Malala Yousafzai returns to Pakistan hometown for first time since she was shot
Malala Yousafzai has returned to her hometown in Pakistan, 13 years after she was shot in the head by the Taliban.
The 27-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner shared a picture of herself in the stunning landscape of northern Pakistan on social media, saying it was the first time she had been back there since she was brutally attacked at just 15 years old.
She wrote: 'As a child, I spent every holiday in Shangla, Pakistan, playing by the river and sharing meals with my extended family. It was such a joy for me to return there today – after 13 long years – to be surrounded by the mountains, dip my hands in the cold river and laugh with my beloved cousins. This place is very dear to my heart and I hope to return again and again.'
In October 2012, Yousafzai was shot in the head by the Taliban while riding a bus home from school. In the days that followed the shocking attack, the teenager was airlifted to hospital in Birmingham, England for life-saving surgery.
She and her family settled in Britain, where she went on to graduate from Oxford University. She has since devoted her working life to campaigning for educational rights for girls and women around the world under the umbrella of the international non-profit organization the Malala Fund.
A police official told CNN that Yousafzai was accompanied on the emotional visit – close to where she was shot – by members of her immediate family.
Umar Rehman, stationed in Shangla, told CNN: 'Malala Yousafzai arrived in Shahpur, Shangla, by helicopter for a short visit, accompanied by her father, husband, and brother. She met with close relatives before visiting the Shangla Girls' High School and College, which was built with support from the Malala Fund.
'At the college, she addressed the students during a special event. She then visited her grandmother's grave in the family cemetery. After spending about two and a half hours in Shangla, Malala Yousafzai departed for Islamabad via helicopter. Strict security arrangements were in place throughout her visit.'
In her post on Wednesday, Yousafzai went on to reference the ongoing instability in her country of birth. She wrote: 'I pray for peace in every corner of our beautiful country. The recent attacks, including in Bannu yesterday, are heartbreaking. I am sending my condolences to the victims and their families and offer my prayers for the safety of every person in my homeland.'
She was referring to an attack earlier this week in Bannu in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, in which at least 12 people were killed.
A group affiliated with the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack in the northwestern area of the country in which two suicide bombers breached a wall at a military base, before other attackers stormed the compound.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
For North Korea, Iran's fate reinforces nuclear strategy
For North Korea, Iran's fate reinforces nuclear strategy As the United States launched airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, officials and analysts in East Asia warned the move could further entrench North Korea's commitment to its own nuclear arsenal. CNN's Mike Valerio explains why North Korea may never give up its nuclear weapons program. 01:18 - Source: CNN Tourists capture drone video of Brazilian hiker tragedy 26-year-old Brazilian tourist Juliana Marins died after nearly four days of search and rescue operations when she fell hundreds of meters from a ridge near volcano Mount Rinjani on Indonesia's island of Lombok, authorities said. 01:28 - Source: CNN Trump maintains Iran strikes caused 'total obliteration' US President Donald Trump reiterated his claim that US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities caused 'total obliteration,' although he acknowledged the intelligence was 'inconclusive' and preliminary. An initial classified report, revealed in a CNN exclusive, found that the attack only set back Tehran's nuclear program by a few months. 00:57 - Source: CNN CNN speaks to victim of syringe attack in France Nearly 150 people in France reported being pricked with syringes during a nationwide street music festival at the weekend. It remains unclear if date-rape drugs were used in the attacks. CNN's Saskya Vandoorne spoke to one of the victims and reports. 01:46 - Source: CNN Why Japan has a rice crisis 01:17 - Source: CNN Reporter asks Trump if he wants regime change in Iran When questioned about Iran while aboard Air Force 1, President Trump addressed whether he desires a change in the countries' regime. 00:58 - Source: CNN At least 49 people killed near aid sites in Gaza over 24-hour period At least 49 people have been killed near aid distribution sites or while waiting for aid trucks across Gaza over just 24 hours, according to Palestinian health officials. CNN's Nada Bashir reports on the latest aid site developments in Gaza. 01:07 - Source: CNN US strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say The US military strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, according to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by three people briefed on it. 00:49 - Source: CNN Meet the 'Maple MAGA' of Alberta Separatists in the Canadian province of Alberta are courting votes for a referendum that could start the process for the province to secede from the rest of the country. Here's a look into what's motivating the movement. 02:50 - Source: CNN Trump lashes out at Israel and Iran President Donald Trump condemned both Iran and Israel as the ceasefire he brokered between the two countries appeared to grow more fragile. Trump was critical of both sides, but reserved his harshest condemnation for Israel, who he said 'unloaded' on Iran 'as soon as we made the deal.' 02:01 - Source: CNN Air defenses remain active in Iran after ceasefire announcement CNN's Fred Pleitgen reports anti-aircraft fire lighting up the sky over the Iranian capital Tehran, after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. 01:26 - Source: CNN Zakaria reacts to Trump's claim of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran CNN's Fareed Zakaria reacts to President Donald Trump announcing a ceasefire between Israel and Iran which he says he hopes to become permanent. Neither Iran nor Israel has made any comments about a pending ceasefire. 01:39 - Source: CNN Why Iran possibly warned Qatar about its attack ahead of time CNN's Clarissa Ward is in Tel Aviv as Iran launched strikes towards a US military base in neighboring Qatar, but according to one source, the Iranians warned the Qataris that the strikes were coming. In short, the US likely knew ahead of time. Ward breaks down why Tehran issued the warning and what it did. 01:15 - Source: CNN National security analyst explains why Iran's strike in Qatar was 'a gamble' National security analyst Peter Bergen details why Iran's strike against a US airbase in Qatar was "a gamble" considering the relationship between the two countries. 00:58 - Source: CNN World leaders divided after US attack on Iran The UN Security Council was deeply divided during an emergency session called after US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. 01:27 - Source: CNN Why the Strait of Hormuz is so significant As Iran threatens to disrupt and close the Strait of Hormuz, CNN's Nick Paton Walsh breaks down why this narrow passage is so important. 00:58 - Source: CNN CNN team witnesses Israeli strike on Tehran Israeli airstrikes rocked the north of Tehran on Monday. CNN's Frederik Pleitgen shows the aftermath of the attack. 01:14 - Source: CNN Iranians demonstrate against US strikes US President Donald Trump's decision to launch direct strikes against Iranian nuclear sites has sparked a wave of anger in the country, with people on the streets of Tehran telling CNN they expect their country to strike back. 01:33 - Source: CNN Satellite images show before and after US strikes in Iran Iran's largest nuclear complex was dealt a series of severe blows in US strikes on Sunday, a CNN analysis of satellite imagery found. See the before and after images, provided by Maxar Technologies, showing the damage visible at three of Iran's nuclear facilities. Initial damage assessments to the three sites are ongoing, according to the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency. 00:54 - Source: CNN
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Wants CNN Reporter He Spent Days Watching Fired ‘Like a Dog'
Donald Trump has unleashed a nasty attack on a CNN journalist who broke news of an intelligence leak about the Iran strikes, demanding that she be 'thrown out like a dog'. In his latest tirade since the leak made headlines, the president also revealed he has been watching the reporter, Natasha Bertrand, on CNN for days-even as he traversed the globe for the NATO summit in the Netherlands. 'Natasha Bertrand should be FIRED from CNN! I watched her for three days doing Fake News. She should be IMMEDIATELY reprimanded, and then thrown out 'like a dog,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. The meltdown was the latest salvo Trump has launched towards the media, ever since it began questioning whether US strikes on Iran's three major nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'obliterated,' as he has repeatedly claimed. In another post, Trump wrote: 'She should not be allowed to work at Fake News CNN. It's people like her who destroyed the reputation of a once great Network. Her slant was so obviously negative, besides, she doesn't have what it takes to be an on camera correspondent, not even close. FIRE NATASHA!' But CNN clapped back on Wednesday, saying in a statement that the company stood '100% behind Bertrand's journalism' and that of her colleagues. 'We do not believe it reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest,' said the statement, by CNN's communications division. Trump, who, unlike his predecessor Joe Biden does not own a presidential dog, has often used animalistic slurs to hit out at people. Over the past few years, he has likened a long list of perceived enemies to dogs — including former FBI director James B. Comey, former acting attorney general Sally Yates, and even his own Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was once a rival for the GOP's 2016 presidential nomination. But his latest tirade is emblematic of the fury within the White House over the leaked intelligence assessment, which suggested that the strikes against Iran this weekend only set Iran's enrichment program back by six months and did not destroy its core components. The preliminary analysis was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's intelligence arm, and also reportedly found that the bombing sealed off the entrances to two of Iran's three main nuclear facilities but did not collapse their underground buildings. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was the first to reject the report, claiming it was leaked by a 'low level loser' to undermine the president. Rubio also weighed in, saying it was the work of 'professional stabbers' while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has launched an investigation into the leak, said it demeaned the work of US military fighters. 'If you want to make an assessment of what happened at Fordo, you better get a big shovel, and go really deep. Because Iran's nuclear program is obliterated,' a fuming Hegseth told reporters Wednesday, standing alongside Trump at the NATO summit. Trump, meanwhile, said the findings of the report were 'not complete' and that more information would paint the true picture of the battle damage caused over the weekend. CNN also acknowledged that the findings were only preliminary. Nonetheless, the president's personal attack against Bertrand demanded that she be fired and accused her of 'attempting to destroy our Patriot Pilots by making them look bad when, in fact, they did a GREAT job and hit 'pay dirt' — TOTAL OBLITERATION!'
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump is creating a new universe of people to deport
The full scope of the Trump administration's mass deportation plan – which has been evident in theory – is only just starting to come together in practice, and its scale has come as a surprise to many Americans. This week, the Supreme Court blessed, for now, the administration's effort to deport people from countries such as Cuba and Venezuela to places other than their homeland, including nations halfway around the world in Africa. In Florida, construction began on a migrant detention center intended to be a sort of Alcatraz in the Everglades. And CNN reported exclusively that the administration will soon make a large universe of people who had been working legally after seeking asylum eligible for deportation. I went to the author of that report, CNN's Priscilla Alvarez, and asked her to explain what we know and what we're learning about how the different stories are coming together. One thing that stuck out to me is how the totality of the administration's actions is turning people who had been working legally in the US into undocumented immigrants now facing deportation. Our conversation, edited for length, is below: WOLF: You have this exclusive report about a large universe of new people the Trump administration might be trying to deport. What did you find out? ALVAREZ: The plans that the administration has been working on are targeting people who came into the US unlawfully and then applied for asylum while in the country. The plan here is to dismiss those asylum claims, which could affect potentially hundreds of thousands of people and then make them immediately deportable. It also puts the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, the federal agency responsible for managing federal immigration benefits, at the center of the president's deportation campaign, because not only are they the ones that manage these benefits, but they have also been delegated the authority by the Department of Homeland Security to place these individuals in fast-track deportation proceedings and to take actions to enforce immigration laws. This is a shift that is prompting a lot of concern. As one advocate with the ACLU put it – and I'll just quote her – 'They're turning the agency that we think of as providing immigration benefits as an enforcement arm for ICE.' WOLF: This is certainly not the criminal population that President Donald Trump and border czar Tom Homan said during the campaign that they would target first for deportation, right? ALVAREZ: You're right to say that coming into this administration, Trump officials repeatedly said their plans were to target people with criminal records. That is a hard thing to do. It requires a lot of legwork, and their numbers in terms of arrests were relatively low compared to where they wanted to be. The White House wants to meet at least 3,000 arrests a day, and you just cannot do that if you are only going after people with criminal records. Now we've seen that aperture widen to include anyone who's in the United States illegally. The administration's perspective on this is that these are individuals who crossed the border unlawfully, therefore they are eligible for deportation. But there has been consternation even among the president's allies about who exactly they're going after. In fact, there was recently a letter from Republican lawmakers to the administration asking for a breakdown of who they were arresting. WOLF: It's hard to keep track of the different buckets of people the Trump administration has targeted, like those with temporary protected status (TPS) versus asylum-seekers. How should we distinguish between them? ALVAREZ: Temporary protected status only applies to people who are currently residing in the US. It's a form of humanitarian relief. The United States acknowledges that the conditions in your country are not ones that they could send you back to. The Trump administration has started to peel that back and said that the conditions are sufficient, therefore we can send you back. There's certainly a debate for many of these countries as to whether or not that is true, but that has been a long criticism of temporary protected status. What is supposed to be temporary for some countries has been extended so many times that it is no longer temporary. Parole is another existing legal authority. The United States has frosty relations, for example, with Cuba and Venezuela, and it's very hard to deport people to those countries because they might not accept repatriation flights. The Biden administration argued that creating a parole program would give people the opportunity to legally migrate to the United States without coming to the US-Mexico border. Hundreds of thousands of people took advantage of that opportunity, and it was very specific to certain nationalities, particularly Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans. There are two more buckets I'll mention: Refugees are people who seek protection in the United States from abroad. Asylum-seekers are those who do it from the United States. All those buckets have been targeted under the Trump administration, and there have been moves to strip those protections from the people who have them. A lot of this is still working its way through litigation. But the effect is that people who perhaps had protection in the United States – could work here legally, could live here, even if temporarily – don't have them anymore and are now eligible for deportation. WOLF: So the Trump administration essentially created a large new population of undocumented people who were previously here with some sort of blessing from the government? ALVAREZ: Yes. I've been talking to experts in industries that depend on migrant workers and there have been situations where someone had hired a migrant worker who had a work permit to legally work here while their applications are being adjudicated, while they went through their immigration proceedings, and they don't have that anymore. Those protections and benefits have been stripped. That person who was hired legally is now suddenly undocumented. That can create an issue for industries that depend on the migrant workforce. Someone mentioned that to me as an example earlier this week, as we were talking through how it can affect agriculture, construction and manufacturing. We don't have a good sense of the numbers yet, but all indications are that by stripping protections consistently through various ways, the number of people who are undocumented in the United States is growing. WOLF: The other thing that happened this week is the Supreme Court allowed, for now, the Trump administration to carry on with deporting people from countries that we've just discussed – Cubans or Venezuelans – to third-party countries such as South Sudan. What do we know about those people? ALVAREZ: The people you're talking about are a group of migrants who were being sent to South Sudan. They're in Djibouti because of litigation, and they are now being interviewed to see if they have grounds for what we call 'reasonable fear.' But just to broaden out from that group, this decision from the Supreme Court was a very big deal. Being able to send people to a country that is not their own, but that is willing to take others – that's a huge deal for the administration to ramp up how many people that they are deporting at any one time. There is the question of due process, which has sort of been a theme in this administration. How much time do you have to provide notice to an individual that they are not going to be deported to their home country – they're going to be deported elsewhere? How much time, if any, do you give for them to contest their removal to that specific country? The overarching point here is that this decision gives the administration so much more runway to execute on their deportation plan. WOLF: The thing that was interesting this week is the so-called Alligator Alcatraz and these efforts to create new detention facilities. How would those be used? ALVAREZ: Let me actually tie these two points together, from your previous question to now. What we are seeing currently is the Trump administration trying to solve for existing hurdles in the immigration system for arresting and deporting people in large numbers. ICE only has a limited number of detention beds. They're only funded for an average of 41,500 beds, but they work with local jails. They have community partners to detain people. Currently, there are more than 58,000 people in ICE custody. They are completely over capacity. That means that they have to look for new ways to detain people, and 'Alligator Alcatraz' is an example of that, which is essentially building a facility very quickly to hold up to 5,000 people and using some FEMA funds so that the state can erect this facility. It's called 'Alligator Alcatraz' because it is located in the Everglades, Florida. The idea is that it would be low-cost because they don't have to worry much about security, given that the surroundings are marshes and swamps full of alligators and pythons. So essentially, if one were to escape, they wouldn't make it very far. It is perhaps a clue or the beginning of how we might see the administration strike more agreements with consenting states or with private companies or military bases to house detainees. The White House imposed a goal of arresting 3,000 people a day. Well, there comes the next question of where do you put them, especially if you've maxed out ICE detention beds. Now we're holding more than 58,000 people and deportations can't keep up. And so there comes the Supreme Court decision of allowing the administration to deport people to other countries. You can start to see how the puzzle pieces are slowly coming together for the administration as they try to execute on this lofty campaign promise. WOLF: You used two interesting words there – clues and puzzle pieces. Do you feel like we have a grasp of everything that the Trump administration is doing right now on the immigration and deportation front? ALVAREZ: They've had four years to think about this. Stephen Miller (who is White House deputy chief of staff) knows the immigration system, there's no question about that, and is the architect when it comes to many of these policies. I would say that over the last six months the administration has been quietly doing a lot behind the scenes that the average person was probably not paying attention to. It may have come in the form of regulations, or it may have come in the form of policy guidance, or diplomatic talks that are happening with countries to eventually take other nationalities. What's been interesting about this particular moment is that everything that they were quietly working on is starting to come to light. The X factor is: Do they get the billions and billions of dollars from the massive package that's working its way through Congress? Because if they do that, it will be a game-changer for them, and it will eliminate so many resource issues, and we could really see this plan take off.
