NY AG Tish James proves she only cares about her own brand, not the little guy
Progressives love screwing over the little guy: Just look at state Attorney General Tish James' latest 'pro-consumer' move, the so-called 'FAIR Business Practices Act.'
She's pushing the Legislature to pass it in the name of cracking down on junk fees, deed theft and other shady moves — but what it mainly does is offer new shakedown opportunities for shady lawyers.
Groups repping New York small businesses are outraged at how it widens the rules around who is actually allowed to sue, and for what.
It also radically expands the scope of what constitutes unlawful business conduct in the Empire State from 'deceptive' practices to 'unfair' and 'abusive' ones — categories with no real definition.
That is: It replaces a clear, objective standard with a subjective one, and sets the stage for any low-rent legal shark to gin up a lawsuit that the right jury might buy.
Big corporations can defend themselves against frivolous suits of this kind, but smaller companies can't — and will likely settle for cash.
Such lawsuits already cost the US economy hundreds of billions a year, according to analysts; why on earth would James want to drive up that figure?
Especially since the bill's supposed point is to protect consumers, who will end up paying the increased costs the new legal regime will bring.
In New York, per one recent analysis, BS lawsuits already cost businesses some $88.6 billion a year — and James wants to supercharge the extortion.
It's 'protection' we wouldn't wish on our worst enemy, in other words.
But James has never been about actually helping the everyday New Yorkers who put her in office.
She's all about enhancing her own political brand (and throwing a bone to the Dem-backing trial bar while she's at it).
The interests of the voters she allegedly represents be damned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iowa Republican Jim Carlin announces primary campaign against Joni Ernst for US Senate
Iowa Republican Jim Carlin is launching a primary campaign against incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, saying the two-term senator has failed to deliver on her famous "make 'em squeal" mantra. 'Joni Ernst said she would go to D.C. and make them squeal,' Carlin said in a statement, referring to a viral campaign ad that helped propel Ernst to her first term in 2014. 'After a decade, it's clear it was a clever campaign commercial, not conviction. Rather than making them squeal, Joni has joined The Swamp." Carlin is a former state senator and trial lawyer who served in the Iowa Legislature from 2017 to 2022. He is the founder of the Iowa Liberty Network, a group focused on "maintaining the liberties endowed by our Creator through getting authentic, constitutional conservatives elected to the state legislature and other public offices," according to its website. Carlin previously mounted a primary campaign against Iowa's other Republican U.S. senator, Chuck Grassley, in 2022. He positioned himself to the right of Grassley, arguing he was more conservative on issues such as immigration and the Second Amendment, and he criticized Grassley for voting to certify the 2020 election in Democrat Joe Biden's favor without pushing to investigate unsubstantiated allegations of fraud. Grassley defeated him 73.5% to 26.5%. "Senator Ernst has a proven record of conservative leadership — cutting waste, securing the border, and making Washington squeal to keep Iowans' hard-earned money in their own pockets," Ernst's campaign manager Bryan Kraber said in a statement. "And she delivers for our families, farmers and veterans. Iowans already saw through Carlin's last failed campaign, and they'll reject his desperate attempt at relevance again in 2026.' Carlin said in a news release that Ernst pledged to serve just two terms in the U.S. Senate when she first ran in 2014, even though she is now seeking a third term. And he said she angered "America First conservatives" with her reluctance to support Republican President Donald Trump's pick to lead the U.S. Department of Defense, Pete Hegseth. Ernst ignited a firestorm among Republicans by withholding her support for Hegseth initially, although she ultimately voted to confirm him. Carlin also pointed to Ernst's 2022 vote for the Respect for Marriage Act, which garnered intense pushback from some Iowa Republicans. At least 17 county parties voted to condemn or censure Ernst over the vote. 'Iowans deserve a voice in Washington, D.C., who actually listens to them and represents them — not big donors and special interests,' he said. 'More than that, Iowans deserve someone who genuinely cares about them and will work to make their lives better. There are enough self-serving establishment politicians in Washington. President Donald J. Trump needs America First allies, not adversaries.' Ernst has not formally announced her reelection effort, but she has hired a campaign manager and scheduled her annual Roast and Ride fundraiser for the fall. One other Republican challenger, Joshua Smith, has announced a campaign against Ernst for the GOP nomination. And two Democrats have formally entered the race: Knoxville Chamber of Commerce director Nathan Sage and State Rep. J.D. Scholten of Sioux City. State Sen. Zach Wahls, D-Coralville, and state Rep. Josh Turek, D-Council Bluffs, have also previously said they are considering running. Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. Reach her at bpfann@ or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Joni Ernst gets primary challenge from Iowa Republican Jim Carlin
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cuomo vows ‘top to bottom review' of key NYC housing agency, stirring mixed responses
Andrew Cuomo is pledging he would as mayor 'cut out the bureaucracy' from New York City's Department of Housing Presevation and Development, arguing it's riddled with 'red tape' — a proposal welcomed by real estate industry players but that is raising alarm bells among tenant advocates. The issue emerged in Wednesday night's first Democratic mayoral primary debate, when Cuomo said he would 'blow up' the department in order to address the city's housing crisis. The agency — which is tasked with helping finance affordable housing construction, enforce tenant protections and administer certain rental assistance programs — has become an 'obstacle' to the mission of building more apartments across the city, Cuomo added. Asked Thursday to elaborate on what Cuomo meanty, his spokesman Rich Azzopardi said the ex-governor 'believes HPD is too slow and too inefficient in fulfilling its core functions.' 'If elected mayor, among his first duties would be to order a top to bottom review of the agency and then implement a plan to cut out the bureaucracy, cut the red tape and make it functional in a reasonable manner,' Azzopardi told the Daily News. Azzopardi said the ex-governor's critical view of HPD applies to all its sectors — affordable housing financing, tenant protection enforcement and rental assistance administration. Cuomo's housing plan released last month didn't include the proposal to overhaul HPD, which has an annual budget of more than $1.5 billion. The plan includes the production of 500,000 new housing units in the city over 10 years, but did not spell out how many of those apartments would be affordable. The plan also said Cuomo would as mayor oppose most up-zoning efforts in outer-borough neighborhoods, a stance at odds with HPD's focus under Mayor Adams to facilitate more affordable housing construction in pockets of the city that have historically produced little of it. Housing has emerged as a key issue in this year's mayoral race as the city reels from skyrocketing rents and a dearth of vacant apartments, and there's widespread agreement more units must be built. However, there are disagreements over what sort of affordability requirements should be placed on developers, with moderate politicians like Cuomo championing looser restrictions while more left-leaning stakeholders want most new apartments reserved for low-income New Yorkers. Cuomo, who's polling as the favorite to win the June 24 Democratic mayoral primary, floated the push for restructuring HPD as his mayoral run has taken in millions of dollars in donations from real estate industry executives and landlord lobby groups, who often air concerns about the need to reform the agency. As first reported by Politico Thursday, Housing for All, a super PAC funded by one of the city's largest landlord lobbies, is plunking down $2.5 million on airing ads boosting Cuomo's run. The lobby group, the New York Apartment Association, which mostly represents landlords of rent-stabilized buildings, vehemently opposes efforts to freeze rent for the city's stabilized tenants, a proposal several of Cuomo's mayoral race opponents, including runner-up candidate Zohran Mamdani, have embraced. Kenny Burgos, the New York Apartment Association's CEO, lauded Cuomo for promising to 'blow up' the HPD, saying the agency is 'choking the market' from producing more housing. 'It is bringing on layers upon layers of violations to owners, where there are scenarios where owners can't even clear the violations because of HPD mismanagement,' Burgos said. 'So, you know, any candidate talking about completely reforming the agency that has really huge overarching powers on regulated housing, I'd say is a good approach.' But Brooklyn Councilman Lincoln Restler, a progressive Democrat who used to be a senior adviser to ex-Mayor Bill de Blasio, including on housing and tenant issues, said Cuomo's proposal is 'dangerous' and voiced concern his comments signal he's open to the real estate industry's push to roll back tenant protections and rent regulations. 'Cuomo is going to do the bidding of wealthy real estate interests who had paid for his campaign, not meet the needs of the people of New York City,' Restler said. Mamdani, who's consistently polling in second place in the mayor's race, told The News: 'HPD doesn't need to be 'blown up' — it needs to be fully staffed so it can protect tenants and get affordable housing built.' A city government official involved in the Adams administration's affordable housing efforts argued HPD has undergone various reforms in recent years to streamline the agency's operations. In the last fiscal year, HPD financed 14,706 newly-constructed affordable homes. 'HPD is already blowing up the status quo, making it easier to build new apartments and easier to get into affordable housing,' said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Cea Weaver, director of the left-leaning Housing Justice for All group, acknowledged there are many roadblocks to affordable housing production, but also argued HPD isn't one of them. 'A top to bottom review, that sounds like a hell of a lot bureaucracy,' she said. 'What needs to happen is to actually just let HPD operate.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Property taxes, book bans and resolutions: Three Grand Forks lawmakers discuss recent session
Jun. 6—GRAND FORKS — Through an hour-long conversation looking back on the 2025 legislative session, three Grand Forks state lawmakers found moments of agreement and professed similar opinions on issues more than they disagreed. Rep. Nels Christianson, Rep. Erik Murphy and Rep. Zac Ista, all from Grand Forks, went through some of the topics from the session with different mindsets but familiar answers. For example, on the matter of property tax and Gov. Kelly Armstrong's bill — which expanded the primary tax credit to a maximum $1,600 and capped local-level tax increases to no more than 3% annually — Christianson said they found some common ground. Property tax was one of the several issues discussed during the legislative wrap-up, held at the Grand Forks County office building on Thursday, June 5. All 18 members of districts 17, 18, 19, 20, 42 and 43 were invited, but Ista, Murphy and Christianson were the only ones in attendance. Joel Heitkamp, host of KFGO News and Views and a former state senator, served as moderator. Some issues involved public funding to private schools, Medicaid, the North Dakota Republican Party and what bills the legislators worked on. Property tax was among the most newsworthy issues during the session. Armstrong discussed it prior to his November election and his bill, HB 1176, was not passed until May 2, near the end of the session. "Did we deliver relief? Yes," Christianson said. "Reform? Maybe not so much." Murphy said property taxes are typically something outside of the Legislature's lane, but that he begrudgingly supported Armstrong's property tax bill. "Property tax is part of the reality of living in a nation such as ours," he said. "Property tax, to me, is a local issue." Ista, the only Democrat among the three, said there will be a trade-off. Homeowners will get some tax relief, but political subdivisions will have to figure out how to continue to pay for things. "Now the burden is going to fall on our local, county, city, school districts to see how to live within this new reality. I think it's going to be a challenge going forward for the state and locals to balance it," he said. One issue on which all three agreed was the matter of banning books. Each legislator was against it, though they had different thoughts on the matter. Ista said he has voted against every book censorship bill, and will continue to do so every chance he gets. "The issues in our state that affect our kids are not what books are displayed where in our libraries," he said. "I love taking my kids to Grand Forks Public Library and watch them go down that big pink slide, and I've never once worried about what book they might stumble into." Christianson said that, under no circumstances, should books be banned. Instead, he said, they should be placed in the appropriate area, and that he wants his daughters to be able to go around the children's section of the library and look at any books they would like in that section. "I absolutely do not support taking anything out of the ability for people to check out from the library," he said. "I just want to make sure that ... parents have a chance to be in the loop, just that parents can understand what their children are reading, especially in the younger ages." Murphy said there are better things to do and think about in North Dakota than book bans, and he mentioned Senate Bill 2307, which would have required libraries to make material considered sexually explicit unavailable to minors, and could penalize failure to comply. One issue he took with the bill was the difference between what was said about it versus what it would really do, he said. "What it really did is, opened up every library in the state, whether it's UND's library, it opened up the (North Dakota Museum of Art)," he said. "If there's a nude in there, that could be considered pornography, therefore we need to take that picture down." Two resolutions that failed during the session — House Concurrent Resolution 3013, which requested the U.S. Supreme Court overturn gay marriage, and House Concurrent Resolution 3020, declaring that "Christ is King" of North Dakota — drew disagreement between Christianson, who voted "yes" on both, and the other two legislators, who voted against them. Christianson's thought on HCR 3013 was that issues such as marriage need to be defined at the state level, not through a court decision, referencing Obergefell vs. Hodges, the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding same-sex marriages. Ista said that it was probably the darkest day of the session for him when the resolution came to the floor, and that he was caught "flat-footed" by it. He said he had thought everyone had moved beyond the issue of marriage equality. Murphy said it's not up to him to decide who any individual should love. He also said that during this recent school year, he knew of students who were transgender and transitioning. The resolution sends the wrong message to North Dakota residents and creates a division in the state, he said. As for HCR 3020, Murphy simply said "absolutely not" when Heitkamp asked if he thought North Dakota should be in the business of declaring that Christ is king. Ista said that the faith leaders in his life respected a foundational concept of no official religions in America, and that, while he respects the religion of his colleagues, the state should be accommodating to all religions and not place one above the others. Christianson said the resolution would have no effect on state policies, claiming that he voted for what he believes is the truth. "It was simply a statement, and that's a statement that I will make every day, that Christ is king," he said.
