logo
Why do wealthy Americans only live as long as poor people in western Europe?

Why do wealthy Americans only live as long as poor people in western Europe?

Euronews03-04-2025

ADVERTISEMENT
Poor Europeans can expect to live at least as long as rich Americans, and in some cases even longer, a new study has found.
How healthy people are and how long they live is often tied to how much money they have, with wealth boosting people's access to education, good jobs, nutritious food, and medical care.
But even the poorest people in countries like the Netherlands and France tend to live longer than wealthy Americans, according to new research published in the
New England Journal of Medicine.
The analysis included nearly 74,000 people in the US and 16 European countries who were between 50 and 85 years old in 2010, and tracked their survival through 2022.
Europeans were split into three groups: northern and western Europe (which included Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland); southern Europe (Italy, Portugal, and Spain); and eastern Europe, which spanned the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia.
Related
The gap between years lived in good health and how long we live is getting wider
Across all groups, the US death rate was 6.5 per 1,000 during the study period. That compares with rates of 2.9 in northern and western Europe, 4.9 in southern Europe, and 5.8 in eastern Europe.
The relationship between health and wealth
While there's a link between wealth and survival everywhere, the health gap between the richest and poorest was wider in the US than in any European country, the study found.
The poorest Americans had the lowest survival rates across the board, and tended to die younger than their counterparts in Europe.
But even the wealthiest Americans were worse off than many Europeans.
Wealthy Americans had lower survival rates than rich people in southern Europe – as well as everyone in northern and western Europe, regardless of how wealthy they were, the study found.
The survival rate for wealthy Americans was on par with the poorest people in northern and western Europe, and with eastern Europeans overall.
Related
Smoking a single cigarette can decrease your life expectancy by 20 minutes
'The findings are a stark reminder that even the wealthiest Americans are not shielded from the systemic issues in the US contributing to lower life expectancy,' said Irene Papanicolas, a health economist at Brown University in the US which led the study.
Americans and western Europeans tend to have more cash than their counterparts elsewhere, the researchers noted, but the relationship between wealth and health is about more than just the size of someone's bank account.
Instead, it matters how wealthy someone is compared to their fellow citizens. The wealth gap in the US is more extreme than in almost any other developed country, while it also has 'weaker social structures' and limited healthcare access, according to the study.
This could help explain why the mortality gap is greater between wealthy and poor Americans, and why the poorest people in the US have lower survival rates than the poorest people in Europe, the researchers said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Related
Having a poor socioeconomic background could speed up biological ageing, new study finds
'Fixing health outcomes is not just a challenge for the most vulnerable – even those in the top quartile of wealth are affected,' said Sara Machado, one of the study's authors and a researcher at Brown University.
Role of social infrastructure
The study did not compare the European countries, but the better outcomes for poorer people in northern and western Europe likely reflects the strength of welfare programmes there, according to Dr Martin McKee, a professor of European public health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and former president of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA).
'This is a strong argument that a welfare state benefits everybody [including] those who would consider themselves at least middle class,' McKee, who was not involved with the study, told Euronews Health.
Across all countries, the researchers accounted for factors like gender, marital status, education level, whether someone lived in a rural or urban area, smoking status, and whether they had an existing health issue such as cancer or diabetes.
ADVERTISEMENT
Related
Why European life expectancy gains have slowed and how to boost longevity again
That helped them home in on the direct link between wealth and survival over time. But other factors that they did not measure, such as race and ethnicity, could also play a role.
They also only divided people into four groups, which could mask even more extreme results for the wealthiest and poorest people, McKee said.
'The real issue in both Europe and the US is the increasing number of people in the top 1 to 2 per cent, not only the top 25 per cent [of wealth],' McKee said, meaning the study 'probably underestimates the scale of the problem'.
Even so, the study authors said the US could look across the Atlantic if it wants to boost life expectancy and well-being for Americans across the spectrum.
ADVERTISEMENT
'If you look at other countries, there are better outcomes, and that means we can learn from them and improve,' Machado said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Robert F. Kennedy fires entire US vaccine panel, citing conflicts of interest
Robert F. Kennedy fires entire US vaccine panel, citing conflicts of interest

France 24

time44 minutes ago

  • France 24

Robert F. Kennedy fires entire US vaccine panel, citing conflicts of interest

US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday announced he was dismissing all current members of a key federal vaccine advisory panel, accusing them of conflicts of interest -- his latest salvo against the nation's immunization policies. The removal of all 17 experts of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was revealed in a Wall Street Journal op-ed and an official press release. Kennedy, who has spent two decades promoting vaccine misinformation, cast the move as essential to restoring public trust, claiming the committee had been compromised by financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. "Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda," he said in a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services. "The public must know that unbiased science -- evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest - guides the recommendations of our health agencies." In his op-ed, Kennedy claimed the panel was "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest" and had become "little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine." He added that new members were being considered to replace those ousted -- all of whom were appointed under former president Joe Biden. ACIP members are chosen for their recognized expertise and are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest. "RFK Jr. and the Trump administration are taking a wrecking ball to the programs that keep Americans safe and healthy," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said in response. "Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion," Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, a medical doctor who expressed concern about Kennedy's track record during his Senate nomination but ultimately voted in his favor, wrote on X. "I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case." 'Silencing expertise' The decision drew sharp criticism from Paul Offit, a pediatrician and leading expert on virology and immunology who served on the panel from 1998 to 2003. "He believes that anybody who speaks well of vaccines, or recommends vaccines, must be deeply in the pocket of industry," Offit told AFP. "He's fixing a problem that doesn't exist." "We are witnessing an escalating effort by the Administration to silence independent medical expertise and stoke distrust in lifesaving vaccines," added Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, in a statement. Once a celebrated environmental lawyer, Kennedy pivoted from the mid-2000s to public health -- chairing a nonprofit that discouraged routine childhood immunizations and amplified false claims, including the long-debunked theory that the Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccine causes autism. Since taking office, he has curtailed access to Covid-19 shots and continued to raise fears around the MMR vaccine -- even as the United States faces its worst measles outbreak in years, with three reported deaths and more than 1,100 confirmed cases. Experts warn the true case count is likely far higher. "How can this country have confidence that the people RFK Jr. wants on the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices are people we can trust?" Offit asked. He recalled that during US President Donald Trump 's first term, several states formed independent vaccine advisory panels after the administration pressured federal health agencies to prematurely approve Covid-19 vaccines ahead of the 2020 election. That kind of fragmentation, Offit warned, could happen again. ACIP is scheduled to hold its next meeting at the headquarters of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta from June 25 to June 27. Vaccines for anthrax, Covid-19, human papillomavirus, influenza, Lyme disease, respiratory syncytial virus, and more are on the agenda.

RFK Jr ousts entire US vaccine panel over alleged conflicts
RFK Jr ousts entire US vaccine panel over alleged conflicts

LeMonde

time5 hours ago

  • LeMonde

RFK Jr ousts entire US vaccine panel over alleged conflicts

US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday, June 9, announced he was dismissing all current members of a key federal vaccine advisory panel, accusing them of conflicts of interest − his latest salvo against the nation's immunization policies. The removal of all 17 experts of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was revealed in a Wall Street Journal op-ed and an official press release. Kennedy, who has spent two decades promoting vaccine misinformation, cast the move as essential to restoring public trust, claiming the committee had been compromised by financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. "Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda," he said in a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services. "The public must know that unbiased science − evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest − guides the recommendations of our health agencies." In his op-ed, Kennedy claimed the panel was "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest" and had become "little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine." He added that new members were being considered to replace those ousted − all of whom were appointed under former president Joe Biden. ACIP members are chosen for their recognized expertise and are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest. "RFK Jr. and the Trump administration are taking a wrecking ball to the programs that keep Americans safe and healthy," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said in response. "Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion," Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, a medical doctor who expressed concern about Kennedy's track record during his Senate nomination but ultimately voted in his favor, wrote on X. "I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case." 'Silencing expertise' The decision drew sharp criticism from Paul Offit, a pediatrician and leading expert on virology and immunology who served on the panel from 1998 to 2003. "He believes that anybody who speaks well of vaccines, or recommends vaccines, must be deeply in the pocket of industry," Offit said. "He's fixing a problem that doesn't exist." "We are witnessing an escalating effort by the Administration to silence independent medical expertise and stoke distrust in lifesaving vaccines," added Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, in a statement. Once a celebrated environmental lawyer, Kennedy pivoted from the mid-2000s to public health − chairing a nonprofit that discouraged routine childhood immunizations and amplified false claims, including the long-debunked theory that the Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccine causes autism. Since taking office, he has curtailed access to Covid-19 shots and continued to raise fears around the MMR vaccine − even as the United States faces its worst measles outbreak in years, with three reported deaths and more than 1,100 confirmed cases. Experts warn the true case count is likely far higher.

RFK Jr ousts entire US vaccine panel over alleged conflicts
RFK Jr ousts entire US vaccine panel over alleged conflicts

France 24

time6 hours ago

  • France 24

RFK Jr ousts entire US vaccine panel over alleged conflicts

The removal of all 17 experts of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) was revealed in a Wall Street Journal op-ed and an official press release. Kennedy, who has spent two decades promoting vaccine misinformation, cast the move as essential to restoring public trust, claiming the committee had been compromised by financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. "Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda," he said in a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services. "The public must know that unbiased science -- evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest — guides the recommendations of our health agencies." In his op-ed, Kennedy claimed the panel was "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest" and had become "little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine." He added that new members were being considered to replace those ousted -- all of whom were appointed under former president Joe Biden. ACIP members are chosen for their recognized expertise and are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest. "RFK Jr. and the Trump administration are taking a wrecking ball to the programs that keep Americans safe and healthy," Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said in response. "Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion," Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, a medical doctor who expressed concern about Kennedy's track record during his Senate nomination but ultimately voted in his favor, wrote on X. "I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case." 'Silencing expertise' The decision drew sharp criticism from Paul Offit, a pediatrician and leading expert on virology and immunology who served on the panel from 1998 to 2003. "He believes that anybody who speaks well of vaccines, or recommends vaccines, must be deeply in the pocket of industry," Offit told AFP. "He's fixing a problem that doesn't exist." "We are witnessing an escalating effort by the Administration to silence independent medical expertise and stoke distrust in lifesaving vaccines," added Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, in a statement. Once a celebrated environmental lawyer, Kennedy pivoted from the mid-2000s to public health -- chairing a nonprofit that discouraged routine childhood immunizations and amplified false claims, including the long-debunked theory that the Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccine causes autism. Since taking office, he has curtailed access to Covid-19 shots and continued to raise fears around the MMR vaccine -- even as the United States faces its worst measles outbreak in years, with three reported deaths and more than 1,100 confirmed cases. Experts warn the true case count is likely far higher. "How can this country have confidence that the people RFK Jr. wants on the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices are people we can trust?" Offit asked. He recalled that during US President Donald Trump's first term, several states formed independent vaccine advisory panels after the administration pressured federal health agencies to prematurely approve Covid-19 vaccines ahead of the 2020 election. That kind of fragmentation, Offit warned, could happen again. ACIP is scheduled to hold its next meeting at the headquarters of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta from June 25 to June 27.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store