‘We're all dreading April' say pubs and salons ahead of business rates rise
Hospitality firms and salon owners have said they are being 'overloaded with extra costs' ahead of a rise in business rates in April.
In Wednesday's spring statement, Chancellor Rachel Reeves made no change to a pencilled jump in how much firms will pay in rates.
Rox Marjoram, who co-owns five pubs and a restaurant in Suffolk, told the PA news agency her rates bill is set to skyrocket from £33,000 a year to £80,000 a year.
'We're all dreading April this year. That's such a shame,' she said.
'We're being squeezed and squeezed, and that's going to make things really difficult… Doors will close across the country.'
The tax, which applies for businesses operating out of physical premises, was previously cushioned during the pandemic, but a 75% relief will fall to 40% in April.
The Government has said it will reform the current business rates system, and on Wednesday said it will publish an interim report on this during the summer.
But no details of the proposed changes are set to be announced until the next autumn Budget later this year.
Ms Marjoram said she is 'pleased' about proposals for rates reform, but that until that happens it is just another rising tax for small business owners.
It comes on top of an increase in company National Insurance Contributions (NICs) which is also set to take effect next month, as well as a rise in the minimum wage.
On Labour's promises to grow the economy, Ms Marjoram said: 'I don't think anyone in hospitality feels like there's much hope for growth at the moment… We're being overloaded with extra costs.'
Meanwhile, salon owner Toby Dicker said the sector faces a 'staggering' tax bill from April, with the rates increase combined with other measures set to disproportionately harm small businesses.
For his own business of five salons in the South East, the rates bill is set to go up by about 2.4 times what it was before to £50,000, he told PA.
'The high street is going to be a bloodbath for the next six months,' he said.
He added that the Government promising to permanently reduce rates is 'patently ludicrous' when the tax bill is set to rise.
Mr Dicker, who is the founder of industry group the Salon Employers Association, has also campaigned to reduce VAT on labour costs from 20% to 10% in the spring statement.
The British Hair Consortium (BHC) recently said the tax disproportionately hits salons, because the work they do is labour intensive compared to selling products.
As a result, they have less opportunity to claim back the costs.
A report earlier in March said the industry faces a 93% employment decline by 2030 without reform, and that there would be no new apprenticeships by 2027.
Ms Reeves made no changes to the VAT on labour costs in the statement.
Mr Dicker said the industry is being 'destroyed' by the tax, and said the Government needs to 'level the playing field' to stop a wave of salon closures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
23 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Canada agrees to ratify Britain's accession to major trans-Pacific trade pact
Ottawa will seek to introduce legislation to its parliament this autumn to approve Britain's entry to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The UK joined the bloc in 2024, but Canada is yet to formally endorse its membership – meaning British exports to the country are not covered by the reduction in tariffs outlined in the pact. Following a bilateral meeting between the Prime Minister and his Canadian counterpart in Ottawa's Parliament Hill on Sunday, Downing Street said the move would bring 'huge benefits' to UK businesses. Ahead of the @G7, Prime Minister @Keir_Starmer and I are meeting in Ottawa to discuss how Canada and the United Kingdom can work more closely together — to expand trade, create more opportunities for our workers and businesses, and strengthen transatlantic security. — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) June 15, 2025 The two leaders will also look to work through sticking points in a rollover British-Canadian trade deal after negotiations were suspended under the previous Tory government amid disputes over beef and cheese. Number 10 said a 'joint taskforce' would be set up to 'turbocharge progress on other areas of mutual benefit, including technology and artificial intelligence – in support of shared growth and our national security'. 'The taskforce will also look to make progress on the wider UK-Canada Free Trade Agreement,' Downing Street said. Mr Carney's office said they had also agreed on a partnership to strengthen collaboration on AI safety between the Canadian AI Safety Institute and the UK AI Security Institute. UK-Canada trade talks snagged before the election last year amid concerns among Canadian farmers over a UK ban on hormone-treated beef and import levies hiked on British cheese. But Downing Street said on Sunday that the Government's 'red lines' on food standards, which remain in place under its recently-agreed trade deal with the US, would not shift. The Government has reached economic agreements with India, the US and the EU in recent months and is looking to pursue further deals with other allies to mitigate the threat of Donald Trump's tariffs. The talks between Sir Keir and Mr Carney, which followed a private dinner on Saturday evening and a pint in an Ottawa pub where the pair watched a game of ice hockey, are a clear show of support from the UK premier ahead of the G7 summit in Kananaskis next week. Fantastic to find a British pint in Ottawa. Meeting Brits abroad, while delivering for people back home. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 15, 2025 The Prime Minister will be walking a diplomatic tightrope in the coming days as he seeks to strengthen bilateral relations with Canada while keeping the US president, who has repeatedly threatened to annex the country, on side. In warm words at the top of Sunday's meeting, Sir Keir appeared to issue a veiled challenge to Mr Trump's call to turn the nation into a '51st state'. 'For years, we've worked together as Commonwealth members, as independent, democratic sovereign countries, working alongside each other on issues of security, defence, trade, the economy, you name it,' he said. 'We think alike, we work alike, and I think that's not just a reflection on the past. I think it is very much needed in the here and now and how I think we can forge our future together as we go forward.' Mr Carney said the UK and Canada shared a 'foundation of prosperity' which would be built on in the future, including through developments in AI. 'It is a great pleasure, and I think entirely appropriate that my first official bilateral in Canada with a head of government is with Prime Minister Starmer,' he said. 'Canada and the United Kingdom, of course, share history – we share values, we share governance. 'We are a parliament inspired by the Westminster tradition, but it's much, much more than a heritage. 'This is a foundation of prosperity for all our citizens going forward, and a prosperity based on those shared values, expressed through the future – artificial intelligence, critical minerals, new partnerships in security and defence, but all in pursuit of sustainable prosperity for our citizens. 'And if I may, just on a personal level, I've learned a lot from the Prime Minister over the years. I'm a great admirer of his and the values that he's bringing to bear, to his government and… internationally.' Prime Minister of Canada Mark Carney (PA) Sir Keir will fly from Ottawa to Kananaskis in the Canadian mountains for talks with counterparts from the world's leading economies. Spiralling conflict in the Middle East and the war in Ukraine will be top of the agenda in the talks between the UK, Canada, the US, France, Italy, Japan and Germany. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is also expected to attend. Number 10 said the Prime Minister would use the trip to urge 'restraint and de-escalation' after Iran launched retaliatory strikes on Israel overnight. 'In these dangerous times, I am determined to forge a unique path to secure and renew Britain in an era of global instability,' he said. Sir Keir is also expected to meet Mr Trump, with whom he said he is in the 'final stages' of completing a US-UK trade deal, at the G7 summit. The Prime Minister told reporters on Saturday he had a 'good relationship' with the US president and 'that's important'. 'I've been saying, for probably the best part of six months now, we're in a new era of defence and security, a new era for trade and the economy,' he said. 'And I think it's really important for Britain to play a leading part in that, and that's what I'll be doing at the G7, talking to all of our partners in a constructive way. 'And I'm very pleased that I have developed good relations with all the G7 leaders to the point where… I have a very good relations with all of them.'
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Disability benefit isn't 'disposable income', says reader
Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Claire (MetroTalk, Thu) says the 'problem' working people have is that those on benefits have more disposable income than them. It's a fact that many disabled people have extra living costs. Many also have to supplement housing benefit payments out of their own pocket. Many more disability benefit claimants would rather work but are unable to find jobs that offer the flexibility those with fluctuating conditions require in order to make work a reality. Many of the myths about disabled benefit claimants are born of falsehoods fuelled by a downgrading of the sick and disabled, which has become prevalent in recent decades. This is hardly surprising when they're often described as a burden to the welfare state. James, Stockport Claire's view is entirely misguided. People on only universal credit have no disposable income despite (variable) allowances on council tax etc. The extra money disabled people get is to cover foreseen and unforeseen costs related to their disability and, anyway, it isn't a fortune. The disabled and unemployed are not your enemy. It's the tax cheats and uber-wealthy millionaires and billionaires funnelling their resources towards themselves who are. Deon, Barnet Of course Sir Keir Starmer is right to restore winter fuel payments to all but the wealthiest pensioners (MetroTalk, Thu) – but for political reasons. Reasonably well-off pensioners managed to get through winter without the payment but they made Labour pay at the ballot box. Pensioners make up around a quarter of the electorate and they always turn out to vote. Taking hundreds of pounds from them was always political suicide. Mess about with pensioners, find out at the election. It's a shame Sir Keir had to be reminded of this. John, Glasgow P Wright from Solihull (MetroTalk, Thu) argues that being willing to change your mind is a good thing, asking how many lives could have been saved if the British Army had done so on the first day of The Somme. His analogy is unconvincing. The fact that this 'progressive' administration did not know or care that large numbers of elderly people do not have access to generously funded workplace pensions shows how politically naive it is. The economy has barely improved since the payments were axed to all but those on pension credit so there is no financial argument to be made for reversing the cut. It is an obvious political ploy to slow the rise of Nigel Farage's Reform and has made no difference to political polling. Chris Shepherd, London Mick (MetroTalk, Thu) suggests Benjamin Netanyahu and his cabinet should watch a video of 'Israeli atrocities'. He was responding to Greta Thunberg being asked to watch a video of those carried out by Hamas on its October 7 attacks in 2023 that killed 1,200. The environmental activist and her colleagues had been detained trying to break the aid blockade on Gaza. The video they reportedly wanted to show Greta was of all the atrocities Hamas intentionally perpetrated against civilians – kidnap, rape and murder. Israel is fighting a war she did not start or want and all civilian deaths in Gaza are a tragedy. However they have been caused by Hamas using its civilians as human shields – hiding in schools, mosques and hospitals. Daniel, Milan It is a pity Greta Thunberg did not watch the video. It may have helped her to see it is Israel that needs aid for its survival. William, Bromley Further to the government allocating £16.7billon for nuclear power projects. More Trending Nuclear power won't make us self-sufficient in energy because it relies on uranium, which has to be imported. Around 50 per cent of the world's uranium comes from Russia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Then there is the problem of radioactive waste. The facility at Sellafield is leaking waste into the ground and is expected to do so until 2050. The vast sums that building nuclear reactors will cost would be far better spent on wave power. Roger Smith, Witham MORE: Partner of mum, 48, killed in skydive accident saw her fall to her death MORE: Three ways latest Middle East crisis could make life more expensive in the UK MORE: Emotional Jessie J vows to 'beat breast cancer' in final performance before surgery
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labour needs to make its priorities clear to everyone
Martin Kettle quotes a former Whitehall mandarin saying that 'the government has still not made clear what kind of Britain it is trying to create' (Rachel Reeves seized her moment – whatever the future brings, Labour's economic course is now set, 12 June). He has a point, not wholly answered by Rachel Reeves. It's the vision thing, and the ability to communicate it. It's about describing what Labour is for, in a general sense, beyond a list of policy deliverables. Growth is important, but only as a means, not an end. 'Securonomics' is interesting, but has no public resonance. If people are now unsure what Labour stands for, it is because the task of ideological self-definition has been neglected. This is unlike 1997, which was preceded by a process of rethinking that produced New Labour and the 'third way'. Something similar is needed now. There is a rich tradition of social democratic thinking in Britain to draw on, including RH Tawney's argument for equal access to what he called 'the means of civilisation' as the basis for a common culture. Pragmatism is valuable, but it is not enough. An argument should be constructed around the three pillars of security, opportunity and community that would pull together all that the government is trying to do, and the kind of Britain it wants to create. And in a way that people might WrightLabour MP, 1992-2010 I agree with Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah that the focus on investment alone will not work (Has Rachel Reeves made the right choices? Our panel responds to the spending review, 11 June). New public investments are pointless if the operation and maintenance of what already exists isn't adequately funded. After years of austerity, the quickest and surest way to raise GDP and improve public services is to ensure that we realise the full potential of what we already have. The highest priority should be to relieve the financial pressure on those delivering services, especially our severely cash-strapped local authorities. This will deliver more broad-based and higher economic growth quickly, in contrast to the central allocation of investment funds to mega-projects that will take decades to deliver results. Entrepreneurs want to live and invest in safe areas with good health and education, well maintained roads and pleasant amenities. Properly funded local authorities can encourage higher private investment by delivering that. Unfortunately, they are instead expected to implement an expensive and disruptive reorganisation and find the money to pay higher minimum wages and national insurance while receiving a settlement that implies a real-terms cut in funding. Labour needs to think FosterChelmsford According to Rachel Reeves, the NHS has been 'protected' and will receive 'a 3% rise in its budget' (Spending review 2025: who are the winners and losers?, 11 June). But will it in practice? In a recent meeting with the chief executive of the Nottingham University hospitals trust, he told us that he had been instructed to make £97m of cuts in this financial year. This would mean leading to the loss of about 750 jobs and the closure of some wards. Further, these massive cuts are the trust's contribution to the even bigger ones imposed on the integrated care board for our county: a £280m reduction in the provision for all local health services. So, which is it really, protection and a 3% rise, or enormous cuts?Mike ScottChair, Nottingham & Notts Keep Our NHS Public Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
