Opinion - Our military is the real victim of Trump's war against DEI
We swore an oath to protect this country and uphold its Constitution. That commitment didn't end when we hung up our boots. But these days, we're left wondering whether our sacrifices, and those of countless others, are valued.
Memorial Day is a time to honor those who served and sacrificed for this country. But as veterans who dedicated our lives to defending the freedoms we all cherish, this year feels different. It feels heavier.
That's because the very values we fought for — freedom, equality, opportunity — are being rolled back by the same government that once relied on our service. From eliminating diversity and inclusion programs to restricting the teaching of hard but necessary truths, these changes are heartbreaking. They don't reflect the military we were proud to be part of. And they certainly don't honor the full legacy of those who wore the uniform.
Serving has taught us many things, namely that this oath of protecting and serving our country does not expire. 'Liberty and justice for all' is ingrained in our lives, but with the Trump administration seeking to erase the historic contributions of women and people of color who have bravely sacrificed their lives for our nation, we pose the question: for whom does 'for all' actually entail?
Despite baseless and false attacks stating otherwise, the fundamental American values of diversity, equity and inclusion or DEI are not divisive — they are the very foundation of a stronger, more unified military and nation. DEI ensures that every service member, regardless of race, gender, disability or background, has an equal opportunity to serve and succeed.
DEI programs have helped dismantle barriers for women in combat roles, addressed disparities in healthcare access for veterans of color, and ensured accommodations for disabled service members so they can continue to thrive. Without these values, the Trump administration is not just erasing history — it is endangering our future by building a force that is less capable, less inclusive and less prepared to meet the diverse challenges.
As two veterans, we are patriotic as they come, and know firsthand the bravery and dedication to servitude to our country. Yet our life's dedication now reads as 'content not found' on government websites. Where's the consistency in that?
In 1948, the U.S. Military was the first federal agency to desegregate, paving the way for us to join in defiance of the societal limits placed on us as minorities. While this was a moment of pride for us both, it was also an early signal of the pressures we would face: proving that we could do a 'white man's job.'
We continued to fight, not just for our place in the ranks but for the right to be seen as equal to our male and white counterparts, despite the systemic barriers that continue to surround us. The issue of gender and racial equality within the military is certainly not a new one. And despite the strides we have made, it is far from resolved.
To describe our jobs as dangerous would be an understatement: flying through typhoons and treating soldiers with post-traumatic stress disorders returning from Vietnam, all while struggling to process our own mental health trauma from war, was not for the faint of heart.
Our military journeys have been shaped as much by our daring professions as by facing systems that have tried to silence or ignore us. Black Americans make up 19 percent of active-duty military enlistments, and women make up roughly 17 percent; and I cannot imagine these numbers will increase, given the pervasive attempts to erase our identities.
We gave our lives to the military, and yet, upon reflection, we realize how hollow the American dream still feels. We are speaking up because just as it is our duty to protect this country, its values and its promise of equality, it's time for the country to fight for us in return. Our service may have ended, but the fight for equity and recognition continues.
Nearly 3.5 million veterans report having a disability, and current attacks on DEI disproportionately harm them. The Department of Defense's recent purge of DEI content from military websites has resulted in the erasure of historical minority contributions to the military, sending a harmful message to disabled veterans, particularly those from minority backgrounds, by diminishing their contributions and experiences.
People like us stand as a testament to what diversity, equity and inclusion can do for this country. When we provide a space for everyone to contribute, we make this nation stronger. But when those who have served are overlooked, we are left with a fractured system that fails to live up to its promises.
That's why we cannot afford to let things stay the way they are. As veterans, as citizens, as people who have sacrificed, we must demand change. We must ensure that the rights and privileges we fought for are not only upheld but expanded. And that starts with supporting the rights of veterans, supporting DEI initiatives, and ensuring that every American, no matter who they are, has a seat at the table.
Sylvia Andersh-Gonzalez is a U.S. Air Force veteran, medical professional, career military spouse, daughter of immigrants and current cancer patient, with experience serving in five VA hospitals. Ed Anderson is a Vietnam-era U.S. Air Force veteran, retired science educator and Georgia lead organizer for Common Defense, with a distinguished career in military meteorology, broadcast journalism as the first African American TV meteorologist at WXIA-TV, and public service.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
29 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive
President Donald Trump's former Secretary of Commerce doesn't think the trade deal between the US and China is close to being "done." "It looks as though they made a fairly modest deal, mostly focusing on export controls on both the US side and the China side," Wilbur Ross, who was part of the first Trump administration, told Business Insider. "So it's far from a comprehensive deal." On Wednesday morning, Trump said on Truth Social that the deal with China is now "done." "It seems more or less to be reiterating the deal they thought they had set a few weeks ago," Ross said of the deal. China and the US reached a trade framework agreement on Tuesday, after their respective negotiation teams held two-day talks in London. The current Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, is part of the US trade talk team. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China," Trump added in all caps in the post. "Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)." Ross said that the deal has not addressed many important issues, including intellectual property, so it may be too soon to call this a victory. "The Chinese side has been very careful to say it still needs to be approved by President Xi," said Ross. "When we negotiated with the China side last time, it wasn't unusual for the trade negotiators to agree to something, and then they would go back to Xi, and he would not go along with it." This year in duties on imports from China reached up to 245% on some goods. On May 14, many of the tariffs on China were reduced to 30% for 90 days, with a deadline of August 12. A 10% baseline tariff is still in place on the rest of the world, while additional higher tariffs on 75 countries have been paused until July 9. Ross said that it would be important to complete at least a few deals with key trading partners before the tariff pause on 75 countries expires. "I think that will help clear the air for the stock market because it'll start to show a direction and that there is a way to get all these things resolved," he said. "It's very important from a bond market point of view and from an equity market point of view."
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that Donald Trump is again intending to move the goalposts for his global tariff policy. The United States is fast approaching the end of the president's 90-day pause on his sweeping global tariffs on July 9, but while testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, Bessent said that 'Liberation Day' Part 2 may not come to pass so soon. 'I would say, as I have repeatedly said, that there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those. And it is highly likely that those countries that are negoti—or trading blocs, in the case of the EU—who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue good-faith negotiations,' Bessent said. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not,' he added. The Trump administration has not even vaguely approached its initial promise to crack 90 deals in 90 days, only announcing two unfinished deals, with the U.K. and China. Crucially, Trump's paltry set of terms with China isn't even a deal. China referred to it as merely a 'framework,' while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said it was a 'handshake for a framework' that both Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping need to approve. Trump seems intent on running the country's economic policy in 90-day increments, prolonging economic uncertainty that has roiled the markets and sent prices rising. But the president's failure should hardly come as a surprise, as the stated purpose of his tariffs—not to ensure economic prosperity but to bring U.S. trading partners to their knees—defies all logic and reason. With only two half-deals made, and a suddenly unclear horizon, it's not clear how TACO Trump will ever reach the goal of 200 trade deals he'd claimed to have made in April. Especially considering that there aren't even that many countries.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
When is Flag Day 2025? Is it a federal holiday? What to know
As the country prepares to salute the Army's 250th year with President Donald Trump's grand military parade in downtown Washington, D.C. on June 14, the day will also celebrate America's symbol of freedom: the American flag. A flag resolution was adopted 248 years ago, on June 14, 1777, according to the Smithsonian, that said, "Resolved: that the flag of the United States be made of 13 stripes, alternate red and white; that the union be 13 stars, white in a blue field, representing a new constellation." However, it would be more than 100 years after the Continental Congress approved the flag, that Flag Day would be observed. The event was first observed in the late 1800s by schoolteachers around the U.S., according to the National Constitution Center, and in May 1916, President Woodrow Wilson declared June 14 Flag Day. Since then, the U.S. has honored the adoption of the stars and stripes in a number of ways, including carrying the flag in parades, displaying it outside homes and holding other patriotic events. Before 1916, a number of states and cities had started to observe the day. Flag Day, meanwhile, was declared a national holiday in 1949 by congressional legislation signed into law by President Harry Truman, who in a proclamation directed the U.S. flag to be displayed on all government buildings on that day. Here's what to know about Flag Day and its evolution over the years. Army's 250th birthday parade: How to celebrate Army's 250th year – and (unofficially) Trump's birthday parade Flag Day is on Saturday, June 14, 2025. The June 14 date for Flag Day remains the same, no matter which day of the week it falls. Though it's observed nationally, Flag Day is not a federal holiday. However, the president traditionally proclaims its observance every year. Pennsylvania, meanwhile, recognizes it as a state holiday. June 2025 holiday schedule: Summer solstice, Pride Month, Father's Day, Juneteenth, more The American flag, characterized by 50 stars and 13 stripes, will celebrate its 65th birthday on July 4. After Hawaii became the 50th state in 1959, on July 4, 1960, the flag's new design was officially adopted. Contributing: Janet Loehrke, USA TODAY / Cheryl McCloud, USA TODAY NETWORK - Florida Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at sshafiq@ and follow her on X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Flag Day 2025 date: When is it? Is it a federal holiday?