the original charge against Baraka a 'a worrisome misstep by your office' and suggested Habba might have been motivated by 'political agendas.' 'An arrest, particularly of a public figure, is not a preliminary investigative tool,' the judge said, calling it 'a severe action, carrying significant reputational and personal consequences.' And Baraka, who's running in next week's gubernatorial primary, is now seizing on that alleged damage to his reputation. On Tuesday he filed suit against Habba, accusing her of false arrest, malicious prosecution and defamation. The other recent example regards the Covid-19 vaccine. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. last week made a major announcement. He said – also on X – that 'the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule.' But just two days later, when the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance, the vaccine was not, in fact, removed from the childhood schedule. It instead was listed under a slightly different designation – recommended based on 'shared clinical decision-making.' In other words, children would still be able to get the shot after consulting with a health care provider. HHS claimed this was not a contradiction, and said on X that the vaccine 'is not recommended for healthy children.' But on the CDC's website, the vaccine is still coded as a 'Recommended vaccination based on shared clinical decision-making.' These are only the most recent examples of statements and actions that have struggled with age: The DOGE effort has involved laying off or firing lots of people, some of whom the administration then sought to rehire because they needed them, and some of whom courts have instructed the administration to keep or rehire because of legal questions. Trump and a number of top administration officials last month leapt to accuse former FBI Director James Comey of threatening to assassinate Trump by posting an Instagram image of shells that spelled out '86 47.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said Comey should be jailed. Despite the rhetoric, there is little sign of impending charges against Comey. Comey said he doesn't expect to be charged. And even if Comey had been referring to assassination – which it's not at all clear he was – it's quite possible that speech was First Amendment-protected. Trump has justified his rapid deportations of Venezuelan migrants by arguing that they are members of a gang, Tren de Aragua, that is acting 'directly and at the direction … of the [Nicolás] Maduro regime in Venezuela.' But The New York Times has reported that a US intelligence report undermined that claim. And plenty of reporting suggests the administration has worked to obscure that fact. (ODNI declined to comment to the Times.) Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed he didn't share 'war plans' while discussing strikes in Yemen on the unclassified Signal app with other top administration officials – right before The Atlantic published the texts showing detailed plans for the strikes. The White House offered a lengthy series of conflicting signals about whether it viewed Trump's tariffs as a negotiating tool, before ultimately pushing for a bunch of deals. So what does this all reveal? Some of it is just a reflection of a president with a demonstrated disregard for the truth (see: 30,000-plus false and misleading statements in his first term) and rhetorical consistency. Under Trump's bare-knuckle brand of politics, you can say pretty much anything or level any wild accusation and then, when that doesn't pan out, you just move on to the next provocation. It also seems to be a reflection of the kinds of people he's picked to lead the government. Many of these people don't have anywhere near the kinds of experience of those who usually hold their positions; among their chief qualifications was loyalty to Trump and willingness to do his bidding. But also, these are people whose credibility matters, and their words have consequences. Law enforcement generally isn't supposed to accuse people of things it doesn't intend to prove in court, because those people can be impugned by the mere allegations. It's quite likely that people who would consider the Covid-19 vaccine for their children are confused by the conflicting signals from HHS. Statements about tariff plans – and their staying power – have real-world impacts when it comes to long-term planning for American businesses. If you're a business, do you actually try to move manufacturing to the United States (assuming the tariffs will stay) or just wait things out (hoping they go away)? And talking about massaging US intelligence to fit a political narrative is, as recent history makes clear, an extremely fraught enterprise. But all indications are that this fast-and-loose style is going nowhere.
