Believe it or not, a Catholic saint's 400-year-old body is well preserved even now. Here's why
The remains of a
Catholic saint
who died over 400 years ago were displayed in Spain. The body of
St. Teresa of Jesus
, also known as
St. Teresa of Avila
, amazed visitors during a public event. This was the first public viewing since 1914.
Public Viewing
The event took place at the Basilica Annunciation of Our Lady of Mount Carmel. It is located in Alba de Tormes in the
Salamanca
province. The ceremony marked the beginning of public veneration. It attracted many people. Some visitors were emotional. One woman covered her mouth. Another looked tearful. Others stood in silence and prayed.
Condition of Saint's Body Studied
St. Teresa died at age 67 in 1582. Her body has stayed mostly incorrupt, according to the Diocese of Avila. Last summer, church officials opened the tomb.
Discalced Carmelite
monks, nuns and priests participated. They wanted to study relics of her heart, hand and arm. They also compared her current condition with a 1914 photo.
Also Read:
Doom: The Dark Ages: Early Access date, time across regions, and full game launch date and time. Here's how to preload
Visible Signs of Preservation
Father Marco Chiesa said the face and foot looked the same as they did in 1914. A professor of anthropology released a 53-page report in March. The report noted that her right foot, left hand, heart and left arm were still preserved. Skin, tissues and muscles had not broken down.
Live Events
Hair and Eye Remain Intact
Reports said her scalp had brown hair. Her right eye still had dark eyelids and an iris. An X-ray analysis was also conducted. It revealed that St. Teresa had multiple chronic conditions. These affected her ability to move.
What has preserved the body?
Experts believe the tomb's dryness played a role in keeping the body in good condition. Professor Luigi Capasso called it a unique natural occurrence. The church continues to preserve the body for religious and scientific study.
FAQs
Why is St. Teresa's body still preserved after 400 years?
Experts believe the dryness of her tomb and natural conditions helped slow decomposition, allowing her body to remain mostly intact over centuries.
Where can people see St. Teresa's remains?
The body is currently on display at the Basilica in Alba de Tormes, Spain, as part of a religious veneration ceremony.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
A judge tells federal agencies they can't enforce anti-trans bias policies against Catholic groups
BISMARCK, N.D. — Two federal agencies cannot punish Catholic employers and health care providers if they refuse for religious reasons to provide gender-affirming care to transgender patients or won't provide health insurance coverage for such care to their workers, a federal judge ruled Thursday. The ruling from U.S. District Judge Peter Welte, the chief federal judge in North Dakota, bars the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from enforcing a health care rule it imposed in 2024 under Democratic President Joe Biden. The rule said that existing policies against sex discrimination covered discrimination based on gender identity, so that health care providers risked losing federal funds if they refused to provide gender-affirming care. Welte also barred the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from telling employers that a failure to have health plans cover gender-affirming care for their workers would represent discrimination based on sex that could lead to a lawsuit against them and penalties. The judge rejected a request from an order of nuns, two Catholic homes and the Catholic Benefits Association, which represents employers, to impose similar bans on each agency covering abortion and fertility treatments Catholic organizations consider immoral. He said those claims were 'underdeveloped' and not ready for court review. But he concluded that allowing the two agencies to enforce policies on gender-affirming care or health coverage for it would restrict employers' and health care providers' ability to live out their religious beliefs, violating a 1992 federal law meant to provide broad protections for religious freedoms. The HHS rule had a provision allowing the agency to make case-by-case exceptions based on religious beliefs, but Welte said that would be insufficient. 'The case-by-case exemption procedure leaves religious organizations unable to predict their legal exposure without furthering any compelling antidiscrimination interests,' wrote Welte, who is based in Fargo. The two agencies did not immediately respond to email messages seeking comment Thursday. The Catholic Benefits Association serves more than 9,000 employers and about 164,000 employees enrolled in member health plans, according to its website. The group, founded in 2013, says it 'advocates for and litigates in defense of our members' First Amendment rights to provide employee benefits and a work environment that is consistent with the Catholic faith.' The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects religious freedoms. Association General Counsel Martin Nussbaum welcomed the ruling, saying the organization's members 'want to do the right thing in their health plan and in their medical services that they provide for those medical providers, and this gives them protection to doing that.' And he said the judge's ruling suggests there are no mandates from the federal government on abortion or fertility treatments, so there is 'no need to provide protection.' The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that the Civil Rights Act's protections against discrimination based on sex also cover anti-LGBTQ bias in employment. The landmark 1964 act doesn't have specific provisions dealing with bias based on sexual orientation or gender identity. But courts also have intervened to limit how far the federal government can go in combating anti-LGBTQ discrimination when religious organizations or employers with religious beliefs against LGBTQ rights are involved. Both the HHS rule and the EEOC's policy on sex discrimination have their roots in efforts by President Barack Obama to protect LGBTQ rights in 2016, in his last year in office. When President Donald Trump began his second term in January, he issued an order saying the federal government would not recognize transgender people's gender identities. In April, two employees said the EEOC was classifying all new gender identity-related discrimination cases as its lowest priority, essentially putting them on indefinite hold. The 2024 HHS rule also covered bias based on 'pregnancy or related conditions," and the Catholic health care providers argued that they might face losing federal funds if they refused to perform abortions, in line with Catholic opposition to abortion. But HHS said the rule wouldn't have forced them to perform abortions or provide health coverage for abortions — only that it couldn't refuse to care for someone because they'd had one, according to Welte. Hanna reported from Topeka, Kansas.
Time of India
27-05-2025
- Time of India
France's lower house backs assisted dying bill
Photo: AP PARIS: France's lower house on Tuesday approved a right-to-die bill in the first reading, the initial step in a lengthy process that could grant patients medical assistance to end their lives in clearly defined circumstances. "The National Assembly's vote on legislation concerning the development of palliative care and assisted dying is an important step," President Emmanuel Macron said on X after 305 lawmakers approved the legislation and 199 voted against. "With respect for sensitivities, doubts and hopes, the path of fraternity that I hoped for is gradually opening up." Macron has insisted that any authorisation to choose death should be limited to people with incurable illnesses and intense physical or psychological pain. The National Assembly vote was an initial stage for the draft law, which will now go between the lower house and the Senate for modifications acceptable to both houses. Some conservative groups oppose the law and Macron has said he could put the deeply divisive topic to a vote by referendum. If approved, France would join a small group of European countries that give the right to aid in dying, including Germany, Spain, Austria and Switzerland. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Until now, French patients wishing to end their lives have had to travel abroad, including to neighbouring Belgium. A separate bill, submitted at the same time and concerned with end-of-life medical assistance including palliative care, passed on Tuesday without opposition. All parties in parliament have allowed their lawmakers a free vote on the issue. Leftist and centrist parties were expected to vote in favour of the right-to-die bill, with conservatives and far-right deputies seen broadly hostile. The bill is widely referred to as focusing on "end of life" or "aid in dying" in the French debate, rather than "assisted suicide" or "euthanasia". 'Expressed such a wish' The bill brought by Macron ally Olivier Falorni would allow medical staff to help "a person gain access to a lethal substance when they have expressed such a wish". The patient would use the substance without aid or have it administered by a medically qualified person "if they are in no condition physically to do so themselves". Health Minister Catherine Vautrin said at the weekend that the "French model" of assisted dying would be "strict and closely supervised". Macron said last year that France needed legislation because "there are situations you cannot humanely accept". The goal was "to reconcile the autonomy of the individual with the solidarity of the nation", he said. The bill faces stiff opposition from religious leaders in a country with a longstanding Catholic tradition, as well as many health workers. Prime Minister Francois Bayrou, a devout Catholic, said Tuesday that he would abstain if he were a deputy because of lingering "questions". The draft law would allow assisted dying only in an "advanced" stage of illness, which it defines as "entering an irreversible process characterised by a worsening health condition of the sick person that affects the quality of their lives." Current French legislation allows passive euthanasia, such as withholding artificial life support, and since 2016 doctors have also been authorised to induce "deep and continuous sedation" for terminally ill patients in pain. But active euthanasia, where doctors administer lethal doses of drugs to patients, remains illegal. Vautrin said she hopes that the Senate will begin examining the issue this year and submit its suggested changes back to the National Assembly in early 2026. "I want this bill to get a final vote by 2027 which is still possible," said the minister. France holds presidential elections in 2027 in which Macron cannot stand after serving two consecutive terms.
NDTV
27-05-2025
- NDTV
As France Votes On Bill Today, A Look At Nations That Allow Assisted Dying
Paris: France's National Assembly votes on Tuesday on proposed laws concerning palliative care and assisted dying. In Europe, several countries already allow the terminally ill to receive help to end their lives. Here is a round-up of the situation on the continent: Pioneers: Netherlands, Belgium The Netherlands and Belgium were the first European countries to authorise euthanasia, namely death induced by a caregiver at the request of a patient. In the Netherlands, euthanasia has been strictly regulated since April 2002. A doctor and an independent expert must determine that the patient is suffering unbearably and without hope of improvement. This right was extended in 2023 to children under 12. In 2002 Belgium followed the Netherlands by adopting euthanasia and assisted suicide with similar caveats to the Dutch. In 2014 it went further by allowing terminally ill children of all ages to also request the procedure, with the consent of their parents. Luxembourg decriminalised euthanasia and assisted dying in 2009. Assisted Suicide Switzerland, which prohibits euthanasia, has for decades allowed assisted suicide, making it the go-to destination for patients from around Europe looking for assistance to end their suffering. The growth of so-called "suicide tourism" has caused much soul-searching in Switzerland but the authorities decided in 2011 against restricting the practice. Neighbouring Austria, a staunchly Catholic nation, also legalised assisted suicide in 2022 after its constitutional court ruled the country was violating citizens' fundamental rights with the prohibition. Strict conditions in Spain Spain adopted a law in 2021 allowing euthanasia and medically assisted suicide for people with a serious and incurable illness. The conditions are strict: the applicant must be capable and conscious, the request must be made in writing, reconfirmed later, and approved by an evaluation committee. In Portugal, the decriminalisation of euthanasia adopted in 2023 has not come into force following a decision by the Constitutional Court rejecting certain articles of the law. The new parliament elected in May will have to rule on the issue. Regulation in Italy Tuscany was the first Italian region to adopt regulation paving the way for assisted suicide after a regional parliamentary vote in February. However, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government challenged the regulation in the Constitutional Court, arguing it came under the central state's jurisdiction rather than the regions'. In September 2019, the Constitutional Court had outlined the conditions under which a patient could access assisted suicide without the helper facing criminal charges. The Italian parliament was supposed to legislate on the matter but it has taken no action. As a result, a pro-euthanasia association pushed for the adoption of regional rules, with Tuscany being the first to act. Debating law in Britain UK lawmakers approved in November 2024, in a first vote on the issue, the legalisation of assisted dying for adults with an incurable illness who have a life expectancy of fewer than six months and are able to take the substance that causes their death themselves. The text, amended in May to allow medics to opt out, will now be voted by lawmakers on whether to send it to the House of Lords upper chamber for further scrutiny or reject it entirely. If passed, the law, which would apply in England and Wales, is still expected to be several years away. Simultaneously, the Scottish parliament, with delegated powers over healthcare, passed its first vote on a bill to legalise assisted dying.
