6.3 million homes and properties in UK currently 'at serious risk' of flooding
6.3 million homes and properties in the UK are currently at risk of flooding, according to a damning report. This is set to rise to eight million by 2050.
Following this, the Government has been slammed for failing to prepare the UK for 'tomorrow's disaster' of floods, heatwaves, drought and wildfires, its climate advisers have warned.
The independent advisory Climate Change Committee also raised fears that spending needed to protect communities and critical services such as the NHS from worsening weather extremes could be cut in the summer spending review.
Early deaths from heatwaves are projected to rise from the 3,000 seen in 2022's record hot summer to 10,000 a year by mid-century.
🇬🇧 Meanwhile in Northampton, UK Resultant flooding has completely destroyed hundreds of mobile homes & other property in the area. Sadly the flooding will only get worse Britain - just as we've been warning & no it's not Climate Change. pic.twitter.com/rHldr0HZQK
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) November 27, 2024
The committee warned there had been no improvement since its last assessment in 2023, and accused the new government of failing to deliver the change in approach needed.
Already, half the UK's prime agricultural farmland is at risk of flooding, which is set to worsen, while schools, hospitals and care homes are among the most vulnerable to impacts such as heatwaves, the committee warned.
The committee's chairwoman, Baroness Brown, pointed to 2022's heatwave, when temperatures topped 40C for the first time ever, which, in addition to thousands of deaths, put huge pressure on emergency services and halted operations in hospitals.
'All of this and we are seeing no increase in action,' Baroness Brown said.
The committee's assessment looked at 46 areas where adaptation needed to be delivered, and found only good progress in plans and policies for three, making rail and strategic road networks reliable and ensuring risks were properly disclosed and managed by financial institutions.
Not a single measure – from ensuring resilience in nature and farmland to water, food and energy supplies – was making good progress, with 12 areas rated insufficient.
The committee warned delivery had actually worsened in the water sector because of a lack of credible plans to cut leaks and reduce water demand in the face of worsening drought risk.
The committee said the previous government's action plan fell short of preparing the UK for the climate change already being experienced, let alone the future, but found little evidence of change now despite Labour's manifesto promising to 'improve resilience and preparation' for the country.
Baroness Brown said: 'People are worrying about the impacts of extreme weather, worrying about food prices. People are worried about what's going to happen to their vulnerable friends and relatives.
'Despite all this, we are seeing no such change in activity from the new government, despite the fact that it's clear to my committee, it's increasingly clear to the public that the current approach to adaptation policy just isn't working.
She added: 'We can't wait to take action, this is not tomorrow's problem, it's today's problem, and if we don't do something about it, it will become tomorrow's disaster.'
A wide array of measures are needed, from building new resilient hospitals and retrofitting existing ones with air conditioning and green roofs for cooling, to ensuring people know what to do in a heatwave such as closing windows and curtains in the morning.
Standards for new homes need to prevent overheating and ensure they are not at risk of flooding, while agricultural subsidies, the 25-year farming plan and food strategy should all support efforts to adapt nature and food production to the changing climate.
Baroness Brown also suggested the level of personal protective equipment (PPE) still being used post-Covid needed to be reviewed, to reduce costs and plastic waste and allow staff to work more comfortably in the heat.
But the committee raised concerns that the Government had said last autumn that there was a need to review flood defence spending in light of financial pressures, raising fears it signalled cuts in the spending review.
Baroness Brown said: 'We are seriously concerned that resilience and climate adaptation may be cut in the spending review.
'Government needs to recognise this is not a future problem, it's today's problem,' she urged.
Campaigners described the report as a 'wake-up call' for Government, with WWF's head of climate policy Bella O'Dowd saying: 'The evidence is clear: action on climate unlocks economic opportunities, improves our health and saves lives.
'Farmers, communities and businesses can't afford any more delays.'
And Dr Friederike Otto, from Imperial College London, an expert on climate's role in extreme weather said: 'Climate change is already hurting the UK – more intense heatwaves and floods are damaging infrastructure, reducing worker productivity, wiping out crops, and putting more pressure on the NHS.
Recommended reading:
Can an alcoholic drink improve your health? Experts believe they've found one
John Torode and Lisa Faulkner deal Gregg Wallace 'huge snub' over Grace Dent
DVSA makes 'long-awaited' driving licence change which could help thousands
'Given the Government's current focus on growth, it is hard to believe there has not been a renewed focus on adaptation, which could save the UK billions of pounds in avoided losses.'
A Government spokesperson said they would carefully consider the findings of the committee's report.
They added: 'Alongside our transition to become a clean energy superpower and accelerating towards net zero, the Government is taking robust action to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate.
'We are investing a record £2.65 billion to repair and build flood defences, protecting tens of thousands of homes and businesses and helping local communities become more resilient to the effects of climate change such as overheating and drought.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
37 minutes ago
- Washington Post
We're witnessing a historic test of two assumptions about Israel
Natan Sharansky, a human rights activist and former Soviet dissident, is a former Israeli government minister and deputy prime minister. Early Friday morning, Israelis woke up to the news that our government had launched a targeted military assault against the Islamic Republic of Iran, striking its military facilities, nuclear sites and top military leadership. As we brace for Iran's response and the possibility of a longer war to follow, we are also witnessing the historic test of two assumptions that have long guided Israeli and international policy.


Fast Company
38 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Trump's ‘gold card' visa scheme is pure gilded nonsense
President Donald Trump announced, back on February 25, that his administration would soon debut a 'gold card,' an immigration program that would allow wealthy foreigners, for the low, low price of $5 million, to become lawful permanent residents of the United States. At the time, Trump touted the program as a 'great' and 'fantastic' revenue generation strategy that would help reduce the national deficit, which approached $2 trillion during the most recent fiscal year. 'Wealthy people will be coming into our country by buying this card, they'll be wealthy and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot of money and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people,' Trump said. He told reporters that gold card buyers would not be required to pay tax on their income outside the United States; that the program was 'totally legal' and 'all worked out from the legal standpoint'—and that he expected it to go live within two weeks. 'Two weeks,' confirmed Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, standing behind Trump in the Oval Office. When Trump estimated that the government could raise an easy $5 trillion by selling 'maybe a million' gold cards, Lutnick was unable to suppress a chuckle of delight. 'Wow!' he said. Today, though, anyone hoping to relocate to a budding police state where riot cops might shoot you point-blank for looking at them is still waiting for the chance to cut a check. In mid-March, Lutnick said during a podcast interview that gold cards would be available in 'about two weeks,' and claimed he'd presold 1,000 already. (I assume these sales, to the extent they exist, are handshake deals, since the alternative would involve the Secretary of Commerce personally collecting $5 billion and stashing it God knows where.) On April 3, Trump showed reporters a physical gold card bearing his scowling face and seismogram signature, and (again) said it would be out in 'less than two weeks.' But the delays kept coming. On April 11, Lutnick announced that gold cards would be available 'within a week and a half.' On May 21, he moved the goalposts even further, revealing that a website where 'people can start to register' for gold cards would be online in 'about a week.' On Thursday—three weeks after that update, for those keeping score— at last went live. Trump celebrated the launch on Truth Social as a way to 'ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere.' On Fox Business, Lutnick claimed to have logged 25,000 sign-ups in 15 hours. But he also acknowledged that these are waiting list spots, and that the administration is still 'getting everything set up.' The website itself most closely resembles an especially lazy phishing attempt; its only content is a contact submission form assuring prospective buyers that the gold card is 'coming,' and urging them to provide their email addresses to 'get notified the moment access opens.' The White House's struggles to get this initiative off the ground demonstrate just how unprepared Trump is for the basic work of governing, on the rare occasions that he expresses any interest in engaging in it. A key part of his pitch to voters has always been that, as an outsider to politics, only he has the Business Guy Mindset necessary to transform the federal government from a bureaucratic morass into a slickly branded, profitable enterprise. But fulfilling his more ambitious promises is always harder than he expects. As a result, an idea that Trump once suggested would single-handedly wipe out this country's $36 trillion national debt is, four months later, still taking the form of a bare-bones website that looks like it is soliciting interest in a new over-the-counter erectile dysfunction medication. At the announcement earlier this year, Trump explained that gold cards would replace the existing EB-5 visa program, which allows immigrants to obtain green cards if they invest at least $800,000 (and usually more) in a new business, and create at least 10 full-time jobs in the United States. In a Cabinet meeting, Lutnick clarified that the gold card program would technically 'modify' the EB-5 visa program, allowing buyers to obtain a 'license' from the Department of Commerce that would entitle them to make a 'proper' EB-5 investment. In response to a question from reporters, Trump asserted that the program does not require legislation because it allows buyers to obtain lawful permanent resident status and a 'very strong path to citizenship,' but does not directly confer U.S. citizenship. advertisement law limits EB-5 visas to around 10,000 per year, which is of course nowhere near the million units Trump and Lutnick imagine selling in short order. The amount of the required capital investment, too, is set by statute, and nothing in the law would allow Trump to increase it to $5 million just because he feels like it. His distinction between programs that confer citizenship and programs that only confer lawful permanent resident status is nonsensical, as is Lutnick's reference to a 'license' from the Department of Commerce. Depending on what he has in mind, Trump's promise that gold card holders will enjoy some form of VIP treatment—'green card privileges plus,' he called it—probably also hinges on Congress's willingness and ability to pass a law to that effect. Absent congressional action, Trump's best bet for making this work might involve using his statutory authority to allow gold card buyers to enter the United States on the grounds that doing so entails a 'significant public benefit,' since a willingness to fork over $5 million to the Treasury Department arguably qualifies as such. But this status—the product of a legal process known as parole—is typically temporary, and is not even considered a form of 'admission' to the United States. It also would not make gold card buyers lawful permanent residents or give them a path to citizenship, which are things that people who pay that much would reasonably expect to get in return. Given that the Trump administration has spent the last several months gleefully repudiating the very concept of parole, I understand not wanting to pay seven figures for the right to be in the country for as long as Stephen Miller feels like allowing it. The lingering uncertainty around the program's specifics has resulted in a gold card market that is likely cooler than Trump might have imagined. Earlier this month, NPR interviewed several immigration attorneys who said they'd fielded inquiries from wealthy foreigners who are eager to pay up—which is, to be fair, exactly what I would say if I were an immigration lawyer contacted by a national publication for comment about a program aimed at potential clients who have at least $5 million in cash. Other experts, though, told NPR they anticipate sales in the low thousands; one explained that callers often lose interest once they find out that the $5 million is not an EB-5-style investment that they might recoup, but a de facto donation to the U.S. government. (As London School of Economics professor Kristin Surak points out, if you're a rich person looking to pick up another passport, why pay $5 million for a glorified green card when you can buy Maltese citizenship, and thus the right to live anywhere in the European Union, for about a fifth of the cost?) Nuri Katz, a Canada-based immigration consultant, told Bloomberg that he would expect a grand total of '50 to 200' applicants for Trump gold cards; more recently, in Forbes, he hypothesized that the White House is 'backpedaling' on the proposal because it realized it would 'have to expend a lot of political capital in order to get this done.' Perhaps there was a time when more than a handful of people might have been interested in ponying up for 'green card privileges plus,' whatever that may entail. But regardless of the legal form that Trump gold cards eventually take, the basic challenge of selling them will be that that they are branded with the face of an unabashed xenophobe whose administration is waging a global trade war, trying to bar foreign-born students and academics from entering the country, torpedoing international educational exchange programs, attempting to end birthright citizenship, and snatching noncitizens (and sometimes citizens) off the streets. Chances are that if you are privileged enough to be able to pay $5 million for the right to live in the United States, you are wise enough to decide that that money is better spent on something else. The final deadline for Fast Company's Next Big Things in Tech Awards is Friday, June 20, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer Says No Obstacles Left in Finishing US-UK Trade Deal
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said there are no 'hiccups or obstacles' remaining in the way of finalizing a trade deal with the US and indicated that an agreement would likely come soon. Starmer's comments, ahead of a summit meeting with other G-7 leaders in Canada this weekend, follow negotiations between US and UK officials in London aimed at hashing out the details of the pact he and US President Donald Trump announced last month.