Trump says he won't call Walz about Minnesota lawmaker shootings, calls governor "whacked out"
President Trump said Tuesday that he won't call Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz after the targeted shootings of two state lawmakers because it would "waste time."
One of the lawmakers and her husband were killed.
The president spoke to reporters early Tuesday aboard Air Force One as he flew back to Washington after abruptly leaving the G7 summit in Canada. The White House said the president wants to better monitor the rising tensions in the Middle East between Israel and Iran. Asked if he planned to call Walz, Trump said the Democratic governor is "slick" and "whacked out" and said, "I'm not calling him."
Presidents often reach out to other elected officials at times of tragedy to offer condolences.
Trump added, "The guy doesn't have a clue. He's a mess. So, you know, I could be nice and call him, but why waste time?"
A source close to the governor's office told CBS News Minnesota that Walz spoke with Vice President JD Vance on Saturday about the shootings.
"The governor expressed appreciation for the ongoing coordination between federal law enforcement and Minnesota public safety officials," the source said.
Walz was the vice presidential running mate for 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, who lost her presidential bid to Trump. During the campaign, Walz often branded Trump and other Republican politicians as "just weird."
Vance Boelter, 57, faces federal and state charges in the killings of Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark and wounding state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette. Boelter was captured after a massive, multi-agency manhunt. Authorities say he planned to target other lawmakers and even visited others' homes the night of the shootings.
Boelter has not yet entered a plea.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
32 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Rocket Companies Like SpaceX May Soon Pay Per Pound to Use the Sky
The skies may no longer be free for the space industry. Rocket companies like SpaceX and United Launch Alliance (ULA) may soon be required to pay a fee to support FAA oversight and airspace coordination, part of a broader effort to keep up with the growing launch industry. A budget reconciliation bill released by Senator Ted Cruz last week proposes that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) begin charging licensing fees to rocket companies starting next year. The collected fees would go into a trust fund to help the FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) acquire more resources needed to manage the growing number of rocket launches as it faces budget cuts for the coming year. Today, companies like SpaceX are required to pay small fees that cover the application process for launch and reentry licenses issued by the FAA. In return, the FAA clears airspace of commercial and private flights during the rocket launches and along the path of reentry. Airlines, on the other hand, do pay fees to the FAA, which go into the Airport and Airway Trust Fund that makes up nearly half the administration's annual budget. The burgeoning space industry is placing an added burden on the FAA, and the authors of the proposed bill suggest it's time for companies to start paying their dues. 'You have this group of new users that are paying nothing into the system that are an increasing share of the operations, and I truly believe the current structure isn't sustainable,' former FAA administrator Michael Huerta told NPR in an interview in May 2024. The FAA initially waived fees for space companies to help the industry grow in its early years. Last year, SpaceX launched 134 rockets to orbit, mostly the Falcon 9, and it's aiming to break its record with 170 launches in 2025. As a clear industry leader, SpaceX dominates the use of airspace over the U.S., while other companies like ULA carried out a total of five launches in 2024. SpaceX executives have also been the most vocal against the FAA's lack of resources and its inability to keep up with the growing space sector. In 2023, William Gerstenmaier, SpaceX's vice president, spoke at a hearing by the Senate subcommittee on space and science, warning that the FAA's licensing department is in 'great distress' and 'needs twice the resources it has today.' Perhaps SpaceX didn't anticipate that the funding for those resources would come out of the company's own pockets. The new bill suggests the FAA charge rocket companies based on the weight of the payload per launch, starting with $0.25 per pound in 2026 and gradually increasing by approximately $0.10 every year. In 2033, companies will potentially have to pay $1.50 per pound of payload. For SpaceX, the fee for a Falcon 9 launch of the company's Starlink satellites would amount to an average $9,400 in 2026, according to Ars Technica. SpaceX launched 89 Starlink missions in 2024, which would have cost it around $836,600 under the suggested fee guidelines. The FAA's AST could use that money as it faces a tight budget for 2026. The U.S. administration's skinny budget, released last month, allocates $42 million for AST. The FAA's overall budget request for 2026 is $22 billion, a very small portion of which will be used to expand the staffing for launch and reentry licensing. The budget for the FAA's commercial space office increased from $27.6 million in 2021 to $42 million in 2024 to account for the increasing number of rocket launches. The AST received roughly the same budget in 2024 and 2025, without accounting for inflation or a continually growing industry. The suggested trust fund could help fill the budgeting gap for the FAA, and allow it to expand its rocket licensing operations. Space companies have been quick to criticize regulatory bodies like the FAA for slow processes, but now it might be time for them to pay up to launch their rockets on a speedier timeline.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How unpopular is Trump? Even some people who attended his military parade don't like him
President Donald Trump's decision to go forward with his military parade landed with thud. While the Trump administration said 250,000 people watched the parade, the 'No Kings' protests across the country reportedly had four million people attend, the largest mass demonstrations in the nation's history. The event Saturday was billed as a way to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the Army, though inevitably, people brought up how it came the same day as the president's 79th birthday. Television broadcasts and The Independent flagged how few people attended the event. The parade came as Israel and Iran escalated military strikes against each other after Israel conducted its strikes beginning on Thursday. The next day, Trump announced that he would dispatch ICE to Democratic-run cities in blue states after he had already attempted to send in the National Guard and Marines without consent of the governor. But even outside the parade, much of the city remained relatively muted. Protesters walked in between the lines of attendees yelling 'Save America, F*** Trump' as they filed and some heckled and yelled shame to them as they entered the premises for the military parade. Others read from the Constitution or played Rage Against The Machine's 'Killing in the Name Of.' But even some of the people who attended the event did not necessarily approve of the president. Cassie Hafner came to Washington because her sister lives in the city and she wanted to bring her children. 'My son is a big military buff, and I know he wanted to see a lot of the vehicles,' she told The Independent. 'We were most excited to see the tanks and the airplanes, and he got to sit in the helicopters and stuff, and super fun.' Hafner said she liked that the event was not an 'explicitly MAGA event,' and she said she is not a fan of Trump a few months into his presidency. 'I think it's, he's very reactionary,' she said. 'And he's not thinking through the long term consequences of some of the decisions that he's making.' In the same token, Terry Modglin said he served in the Army. Specifically, he served a tour of duty in Vietnam. 'So this is a singular day I won't be around for the next one,' he told The Independent. 'I think we it's important that we, too understand what our soldiers do for us, for this country.' Modglin said that he did not come because of Trump, but rather to pay tribute to U.S. service members. 'My thoughts are independent of the President,' he said. 'I'm here to honor our service to our soldiers.' In fact, Modglin said that he was 'not a fan of the president.' 'A number of the things that he's done that I think are a little too, a little over the top,' he said. Of course, plenty of people--arguably a majority of the people--attending the parade counted themselves as fans. As people walked into the area where the parade took place, one busker with a guitar sang Lee Greenwood's 'God Bless the USA,' which has become something of an unofficial song of the Trump movement, and 'YMCA,' by the Village People, which Trump plays regularly at his rallies. As people waited in line, plenty of street vendors hawked 'Make America Great Again' hats and or images of Trump saying 'Daddy's Home.' Others wore hats saying 'Trump was right about everything' or they wore 'Dark MAGA' hats similar to the ones Elon Musk donned when he was in Trump's better graces. 'A lot more organized, a lot more together to fight the resistance, the anti-American people,' said a man named John who did not want to use his last name. 'He spent four years getting together organized, and now is doing it.' John said he appreciated 'all the way from immigration from economics from everything' in terms of Trump's policies. Bryan Benaiges, who was pushing a stroller with his baby, wore a Trump hat, but said he did not like how the event became politicized. 'I think it's primarily in support of the military and the country and its army, historic feat that our army survived 250 years,' he told The Independent. 'A lot of people are just curious and want to see it or want to support our country or our service members.' Still, Benaiges said he supports Trump. But there is evidence that Trump is losing some popular support. An NBC News Decision Desk poll showed that 55 percent of all adults disapproved of Trump. A YouGov poll right before the parade showed that people were about evenly split on whether they approved or disapproved of the military parade. All of this matters as Trump will begin a major push to ram through his 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' legislation through the Senate. But if he continues to shed support, that will make his job much harder.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's military parade will take ‘many days' to clean up, says D.C. mayor
Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has said there's so far no reported damage to the city's roads following Donald Trump's military parade — but the cleanup will take "many days" yet. "We expect for them to clean up over several days," Bowser told reporters at a press conference on Monday, referring to the Army Corps of Engineers — which is handling the aftermath. 'When I say clean up, I mean move all of their equipment and fencing and jersey barriers. It will take many days, as I understand it." Roughly 7,000 soldiers, 128 tanks, 34 horses, and a pack of dog-like robots paraded down the National Mall on Saturday to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Army — which just so happened to coincide with Trump's 79th birthday. But the sparse crowds lining the parade route were dwarfed by the estimated four million people who turned out across the country for "No Kings" protests against Trump's attempted centralization of power. The president's plans for a similar parade in 2018 were kiboshed over the potentially massive price tag and fears that heavy tracked vehicles could damage D.C.'s roads. On Monday Bowser said she did not "at this point" have any damage or necessary repairs to report. "We will evaluate with the utility companies any issues that we are aware of [with roads]. At this point I don't think we have any to report... "From my vantage point, our public safety agencies... performed very well in the support of the national special security event. I don't think there's anything remarkable [to report] about public safety incidents," Bowser said. "We had some First Amendment demonstrations that [D.C. police] supported to make sure that everybody was safe. And I think that happened without event." She added that she watched the parade after celebrating a seven-year-old's birthday party at Chuck E. Cheese, and that she had been 'surprised' and 'excited' to see one of the paratroopers fly the D.C. flag. The Army has pledged to pay for any repairs that prove necessary. Saturday's parade was the largest such event by the military since the end of the Gulf War in 1991, and featured everything from Revolutionary War marching bands through WW2-era Sherman tanks to parachute displays and flights of Apache helicopter gunships. But the event came amid controversy over Trump's use of military troops to guard immigration raids and quell protests in Los Angeles, against the wishes of California's Governor Gavin Newsom. Beforehand, Trump had threatened that "those people who want to protest" against the parade would be "met with very big force", calling them "people who hate our country". The Independent's reporter found the parade less Soviet Russia and more "small-town July 4", with small crowds, a subdued atmosphere, and booming tannoy announcements advertising the parade's commercial sponsors. A spokesperson for Trump claimed that more than 250,000 people attended the parade, but the Associated Press estimated its audience fell "far short" of 200,000.
