Derbyshire Reform leaders scrap climate change committee
Opposition councillors have criticised a decision by Derbyshire County Council's new Reform UK leaders to scrap the authority's climate change committee as "short-sighted" and "threatening". The committee, formally named the Climate Change, Biodiversity and Carbon Reduction committee, was made up of councillors from different political parties and monitored the council's ambitions on reducing Derbyshire's carbon emissions.Reform UK's new leader of the council Alan Graves told the BBC that net zero "is not a priority". It is understood the committee was decommissioned a week after Reform won control of the council from the Conservatives in the local elections.
Scrutinising the authority's climate targets, some of which it is legally obliged to meet, will instead be absorbed into the work of other committees.The authority's latest annual report on delivery of its Climate Change Strategy said while there had been "significant reductions" in emissions from the council estate, the county's emissions were reducing at a slower rate than the national average. The council indicated at the beginning of the year there would be difficulties in meeting its net zero targets going forward without securing external funding, because of "technical and economic challenges".It has a target to become carbon neutral by 2032, with the county as a whole doing the same by 2050.The council also noted that emissions for industry in the county remain "stubbornly high".
The county council's Reform UK leader Alan Graves said "We don't believe it [the committee] is of any value."We're about saving the council money where we don't need to spend it."Graves could not give a figure for how much the move had saved but acknowledged it would be small."[Net zero] is not a priority for us...the net zero agenda is costing every single person in this country a lot of money," he said. "Why do we need to burden the people?"
Alex Dale, leader of Derbyshire Conservatives, said the decision was "short-sighted"."I understand Reform's concerns around net zero and as a party the Conservative Party have similar concerns."But climate change is still happening and there are still challenges that we face as a county so I do think it's important we show leadership."
The leader of Derbyshire Greens Giz Kinsella said he had "major concerns" about the decision and that it put the council's legal duties on biodiversity at risk.He said it could mean "no delivery on providing cheaper cleaner energy [and] no delivery on green homes for the poorest in our communities."All of these benefits will be threatened or undermined with the change of the committee structure," he said."In terms of outcomes [of the committee] there probably wasn't a lot achieved, but at least the intent was there. Now it's not there."Derbyshire County Council has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Independent Scotland would cut ties with Israel, says SNP Westminster leader
An independent Scotland would sever diplomatic ties with Israel, the SNP's Westminster leader has said. Speaking on the News Agents podcast, Stephen Flynn said he was 'deeply upset and angry' about what was happening in Gaza as he hit out at the UK Government's 'weak' position on the issue. The Scottish Government, under the leadership of both Humza Yousaf and John Swinney, has been outspoken on the conflict, consistently calling for a ceasefire and for humanitarian aid to be able to enter Gaza. The Aberdeen South MP also said the UK Government should do something to catch the Israeli government's attention as it looks to ramp up pressure. Asked if an independent Scotland would close its embassies in Israel and break off relations with the country, Mr Flynn said it would. 'I've gone into the House of Commons on God knows how many occasions now and listened to David Lammy and Hamish Falconer, the Middle East minister, and they've told us how 'we're going to do this, or we're going to do that, and this is the latest thing we're going to do'. 'And then he stands up and says, 'but they're ignoring us'. 'Well, if they're ignoring you, then do something that captures their attention.' Mr Flynn's comments come as the Foreign Secretary announced the UK would be sanctioning two Israeli ministers. Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, Israel's security minister and finance minister respectively, have been 'inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months and months, they have been encouraging egregious abuses of human rights', David Lammy said. Both will be subject to a travel ban and asset freeze. The Westminster SNP leader went on to say that it would not be 'wise' for his party's MPs to visit Israel, claiming they were likely to be turned away from the country, as happened with Labour MPs earlier this year, owing to the party's outspoken opposition to the conduct of the war in Gaza. 'I'd be amazed if any of them did, because they're not daft, and they probably know that they would get turned around and stuck on a plane right back out Israel,' he said. 'Look, I'm deeply, deeply upset and angry about what's happened in Gaza, and what continues to happen in Gaza, and the fact that the UK position has been so weak for far too long in respect of this. 'I think it's important that you convey your views to people who are rational actors.'
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Pride crumble' served in House of Lords
The House of Lords canteen has served peers a 'pride crumble' dessert with a rainbow-coloured topping. The River Restaurant in Parliament, which caters for peers and other staff on the parliamentary estate, offered as its hot dessert option on Tuesday a 'pride crumble'. The topping of the £2.15 pudding appeared to be dyed with red and blue food colouring in horizontal stripes, and was served with custard to mark Pride month. It is unclear whether the crumble was designed to resemble a particular LGBT flag, such as the rainbow flag, or the pink, blue and white transgender flag. It comes after the House of Lords removed Pride flags from its canteen put up at the start of June following a complaint from a peer. The 'Progress Pride' flag, which was among the decorations, includes the colours of the transgender movement and is seen by many as indicative of support for gender ideology – the idea that sex is a spectrum and that people can change their identity. Baroness Nicholson, a Tory peer, complained to the Lord Speaker, Lord McFall, and officials agreed that the flags should be taken down as they had not been sanctioned by the authorities. During her time in Parliament, she voted in favour of section 28, which banned the 'promotion of homosexuality' by local authorities, and against gay marriage. The Progress Pride flag, designed in 2021, is replacing the traditional rainbow Pride flag in many venues. It includes an extra triangle of colour on the left hand side, made up of stripes including white, pink and light blue – the colours of the transgender movement. The flags were not on display in the House of Commons restaurants. The canteen also served rainbow couscous for peers last week as part of its Pride celebrations. The Pride flag was flown from Parliament for the first time in history in June 2016. Last month, Reform UK announced that its councils would not be allowed to fly any LGBT or Pride flags, restricting local authorities to flying only the Union Jack and the St George's Cross.
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Calling us Nimbys is ‘hate speech', anti-solar campaigner tells Government
The term 'Nimby' is hate speech, the leader of a campaign trying to block Britain's biggest solar farm has said. Prof Alex Rogers, the chair of the Save Botley West community group, is organising efforts to prevent the construction of a £800 million solar farm covering almost 3,500 acres in the Oxfordshire countryside. If approved, it would become the largest in Europe – and equivalent in size to Heathrow Airport. Save Botley West called on the King to intervene on the grounds of an obscure law from the early 18th century. But the 57-year-old marine biologist has hit out against the Government by describing Labour's use of the term 'Nimby' as a form of 'hate speech'. Nimby, which stands for 'not in my backyard', is used to describe people who oppose new housing developments because they live near them. The term has been used by prominent figures in the Government including Sir Keir Starmer, who in January vowed to end a 'challenge culture' against new developments by 'taking on the Nimbys'. Prof Rogers said: 'We've heard the term Nimby bandied about by the Labour Government in particular, effectively that is pejorative language deliberately used to alienate and isolate ordinary people who are legitimately concerned about the really serious impacts of what is, in effect, a non-sustainable project. 'I would view a sustainable project as one which obviously benefits the climate, which this does, but also benefits people who live in the region and benefits wider aspects of the environment - and this scheme certainly does not do that.' He added: 'I do have a message, particularly for the Labour Party, in respect of the use of 'Nimbys' or 'Nimbyism'. 'If you look at the UN definition of hate speech, the use of that term falls within that UN definition, and I think Labour would be appalled if people were using these sorts of terms to alienate other sections of society.' The UN defines hate speech as: 'any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are, in other words, based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, colour, descent, gender or other identity factor.' On Sunday, activists opposed to the solar farm are walking from the gates of Blenheim palace to Winston Churchill's grave in Bladon – both of which will be affected by the proposal – in protest. Prof Rogers said although he recognises the severity of climate change, the plans were 'too big' and in 'the wrong place' – and worries about the impact it will have on the local landscape. The proposal is currently at the examination stage where representations are being submitted. The final decision will be made by Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, because Botley West is classified as a nationally significant infrastructure project. The King is yet to respond to the group's letter.
