
Heads up! Soviet-era probe to re-enter atmosphere this week, could make it to the surface
Fifty years ago, the former Soviet Union launched a probe to Venus. Except it never made it. Instead, the rocket engines shut off too early, and the probe was stuck in Earth orbit. Now, it's making its way back to Earth.
Venera 8, launched on March 27, 1972, was one of a pair of probes designed to study the surface of Venus. Four days later, it launched the second probe, which, after it was stuck in Earth orbit, was catalogued as Kosmos 482.
The probe is estimated to be around half a tonne and is expected to re-enter Earth's atmosphere around May 10, give or take a day and a half, according to a recent update from Marco Langbroek, who has been tracking the object for quite many years.
What's most interesting is that this lander (or re-entry capsule) was built to survive Venus's punishingly dense atmosphere. So, unlike rockets that we see re-enter Earth's atmosphere and break up (think Starship's recent mishaps), it's unlikely that this will happen with Kosmos 482.
But it's not a reason to panic, said Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist with the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics's Chandra X-ray Center.
"So you've got basically something the size of a small car plowing into the Earth at [240 kilometres] an hour," he said. "Let's not overstate it, right? It's not, like, evacuate the city kind of thing. But it's like a small plane crash or something like that: You don't want to be standing right underneath."
McDowell is well known for his extensive satellite- and debris-tracking database. In fact, it was he who first postulated back in 2000 as to what Kosmos 482 could be.
"Back in 2000, I was going through every object in the NORAD space object catalogue, trying to figure out what each object was, all 25,000 of them as there were at the time. And I came across this one and went, 'OK, this is something unusual.'"
It wasn't widely known what the object was at the time because the U.S. and the Soviet Union were in the midst of the Cold War, and many things were kept secret.
Where it is expected to crash
As for where it might crash, Langbroek recently told Spaceweather.com, "With an orbital inclination of 52 degrees, the Kosmos 482 descent craft could come down anywhere between 52 degrees north and 52 degrees south latitude," said Langbroek.
That covers much of the world at south and mid-latitude.
WATCH | Kosmos 482 Descent Craft, 27 Oct 2020
However, McDowell said that it's more likely to come down in the ocean, since Earth is mostly covered by water.
"The odds are … it'll be in the ocean or in an empty area. But there's ... some decent chance that it'll come down in an area where there are people, though, even in populated areas, most populated areas are not like people packed side by side. And so the chances are that it won't hurt anyone."
This is a somewhat familiar story.
In 1979, NASA's empty Skylab space station re-entered Earth's atmosphere after a few failed attempts to keep it in orbit. Much of it did burn up in the atmosphere, however debris fell over the Indian Ocean and in parts of Australia.
The big differences between the two are that Skylab wasn't built to withstand Venus' dense atmosphere, and it was 70 tonnes, not half a tonne.
Now, the belief is that Kosmos 482 is the descent craft, but it's not known for certain.
The launch consisted of several elements, including the rocket stage and the service module (which provides power among other things). The service module was believed to have re-entered Earth's atmosphere in 1981.
McDowell said that there's a possibility that what was labelled as the service module, which re-entered the atmosphere in 1981, was actually the lander and that Kosmos 482 could instead be the service module. In that case, it would most likely burn up in the atmosphere.
However, he said based on the size and density of the current object labelled as Kosmos 482, it's more likely to be the Venus lander.
Astrophotographer Ralf Vandebergh imaged Kosmos 482, which showed some sort of protuberance. He speculated that it could be the parachute, but that will likely never be confirmed as it will burn up in the atmosphere upon re-entry.
As this is an uncontrolled re-entry, it's difficult to determine exactly where or when this will re-enter Earth's atmosphere.
"Because we don't know when it's going to re-enter to within a few hours at best, even the day before, we won't be able to say, 'Here's where it's going to come down,'" McDowell said. "We'll have to find out after the fact."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
2 days ago
- Toronto Sun
Harvard files legal challenge over Trump's ban on foreign students
Published Jun 05, 2025 • 4 minute read People walk between buildings, Dec. 17, 2024, on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass. Photo by Steven Senne / AP Winning admission to Harvard University fulfilled a longtime goal for Yonas Nuguse, a student in Ethiopia who endured a war in the country's Tigray region, internet and phone shutdowns, and the COVID-19 pandemic — all of which made it impossible to finish high school on time. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Now, it's unclear if he will make it this fall to the Ivy League campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He and other admitted students around the world are anxiously tracking the school's feud with the Trump administration, which is seeking to keep it from enrolling international students. On Thursday, Harvard challenged President Donald Trump's latest move to bar foreign students from entering the U.S. to attend the college, calling it illegal retaliation for Harvard's rejection of White House demands. In an amended lawsuit filed Thursday, Harvard said the president was attempting an end-run around a previous court order. Last month, a federal judge blocked the Department of Homeland Security from revoking Harvard's certification to host foreign students. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Increasingly, the nation's oldest and best-known university has attracted some of the brightest minds from around the world, with international students accounting for one-quarter of its enrollment. As Harvard's fight with the administration plays out, foreign students can only wait to find out if they'll be able to attend the school at all. Some are weighing other options. For Nuguse, 21, the war in Ethiopia forced schools to close in many parts of the province. After schooling resumed, he then took a gap year to study and save money to pay for his TOEFL English proficiency test in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia's capital. 'The war affected me a great deal and when I found out the news that I was accepted to Harvard, I was ecstatic. I knew it was a proud moment for my family, teachers, mentors and friends, who were instrumental in my achievement,' he said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The following months have been filled with uncertainty. On Wednesday, Trump signed a directive seeking to block U.S. entry for Harvard's international students, which would block thousands of students who are scheduled to come to the campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for summer and fall terms. Harvard's court challenge a day later attacked Trump's legal justification for the action — a federal law allowing him to block a 'class of aliens' deemed detrimental to the nation's interests. Targeting only those who are coming to the U.S. to study at Harvard doesn't qualify as a 'class of aliens,' Harvard said in its filing. 'The President's actions thus are not undertaken to protect the 'interests of the United States,' but instead to pursue a government vendetta against Harvard,' the university wrote. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The standoff with Harvard comes as the administration has been tightening scrutiny of student visas nationwide. Thousands of students around the country abruptly lost permission to be in the U.S. this spring before the administration reversed itself, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last week the U.S. would 'aggressively revoke' visas for students from China. 'It is one blow after another,' said Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, who works with colleges in the U.S., Canada and Europe to recruit international students. 'At this point, international student interest in the U.S. has basically dropped to nil.' The future of Harvard's more than 7,000 international students has been hanging in the balance since the Department of Homeland Security first moved to block its foreign enrollment on May 22. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. For many, the twists and turns have been exhausting. Jing, a 23-year-old master's student, is currently completing an internship in China this summer, and unsure if he can reenter the U.S. for the fall semester. 'It is tiring, we all feel numb now. Trump just makes big news headlines once every few days since he got back to the White House,' said Jing, who agreed to speak under his family name out of concern about retaliation from the Trump administration. Jing said he is going to watch and see what happens for now, in case the move against international students is a negotiating tactic that does not stick. The possibility that Trump could block foreign enrollment at other colleges only raises the uncertainty for students planning to pursue their education overseas, said Craig Riggs, who has been working in international education for about 30 years and is the editor of ICEF Monitor. He said he urges families to consult carefully with advisers and not to overreact to the day's headlines. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'The rules under which students would make this huge decision to devote years of their lives and quite a bit of money to studying at Harvard have been shown to change quite quickly,' Riggs said. An aspiring economist, Nuguse was the only student accepted to Harvard this year from Kalamino Special High School, which caters to gifted students from underprivileged backgrounds from across Tigray. After receiving acceptances also to Columbia University and Amherst College, Nuguse chose Harvard, which he had long dreamed of attending. He said he hopes it will work out to attend Harvard. Nuguse was granted a visa to study at Harvard, and he worries it might be too late to reverse his decision and attend another university anyway. He received an email from Harvard last week, telling him to proceed with his registration and highlighting a judge's order in Harvard's favor in the dispute over foreign enrollment. 'I hope the situation is temporary and I can enroll on time to go on and realize my dream far from reality in Ethiopia,' he said. Read More World Olympics Toronto & GTA Columnists Columnists


Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Musk threatens to decommission a key space station link for NASA
As President Donald Trump and Elon Musk argued on social media on Thursday, the world's richest man threatened to decommission a space capsule used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. After Trump threatened to cut government contracts given to Musk's SpaceX rocket company and his Starlink internet satellite services, Musk responded via X that SpaceX 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' It's unclear how serious Musk's threat was. But the capsule, developed with the help of government contracts, is an important part of keeping the space station running. NASA also relies heavily on SpaceX for other programs including launching science missions and, later this decade, returning astronauts to the surface of the moon. The Dragon capsule SpaceX is the only U.S. company capable right now of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. Boeing's Starliner capsule has flown astronauts only once; last year's test flight went so badly that the two NASA astronauts had to hitch a ride back to Earth via SpaceX in March, more than nine months after launching last June. Starliner remains grounded as NASA decides whether to go with another test flight with cargo, rather than a crew. SpaceX also uses a Dragon capsule for its own privately run missions. The next one of those is due to fly next week on a trip chartered by Axiom Space, a Houston company. Cargo versions of the Dragon capsule are also used to ferry food and other supplies to the orbiting lab. NASA's other option: Russia Russia's Soyuz capsules are the only other means of getting crews to the space station right now. The Soyuz capsules hold three people at a time. For now, each Soyuz launch carries two Russians and one NASA astronaut, and each SpaceX launch has one Russian on board under a barter system. That way, in an emergency requiring a capsule to return, there is always someone from the U.S. and Russian on board. With its first crew launch for NASA in 2020 — the first orbital flight of a crew by a private company — SpaceX enabled NASA to reduce its reliance on Russia for crew transport. The Russian flights had been costing the U.S. tens of millions of dollars per seat, for years. NASA has also used Russian spacecraft for cargo, along with U.S. contractor Northrup Grumman. SpaceX's other government launches Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The company has used its rockets to launch several science missions for NASA as well as military equipment. Last year, SpaceX also won a NASA contract to help bring the space station out of orbit when it is no longer usable. SpaceX's Starship mega rocket is what NASA has picked to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon, at least for the first two landing missions. Starship made its ninth test flight last week from Texas, but tumbled out of control and broke apart. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


Winnipeg Free Press
5 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The benefits of basic research in universities
Opinion A few weeks ago, I told my eldest son's wife that I planned to write and publish after retirement from the University of Winnipeg. She didn't understand, because she thought the job of university professors was just to teach. She did not appreciate that we do scientific research, including especially what might be called curiosity-driven or basic research with no foreseeable immediate application. Such misunderstanding appears widespread, given comments on right-wing Facebook pages. As U.S. President Donald Trump withholds government funding from Harvard and bans students from other countries, including Canada, comments appear like 'Cut funding to Harvard and give it to trades schools' and 'Harvard with $50 billion in endowment doesn't need taxpayer support.' Education in trades is important, but the money being cut is for research, not teaching, including basic research done in universities and without which people wouldn't even have a device or internet to spread misleading comments. Moreover, only interest from endowments can be spent, and just for purposes specified by donors (e.g., research, scholarships), not for general university operations. Spending only the interest ensures donors' goals last forever. Many people know Marie Curie discovered radioactivity, but fewer know her groundbreaking work was conducted at Sorbonne university in Paris. Government support for basic research on radioactivity by many university scientists led ultimately to MRI machines, nuclear power plants, and tools to support sustainable agriculture, to mention a few benefits. Another familiar scientist, Albert Einstein, is known for his highly theoretical research on relativity, developed in a Swiss patent office and then several universities. The theory seems far removed from practical use, but wrongly so. It is fundamental to many current devices, such as lasers and GPS, the latter using satellites with highly precise atomic clocks. Next time you use a smartphone to find your way, think of Einstein. Although Curie and Einstein are well known, much basic research leading to advances is carried out by unnamed scientists working away in university laboratories. Here are just a few examples of research that formed the foundation for applications we benefit from today. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are tiny biological capsules (100-200 nanometers in size, 25.4 million nm = one inch), and studied for decades in universities, again with government funding. Better understanding of LNPs eventually led to such applications as delivering medicines to treat cancer or prevent disease and increasing uptake of nutrients in agriculture. Nanoparticles in catalytic converters reduce harmful emissions from cars. On the surface, pure mathematics appears an unlikely candidate for practical benefits. People studied number theory, for example, simply to understand the properties and beauty of mathematics. No one anticipated that the abstract and highly theoretical study of prime numbers divisible only by 1 and themselves (e.g., 3, 7, 53) would be fundamental for cryptography. Next time you make an e-transfer, thank number theory for the security of the transmission. Basic research in many sciences can lead to later applications. In cognitive psychology, for example, research on lists of words and other lab tasks demonstrated that mental images play an important role in memory. This theory informs applications in education, such as using multi-media to learn knowledge involving visual concepts as in chemistry. These examples illustrate that diverse applications depend on prior knowledge developed by research done out of curiosity without foreseen benefits. As noted by psychologist Kurt Lewin, 'There is nothing so practical as a good theory.' Applied research at universities is also undermined by cuts in taxpayer support. Governments funded years of work at the Universities of Manitoba and Saskatchewan that led to a variety of rapeseed plant with low acidic content and to one of Canada's largest crops and exports, canola. And many industries benefit from skilled graduates with research experience. How important is basic research? Very! J. H. Comroe Jr. and R. D. Dripps reviewed research necessary for certain medical advances (e.g., cardiac surgery, chemotherapy). Basic, curiosity-driven research made up about 40 per cent of studies, much done in universities. It makes sense. Without knowing how the heart works or cancer fundamentals, better diagnosis and treatment is impossible. I understand why my daughter-in-law did not appreciate the science side of my job. She never attended university and even if she had, few students see that part of university work unless they serve as research assistants or do research themselves, activities that are less likely with reduced taxpayer support. In short, research that lacks foreseeable applications is invisible to most members of the public. Sadly, short-sighted politicians can exploit people's lack of knowledge for political gain and to cut government support. The result is fewer countries invest in university research to simply understand the world, and fewer benefit economically from later applications without which the world is worse off. James M. Clark is a professor of Psychology at the University of Winnipeg.