logo

Trump Tower Damascus? Syria seeks to charm US president for sanctions relief

Zawya12-05-2025

DAMASCUS/WASHINGTON: A Trump Tower in Damascus, a detente with Israel and U.S. access to Syria's oil and gas are part of Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa's strategic pitch to try to get face time with U.S. President Donald Trump during his trip to the Middle East, according to several sources familiar with the push to woo Washington.
Jonathan Bass, an American pro-Trump activist, who on April 30 met Sharaa for four hours in Damascus, along with Syrian activists and Gulf Arab states has been trying to arrange a landmark - if highly unlikely - meeting between the two leaders this week on the sidelines of Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
Syria has struggled to implement conditions set out by Washington for relief from U.S. sanctions, which keep the country cut off from the global financial system and make economic recovery extremely challenging after 14 years of grinding war.
Bass hopes that getting Trump into a room with Sharaa, who still remains a U.S-designated terrorist over his al-Qaeda past, could help soften the Republican President and his administration's thinking on Damascus and cool an increasingly tense relationship between Syria and Israel.
Part of the bet for the effort is based on Trump's history of breaking with longstanding U.S. foreign policy taboos, such as when he met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea in 2019.
"Sharaa wants a business deal for the future of his country," Bass said, noting it could cover energy exploitation, cooperation against Iran and engagement with Israel.
"He told me he wants a Trump Tower in Damascus. He wants peace with his neighbours. What he told me is good for the region, good for Israel," said Bass.
Sharaa also shared what he saw as a personal connection with Trump: both have been shot at, narrowly surviving attempts on their lives, Bass said.
Syrian officials and a presidency media official did not respond to a request for comment.
Sharaa spoke with Saudi Arabia's de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Sunday, according to the Syrian presidency.
A person close to Sharaa said afterwards a Trump-Sharaa meeting remained possible in Saudi Arabia, but would not confirm whether Sharaa had received an invitation.
"Whether or not the meeting takes place won't be known until the last moment," the person said.
'PUSH UNDERWAY'
To be clear, a Trump-Sharaa meeting during the U.S. president's visit to the region is widely seen as unlikely, given Trump's packed schedule, his priorities and lack of consensus within Trump's team on how to tackle Syria.
A source familiar with ongoing efforts said a high-level Syria-U.S. meeting was set to take place in the region during the week of Trump's visit, but that it would not be between Trump and Sharaa.
"There is definitely a push underway," said Charles Lister, head of the Syria Initiative at the Middle East Institute.
"The idea is that getting to Trump directly is the best avenue because there are just too many ideologues within the administration to get past."
Washington is yet to formulate and articulate a coherent Syria policy, but the administration has increasingly been viewing relations with Damascus from a perspective of counterterrorism, three sources including a U.S. official familiar with the policy-making said.
That approach was illustrated by the make-up of the U.S. delegation in a meeting last month between Washington and Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani in New York, which included a senior counterterrorism official from the State Department, two of the sources said.
U.S. officials conveyed to Shibani that Washington found steps taken by Damascus to be insufficient, particularly on the U.S. demand to remove foreign fighters from senior posts in the army and expel as many of them as possible, the sources said.
The U.S. Treasury has since conveyed its own demands on the Syrian government, bringing the number of conditions to more than a dozen, one of the sources said.
The U.S. State Department declined to disclose who attended the meeting from the U.S. side and said it does not comment on private diplomatic discussions.
White House National Security Council spokesperson James Hewitt said the actions of Syria's interim authorities would determine the future U.S. support or possible sanctions relief.
'OLIVE BRANCH'
A key aim of Syria's overtures to Washington is communicating that it poses no threat to Israel, which has escalated airstrikes in Syria since the country's rebels-turned rulers ousted former strongman Bashar al-Assad last year.
Israel's ground forces have occupied territory in southwestern Syria while the government has lobbied the U.S. to keep Syria decentralised and isolated.
Israel has said it aims to protect Syrian minority groups. Syria has rejected the strikes as escalatory.
Sharaa last week confirmed indirect negotiations with Israel aimed at calming tensions, after Reuters reported that such talks had occurred via the UAE.
In a separate effort, Bass said Sharaa told him to pass messages between Syria and Israel that may have led to a direct meeting between Israeli and Syrian officials.
But Israel soon resumed strikes, including one near the presidential palace, which it framed as a message to Syria's rulers to protect the country's Druze minority amid clashes with Sunni militants.
"Sharaa sent the Israelis an olive branch. Israel sent missiles," Bass said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli attack on Iran echoes bombings in Iraq and Syria decades ago
Israeli attack on Iran echoes bombings in Iraq and Syria decades ago

The National

time21 minutes ago

  • The National

Israeli attack on Iran echoes bombings in Iraq and Syria decades ago

Once again, the skies of the Middle East bore witness to a familiar doctrine: Israel 's decades-long strategy of pre-emptive attacks designed to cripple its regional foes' nuclear ambitions, which it sees as existential threats. What came to be known as the 'Begin Doctrine' was established in 1981 when Israeli warplanes pierced Iraqi air space and flattened the unfinished Osirak nuclear reactor south-east of Baghdad. Then in 2007, Israel hit a suspected nuclear reactor in Syria. At dawn on Friday, Israeli fighter jets stunned the world again in a provocative cross-border raid on Iran, unleashing a wave of strikes against dozens of targets, including nuclear facilities and military command centres. These strikes also killed senior figures, among them the armed forces chief and top nuclear scientists. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned Israel it faced a 'bitter and painful' fate over the attacks, while the Iranian military said there were 'no limits' to its response. Israel's military later said Iran launched around 100 drones in retaliation, which air defences intercepted outside Israeli territory. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel struck at the 'heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme', taking aim at the atomic facility in Natanz and nuclear scientists. Mr Netanyahu said the strikes would 'continue as many days as it takes', while the military said intelligence showed Iran was approaching the 'point of no return' on its nuclear programme. The previous attacks in Iraq and Syria were executed with surgical precision. Dubbed Operation Opera, the raid in Iraq was a watershed moment. Saddam Hussein 's power was increasing and Israel feared his nuclear ambition would shift the balance of power in the region. Similarly, Israel launched Operation Orchard against the nuclear facility in Syria in 2007, which was far more secretive. At that time of the Israeli strikes both Iraq and Syria were isolated and relatively weaker states. Syria never rebuilt its sites, while Iraq attempted to develop its atomic programme but was crippled after the 1991 Gulf War and UN-imposed sanctions. Today's wave of attacks on Iran present a far more complex and dangerous scenario. Unlike Iraq and Syria, Iran's nuclear programme is more advanced with a military capabilities enough to respond, triggering a broader confrontation in the region. From Lebanon to Yemen and Iraq, Tehran runs a network of proxies capable of responding in multiple arenas. The exact impact of these strikes on the nuclear sites is still unclear. However, the UN nuclear watchdog said there was no radiation leak at the targeted Natanz site and it was working with Iran to monitor radiation levels. 'Iranian authorities have informed the [International Atomic Energy Agency] that the Bushehr nuclear power plant has not been targeted and that no increase in radiation levels has been observed at the Natanz site,' it said, describing the situation as 'deeply concerning.' The IAEA's general director Rafeal Grossi condemned the attacks. 'I have repeatedly stated that nuclear facilities must never be attacked, regardless of the context or circumstances,' Mr Grossi said on Friday. He warned that 'such attacks have serious implications for nuclear safety, security and safeguards, as well as regional and international peace and security'. The strikes killed Iran's highest-ranking military officers. Maj Gen Hossein Salami, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, was killed, along with another senior IRGC commander, Maj Gen Gholam Ali Rashid and his son. The chief of staff of Iran's armed forces, Gen Mohammad Bagheri, was also killed state television reported. 'The precise targeting of senior commanders of the Revolutionary Guards, the Iranian military, and nuclear scientists – all of whom were involved in advancing the plan to destroy Israel – sends a strong and clear message: those who work toward Israel's destruction will be eliminated,' Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said. The US insisted that it was not involved in the Israeli action and warned Iran not to attack its personnel or interests. US President Donald Trump told Fox News he had prior knowledge of the Israeli strikes, which Israel said involved 200 fighter jets. Mr Trump also stressed that Tehran 'cannot have a nuclear bomb'. But Tehran said Washington would be 'responsible for consequences' as Israel's operation 'cannot have been carried out without the co-ordination and permission of the United States'.

Egypt halts fertilizer production as Israeli gas disruptions deepen energy strain
Egypt halts fertilizer production as Israeli gas disruptions deepen energy strain

Zawya

time22 minutes ago

  • Zawya

Egypt halts fertilizer production as Israeli gas disruptions deepen energy strain

Egyptian fertilizer companies halted operations on Friday due to a drop in gas imports from Israel, industry sources told Reuters. They said the gas import decline was caused by the suspension of operations at major Israeli gas fields following Israel's large-scale strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities and missile factories. The sources said Egypt's Petroleum Ministry did not provide a date for when gas supply was expected to return to normal. The ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. But Israel's Energy Ministry earlier said that the offshore Leviathan gas field was closed. An analyst told Reuters that a second gas field, Karish, had also halted production, while Israel's third gas field, Tamar, remained operational for now. Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly said that Cairo was monitoring the regional situation closely and was aiming to increase its strategic stocks of various commodities, before holding a high-level meeting with top energy officials and the central bank. In a statement, Petroleum Minister Karim Badawi said his ministry was working to ensure stable gas supplies to power stations and had already contracted gas shipments and stockpiled fuel oil, while work was under way to bring Egypt's third floating storage and regasification unit online. Madbouly said the third vessel would bring Egypt's combined regasification daily capacity to 2,250 million cubic feet, more than double last year's capacity, adding that Egypt still hopes to lease a fourth unit to be used in emergencies. Egypt had to increasingly rely on imported Israeli gas after its own production began declining in 2022. Israeli gas accounts for 40-60% of Egypt's total imported supply and about 15-20% of its consumption, data from the Joint Organisations Data Initiative (JODI) shows. Egypt signed several agreements with energy firms and trading houses this week to buy at least 150 cargoes of liquefied natural gas in the country's largest ever import purchases that will cost it over $8 billion at current prices.

Israel's attack on Iran aimed to derail nuclear talks, Tehran observers say
Israel's attack on Iran aimed to derail nuclear talks, Tehran observers say

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Israel's attack on Iran aimed to derail nuclear talks, Tehran observers say

Israel's multi-pronged attack on Iran aimed to derail nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran, former Iranian government officials and analysts have said. Israel 'tried to sabotage America's diplomatic work with a military attack', Sasan Karimi, a former deputy vice president for strategic affairs, told The National. The strikes across Iran, which killed senior military commanders and nuclear scientists, took place only 48 hours before US and Iranian officials were due to meet for a sixth round of talks over limits on Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. Iran has responded by launching drones at Israel. Unprecedented 'Israel's unprecedented strikes across Iran overnight were designed to kill US President Donald Trump's chances of striking a deal to contain the Iranian nuclear programme,' said Ellie Geranmayeh, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations in London. 'This is the biggest military attack Iran has faced since the war with Iraq in the 1980s and is being viewed as a declaration of war.' Long opposed to a nuclear deal between the US and Iran, Israel sought to upset the negotiations in which the Trump administration and President Masoud Pezeshkian's government in Iran have been engaged for the past two months, the observers said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government has instead lobbied for military action to destroy Tehran's nuclear capability. Mr Trump has repeatedly refused to support such action in favour of diplomacy, while warning Iran that a military option was on the table should the talks fail. 'The most important political goal of this attack was to prevent the continuation of the line of negotiation,' said Mr Karimi, now a director at Nuclear Watch Network, a think tank in Tehran. "And with this attack, Israel has taken the initiative away from Trump." US involvement? US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington played no part in the Israeli strikes. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence,' he said. The US State Department on Wednesday began preparing to evacuate non-essential staff from the American embassy in Baghdad, as regional tension flared amid an impasse in the nuclear deal talks. The US has insisted Iran should not be allowed to enrich uranium under an agreement, while Tehran claims it should be permitted to continue enriching, perhaps with limitations, for non-military scientific and agricultural purposes. The most important political goal of this attack was to prevent the continuation of the line of negotiation Sasan Karimi, Former Iranian deputy vicepresident for strategic affairs There is widespread belief in Iran that Israel could not have acted without US support, and that the allies had discussed this over the past week. The attacks took place 'with co-ordination with the US, in my opinion, and of course with the co-ordination of some countries in the region – at the least they made their airspaces available and provided logistical support to the US and were in the know about the attack,' Sayed Mohammad Ali Sayedhanaee, founder of the Nations Diplomacy think tank in Tehran, told The National. Countries in the region, including the UAE, Oman, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, have condemned the strikes. Public opinion Israel's attacks leave the fate of the US-Iran nuclear talks in the balance, with Iranian officials saying they will not attend the next round, scheduled for Sunday in the Omani capital Muscat. Public anger in Iran over the attacks carried out by the US's closest ally in the region may make participation more difficult politically for Iranian officials. "Public opinion in Iran does not allow negotiations to continue easily,' Mr Karimi said. The Israeli strikes may also have been intended to force Iran into concessions should the talks proceed. 'Maybe America's wish is that with these actions by Israel, Iran will be under greater pressure,' Javad Heirannia, an analyst in Tehran, told The National. Mr Trump has already heightened his warnings. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire,' he posted on his Truth Social platform on Friday morning. Mr Netanyahu has attempted to appeal to Iranians and to justify the strikes. 'To the brave people of Iran: our fight is not with you. Our fight is with the brutal dictatorship that has oppressed you for 46 years,' he said in a video message published on X. Iranians largely do not buy into such messaging, observers said. Residents of cities across the country shared videos on social media of terrified civilians running through rubble-strewn streets and inspecting damage to residential buildings, streets and cars. They have framed the attacks as a strike on Iranians – the opposite of Mr Netanyahu's claim that they were aimed at the government, the military and nuclear infrastructure. Condemnation 'Even those who are against the government [in Iran] have condemned these actions and don't believe what Netanyahu says,' Mr Sayedhanaee said. 'Another belief in Iran is that Netanyahu has a problem with Iranians on an ethnic and national basis. Essentially, he has a problem with the Iranian nation and it makes no difference who is in government.' Gulf nations' condemnation of the attacks has not gone unnoticed in Iran. Wary of the fallout of an Israel-Iran conflict, these countries have in recent years attempted to build better relations with Tehran, while also retaining ties with the US, and in some cases establishing relations with Israel. 'Condemning these [Israeli] attacks is also a sign that they want to stay out of this conflict – such a conflict could have very dangerous economic ramifications for them, and endanger their prospects for development,' Mr Heirannia said. 'So while they have links with the US and Israel - whether official or unofficial – they have tried not to incite Iran and so make themselves a target for Iran.' Ms Geranmayeh said European and Gulf countries should co-ordinate at the highest level to call for de-escalation from Israel, Iran and the US. 'This joint effort between Europe and the Gulf Co-operation Council states should aim to prevent another major wave of attacks, which currently look likely,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store