logo
Dutch government collapses after far-right walkout

Dutch government collapses after far-right walkout

Channel 42 days ago

The Dutch coalition government has collapsed after veteran far-right leader, Geert Wilders, ordered his ministers to quit their posts this morning.
The remaining three parties in the coalition decided that they cannot continue without a majority in parliament.
Prime Minister Dick Schoof is expected to stay on as caretaker PM after tendering his resignation.
An election is likely to be held after the summer.
The far-right Dutch Freedom Party (PVV)
came first in the last election
held in November 2023. Nonetheless, including the party in government for the first time was controversial.
After months of negotiations, a four-way coalition saw the PVV take five ministerial positions, but party leader Geert Wilders was frozen out of a job.
He has been a vocal opponent of the government from the sidelines ever since.
Last week he issued an ultimatum, demanding the government adopt stringent new anti-migrant policies or he would pull the plug.
The coalition agreement already included a tough migration line. And some of Wilders' suggestions such as the idea of using the army to stop migrants at the border were dismissed as illegal under Dutch and EU law.
This morning, in a meeting which reportedly lasted around 60 seconds, Wilders confirmed to the other parties in the government that the PVV would quit.
Geert Wilders has made no secret of his wish to become Prime Minister and he is expected to make immigration a major theme of his campaign.
The remaining governing parties could have chosen to continue as a minority administration and avoid an election, but are unlikely to do so.
They know that Wilders risks a backlash from the public for causing the government to fall.
Prime Minister Schoof called it an 'unnecessary and irresponsible' move.
'We are facing major challenges nationally and internationally, and more than ever, decisiveness is required for the safety of our resilience and the economy', Schoof said in a hastily arranged press conference this afternoon.
The centre-right VVD said Wilders had chosen ''his own ego and his own interests' over those of the country.
Polls suggest that support for Wilders has fallen 10 points from the highs the PVV enjoyed a year ago. The party is now polling neck and neck with both its former bedfellows on the right, and with the Green-Left opposition.
Critics say that the government has achieved little in its 11 months in office.
The leader of the Green-Left, former European Commissioner, Frans Timmermans, told the Dutch public broadcaster NOS earlier, there is an urgency for change.
'We have had enough of this standstill and that is not helping our country. There is war in Europe and people are very worried about their future. That requires leadership, solidarity and fair sharing.'
The collapse of the government – the third shortest in recent times – is an embarrassment for Dutch politics.
The Netherlands is due to host a major Nato summit later this month with Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron and Keir Starmer among the leaders due to arrive in The Hague on 24 June.
Dutch consider sending failed asylum seekers from Africa to Uganda
German far right ride Trump wave ahead of election
Another far-right winner in a European election: who is Călin Georgescu?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike
Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike

The Herald Scotland

time25 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike

Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. 'Today we decide on the capability targets. From there, we will assess the gaps we have, not only to be able to defend ourselves today, but also three, five, seven years from now,' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said. 'All these investments have to be financed,' he told reporters before chairing the meeting at Nato's Brussels headquarters. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth delivers a statement ahead of the meeting at Nato headquarters in Brussels on Thursday (Virginia Mayo/AP) US President Donald Trump and his Nato counterparts will meet on June 24-25 to agree to new defence investment goals. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said that 'to be an alliance, you've got to be more than flags. You got to be more than conferences. You need to keep combat ready capabilities'. Spurred on by their own security concerns, European allies and Canada have already been ramping up military spending, including arms and ammunition purchases, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some allies balk at US demands to invest 5% of their gross domestic product in defence – 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly – when they have already struggled to grow their budgets to 2% of GDP. The new targets are assigned by Nato based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shake-up since the Cold War — to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, Nato would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. The member countries are assigned roles in defending Nato territory across three major zones – the high north and Atlantic area, a zone north of the Alps, and another in southern Europe. Nato planners believe that the targets must be met within five to 10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine. Some fear Russia might be ready to strike at a Nato country even sooner, especially if Western sanctions are eased and Europe has not prepared. 'Are we going to gather here again and say 'OK, we failed a bit', and then maybe we start learning Russian?' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said. Swedish Defence Minister Pal Jonson also warned that while Russia is bogged down in Ukraine right now, things could quickly change. 'We also know after an armistice or a peace agreement, of course, Russia is going to allocate more forces closer to our vicinity. Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use these couple of years now when Russia is still limited by its force posture in and around Ukraine,' Mr Jonson said. If the targets are respected, the member countries will need to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said his country calculates in the medium term that 'we should spend 3.5% at least on defence, which in the Netherlands means an additional 16 to 19 billion euro (£13-16 billion) addition to our current budget.' The Netherlands is likely to buy more tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and long-range missile systems, including US-made Patriots that can target aircraft, cruise missiles and shorter-range ballistic missiles.

Farage's party in chaos after Reform chairman slams own MP over 'dumb' question
Farage's party in chaos after Reform chairman slams own MP over 'dumb' question

Daily Mirror

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Farage's party in chaos after Reform chairman slams own MP over 'dumb' question

Reform MP Sarah Pochin, who was elected in last month's Runcorn by-election, demanded the government ban the burka face covering - but officials said this was 'not party policy' Reform UK's chairman has hit out at a "dumb" PMQs question asked by the party's newly elected MP. Sarah Pochin, who was elected in last month's Runcorn by-election, yesterday demanded the government ban the burka face covering. During Prime Minister's Questions, she asked Keir Starmer whether he would be joining countries including France, Denmark and Belgium in banning the face and body covering worn by some Muslim women. ‌ Reform UK distanced itself from the question, confirming that a burqa ban is "not party policy". They added there needs to be a "national debate" about it. ‌ Zia Yusuf, Reform's chairman, today said it was "dumb" for Ms Pochin to ask the question if it was not something Reform was behind. His comment came after controversial commentator Katie Hopkins asked him on social media if he had been the one to say it was "not party policy". The far-right TV personality added: "Burka ban MUST be party policy." Mr Yusuf replied: "Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn't policy. Busy with other stuff. I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do." Labour slammed Nigel Farage's party for again descending into fighting in their own ranks, especially as the party was small enough that its five MPs could fit "in the back of a cab". It warned voters Reform "only guarantees more Liz Truss-style chaos". A Labour spokesman said: ' Nigel Farage could fit all of his MPs in the back of a cab, yet he can't stop them fighting among themselves. Reform only guarantees more Liz Truss-style chaos. Their £80billion of unfunded commitments would lead to economic meltdown and put up everyone's mortgage and bills. They're just not credible.' Ms Pochin faced disquiet and cries of "shame" from MPs in the Commons on Wednesday after she called for a burqa ban during PMQs. She asked the PM: "Given the Prime Minister's desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he in the interests of public safety follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others and ban the burka?" ‌ Then-French president Nicolas Sarkozy introduced the ban in France in 2010. Anyone found wearing the covering in a public space can face a fine of 150 euros (£125). It has since been unsuccessfully challenged in the European courts. Belgium brought in a similar ban a year later, and other countries including Denmark and Austria have got similar laws. Switzerland was the latest European country to introduce a prohibition, which started on January 1 this year. ‌ The Prime Minister did not answer Ms Pochin's question, and instead used the opportunity to attack Reform's economic plans announced by party leader Mr Farage last week. Mr Starmer said: "Can I welcome her to her place, but I'm not going to follow her down that line. But now she is here and safely in her place, perhaps she could tell her new party leader that his latest plan to bet £80billion of unfunded tax cuts, with no idea how he's going to pay for it, is Liz Truss all over again. "Although considering I think (Ms Pochin) was a Conservative member when Liz Truss was leader, she probably won't." His response drew criticism from Conservative former foreign secretary James Cleverly, who tweeted afterwards: "After failing to answer any of Kemi's (Badenoch) questions, he basically said to Sarah Pochin that he didn't like her question, so 'wasn't going to engage with it'. Refusing to answer MPs' questions isn't an option as a government minister."

Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike
Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike

Belfast Telegraph

time33 minutes ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike

The 'capability targets' lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment such as air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and 'strategic enablers' such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. 'Today we decide on the capability targets. From there, we will assess the gaps we have, not only to be able to defend ourselves today, but also three, five, seven years from now,' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said. 'All these investments have to be financed,' he told reporters before chairing the meeting at Nato's Brussels headquarters. US President Donald Trump and his Nato counterparts will meet on June 24-25 to agree to new defence investment goals. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said that 'to be an alliance, you've got to be more than flags. You got to be more than conferences. You need to keep combat ready capabilities'. Spurred on by their own security concerns, European allies and Canada have already been ramping up military spending, including arms and ammunition purchases, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some allies balk at US demands to invest 5% of their gross domestic product in defence – 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly – when they have already struggled to grow their budgets to 2% of GDP. The new targets are assigned by Nato based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shake-up since the Cold War — to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, Nato would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. The member countries are assigned roles in defending Nato territory across three major zones – the high north and Atlantic area, a zone north of the Alps, and another in southern Europe. Nato planners believe that the targets must be met within five to 10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine. Some fear Russia might be ready to strike at a Nato country even sooner, especially if Western sanctions are eased and Europe has not prepared. 'Are we going to gather here again and say 'OK, we failed a bit', and then maybe we start learning Russian?' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said. Swedish Defence Minister Pal Jonson also warned that while Russia is bogged down in Ukraine right now, things could quickly change. 'We also know after an armistice or a peace agreement, of course, Russia is going to allocate more forces closer to our vicinity. Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use these couple of years now when Russia is still limited by its force posture in and around Ukraine,' Mr Jonson said. If the targets are respected, the member countries will need to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said his country calculates in the medium term that 'we should spend 3.5% at least on defence, which in the Netherlands means an additional 16 to 19 billion euro (£13-16 billion) addition to our current budget.' The Netherlands is likely to buy more tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and long-range missile systems, including US-made Patriots that can target aircraft, cruise missiles and shorter-range ballistic missiles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store