Wolverhampton councillor 'appalled and hurt' over cancer remarks
A Labour councillor who is being treated for cancer has said she felt "appalled, hurt and upset" after a Reform councillor told a full council meeting she was unable to represent her constituents effectively.Carol Hyatt has non-Hodgkin lymphoma and due to her illness City of Wolverhampton Council has given her a dispensation to carry out her duties from home.At the meeting on Wednesday, councillor Anita Stanley said she did not feel Hyatt's arrangement was "very fair on the residents"."I'm immunocompromised, I can do everything, but I can't go out because then I'll get sepsis and could die, but I've done my very best still represent my ward," Hyatt told the BBC.
Reform UK and Stanley have been contacted for comment.During a full council discussion about a proposed extension of Hyatt's dispensation to work from home, Stanley stood up and said: "I do not feel it is very fair on the residents not to have a political representative being able to speak up for them for the period of effectively one whole year."It's not fair on taxpayers."Hyatt said: "The situation is not a party political thing so why would you treat any human being like that when they're fighting cancer and going through treatment?"I'm really hurt because she hadn't bothered to find out the truth and tell it."Hyatt attends council meetings virtually due to being immunocompromised."I can't turn up in person, I would risk getting neutrophilic septicaemia"Although I'm expecting to be in full remission there's a possibility I might still have cancer again."The extension is usually just automatically agreed on by all the councillors because Wolverhampton is a supportive council," Hyatt said.
Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Palestine Action: We're spreading ‘intifada' in prisons
Jailed Palestine Action activists are radicalising other prisoners in pursuit of their cause, the movement has boasted. The group – which will be proscribed as a terrorist organisation within days – said the 'resistance lives on the streets, in cities, in towns and in prisons' in a meeting accessed by The Telegraph. On a call with potential recruits, the host of the meeting said members of the organisation are 'spreading intifada', an Arabic word for uprising. This week, The Telegraph revealed that Palestine Action was plotting to target RAF bases across the country in a wave of attacks. At a direct action 'workshop' for people wanting to join the organisation, at which the RAF plans were discussed, a member of the group quoted the words of an anonymous former prisoner. The former prisoner said: 'In locking me up, the British state made a miscalculation. They thought that by imprisoning me, they would halt the British resistance to Israel's genocide. But while you can imprison a revolutionary, you cannot imprison a revolution. 'The resistance lives on the streets, in our cities and our towns, and in our prisons too. I brought the intifada with me to the prison and I remain steadfast and determined now I am free – just as Palestine, too, will be.' In total, the group says it currently has around 19 members imprisoned in the UK. The majority of those are the 'Filton 18' who are currently remanded in custody awaiting trial in April next year. Members of the group allegedly drove a modified prison van into the Israeli arms company Elbit's research, development, and manufacturing hub in Filton, Bristol. Two responding police officers and a security guard were allegedly injured in the incident. Further arrests were made at a protest in Trafalgar Square this week during a demonstration against Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's plans to proscribe the organisation. On Thursday, the Telegraph exposed a list of Palestine Action's next targets. Tactics discussed included breaking into factories and hitting 'everything you can find with a sledgehammer', as well as setting up autonomous cells able to target military bases without detection. A slide in the call identified three RAF bases most suitable for attack – RAF Cranwell and RAF Barkston Heath, both in Lincolnshire, and RAF Valley, in Anglesey, North Wales. It also recommended action against defence companies believed to be supplying arms to Israel, including a drone factory in Leicester. There have been growing fears of radicalisation in prisons more generally over the past decade, partly because of the presence of a large number of Islamist gangs. Hashem Abedi, one of the terrorists behind the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing, attacked three prison officers with makeshift weapons and hot cooking oil at HMP Frankland in County Durham in April. Two officers were left with life-threatening injuries. The incident came just days after reports that Frankland, the high-security prison where Abedi is serving life, has become 'overrun' with Islamist gangs threatening to attack or kill other prisoners if they did not join up. After a surge of law enforcement activity in the UK in the early 2000s following the 9/11 attacks in the US and the July 7 bombings in London, the number of Islamist extremists in custody for terror-related offences increased sharply. The increase in Islamist terrorist prisoners came at the same time as a rise in the overall number of Muslims in jails across England and Wales – 99 per cent of whom are being held for non-terror offences. The number has nearly trebled, from 5,500 in 2002 to almost 16,000 in 2024, and now represents 18 per cent of the prison population, compared with 8 per cent two decades ago. In 2022, a report by Jonathan Hall KC, the reviewer of anti-terrorism legislation, found that faith-based self-segregation by prisoners had provided a 'fertile base for violent Islamist activity'. It said attacks on non-Muslim inmates, staff and the public were 'encouraged'. The report said charismatic or violent prisoners acted as 'self-styled emirs' to radicalise the wider Muslim prison population, exerting control through a network of 'enforcers' over access to prayer meetings, the prison kitchens and showers.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Welfare reforms: What concessions has the Government made?
Last-minute concessions to the Government's controversial welfare reforms have been welcomed by some campaigners but described as not good enough by others. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at what the changes are and how Labour MPs and disability groups have reacted. – What had the Government originally planned? In March, reforms to the welfare system – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – were announced. The Government said the changes, including restricting access to the main disability benefit known as Pip (personal independence payment) and the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC), were expected to make welfare savings of £4.8 billion by 2029-30. With around 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year', the Government argued the current situation was unsustainable. An impact assessment published alongside the Bill included estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules would see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Changes to UC were expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. Overall, as a result of the changes, it was estimated some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, across Great Britain were likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs by the end of the decade. – What concessions have been made? In a late-night letter to MPs, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall conceded two changes she said would 'strengthen the Bill'. In recognition of the 'uncertainty and anxiety' caused by the proposed changes, she said all current Pip recipients would keep their benefits, saying only new claims from November 2026 will come under the tightened eligibility requirements. An impact assessment had stated that 370,000 current recipients were set to lose Pip entitlement across England and Wales. Ms Kendall also vowed all those currently receiving the UC health element, as well as new claimants meeting the severe conditions criteria, will have their incomes 'fully protected in real terms'. The Work and Pensions Secretary has also promised a review of the Pip assessment, led by social security and disability minister Sir Stephen Timms, which will have input from disabled people 'to ensure the benefit is fair and fit for the future'. – What are disability groups saying? Mikey Erhardt, from Disability Rights UK, accused the Government of 'playing politics with our lives', insisting the Bill must still be pulled. He said the changes will mean 'a benefits system where future generations of disabled people receive less support than disabled people today' and added that, in making the original announcement of cuts, the Government had 'prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of disabled citizens'. Mr Erhardt added: 'Despite seemingly rowing back on some of the worst aspects of its plans, the Government is still attempting to slash billions of pounds from a system that doesn't provide enough support as it stands.' The MS Society said the Government was simply 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster', and urged MPs 'not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions'. Food bank network Trussell welcomed the 'significant' concessions but said the proposals 'still present a bleak future for future claimants and still risk placing the Government's commitments to end the need for emergency food and tackle poverty in serious jeopardy'. – What are Labour MPs saying? Dame Meg Hillier, one of the leading rebel voices, described the concessions as 'a good deal' involving 'massive changes' to protect vulnerable people and involve disabled people in the design of future reforms. She said: 'It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed.' Health minister Stephen Kinnock said he is confident the welfare reforms – being brought under the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – will pass a vote in the Commons on Tuesday in the wake of the concessions. But some Labour MPs are still not satisfied, with Nadia Whittome saying the concessions are 'nowhere near good enough', vowing to still vote against the Bill unless 'serious' proposals are made to 'protect the dignity of disabled people'. Speaking to the Today programme on BBC Radio 4, she said MPs she had spoken to 'are sticking to their position because we understand that we are answerable to our constituents'. Ms Whittome added: 'If the Government doesn't pull the Bill, doesn't consult properly with disabled people and come back to MPs with a serious proposal that protects the dignity of disabled people, I will vote against and I will be far from the only one.'
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
What does the UK spend on welfare – and how much will it rise?
Welfare spending is forecast to rise sharply over the next few years, driven by the UK's ageing population and an increase in the number of people receiving health and disability benefits. Here, the PA news agency looks at the latest figures and projections for social security and welfare expenditure. – How much does the UK spend in total? The Government is forecast to have spent £313.0 billion on welfare in 2024/25, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). This is the equivalent of 10.9% of UK GDP (gross domestic product, or the total value of the economy). The OBR forecasts annual spending on welfare to reach £373.4 billion in 2029/30. This is up £60.4 billion on the figure for 2024/25 – an increase of nearly a fifth. Welfare spending as a proportion of GDP is forecast to fall slightly to 10.8%, however. – What takes up the biggest share of the welfare budget? Spending on pensioners. Some £150.7 billion was spent on pensioners in 2024/25, accounting for nearly half (48%) of the total welfare budget. Besides the state pension, this spending also includes pensioner housing benefit, pension credit and the winter fuel payment. Spending on pensioners is forecast to reach £181.8 billion by 2029/30, but this would still be just under half (49%) of the full welfare budget. – How does the rest of the welfare budget break down? The next largest chunk of spending goes on Universal Credit, which made up 28% of the 2024/25 budget (£87.8 billion). It was followed by disability benefits at 13% (£41.4 billion) and child benefit at 4% (£13.3 billion), with other types of spending – including social security in Northern Ireland – accounting for 6% (£19.9 billion). – Is spending set to increase for all types of welfare? No. The child benefit budget is forecast to remain largely flat, at £13.6 billion in 2029/30, compared with £13.3 billion in 2024/25. By contrast, spending on disability benefits is forecast to jump to £56.3 billion by 2029/30, up from £41.4 billion in 2024/25. Spending on Universal Credit will reach £99.0 billion, up from £87.8 billion. – Why is welfare spending rising? The OBR identifies two main drivers of the increase. The first is higher spending on pensioners. This is because of the UK's ageing population and the 'triple lock', which guarantees pensions will rise each year by whichever is highest: the annual rate of inflation, average growth in earnings, or 2.5%. Of the forecast £60.4 billion extra spending on welfare in 2029/30, pensioners are responsible for just over half of the amount, at £31.3 billion (51%). The second factor identified by the OBR as driving an increase in welfare spending is the rise in people eligible for health and disability benefits. Spending on disability benefits, which includes disability living allowance and personal independence payments, accounts for £14.9 billion (25%) of the £60.4 billion extra spending on welfare in 2029/30. – How does spending on health and disability benefits break down by age group? The OBR defines health and disability benefits as covering the following entitlements: the standard allowance and health element spending for Universal Credit claimants; employment and support allowance; incapacity benefit; severe disablement allowance; income support for incapacity; disability living allowance; personal independence payment; attendance allowance; spending on the Universal Credit carer's element; carer's allowance, and income support for carers. Spending on all these benefits was estimated to be £75.7 billion in 2024/25, three-quarters of which (75% or £56.9 billion) went to working-age adults. Just under a fifth (19%, or £14.2 billion) went to pensioners, while 6% (£4.5 billion) went to children. Although the amount spent on health and disability benefits is forecast to rise to £97.9 billion in 2029/30, the proportions are expected to remain broadly the same: 74% on working-age adults (£72.3 billion), 19% on pensioners (£18.3 billion) and 7% on children (£7.0 billion). – How does welfare spending compare with other government departments? In 2023/24, actual spending on health and disability benefits was £66.3 billion. This was more than than the total departmental expenditure on defence (£57.6 billion) or transport (£32.6 billion), but well below the figure for education (£127.0 billion) and overall health and social care spending (£196.7 billion), according to the latest Treasury data. Total expenditure by the Department for Work & Pensions stood at £275.1 billion in 2023/24, up from £239.1 billion in 2022/23 and the highest figure among all government departments.
