
Focus: Novo Nordisk's former chief makes comeback to steer choice of new CEO
COPENHAGEN/LONDON, May 22 (Reuters) - Years before Novo Nordisk's (NOVOb.CO), opens new tab obesity drug Wegovy became a U.S. blockbuster, then-CEO Lars Rebien Sorensen told a press conference in Copenhagen: "You ain't seen nothing yet."
More than a decade later, the 70-year-old is returning to Denmark's biggest company and is expected to strongly influence its future direction - most immediately through the selection of a new chief executive.
His appointment as an observer on the board follows the removal on Friday of current CEO Lars Fruergaard Jorgensen by Novo and the Novo Nordisk Foundation - the company's controlling shareholder, which Sorensen chairs.
Jorgensen succeeded Sorensen as CEO in 2017.
Six people interviewed by Reuters said they think Sorensen will use his influence to push for an external hire, the first in Novo's 103-year history. The company has had only five chief executives, all Danes.
A source close to Novo who spoke on condition of anonymity said Sorensen would look for someone who could recharge the company's U.S. performance, and that such a candidate was likely to come from outside.
Under Jorgensen's leadership, Novo became a world leader in the lucrative weight-loss drug market, launching Wegovy in 2021. But in the United States, its largest and most profitable market, the drug has been struggling against U.S. rival Eli Lilly's (LLY.N), opens new tab Zepbound.
The decision to remove Jorgensen showed the Foundation's frustration with management over the execution of a strategy to shift Novo's focus to obesity from diabetes care, devised when Sorensen was CEO, the same person said.
Novo Nordisk chair Helge Lund on Friday said the company's strategy is unchanged despite the shake-up.
Lund said last week the search would include internal and external candidates and Jorgensen will stay on until a successor is appointed.
The Foundation declined to comment on Thursday.
A Novo Nordisk spokesperson said Sorensen will participate in board meetings but holds no voting rights as an observer. He will become a full board member at the next AGM.
Novo's shares have more than halved from their peak when the company was valued at $615 billion in June last year, one reason cited by the Foundation for intervening to remove Jorgensen.
At one point Europe's most valuable company, its expansion bolstered Denmark's economy and the country's global standing.
Nevertheless, Friday's move stunned investors, analysts and many Danes, who viewed it as a public humiliation of Jorgensen and the company's board.
The change of CEO also comes at a critical moment for the pharmaceutical industry as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens tariffs on pharmaceutical products and wants drugmakers to cut U.S. prices of brand-name medicines.
Financial analysts Reuters spoke to last week said an American chief executive might be better placed to deal with the Trump administration.
Investors and analysts do not see Sorensen himself - who during his 16 years in charge was twice named global CEO of the year by Harvard Business Review - as a candidate for the job.
When he stepped down as CEO in 2016, Novo cited as reasons increased competition in the U.S. market and pricing pressures for insulin, then its most profitable line.
But some people said Sorensen might want someone with a similar style to his own.
"He was very self-confident and a great communicator," said Frank Horning Andersen, a former analyst at Jyske Bank who covered Novo during Sorensen's tenure.
In contrast, Jorgensen, an economist by training, is a self-described introvert.
Pointing to "market challenges", Sorensen said on Friday the "timing is right for a new profile as CEO of the company".
Gareth Powell, head of healthcare at London-based investment fund Polar Capital, told Reuters the Foundation's move to oust Jorgensen implied "a greater degree of scrutiny".
"I think they need to be very careful going externally (for a CEO) because they've got to keep the pace up whilst they're going through this process," he said.
"But if they think they need to do something dramatic here, then maybe an external (hire) shakes things up."
As CEO, Sorensen had his own clash with the Foundation, over plans in 2004 for a merger with Swiss-based drug company Serono that could have seen company headquarters moved to Switzerland.
The Foundation blocked the deal to preserve Novo's Danish roots, according to Kurt Jacobsen, professor emeritus at Copenhagen Business School, who wrote a book about the company.
"Sorensen was furious," Jacobsen said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Auto Express
15 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog
Consumers have been advised to steer clear of using car finance claim firms, as the UK's top financial watchdog says they could be spending money unnecessarily. The Financial Conduct Authority has begun setting out advice surrounding a possible redress scheme with regard to the ongoing car finance scandal which, according to experts, could see billions of pounds made available for potential claims. Advertisement - Article continues below However, with countless companies now popping up to assist potential claimants, the FCA is keen to remind motorists that in using one 'they may end up paying for a service they do not need and having to pay up to 30 per cent in fees out of any award they may receive'. Rather than utilise one of these paid services, consumers can submit timestamped complaints and claims themselves. Tools such as those on the MoneySavingExpert website can help people search for previous finance agreements, while the site also provides a template in order to draft a letter of complaint. With the Supreme Court set to make its judgement next month in regard to whether 'discretionary commission arrangements' (DCAs) were illegal in the first instance, the FCA is also advising finance firms on how they should calculate claims for disgruntled clients. The FCA is keen for a redress scheme to strike a balance between being fair to consumers, but at the same time not disrupting the market by putting finance firms out of business. In its latest release, the FCA says that the latter scenario could 'reduce competition and could make it more expensive for consumers to borrow money to buy a car in the future'. Such a scheme will fall under one of two arrangements: 'opt-in' and 'opt-out'. With the former – considered the most likely scenario – claimants would be required to notify their finance provider prior to a specified date if they wish to be considered for redress. 'Opt-out', on the other hand, would mean that everyone who is eligible will automatically be included, unless they contact their firm to be taken off the list. Consumers can expect the FCA to announce within six weeks of the Court's judgement in July as to whether a full redress scheme will be implemented, and how exactly it will operate. Tell us which new car you're interested in and get the very best offers from our network of over 5,500 UK dealers to compare. Let's go…


BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cancer patients 'priced out' of holidays, charity warns
Cancer patients are being "priced out" of holidays due to "extremely unfair" travel insurance costs, a charity has cancer support charity said patients and those with a history of the disease were "frequently" being quoted premiums of thousands of pounds, while some were being refused cover chief executive, Dame Laura Lee, said: "We know how stressful a cancer diagnosis can be, and the last thing people should have to think about is inflated insurance costs."The Association of British Insurers (ABI) said the "significant costs" associated with emergency treatment abroad for pre-existing medical conditions were taken into account when offering cover. In a statement, Dame Lee emphasised the "emotional distress" caused by "barriers" to obtaining travel insurance for people with said: "Travelling and taking holidays can be so important for someone's wellbeing and recovery, and it is extremely unfair that people with cancer are being priced out of the opportunity to visit family and friends abroad or simply explore the world."Maggie's has called on the Treasury, Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and insurers to jointly develop recommendations to ensure cancer patients are "treated more fairly" by providers. 'Completely unaffordable' Josh Cull, 28, told BBC Breakfast he went through "a year of hell" in 2021 after being treated for a brain tumour which affected his eyesight and ability to walk. "I then decided, you know what, I'm going to live some life now," he while searching for insurance for a trip to South East Asia with his fiancée and brother, Mr Cull said the lowest quote he could find was £3,000, which he described as "completely unaffordable"."[That was] despite being two-and-a-half years clean, no recurring conditions. I was completely healthy," he Cull said he decided to travel without insurance, having had most of his savings "wiped out" by his time off work for treatment."I [didn't] want it to stop me living my life," he said, adding that he instead took other more "affordable" precautions ahead of the trip, such as getting "extra vaccines".A spokesperson for the ABI said in a statement that it "remained committed" to supporting customers who have or have had cancer. "As part of a signposting agreement introduced by the FCA, if an insurer is unable to offer you cover because of a pre-existing medical condition, they will point you to specialist providers who can help you find an appropriate policy."A 2018 report by the FCA warned that cancer patients were struggling to find affordable travel insurance, even long after their treatment had BBC has approached the Treasury for comment.


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Media giant Canal+ strikes settlement with French tax authorities
Shares in Canal+ rose on Friday after the London-listed media conglomerate settled a tax dispute with the French Government. The StudioCanal owner, which listed in London last December, told investors it expects no impact on cash from the settlement. French authorities had accused the Paris-based company, formerly a subsidiary of telecoms giant Vivendi, of incorrectly applying lower rates of value-added tax on some of its services. Canal+ had warned that the dispute could have potentially cost it around €655million. It anticipates recording some exceptional charges in its first-half results, but told investors the settlement 'removes uncertainty regarding the possibility of a material additional disbursement'. Alongside this, the firm upheld its full-year outlook on turnover and earnings before nasties, with the latter expected to total approximately €515million. It came as Canal+ said it was on track to achieve organic growth this year because of a 'material one-off cash improvement'. But the business cautioned that this would be offset by the end of some contracts and the closure of terrestrial television channel C8 in February. The group's distribution deal with Disney+ ended at the start of 2025, resulting in its roughly 27 million subscribers losing access to the streaming service. In late February, C8 shut down after regulators revoked its broadcasting licence following accusations of promoting fake news and conspiracy theories. Consequently, its first-quarter turnover fell by 2.5 per cent to €1.55billion, although organic sales increased by 1.5 per cent, thanks to a robust performance by its film studios division. StudioCanal's recent box office successes include the animated sequel Paddington In Peru, horror film The Monkey, romantic drama We Live in Time, and comedy Bridget Jones: Mad About The Boy. In a rare victory for the UK capital, Canal+ went public on the London Stock Exchange last year after Vivendi shareholders voted to spin off the group. It debuted with an estimated £2.5billion valuation, making it the LSE's largest flotation in two years. Just 45 businesses applied to join the main London market in 2024, compared to 59 the year before and 111 in 2022, according to the Financial Conduct Authority. By comparison, 88 companies delisted or transferred their primary listing from the LSE, the largest number since the global financial crisis in 2008, figures from EY have shown. Canal+ shares rose 7.1 per cent to 215p on Friday morning, although this is far below its initial public offering price of 290p.