‘Wasting Judicial Resources': Judge Shreds Trump Admin's Alien Enemies Act Case
Immigration and Customs Enforcement released a Venezuelan couple Friday after a federal judge in Texas ruled that the Trump administration's handling of their case did not have a 'lawful basis.'
U.S. District Judge David Briones of El Paso wrote in a searing ruling that ICE had not demonstrated convincing evidence that Julio Cesar Sanchez Puentes and Luddis Norelia Sanchez Garcia, who were detained for nine days, are members of the Tren de Aragua gang and are therefore 'alien enemies.'
This is the first case in which a judge ruled on the Trump administration's allegations that someone is a gang member subject to removal under the Alien Enemies Act. President Donald Trump has invoked the infamous 1798 wartime law and claimed he can use it to deport Venezuelan migrants whom his administration claims are members of a gang that he has declared to be a terrorist organization. This is the basis his administration has used to ship hundreds of Venezuelan migrants, without due process, to a notorious mega-prison in El Salvador.
Briones wrote in his decision that the allegations in Sanchez Puentes and Sanchez Garcia's case were based on 'multiple levels of hearsay, hidden within declarations of declarants who have no personal knowledge about the facts they are attesting to.'
'This court takes clear offense to respondents wasting judicial resources to admit to the court it has no evidence, yet seek to have this court determine petitioner Sanchez Puentes is 'guilty by association'' by being married to his wife, Briones wrote.
Sanchez Puentes and Sanchez Garcia came to the U.S. with their three children in 2022. At the border wall, they turned themselves in to U.S. Border Patrol agents, according to the nonprofit news outlet El Paso Matters. They are in the country under protected temporary status with work permits and have applied for asylum.
The couple, who live in the Washington, D.C. area, had come to El Paso over a misdemeanor charge over their entry into the country following a warrant issued this year. On April 14, a federal magistrate ruled that they could be free on bail until their court date in June, but they were arrested April 16 at El Paso International Airport.
Briones wrote, 'It is clear as day that respondents have not demonstrated to this court by a 'preponderance of evidence,' let alone the required 'clear, unequivocal, and convincing' evidence that petitioner Sanchez Puentes is a member of TdA, nor that he is an 'alien enemy.''
The judge ruled that Sanchez Puentes cannot be designated an 'alien enemy,' and 'his continued confinement on these grounds is therefore unlawful. Petitioner Sanchez Puentes must be released.'
Writing about the claims against Sanchez Garcia, Briones pointed out that Trump administration officials 'contradict themselves throughout the entire record. Respondents claim petitioner Sanchez Garcia is somehow both 'a money receiver and lookout' as well as a 'senior member of TdA.''
'Respondents ask this court to accept their claims, going off of nearly nothing, to substantiate their mammoth claims that Petitioner Sanchez Garcia is a 'senior member,' or perhaps just a 'member,' or maybe at the least an 'affiliate' of TdA,' the judge wrote. 'The court would not accept this evidence even in a case where only nominal damages were at stake, let alone what is at stake here.'
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at American Immigration Council, posted on X, 'This is the first case testing ICE's allegations that someone was in Tren de Aragua and thus subject to the Alien Enemies Act — and ICE utterly failed the test!'
This is not the first time this year that the couple was arrested and detained. In March, a federal judge ordered their release as well. Earlier in March, a Magistrate Judge referred to the case as 'odd.' The Trump administration subsequently attempted to deport them under the Alien Enemies Act.
'They have gone through four different judges, none of whom thought they should be detained,' the couple's attorney, Chris Benoit, told El Paso Matters. 'They have deep ties to their community in the United States. They have three minor children. They've been living peacefully in our country since 2022.'
'The court ruling made clear they should not have been designated alien enemies. The consequences of that are drastic because if they were successful, César would be facing a life sentence in a brutal El Salvadoran prison. We don't know where Norelia would be, but we believe it would be in fairly similar circumstances,' he added.
The Trump administration has invoked the Alien Enemies Act to deport supposed Venezuelan gang members to a prison in El Salvador. A judge issued an order blocking the deportations, but the Trump administration carried them out anyway. The Alien Enemies Act was previously used to justify Japanese internment during World War II.
Briones also issued an injunction that blocked the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport anyone in the Western District of Texas without 21 days notice.
More from Rolling Stone
Zelensky Urges Trump Not to Surrender to Russia
'I Was Taken Hostage': How an American Metal Rocker Landed in Russian Prison
Trump Has Now Deported Multiple U.S. Citizen Children With Cancer
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Looking for an edge, Democrats? Just look around you.
Here's a simple, cost-effective, noncontroversial, and human response to the chaos: storytelling. Telling stories about the real-life human consequences of this administration's policies and directives could cut through the noise. Run 15-second spots about real people and their stories nationally across multiple platforms from now to the midterms and beyond. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Hear from a mother returning food when the grocery bill is too high, a student dropping out of college because child care is unavailable or too expensive, a pizza shop owner without a dishwasher, or a contractor who cannot find painters. Watch a parent being arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement with their children watching. Show a grandfather waiting hours to talk to Social Security, or a woman taking her medication every other day because health care costs are too high. All in 15 seconds each. Advertisement By telling people about the results of policy decisions and executive actions in clear, simple ways, the Democratic Party can create a groundswell of informed, engaged citizens ready to advocate for change and hold their leaders accountable. It would be powerful. Advertisement Deborah Heller Boston Democrats shouldn't get lost in words A Washington Post report featured in the Globe ('Debate revives over left-wing buzzwords,' Political Notebook, May 27) suggests that terms like 'Food insecurity' sounds like an anxiety disorder. Children in the depths of poverty are not experiencing food insecurity. They are hungry or starving. The Trump regime is not an oligarchy; rather, it is a dictatorship with one ruler enabled by people like Marco Rubio and Mike Johnson, who are not fellow oligarchs but, rather, bootlickers or, to use the fancy Greek word, sycophants. In 'Politics and the English Language,' George Orwell demonstrates how politicians use vague, sugar-coated, euphemistic terms (like 'food insecurity') to justify behavior, policy, or circumstances that cannot be justified. Such words are lies in disguise. Donald Trump's supporters often say they like him because he speaks his mind. He's upfront. He doesn't talk euphemistically, like other politicians. No disguises. Right. He just lies and lies and lies. The mystery is why so many Trump supporters don't seem to care how often or how blatantly he does so. John R. Nelson Gloucester The writer is a professor emeritus of English at North Shore Community College. The poor get poorer while the Trump family gets richer An article on Page A6 of the May 26 Boston Globe was headlined Advertisement The Democrats certainly have to promote a better path forward, but highlighting Trump's abuses while putting forward a plan for the future would be a foundation on which to build. There's so much at stake for the economy, health, education, the environment, and the rule of law that Democrats can champion in contrast to the utter destruction we're seeing now. John Cotter Melrose If populism thrives on grievance, we need a new brand of populism As Larry Edelman and countless other commentators have pointed out, populism thrives on grievance ( We've seen increasing signs of the human tropism toward divisiveness and an 'us against them' mentality. A 'revenge is sweet' refrain now echoes around the world. It's considered not just sweet but justified. Not just justified but necessary. Populism will always thrive on carefully choosing its targets. And though hurting Harvard or immigrants or health research will improve the lives of no one, that doesn't matter. Revenge is rarely rational or well-reasoned. It's emotionally intoxicating. Therein lies the enduring lure of populism. Until the Democrats figure out how to build their own brand of populism, one that captures the hearts, souls, and imaginations of the populace, we will all be forced to endure life in an 'us against them' society. Advertisement Elaine Mintzer Keene, N.H.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman, 64, in U.S. legally for 50 years detained by ICE for 3 months
A 64-year-old woman, a legal permanent resident of the United States for the last 50 years, was held in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement for three months, according to multiple media reports. A lab technician at the University of Washington, Lewelyn Dixon, was arrested at Seattle-Tacoma Airport and taken to the Northwest ICE Processing Center in Tacoma, according to reporting by Oregon Public Broadcasting. A Filipino green-card holder, Dixon has been in the U.S. since she was 14 and was detained after returning from a trip to the Philippines in late February. 'It was horrific; it was awful, it is crowded,' she told loved ones, friends and supporters who greeted her outside the detention facility after a judge ruled she was not eligible for deportation, NBC News reported. Since Trump has taken office, several green-card holders, including a Danish national father of four with no criminal record who has legally been in the country for more than 10 years, have been swept up in the administration's immigration crackdown. In Dixon's case, what caught the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection was likely a 25-year-old embezzlement conviction, attorney Benjamin Osorio told the outlet. In 2000, the 64-year-old pleaded guilty to stealing $6,460 from Washington Mutual Bank, where she worked as a vault teller and operations supervisor. She was ordered to spend 30 days in a halfway house and pay restitution, both of which she has completed. 'They're trying to kill me': Transgender woman in L.A. violently assaulted Lani Madriaga, Dixon's niece, told NBC News the entire ordeal has been traumatizing and emotional, especially since the 64-year-old never told her family about the conviction. 'We don't think of her any differently after we found out about her conviction,' she told the outlet. 'She turned it all around and she really worked hard and really focused on health care, where it's really about helping the community.' Long eligible for citizenship, the 64-year-old never pursued it because she promised her father she'd maintain her Filipino nationality so that she could keep property in the country. According to her niece, Dixon's first priorities now that she's out of the detention facility are to get her citizenship and return to work. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bill requiring sheriffs to work with ICE passes Texas legislature
The Brief A bill requiring Texas sheriffs to partner with ICE has passed both legislative chambers. The bill mandates sheriffs to request 287(g) agreements, which allow local authorities to assist with federal immigration enforcement in jails. Critics are concerned about possible changes to state-level law enforcement. AUSTIN - A bill that would require all sheriffs in Texas to work with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement by serving federal immigration warrants at local jails has been approved by both chambers of the state legislature. The bill now heads to Gov. Greg Abbott's desk to potentially be signed into law. Critics worry the proposal could change Texas law enforcement for the worse. The Latest Senate Bill 8 was approved by the House and Senate in its final readings on Sunday, the penultimate day of Texas's 89th legislative session. The backstory The bill would require sheriffs to request partnerships with ICE, known as 287(g) agreements. The agreements allow ICE to authorize local authorities to perform certain types of immigration enforcement in local jails, including allowing officers to question inmates about their immigration status and serve administrative warrants. In its original form, the bill would have applied only to counties with populations over 100,000. On May 24, the House passed an amended version in an 89-50 vote that would apply to all sheriffs in the state. The other side Critics of the bill worry that the 287(g) agreements could lead to local profiling, targeting of people with little or no criminal history and harming the relationship between law enforcement and the community. What they're saying The ACLU of Texas spoke out on Sunday following the bill's passage. Sarah Cruz, policy and advocacy strategist for border and immigrants' rights, included a statement in the release. "S.B. 8 will not make our communities safer, but it will force sheriffs to do the work of ICE in support of the federal government's shameful mass deportation efforts. This bill will also divert limited law enforcement resources, lead to racial profiling, and drive victims and witnesses of crime into the shadows. The legislature should not strip local communities of their ability to make decisions about what keeps them safe." What's next The bill now awaits approval or veto from Abbott. The Source Information in this article comes from the ACLU of Texas and previous FOX reporting.
