US senators examine China's influence over Panama Canal
US senators heard sharply different analyses about Chinese influence over the Panama Canal on Wednesday, with some experts suggesting solutions ranging from enhanced trade partnerships to military intervention to regain control of the strategic waterway.
The hearing before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee attempted to examine President Donald Trump's claims that China has gained undue control over the canal, which the US transferred to Panama in 1999 under terms of a 1977 treaty.
Trump has contended that Panama's authorisation of increased Chinese commercial activity violates the canal's neutrality agreement.
'We gave it [the canal] to Panama, not China, and we're taking it back,' Trump declared in his inauguration address, alleging treaty breaches to support a potential intervention.
04:23
Trump wants the Panama Canal: empty talk or real threat for Hong Kong? Trump wants the Panama Canal: empty talk or real threat for Hong Kong?
But China's direct involvement remains a matter of debate. In 2018, a Chinese state-owned enterprise – China Harbour Engineering Company – secured a US$1.4 billion contract to construct the canal's fourth bridge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump hints he would support arrest of California Governor Newsom amid pro-immigration protests
US President Donald Trump on Monday suggested that he would support an arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom amid pro-immigration protests in the state, which prompted the president to deploy the National Guard. On Saturday, Tom Homan, the administration's border czar, threatened to arrest anyone who obstructs immigration enforcement efforts in the state, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. Newsom responded during an NBC News interview by challenging Homan to 'just get it over with' and move ahead with the arrest. Asked on Monday about Newsom daring Homan to arrest him, Trump said: 'I would do it if I were Tom.' Earlier on Monday, Newsom said he planned to file a lawsuit against Trump in response to the administration's extraordinary deployment of the National Guard. 'Commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the governor of that state is illegal and immoral,' Newsom, a Democrat, told MSNBC.
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Canada to hit 2% defence Nato spending target, years ahead of schedule, says Carney
Canada will hit Nato's defence spending threshold of two per cent this year, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Monday, warning that in a 'darker' world, Canada must reduce its security dependence on the United States. 'I am announcing today that Canada will achieve Nato's two per cent target this year, half a decade ahead of schedule,' Carney said during a speech at the University of Toronto. 'The threats that Canada faces are multiplying,' he added. Carney's pledge followed similar announcements by members of the alliance and comes after consistent pressure by US President Donald Trump for Nato members to spend more on defence. 'In a darker, more competitive world, Canadian leadership will be defined not just by the strength of our values, but also by the value of our strength,' Carney said. Since taking office in mid-March, Carney has delivered a series of stark warnings about what he terms the changing nature of US global leadership under Trump.
South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Why Xi's decision to talk to Trump during trade crisis speaks volumes
Chinese President Xi Jinping's decision to speak to US President Donald Trump directly last week, the first such call in four months, spoke volumes about the importance to Xi of finding a way through the morass of Sino-US relations. Xi's decision ran counter to the long-standing Chinese diplomatic approach during Sino-US tensions of the Chinese president refusing calls from the US president despite persistent entreaties. The White House had repeatedly predicted a Xi-Trump phone call only to fall silent when it did not materialise. Xi was almost certainly wary of speaking to Trump because of his track record of embarrassing foreign leaders , but I believe the central reason is rooted in the risk aversion in ties with Washington that has characterised Chinese foreign policy since the normalisation of relations in the 1970s. When I recently asked a Chinese academic why it is so hard for Xi to pick up the phone, he said that direct leader-to-leader negotiations in a time of crisis were not in the DNA of the Communist Party leadership. The historical record gives us ample evidence of this. As student protests rocked Beijing in 1989, ultimately ending in military forces suppressing the movement in Tiananmen Square, US president George H.W. Bush repeatedly requested a phone call with China's paramount leader Deng Xiaoping. The Chinese refused. Perplexed, Bush asked my China analytic team at the CIA why Deng would not take his call and why, during the crisis, Deng had disappeared from public view. Bush wondered whether he was sick or had been ousted. We explained that we had intelligence he was still in charge but that it was typical of Chinese leaders to 'go to ground' during a domestic crisis and not reappear or talk to foreign leaders until they were sure that the situation had stabilised.
