
The GB News rejects trying to conquer YouTube
After being sacked from GB News in what he branded 'one of the biggest MSM [mainstream media] beat-ups in history', Dan Wootton soon found a new home for his tirades: YouTube.
'We are increasingly becoming an authoritarian state where dissident voices are taken down by wholesale abuses of the political and legal system,' he declared in the first episode of his Outspoken show last year.
Wootton, who claims his daily broadcast provides news and opinion with 'no spin, no bias and no censorship', is not alone in moving to the platform. He has been joined by a number of other former GB News presenters – as well as a wider group of alt-Right figures – attempting to wield power over Britain's Right through their own media ventures.
It is a tactic that has enjoyed remarkable success in Trump's America. But as UK news outlets move ever further into opinion-led programming and maintain their hold over audiences, can this new breed of influencers repeat the trick here?
Wootton, a New Zealand-born former senior editor at The Sun, now has more than 334,000 subscribers on his YouTube channel, which is sponsored by anti-ageing supplements and an underwear brand. He also clips up excerpts of his show on TikTok.
He is currently embroiled in a High Court case over allegations that he 'catfished' a former colleague and tricked them into sending explicit images by pretending to be a woman.
Other GB News figures have followed suit.
Laurence Fox and Calvin Robinson, who were also ousted from the broadcaster in the wake of sexist remarks made by Fox on Wootton's show, have established YouTube channel Reclaim The Media, which they describe as an 'antidote to our biased MSM'.
After being ejected from the airwaves, these figures have joined a small but vocal group of online influencers attempting to influence Right-wing British politics.
Carl Benjamin, who also uses the pseudonym Sargon of Akkad, has been a prominent figure on YouTube in recent years and in 2020 set up Lotus Eaters, which now hosts Robinson's Common Sense Crusade show.
Triggernometry, a self-proclaimed free speech channel set up by comedians Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster, has racked up more than 1.3m subscribers, while more recently Reform has been attempting to boost its youth support base through 22-year-old activist and TikTok influencer Nicholas Lissack.
In many ways, the shift online is a facsimile of the step change in US media, where the alt-Right has gained ground since Donald Trump's first administration. This has only accelerated with his second term in office as close ally Elon Musk has used his ownership of X to turn the social media platform into a Maga mouthpiece.
Podcasters such as Joe Rogan played a crucial role in determining the outcome of the 2024 election, particularly by harnessing the support of young men.
The influence exerted by these figures is now such that Tim Pool, a pro-Trump podcaster accused of taking money from Russia to promote Kremlin propaganda, was this week granted a question at a White House press briefing, even as established outlets such as the Associated Press have been excluded.
Would-be British influencers are now trying to mimic the trend as they capitalise on what they view as dwindling trust in conventional media outlets.
'The appeal is the same as you're seeing in the US. It's this distrust of traditional media amongst a particular group of people,' says Nic Newman, at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
'And now the ability to listen to somebody who you identify with, whose view you share and is representing things that previously wouldn't have been seen on mainstream TV.'
There are other motivations for moving online as audiences increasingly ditch traditional TV. Piers Morgan last year quit Rupert Murdoch's TalkTV to pursue his own show on YouTube, describing his nightly broadcast slot as a 'straitjacket'.
But for the GB News rejects and other alt-Right figures, the move to social media reflects a desire to exert influence over the political right with viewpoints that would not be allowed on regulated broadcast TV.
Wootton, who was also sacked as a columnist by the Daily Mail, frequently launches personal attacks on Sir Keir Starmer and his wife. He has criticised Farage's 'tack to the centre', suggesting he should take a harder line on Islam, and called for 'some kind of union' on the Right.
On Reclaim The Media, Fox and Robinson similarly accused Farage of trying to 'appease' Islam, while branding the Reform leader the 'wokest politician in Westminster'.
In a monologue on Triggernometry this week, Kisin branded the trans debate 'quite possibly the most insane manifestation of woke ideology we've seen'.
Former prime minister Liz Truss, meanwhile, has gone further, announcing plans to launch her own social media platform, claiming that the mainstream media and 'deep state' were stifling free speech.
But while the proliferation of online media and influencers undoubtedly helped to catapult Trump into the White House, can these fringe figures exert as much influence in Britain?
Media analyst Alex DeGroote points out that these UK personalities have a 'comparatively tiny' following compared to the likes of Joe Rogan, who has almost 20m subscribers on YouTube and pulls in 50m listeners per episode to his podcast.
'Their guests are a lot less high profile than Rogan, and he has also had the sponsorship of Spotify,' DeGroote adds.
Research by the Reuters Institute last year revealed that established media brands such as the BBC and Sky still gain the most attention on social media in the UK and are more likely to be challenged on YouTube and TikTok by smaller upstarts like PoliticsJoe and LadBible than by influencers or personalities.
Among individuals, the two most frequently mentioned accounts last year were those of LBC's James O'Brien and ITV political editor Robert Peston, suggesting that Britons still gravitate towards journalists at traditional media outlets.
This trend underscores the continued power of Britain's public service broadcasting system. The latest industry survey by Ofcom showed that, while in decline, BBC One remains the country's most popular individual news source.
At the same time, commercial outlets such as GB News and LBC have expanded further into opinion-led programming, while podcasts including The News Agents and The Rest is Politics have scooped up large audiences seeking news and current affairs in a less staid format.
'I think we're definitely seeing the same trends towards personality-led opinion because it's cheap and the algorithms really support it,' says Newman of the Reuters Institute. 'But it's just happening to a much smaller extent here because the news brands are much stronger.'
There are cultural differences, too. In the US, many of these social media influencers are effectively cheerleaders for Trump.
In Britain, by contrast, this new breed of alt-Right influencers espouse an incoherent array of beliefs, united by little beyond a tendency towards anti-government and anti-establishment viewpoints.
Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the tides are shifting. Having been the main source for news since the 1960s, TV has now been dethroned as Britons are just as likely to access information through online news sites and apps. And with a younger generation brought up on social media, this trend seems likely to continue.
As a result, DeGroote argues that there is room in the UK media landscape for Right-wing personalities to escape their current niche and break out into the mainstream.
'The Rest is Politics and The News Agents are successful podcasts and clearly partisan on the Left wing,' he says. 'There is a gap in the market, but the offerings need to be more muscular to attract younger guys.'
To date, UK politics has not suffered the same levels of polarisation as across the pond. But as debate rages on in key political battlegrounds such as immigration and trans rights, Britain's new breed of alt-Right influencers show no sign of quietening down.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump pulling US personnel from Middle East amid rising tensions with Iran
Donald Trump said he was withdrawing some of the American personnel deployed in the Middle East because it could be a 'dangerous place' amid rising tensions. The State Department said it had ordered the departure of all non-essential personnel and their dependents from its embassy in Baghdad. Simultaneously, a US official said, defence secretary Pete Hegseth had authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents from countries across the region, including Bahrain and Kuwait. American soldiers in the region were not affected by this order, however. The decision comes amid heightened tensions as Mr Trump's push to reach a deal with Iran to halt its nuclear programme is deadlocked and intelligence suggests Israel is making preparations for a strike against Tehran's nuclear facilities. 'They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens,' Mr Trump told reporters on Wednesday. 'We've given notice to move out.' Asked if anything could be done to de-escalate tensions in the region, particularly with Iran, the president said: 'They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple – they can't have a nuclear weapon.' News of the Baghdad evacuation drove oil prices up by more than 4 per cent. Oil futures climbed $3, with Brent crude futures at $69.18 a barrel. The US maintains a military presence across the oil-rich region, with bases in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the UAE. A US official told Reuters that the State Department was 'set to have an ordered departure for the embassy in Baghdad'. 'The intent is to do it through commercial means, but the US military is standing by if help is requested,' the officials said. Iraq 's state news agency reported, citing a government official, that Baghdad hadn't recorded any security indication warranting an evacuation. Sources in Iraqi and US governments did not explain what security risks had prompted the decision, although heightened tensions with Iran were widely speculated to be a reason. The sixth round of nuclear talks between Iran and the US is scheduled to happen over the weekend in Oman, with Tehran expected to hand over a counterproposal after rejecting an offer by Washington. Iran says it does not plan to build a nuclear weapon and is only interested in peaceful use of its nuclear programme. The US, though, wants Tehran to stop uranium enrichment entirely. Speaking on the Pod Force One podcast on Monday, Mr Trump said he was growing 'less confident' about getting a deal with Iran. It wasn't clear, he said, that Tehran would accept the key US demand to stop enriching uranium. 'I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more – less confident about it,' the president said. Iranian defence minister Amir Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that 'the situation may escalate into conflict' if negotiations with the US failed. 'If a conflict is imposed on us,' he warned on Wednesday, 'all US bases are within our reach, and we will boldly target them in host countries'. Tensions in the Middle East are also rising due to Israel 's war on Gaza. Israel and Iran exchanged fire twice last year – the first direct attacks between the region's most entrenched enemies – with missiles and war drones hurtling across Iraqi airspace. Strategic experts and former officials said Israel could consider taking matters into its own hands if nuclear talks with the US didn't yield a favourable outcome. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly warned that a flawed agreement would be more dangerous than no deal at all. Mr Trump recently revealed he had cautioned Mr Netanyahu against taking unilateral action, such as a military strike, which could jeopardise the ongoing negotiations with Tehran.


Daily Record
17 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump booed by theatre as he takes seat for opening night of Les Misérables
Some cast members threatened to pull out of Wednesday night's gig at the John F Kennedy Centre for Performing Arts in Washington DC. Grainy footage has captured the moment theatregoers boo and heckle Donald Trump as he takes his seat in the Presidential box for the opening night of Les Misérables. Some cast members threatened to pull out of Wednesday night's gig at the John F Kennedy Centre for Performing Arts in Washington DC because they were aware the President was due to attend. Trump enraged performers and patrons at the venue when he announced huge changes to its programming earlier this year - having controversially been elected chairman, The Mirror reports. Controversial plans included a cut on what he called "woke" productions, such as drag acts. Mr Trump and wife Melania felt the fury of the crowd as they took their seats ahead of Les Mis. It was his first time at the venue, the national cultural centre of the US, since becoming President again - and since the massive overhaul of its output. Some punters voted with their feet with empty seats spotted in the balconies and even in the orchestra section, amidst talk that patrons intended to boycott the performance. It is understood understudies filled in for main performers, who also had decided to boycott the night due to Mr Trump's presence. The Mirror is working to confirm if this was the case - and how many cast members dropped out. Sales of subscription packages are said to have declined since Mr Trump's takeover, and several touring productions, including Hamilton, have cancelled planned runs at the centre. Actor Issa Rae and musician Rhiannon Giddens scrapped scheduled appearances, and Kennedy Center consultants, including musician Ben Folds and singer Renée Fleming, resigned. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Yet, Mr Trump remained proud as, clad in a tuxedo, he sat for the performance on Wednesday. The politician has a particular affection for Les Misérables, the sprawling musical set in 19th-century France, and has occasionally played its songs at his events. One of them, Do You Hear the People Sing?, is a revolutionary rallying cry inspired by the 1832 rebellion against the French king. Vice President JD Vance and his wife, Usha, were also there. Ric Grenell, the Trump-appointed interim leader of the Kennedy Center, stood nearby as the President spoke to reporters. Attorney General Pam Bondi chatted with other guests. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr took selfies with attendees. But the MAGA takeover was met with heckles in the auditorium itself. People on X also shared the irony Mr Trump chose to see a performance about a mass uprising against a tyrannical king. Images on X show audience members dressed in drag, a nid to Mr Trump's criticism the venue put on drag shows before his takeover. However, some reports suggest a minority in the audience cheered the President's arrival. When reporters told Mr Trump it was expected some cast members had pulled out due to his presence, the nonchalant world leader said:"I couldn't care less."
.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is Trump's America in the middle of a coup?
In conducting a coup in an impoverished undeveloped nation there is a basic to-do list. You capture the presidency, the courts, take over the international airport, emasculate the legislature, decapitate the military of potential opponents, storm the local TV station and declare a new dawn. Bigger countries require more effort, like the mass mobilization of xenophobia through false-flag attacks and terror scares, but from Moscow to Monrovia, the patterns are the same – an autocrat takes power in the name of national salvation. With Donald Trump in power for a little over four months, questions are swirling as to whether this process is happening to what was the most powerful democracy on earth. When he refused to accept he lost the 2020 elections and his supporters stormed the Capital, and later jailed, he pardoned them all. Now America's constitution is again under threat of what many critics are calling an internal coup d'etat. Driven, perhaps, because the president has openly considered a Trump 2028 campaign for a third, unconstitutional, term. While he was duly elected to his office for a second time last November, every check and balance to the power of the US presidency as enumerated in the Constitution has been, or is being, challenged.— a notion only heightened by the drumbeat of declarations from White House insiders of an 'insurrection' in Los Angeles. As protestors took to the streets against the mass arrest of alleged illegal immigrants, Trump lost little time in ordering 700 US Marines and thousands of National Guard onto the streets of Los Angeles. Californian governor Gavin Newsom described the move as 'deranged' which would only serve to inflame tensions on the west coast. The governor declared: 'Democracy is under assault. The moment we feared has arrived. 'Take time. Reflect on this perilous moment a president, bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American traditions.' His words came only hours after Trump warned anyone contemplating protesting during his military parade on June 14 that they would be met with 'very heavy force'. Trump's to-do list in taking on - and taking down - the establishment has already been largely ticked off. First he moved against the military and intelligence services whom, during his first presidency, he blamed for holding back his agenda and for failing to back the 'protestors' who invaded the US Capital on January 6 2021. Mark Milley, chairman of the joint chief of staff during Trump 1.0, lost his security detail and the pre-emptive pardon he'd been given by outgoing president Joe Biden after he was threatened with prosecution by Trump. Trump then fired his successor Airforce general Charles Brown, and the head of the US Coastguards Linda Fagan. They were axed, the administration suggested, because they were DEI hires. Nothing in their backgrounds indicates they were anything but qualified for the top jobs, but the messaging was clear from the White House – we want our own people. But they must be loyal above all – so General Timothy Haugh, the head of the National Security Agency and US Cyber Command, has also gone along with the head of Naval operations admiral Lisa Franchetti. No reason was given for Haugh's dismissal in April. Trump told reporters on Air Force One at the time: 'We're always going to let go of people – people we don't like or people that take advantage of, or people that may have loyalties to someone else.' Moving on, the FBI boss Christopher Wray was replaced with Kash Patel, an avid Trump loyalist who has failed to produce a budget for his agency this year. The new deputy director Dan Bongino is a podcaster who peddled the lie that Trump won the 2020 presidential election. The director of National Intelligence is now Tulsi Gabbard, who has been an apologist for Vladimir Putin and Syria's Bashar al Assad. Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News contributor, is secretary of defence and famed for his attacks on Volodymyr Zelensky, Nato, and for using his personal phone to transmit state secrets. Incompetence among cabinet members and top officials means that Trump knows they owe their place in his orbit to him alone. Each of these leaders have purged their own departments and replaced professionals with apparatchiks. The federal bureaucracy has been hammered by Trump's re-definition of more than 50,000 civil servants and 'political hires', allowing for him to impose pre-vetted loyalists in the executive heart of the government. Opposition to a coup will often come from the judiciary and universities. Trump has moved to stifle both. Top academies like Harvard and Colombia have been threatened with or have lost federal funding worth billions for pushing back at Trump's attempts to control their intellectual life. Foreign students are being banned. Students and academics who have supported Palestinian rights have been accused of backing terror groups like Hamas and fired, expelled or deported. The issue here is focussed on Israel and alleged antisemitism but again, the message is clear – free speech is over. Of course, none of this could have been achieved without the active support of the US Congress and Senate which is supposed to check the worst of executive power. But with Republican majorities in both, Trump has been given a free reign. And Republicans who do not subscribe to Trump's vision in Congress are often living in fear of criticising him. Standout Republican opponent Alaskan Senator Lisa Murkowski said during a townhall last month: 'We're in a time and a place where I certainly have not been here before. I'm oftentimes very anxious myself about using my voice because retaliation is real… 'I have to figure out how to help the many and the anxious who are so afraid [in Congress]'. Many academics from Africa in particular, who have lived through civil wars for the last 30 years, have wondered how long it would be before Americans realized they could be living through their own form of coup. A professor at a prestigious east coast university who has a green card and is world renowned in their field said: 'I'm just wary about being quoted. We (academics non-nationals) have even been told not to leave the US in case we can't get back in. The administration is monitoring our social media accounts'. Speaking anonymously for fear of retribution they went on: 'Those of us who have grown up under authoritarian regimes have learned of the signs of incipient and growing authoritarianism. None of this is rocket science. 'There is a method: the control of the press and judiciary, co-option of the loyalty of the police and the army, rise of militias, manipulation of elections. Trump discredited the mainstream media, stacked the judiciary… He demanded the loyalty of the FBI.' America's judiciary has had patchy success in getting the administration to observe the constitution that the president, military, and intelligence services have sworn to uphold too. Trump's White House has ignored orders to stay deportations. In May, over 130 former state and federal judges demanded the government drop its charges against Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, dubbing her indictment for allegedly helping man evade immigration officials as an 'egregious overreach' by the executive branch. But ICE immigration officials have spread across the country arresting suspects without showing identification, frequently without warrants, and using force to impose meet Trump's mass deportation promises. This week, Trump has been concerned with the manufactured notion of an 'insurrection' in California. A conflict between protestors and the armed forces on the streets of LA could be the excuse any autocrat would use to declare a national emergency, and suspend constitutional law. 'The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends,' said Robert Bonta, California's attorney general after announcing that the state, led by Mr Newsom, was going to sue the Trump administration for violating the US Constitution. 'Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the president's authority under the law – and not one we take lightly. We're asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order.' With decades of experience in West Africa and having published widely on the war that tore Yugoslavia apart, the anonymous east coast professor added a dire warning: 'I think, eventually, a state will consider seceding. Maybe California. Then it will be war, I think Yugoslavia is a good model for the US'.