logo
A panoramic view of a continent

A panoramic view of a continent

Mail & Guardian01-05-2025

Adekeye Adebajo's book is an analysis of Africa, from the perspective of 30 years of study, which offers an overview of the decades since the fall of apartheid in 1994
The 145 essays in my new book The Splendid Tapestry of African Life: Essays on A Resilient Continent, its Diaspora, and the World represent the ripest fruits of three decades of reflecting and writing on the history, regional integration, politics, foreign policy, international relations, culture, film, sports and travel of Africa and its diaspora in the Americas, Europe and the Caribbean, as well as on the world beyond Global Africa.
This volume seeks to capture the zeitgeist of the post-apartheid era after the continent's five-century quest for liberation from the twin scourges of European-led transatlantic slavery and colonialism finally ended with South Africa's democratic transition in 1994.
Africa's independence battles from the late Fifties had been mirrored by similar battles in the Caribbean as well as America's civil rights struggle. Both involved citizens of the Black Atlantic: the heirs of slavery and colonialism.
I entered the field of international relations in 1990 as Nelson Mandela emerged from 27 years of captivity to negotiate South Africa's democratic future at a time when the Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union was ending.
The contemporary age threatens a looming battle between an America (under the erratic, nativist regime of Donald Trump), which is in relative decline and still has a large military presence in Africa, and a rising China, which remains Africa's largest trading partner at $295 billion and accounts for nearly half the continent's construction market.
Africa will have to contend with these powers, as well as others such as Russia, France, the EU and Gulf countries, which are all involved in security, trade and investment activities on the continent.
Over half of the UN's 58 peacekeeping missions in the post-Cold War era have taken place in Africa, while the world body currently has 80% of its peacekeepers deployed across the continent.
The UN thus remains Africa's most important security partner, with conflicts continuing to rage from the Great Lakes, to Central Africa, to the Sahel, the Horn of Africa and northern Mozambique.
Intra-African trade remains a paltry 15%, while Africa's external debt stands at $1.2 trillion, with governments typically spending more than 45% of their revenues on servicing these unsustainable debts rather than on vital social sectors.
Africa's continuing struggle to achieve effective regional integration and industrialisation thus constitutes a major focus of this book.
Similarly, the Caribbean's 20 micro-states have struggled to promote effective regional integration through the Caribbean Community, often prioritising parochial identities over regional ones.
These essays are divided into 10 main sections. The first part examines the legacies of pan-Africanist struggles against slavery and imperialism and Global Africa's efforts to achieve reparations for slavery and colonialism — the African Union's (AU) theme for 2025 — and to promote cultural self-realisation.
The themes covered include: the obligations of the pan-African public intellectual, Western racism towards Africa, the German genocide in Namibia, religion, the legacy on Africa of British imperialist Cecil Rhodes, cultural stereotyping of Africa, the diversity of Afro-Caribbean life, white-supremacist historical monuments, transforming humanities curricula in African and African-American studies, the global apartheid of Covid-19, and the international neglect of the damage which was caused by the 2016 Haitian hurricane.
Critiques are also undertaken of past British Afro-pessimistic writers such as Joseph Conrad and Graham Greene; present-day British Afrophobes such as Nigel Biggar, Richard Dowden, Stephen Ellis and Mark Huband, as well as the Afro-pessimistic Zambian economist Dambisa Moyo.
The second part assesses the challenges of regionalism in Africa through the efforts of the Organisation of African Unity, the AU, the Southern African Development Community and the Economic Community of West African States, while examining regional integration initiatives involving Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific, as well as Afro-Asian cooperation.
Part three focuses on the broad topic of African politics, diagnosing the continent's successes and failures — through its 'madmen' politicians and 'specialist' soldiers — as well as covering subjects such as conflict resolution, popular revolutions and the role of youth activists and regional hegemons.
Also discussed are the negative impacts of European colonial engineering on African state-building and the 'Afro-Arab Spring' of 2011 which toppled autocracies in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya.
With the advantage of having lived in South Africa as a Nigerian citizen for 21 years, I analyse, in the fourth section, the prospects of Africa's two regional hegemons — Nigeria and South Africa — providing leadership to the continent, by examining their domestic and foreign policies, as well as their collaborative peacemaking efforts and complex relationship of cooperation and competition.
I also offer a critique of the writing of South African analysts Mills Soko and Peter Fabricius.
The fifth part assesses Africa's international relations, examining the prospects for Kenyan scholar Ali Mazrui's 1967 concept of Pax Africana — a peace created, cultivated, and consolidated by Africans themselves.
Fourteen Nobel Peace laureates of African descent are examined, with the Tunisian Nobelist quartet counted as a single laureate.
Issues of conflict resolution — from Liberia and Bosnia to Libya and Western Sahara — are also discussed, together with the efforts of African regional bodies and the UN to silence the guns across Africa.
I assess the complicated relationship between Africa and the EU and the roles of bilateral external actors — France, the US, China and Russia — in Africa.
The Afro-pessimistic and neo-colonial musings of the American journalist Robert Kaplan, as well as British economist Paul Collier, are critiqued, while the perspectives of African-American analyst Francis Kornegay and South Africa's Greg Mills, on Libya, are scrutinised.
The sixth part looks at the rich diversity of the Black Atlantic's culture and films, including the Nigeria-hosted second World Black and African Festival of Arts and Culture in 1977; the phenomenon of Nigeria's film industry, Nollywood; Nigerian Nobel Literature laureate Wole Soyinka's play and film Death and the King's Horseman and South African director Mandla Dube's movie Kalushi: The Story of Solomon Mahlangu.
I analyse too Global Africa's fatal attraction with, and triumphs in, Hollywood; examine the life and times of Caribbean-American artist Harry Belafonte and review six important African American films: Selma, Black Panther, If Beale Street Could Talk, Harriet, Ma Rainey's Black Bottom — based on a play by African-American playwright, August Wilson — and The Woman King.
The seventh part examines the history of African football, the successes and failures of modern-day Nigerian football, and the excellence of global African sportsmen at the football World Cup.
Also assessed are topics such as the genius of Brazilian football and New Zealand rugby; pan-African athletes excelling at the 2015 World Athletics championships; the Tokyo Olympics of 1964 and 2021 and last year's Paris Olympics.
In addition, the golden age of West Indian cricket between 1980 and 1995 is analysed.
The eighth section presents travelogues across some of Africa's great cities: Lagos, Abuja, Accra, Abidjan, Johannesburg and Laayoune.
Part nine examines the world beyond Africa through multilateral lenses, analysing the legacies of impactful conferences in Berlin (1884 and 1885) and Bandung (1955), as well as the evolving geo-political struggle between Pax Americana and Pax Sinica.
I suggest how Africa can position itself in this rapidly changing global strategic environment, before examining the efforts of the global South to revive the Cold War-era concept of non-alignment in the wake of Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
After highlighting the EU's region-building initiatives, this section engages with the UN's legacy at 75 and its institutional reform efforts; the global body's humanitarian mission in Iraq during the late 1990s; the futile attempts of the Group of Eight (G8) and G20 to alleviate global poverty and promote international development and the pretentious grandstanding of the World Economic Forum.
The 10th and final section of the book addresses the Anglo-Saxon world of America and Britain, countries in which I have spent a total of 21 years.
Issues of unilateral imperialism, hubristic hypocrisy, delusions of grandeur and dyed-in-the-wool racism are analysed in the politics of both countries, highlighting the role of figures such as Trump, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Boris Johnson, and Rhodes (in a response to South African academic Max Price).
This book thus provides — in a comprehensive but concise and highly readable volume — a panoramic view of the Black Atlantic in Africa, the Americas, the Caribbean and Europe.
Professor Adekeye Adebajo is a senior research fellow at the University of Pretoria's Centre for the Advancement of Scholarship.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression
Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression

IOL News

time7 hours ago

  • IOL News

Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression

Secretary General of Zambia's Patriotic Front Raphael Mangani Nakacinda addressing a media round table in Sandton Johannesburg on the impasse between the Zambian government and the Patriotic Front. Medical Staff at the hospital that treated President Lungu say they have been threatened by Zambian government officials who wanted to remove and repatriate the presidents body to Zambia without the family's consent or knowledge. Former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has died at the age of 68, with his final days clouded by political tension, medical struggles, and serious allegations of state-sponsored persecution. Lungu passed away on Thursday in a South African hospital, where he had been receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. However, the official silence on the cause of death and mounting accusations from his political allies have sparked a storm of controversy, including claims that the former head of state may have been poisoned to prevent him from contesting the 2026 presidential elections. Lungu, who served as Zambia's sixth president from 2015 to 2021, had announced a political comeback in late 2023 after years of relative quiet following his electoral defeat to current President Hakainde Hichilema (popularly known as HH). But what began as a bid to return to the ballot box quickly turned into a contentious and, some claim, dangerous standoff with the ruling administration. A Contested Comeback Lungu's return to politics was met with immediate resistance from the Hichilema-led government. In December 2024, the Constitutional Court ruled that Lungu was ineligible to contest again, arguing that his first, partial term from 2015 to 2016 counted as a full term under Zambia's constitutional two-term limit. Lungu's legal team and supporters decried the judgment as politically motivated, pointing to his widespread popularity among grassroots voters and within opposition coalitions as a threat to the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND). But critics say the court ruling was just the beginning of a broader campaign to shut Lungu out of national politics. Stripped of Protection and Benefits Soon after his political re-entry, Lungu was stripped of all retirement benefits typically afforded to former heads of state. These included state-provided security, official transportation, medical support, and diplomatic privileges. The government justified the move by citing a legal provision that bars retired presidents from engaging in politics if they wish to retain those benefits. While technically legal, the action had far-reaching consequences for Lungu's safety and well-being. Without state protection, his movements were left exposed. More alarmingly, his access to healthcare, particularly urgent specialist treatment, was severely limited. Sources within the Patriotic Front (PF), Lungu's party, say repeated requests for travel permits to receive medical care abroad were delayed or denied.'He was denied not only political freedom but medical care too,' said a senior PF official. 'When it became clear that he needed to leave for urgent treatment, the government stalled. That decision may have cost him his life.' Allegations of Poisoning With the cause of Lungu's death yet to be officially confirmed, speculation is growing that he may have been deliberately poisoned. Though no forensic evidence has been made public, the PF is calling for an independent international investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. His daughter, Tasila Lungu-Mwansa, confirmed in a public statement that her father had been unwell for weeks and had travelled to South Africa under medical supervision. However, she also alluded to the family's belief that his condition may have been the result of "external interference" — a veiled reference to suspected foul play. PF leaders have taken a more direct stance. 'This was not a natural death,' said Brian Mundubile, a close ally of Lungu. 'We believe this was orchestrated to eliminate him politically and permanently.' Restricted Movement and Surveillance Beyond the courtroom and hospital bed, Lungu's daily life was increasingly policed. Police were reportedly stationed outside his home, monitoring his activities and restricting public engagements. Even routine morning jogs and Sunday church services were flagged as political activity and discouraged or blocked by law enforcement.'It was humiliation, plain and simple,' said one family confidant. 'He was a former president being treated like a common criminal just for exercising and praying.' Human rights activists and opposition figures have condemned the government's treatment of Lungu as not only unconstitutional but dangerous for Zambia's democratic fabric. 'What happened to President Lungu sets a dangerous precedent,' said a representative of the Zambia Human Rights Commission. 'If a former president can be silenced this way, what protection exists for the ordinary citizen?'

From Auschwitz to Gaza: The modern-day concentration camp
From Auschwitz to Gaza: The modern-day concentration camp

IOL News

time9 hours ago

  • IOL News

From Auschwitz to Gaza: The modern-day concentration camp

Roberto Amaral GAZA has been transformed into the largest open-air concentration camp ever known to humanity. An unimaginable 'death row' where the Palestinian people, more than half of whom are children, await their sentence without reprieve, dictated by the frighteningly belligerent and perverse Luciferian enemy. And, to the same extent, cowardly. For months, the Zionist government of Israel has been promoting, under the blind eyes of the cynical international community, an open ethnic cleansing. In this true 'concentration and extermination camp,' the wretches do not walk on their own two feet to the gas chambers to which the victims of Nazism were condemned: they are torn apart by the bombs of the ultra-modern army of the State of Israel, founded in 1947 under the auspices of the UN precisely to guarantee a home for the people who survived the Holocaust. Like the Jews of yesterday, today's Palestinians are incapable of defending themselves; but a powerful army – supersonic planes, drones, missiles, tanks and all sorts of artillery – is raining bombs down on them (as if hunger, vilification and theft of their lands were not enough). This is a genocide carried out in the open and in the shadow of the moral iniquity of an international community that watches everything impassively. Unlike the prisoners of the Auschwitz concentration camp, today's victims cannot dream of liberation from the Red Army, which in January 1945 advanced on Poland on its way to Berlin. No one comes to their aid. They are left 'to their own devices,' which has turned out to be a cruel fate. Those who escape the siege of Gaza are already condemned to no future: without a homeland or land, they will have nowhere to go. They are poor, and do not have a chain of protection spread throughout the world; they are the new condemned of the earth. Without 'promised salvation', they have been condemned to exile, they will wander, their dreams shattered, and their most modest hopes lost. In 1947, Palestine, then occupied by 600,000 Jews and 1.3 million Arabs (of whom around 700,000 Palestinians were expelled), was to be divided up so that two states could be established, one Jewish (the future State of Israel) and the other Arab. The first was established, and we know what it is today. The other, 78 years later, is awaiting international recognition, which has been denied. The US and its cohort: the United Kingdom, Germany and most of the European Union are leading the refusal. Israel occupies and blockades the Palestinian territories of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza, where it has been lying and rolling since the 1967 invasion, during the 'Six-Day War'. The Palestinians of Gaza are a captive people in an occupied country waiting to be destroyed, hermetically blockaded, deprived of fuel, electricity, water, food and medicine, with their civil infrastructure destroyed, schools demolished and hospitals at the mercy of bombings. Estimates speak of somewhere between 35 and 45 thousand civilian victims. More than 15 thousand children have already died, and the UN warns that more, more than 15 thousand babies, could still die if the Israeli government continues to block the entry of food and medicine. While the international community remains silent and Zionism applauds war crimes, Ehud Olmert, former Prime Minister of Israel (2006-2009), defines Zionist policy as 'perverse, malicious and irresponsible'. We must listen to him: 'Netanyahu typically tries to obscure the kind of orders he is giving to avoid legal and criminal responsibility in due course. But some of his lackeys say it openly: 'Yes, we are going to starve Gaza.'' He charges: 'Israel is committing war crimes.'

Europe's Left Must Unite to Oppose NATO's Rearmament and Austerity
Europe's Left Must Unite to Oppose NATO's Rearmament and Austerity

IOL News

time11 hours ago

  • IOL News

Europe's Left Must Unite to Oppose NATO's Rearmament and Austerity

U.S. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth (left) and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in conversation ahead of the meeting of NATO defence ministers at NATO Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on June 5, 2025. Image: AFP John Ross As Europe approaches NATO's 24–26 June summit in The Hague, its 750 million people face a decisive strategic choice that will affect their lives for years to come – and one with a far wider global impact. The policies implemented in Europe in recent years have been disastrous socially, economically, politically, and militarily. Europe is experiencing worsening social conditions, its largest war since 1945 in Ukraine, and the biggest rise of far-right authoritarian, racist, and xenophobic forces since the Nazis in the 1930s. The proposals to the NATO summit would worsen that situation. The key question is therefore whether Europe will continue down this destructive, disastrous path or adopt policies that offer a way out. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has proposed to the 32 NATO members that 'the NATO summit… aim for 3.5% hard military spending by 2032' – a 75% increase from the previous 2.0% GDP target. Trump calls for even higher military expenditure of 5% of GDP. Rutte opened the door to this by supporting a commitment to '1.5% related spending, such as infrastructure, cybersecurity and things like that. Also achievable by 2032'. The 3.5% plus 1.5% adds up to Trump's 5%. The social and political consequences of such a course are already clear. Europe's economies are nearly stagnant, with the EU's annual per capita GDP growth averaging less than 1% from 2007 to 2024. The IMF, somewhat optimistically, projects an increase to only 1.3% by 2030. With rising inequality and reductions in social spending due to austerity policies, hundreds of millions of people in Europe have already experienced stagnant or declining living standards. Diverting more resources into military spending, already being accompanied by social spending cuts to finance it, will worsen that situation further. The political consequences are also clear. Far-right and neo-fascist forces, exploiting the worsening conditions, which are caused by austerity measures and increased military spending, by demagogically blaming immigrants and ethnic and religious minorities, will gain further strength. The disastrous consequences for traditional left-wing and progressive parties supporting or enacting these rearmament and austerity policies, even before their support for the new NATO rearmament policies, are already known in major European countries. The SPD in Germany in 2025 saw its vote drop to 16%, the lowest since 1887. In the last elections at which they stood independently, the French Socialist Party gained only 6%. In Britain, the Labour Party, which already received one of its lowest votes since the 1930s at the last election, is now in the polls behind the far-right Reform Party. In contrast, left-wing parties that have opposed austerity and NATO policies – La France Insoumise in France, Die Linke in Germany, and the Belgian Workers Party – have maintained or significantly increased their support. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ This disastrous collapse suffered by traditional left-wing parties that have supported war and austerity is extremely dangerous in the context of the rise of far-right parties across Europe. The reason for the collapsing support for such parties is obvious. Such policies attack the population's living standards. If parties claiming to be on the left continue to support austerity and rearmament, this trend of decline will just continue. The only way out of this situation for both Europe's population and the left is a complete policy reversal to one that prioritises social progress and economic development. Following the end of the Cold War, Europe should have focused on fostering economic cooperation and minimising military tensions and expenditures. This would have created a balanced economic area, equivalent to the US, with a strong potential for growth by combining Western Europe's manufacturing and services with Russia's energy and raw materials. What was possible was shown in Asia by ASEAN, which, in a continent that had suffered the worst conflicts of the Cold War, the Korean and Vietnam wars, became the world's most rapidly growing economic region through a concentration on economic development and the absence of military blocs. But, because an economically cooperating Europe could have been a successful competitor to the United States, US administrations pursued a path to prevent it – primarily through NATO's eastward expansion, which was carried out in direct violation of US promises to then-Soviet Premier Gorbachev that NATO would not advance 'an inch' eastward after Germany's reunification. Instead, in 1999, 2004, 2009, 2017, and 2020, new countries were added to NATO, and the door was deliberately left open to admitting Ukraine, known to be a red line for Russia due to Ukraine's proximity to Russia and its position as a historical route for invasion. Numerous US experts on Eastern Europe opposed this, led by George Kennan, the original architect of US Cold War strategy, who warned NATO expansion would be 'the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era'. But their warnings were ignored, with results culminating in the Ukraine war. Now NATO demands rearmament and cuts in social protection to finance this war. NATO forces simultaneously expanded outside Europe to participate in wars in the Global South, Afghanistan and Libya, and set up numerous organisations and initiatives to prepare for intervention in the Global South – such as the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, the Strategic Direction-South HUB, the Liaison Office in Addis Ababa – and has begun to expand into the Pacific – with Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea attending every NATO summit since 2022. Such NATO expansion would involve Europe in even more conflicts and more calls for military expenditure. What is required is the complete opposite – priority to social progress and investment for economic growth. Both require more spending and are therefore directly contrary to a military build-up. Europe's need for social spending is obvious. But Europe's investment, the key to economic growth, has also collapsed. In the EU, investment, once depreciation (the wearing out of existing means of production) is taken into account, has halved from 7.4% of GDP in 2007 to only 3.5% on the latest data. International comparisons show this is enough only to generate 1% annual economic growth. Additionally, the US is now pressing for further policies harmful to Europe and its people. The US has already enormously damaged Europe by its conscious policy of cutting off Western Europe's source of cheap energy from Russia, achieved via the Ukraine war and the blowing up of the Nord Stream pipeline, which anyone who looks seriously at the matter knows was carried out by the US.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store