We would never have got together if our partners hadn't died
Standing in our hotel room in Colchester, my girlfriend Emma and I should have been excited for our weekend break.
Unfortunately, she was in tears instead.
Something I'd said on the journey earlier had clearly upset her and while I can't remember the exact words I used, I do know that it concerned my previous partner and how she did things 'differently' when dealing with close family.
Bringing up, let alone comparing, a former lover to your new partner is taboo for any relationship for this exact reason. But for us it was a bit more complex…
Emma and I are both widowed.
Emma's husband had died of a brain tumour in 2006 and I lost my wife Vikki to breast cancer a year after that.
So, though we never mean it to, sometimes the past has a habit of coming back to haunt the present.
Love had been the furthest thing from both our minds when our paths crossed in 2008. In fact, it happened completely by chance.
Our children were in the same class at school, and we initially met at her daughter's birthday party. Our first conversation was very direct – we talked about other people's reactions to grief and we seemed to click straight away.
Love reading juicy stories like this? Need some tips for how to spice things up in the bedroom?
Sign up to The Hook-Up and we'll slide into your inbox every week with all the latest sex and dating stories from Metro. We can't wait for you to join us!
I really liked her – she seemed clever, funny and fearless – and I thought she was gorgeous, too. I could immediately envisage a deeper relationship – it really was in that instant – but I dismissed it because it seemed too easy.
How could a lovely, amazing woman who understood me, be a widow, too?
On reflection though, it was my own cynicism and confidence that was the problem. After having a tough time for so long, I had to allow myself to accept that something wonderful could happen to me again, that I truly deserved a new and happy life.
When we finally did get together, other people were so clearly pleased at our 'Hollywood ending' that they'd take me aside at parties to express how delighted they were.
Of course, we were happy too. While grief was obviously a large part of what brought us together in the first place, we were also wrapped up in the newness of the relationship.
It was such a relief just to share with someone again, have fun, be normal – simple things like going to the cinema, enjoying coastal walks, playing board games with the kids – it was all such a change after years of hospital treatments, scans and test results; of feeling like your life was on a permanent cliff edge.
And yes, it helped that she and I both understood each other in a way our friends and family couldn't – there was nothing wrong with that, on the contrary, it was great.
We knew what it felt like getting through those painful early anniversaries – the birthdays and Christmases. We understood how it felt to just get up on an average day and for no apparent reason, feel the sudden crushing weight of loss again.
However, a year or so in, an agitating, niggling voice began to rear its head.
From there, the inevitable complications, doubts, worries, insecurities – which I suppose had always been there – became more prominent.
Was our attraction just a smokescreen? Did we really share more than tragedy and pain and a pretty good feel for the relative merits of oak versus oak-and-copper funeral caskets? Or was death such a big part of our relationship it was all we really had in common?
In both cases it wasn't our choice to end our relationships with our previous partners, so how could we ever properly love a new partner when we'd never decided to stop loving the previous one?
Then there was the fact that, though we avoided the untidiness and sense of bitterness that clouds some divorces, there was something else just as potent that we had to contend with: The deification of the deceased.
You can't compete with a dead person.
They don't make mistakes and it's a natural tendency to edit the past – the untidy bits, the poor bits – to paint those gone in a rosy hue somewhere in the region of perfection, and that's exactly what I did in that moment of thoughtlessness in that Colchester hotel room.
My Life in a Garden: Love, Loss and Mulch: A Single Dad Seeks Answers in Nature by Carl Gorham (Ireton Press, £8.99) and available from all good book retailers https://bit.ly/MyLifeInAGarden
Thankfully, I recognised what I'd done immediately and apologised, and she accepted and we moved past it. One of the things that we've both carried forward from our shared past is the inability to hold grudges.
To this day, Emma and I rarely argue and, if we do, one of us stops it almost instantly – not because we're saints but because after everything we've been through, we know this time together is so precious and we'd rather not waste it.
That's one of the reasons why in the end we haven't let our double bereavement overwhelm us. That, and the fact that there is so much more to our relationship than our common experience of losing a partner.
We make each other happy. We make each other laugh. We're interested in each other, engaged by each other. We miss each other when we're apart. More Trending
So, while it's true we wouldn't have got together if our partners hadn't died, we also certainly wouldn't have survived this long if we hadn't shared a lot more.
In fact, our relationship, far from being weakened or undermined by our shared history, has in some ways, been strengthened by it.
We have a better perspective when everyday things go wrong; we have a sort of measure against which we assess things and once you've looked on helplessly while your partner slips away, it turns out that bar ends up being pretty high.
Life is very short, and we don't want to let any more of it slip by. We want to live. We want to flourish. We want to have fun. And that, for everyone, whether widowed or not, is surely the ultimate goal.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Map reveals UK areas with highest rates of erectile dysfunction
MORE: I was burned by 'check-in chicken' – heed my warning
MORE: I'm desperate to lose my virginity but have a panic attack whenever I come close
Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Johnny Depp: My friends betrayed me
Johnny Depp, the Hollywood actor, has claimed he was betrayed by his friends after being accused of abuse by his ex-wife Amber Heard. The strongly denied claims were first levelled against Depp, 62, by Heard during divorce proceedings in 2016. The actor's failed marriage to the 39-year-old actress made international headlines when details of alleged violence between the pair were aired in courts in the UK and US. Depp has now criticised the behaviour of several close friends at the time and also claimed he had been a 'crash test dummy for the #MeToo movement'. 'I'll tell you what hurts. There are people, and I'm thinking of three, who did me dirty. Those people were at my kids' parties, throwing them in the air,' he told The Sunday Times. 'And, look, I understand people who could not stand up [for me], because the most frightening thing to them was making the right choice.' One individual who spoke out against Depp despite their long working relationship was Tracey Jacobs, his agent of 30 years, who was sacked in 2016. She claimed during Depp's legal battles that studios were 'reluctant' to hire him because of his lateness. Depp said of Jacobs: 'My loyalty is the last thing anybody could question. I was with one agent for 30 years, but she spoke in court about how difficult I was.' His image came under global scrutiny when he brought a libel case against The Sun newspaper after he was described as a 'wife-beater' in a column. Numerous alleged details of the couple's marriage were made public during the case, including claims of the actor having a finger severed, being struck by Heard, passing out drunk and finding her faeces in their bed. Depp said he felt compelled to risk revealing details of his personal life, adding: 'Look, it had gone far enough. I knew I'd have to semi-eviscerate myself. Everyone was saying 'It'll go away'. But I can't trust that.' While a judge ruled against Depp in his High Court case against The Sun, the star won damages for defamation from Heard in June 2022 following a legal battle in the US. But the allegations of abuse levelled against Depp by Heard continued to dog the film star, whose presence at the Cannes film festival in 2023 was opposed by several feminist groups in France. Following a period away from major Hollywood productions, Depp has this year been working on his comeback film Day Drinker. In the thriller, Depp will star as a mysterious guest on a private yacht who finds himself entangled with a criminal, played by Penelope Cruz.
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rust, review – Halyna Hutchins gave Alec Baldwin's cursed western more beauty than it deserves
Every film becomes a séance eventually, but Rust made the transition quicker than most. This sombre, workmanlike western lit up with notoriety four years ago after its 42-year-old director of photography, Halyna Hutchins, was fatally shot on set. The bullet, which also wounded the film's director Joel Souza, came from a gun that was being used as a prop, and which was fired by its star, Alec Baldwin, during preparations for a scene. In the ensuing trial, the film's armourer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter; Baldwin was acquitted and the same charge dismissed on procedural grounds. That awful, avoidable accident is why a large portion of Rust's audience will have heard of the film at all; it's why I'm writing about it, and probably why you're reading about it, too. There's a ghoulishness to this, which is human. But equally human, I think, is the deeper, warmer desire to appreciate the last work of an artist who would have never conceived of it as such, and must have assumed she was just getting started. (Hutchins had served as director of photography on just five fairly minor features in the four years before she made Rust.) It's hard not to suspect that the film's lengthy running time – two hours and 20 minutes is unusual for an independent western without much of a pedigree – is the result of a desire to showcase as much of Hutchins' best work as was possible. (Two years after her death, the further month of filming required to complete the film was overseen by her friend and fellow cinematographer Bianca Cline.) That would certainly explain the film's patient, plaintive and pointedly beautiful opening: two shining close-ups of Baldwin and his young co-star Patrick Scott McDermott's eyes (very Sergio Leone), followed by a series of shots of dawn-pink clouds rolling tenderly across the vast western landscapes, then a proper introduction to McDermott's Lucas Hollister, a careworn 13-year-old orphan, as he wraps up warm for the morning farmyard chores while firelight caresses his face. It's Lucas on whom the film centres, as after an accidental shooting (grim irony), the boy is sentenced to death, then sprung from jail at the 11th hour by his outlaw grandfather, Baldwin's Harland Rust. Films made on this scale often require a Baldwin-level name to attract enough funding to be made in the first place, but the 30 Rock star isn't a natural fit for this grizzled and stoical role: he has the sort of face which knows a well-poured Martini when it sees one, and doesn't quite belong in the rickety saloons of 19th-century Wyoming Territory. The plot, co-written by Souza and Baldwin, toggles soap-operatically between the flight of Lucas and his grandfather for the US-Mexico border and the efforts of Josh Hopkins' sheriff and his rag-tag posse to thwart their escape. It's methodically told, but often ravishingly captured. A simple riverside conversation between Baldwin and McDermott is shot with a split diopter: a vintage lens attachment which lets actors on opposite sides of the frame appear in focus simultaneously, even though one is deep in the background and the other nearby. Rust is stippled with such flourishes; in any other circumstances, they'd feel a little too good for the film in which they appear. In this one, however, they're the reason we're here at all. 15 cert, 140 min. On digital platforms from June 23
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Confessions of a billionaire's PA: I earned £100k catering to the ultra rich. They're not like you or I. This is the truth about what they buy, the bizarre bedroom status symbol and their degrading demands: ALEXANDRA GILMORE
Sirens, the Netflix series starring Julianne Moore and as a PA to her wealthy, controlling boss, is described as a dark comedy, which is how in hindsight I would define many of my own former personal assistant roles. These have taken me around the world working for A list celebrities and ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs). I was privy to a lifestyle not dissimilar to the fictional world of Sirens, where the setting was invariably cinematic in enviable Hollywood Regency-style homes surrounded by museum-worthy art (by Hockney, Chagall et al), gorgeous gardens, fabulous infinity pools and private-access beaches.
