Authorities raid 5 Michigan homes amid yearlong vandalism investigation into pro-Palestinian graffiti
Authorities raided five homes in southeastern Michigan on Wednesday as part of a yearlong investigation into pro-Palestinian vandalism targeting the homes of University of Michigan officials and others.
Search warrants, authorized by a Michigan state court, were executed in Ann Arbor, Canton and Ypsilanti, according to a Thursday news release from the Michigan Department of Attorney General. The individuals whose homes were searched were not arrested, officials said. Two University of Michigan student organizations claim six were detained and later released.
The search warrants were executed as part of the Michigan Department of Attorney General's investigation into at least 12 'coordinated and related' acts of vandalism and property damage that occurred in multiple Michigan counties between approximately February 2024 through March 2025, officials said. The estimated cost of the damage is about $100,000, according to authorities.
'Political slogans or messages' were placed at every vandalized site, the attorney general's office said. Graffiti displayed pro-Palestinian messages at most of the sites, photos show.
Several University of Michigan administrators were among those targeted.
The home of Erik Lundberg, the university's chief investment officer, was vandalized with the words 'Divest' and 'Free Palestine.' University of Michigan President Santa Ono's home was vandalized with graffiti that included the word 'intifada' in part. The home of Jordan Acker, a member of the university's Board of Regents, was also damaged – with a window broken and the words 'Free Palestine' written on his car. His law firm was also vandalized with pro-Palestinian language. Photos of provost Laurie McCauley's home likewise show shattered glass and the words 'No honor in genocide' graffitied on her fence.
No charges have been filed against any of the people whose homes were searched, authorities said. The attorney general's office did not identify any suspects in the investigation.
'The University of Michigan condemns these criminal acts in the strongest possible terms,' the school said in a December statement after Acker's home was vandalized. 'They are abhorrent and, unfortunately, just the latest in a number of incidents where individuals have been harassed because of their work on behalf of the university. This is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.'
The Maurice & Jane Sugar Law Center for Economic & Social Justice, which is representing some of the individuals whose homes were raided, said most are University of Michigan students. When asked about the vandalism at Acker's home, the lawyers denied that their clients were involved.
John Philo, the legal director at the law center, said the raids are a testament to the 'state attorney general's cooperation with the Trump administration's FBI to target student protesters who advocate a particular viewpoint - for their school's divestment from Israel.'
The incidents followed months of tensions between the university's administration and pro-Palestinian students who had in 2024 demanded university leaders divest from Israel amid its war in Gaza.
Other instances of vandalism and property damage occurred at the Jewish Federation of Detroit, an officer's home, a country club, a car dealership, an office and the historic Wilcox House, according to the attorney general's office.
The alleged vandalisms were committed in the middle of the night, and in one instance, children were sleeping at a residence but were awoken, according to the attorney general's office. Windows were smashed in several cases and 'noxious chemical substances were propelled' into homes on two occasions.
The TAHRIR Coalition, a pro-Palestinian student organization at the University of Michigan, said FBI agents, the Michigan State Police and local police officers detained but later released six activists whose homes were searched in Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti. Personal belongings and electronics were also confiscated, according to the organization. At a third residence in Canton, no individuals were detained.
At one of the homes searched Wednesday, police forcibly entered after they negotiated entry for more than an hour to satisfy the search warrant, the attorney general's office said.
Graduate Employees' Organization, a union representing graduate workers at the University of Michigan, said one of its members was among those detained and released and 'executors of the search warrants were reluctant to reveal their warrants or their reason for visiting these activists.'
'We strongly condemn the actions taken today and all past and present repression of political activism,' the union said in a news release. 'We urge University of Michigan administrators, the Regents of the University of Michigan, and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel to end their campaign against students and stop putting graduate workers in harm's way.'
Philo said that the alleged vandalism 'may be a misdemeanor under city, county, and/or state law.'
'Unless there are some unknown pool of facts, the vandalism that is alleged to have occurred at this point (spray painting/use of markers with water soluble materials) is far less than occurs on any given football weekend in Ann Arbor, East Lansing, or other college community,' he said. 'While nothing anyone would endorse, [the alleged vandalism] does not seem to warrant the scope and scale of FBI, State Police, and local law enforcement activity that occurred this morning.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Abbott readying National Guard for protests, not the first time
AUSTIN (KXAN) – Gov. Greg Abbott has called up Texas National Guard members to at least two Texas cities, in response to immigration-related protests, officials from Austin and San Antonio have confirmed. It isn't the first time Abbott has brought in guardsmen in reaction to protesters. Mayor: TX National Guard on standby to assist DPS during protests in Austin The governor previously activated more than 3,800 Texas National Guard members, including Army National Guard soldiers, in 2020 amid the George Floyd protests and the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the Texas Military Department. The National Guard was not called in for the pro-Palestine student protests at the University of Texas at Austin last year, according to AP News, but more than 100 Department of Public Safety troopers were deployed, The Texas Tribune reported. Abbott said this current deployment of Texas National Guard is meant to 'ensure peace & order.' 'Peaceful protest is legal,' Abbott said in a social media post. 'Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrst.' Bringing in the National Guard has drawn mixed reactions from local and state officials. KXAN's Kelly Wiley is reporting on the state's use of the National Guard, and we will be updating this report throughout the day. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Politico
17 minutes ago
- Politico
Judge blocks Trump admin from deporting Mahmoud Khalil using Rubio power
A federal judge in New Jersey blocked the Trump administration from deporting pro-Palestinian Columbia University protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil on foreign policy grounds. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil under a provision of federal law that allows the deportation of any foreign citizen whose 'presence or activities' in the U.S. is determined to 'have serious adverse foreign policy consequences' and is chilling Khalil's First Amendment free speech rights. In a 14-page order, Farbiarz said the rarely used statute Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked against the former Columbia graduate student is likely unconstitutional. He also ruled that the activist and legal U.S. resident who has been in immigration custody in Louisiana since March can't be detained further on that basis. The judge said it was unlikely the Trump administration could justify detaining Khalil via another rationale it tacked on after his arrest in Manhattan: that when he applied for a green card, he failed to disclose all his past employment and membership in certain organizations. Immigrants are almost never detained for those sorts of omissions, the judge noted, finding it likelier that Rubio's determination was the basis for Khalil's ongoing detention. However, the judge's ruling did not foreclose Khalil's continued detention on alternative grounds, emphasizing that he had only definitively rejected Rubio's determination and that his decision had 'no impact' on other aspects of the effort to deport Khalil. Farbiarz, a Biden appointee, put his ruling on hold until Friday morning to allow the Trump administration to appeal. A lawyer for Khalil, Baher Azmy, said in an email that he believes Farbiarz's order means Khalil should be released from custody by Friday morning unless an appellate court intervenes. 'We are relieved that the Court determined that both his detention and his removal based on the ridiculous, overbroad Rubio determination would be unconstitutional,' Azmy said, 'and that he is suffering severe ongoing harms [from] the government's grotesque, vindictive retaliation for his constitutionally protected expression in support of Palestine.' The departments of Justice, State and Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment. While Khalil has remained detained, others who have been similarly swept up as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian academics have been released. In early May, a Vermont federal judge ordered the release of Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish Tufts University Ph.D. student. A few days later, a federal judge in Virginia ordered the release of a Georgetown researcher, Badar Khan Suri. Like Khalil, both Ozturk and Suri had been detained in March.
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
Why Los Angeles protesters fly the Mexican flag
Anyone looking at images of the Los Angeles immigration protests has almost certainly seen the Mexican flag flying somewhere in the frame. Demonstrators have hoisted the red, white and green banner atop cars and while marching down streets and freeways. It's spilled into the corners of CNN live shots and been splashed across social media. To some, the flag — its bright colors standing out against dark smoke from burning cars and tear gas — is a powerful sign of resistance to President Donald Trump's mass-deportation agenda. To others, it is ammunition for conservatives aiming to paint the unrest as a 'migrant invasion.' Case in point: a National Review headline calling the Mexican flag the 'Confederate banner of the L.A. riots.' Protesters' prominent use of the flag evokes photos from more than 30 years ago, when thousands of demonstrators raised the same banner while fighting a ballot measure that sought to bar undocumented Californians from accessing public schools and other services. That 1994 initiative, Proposition 187, was a turning point for Latino political power in the state. It served as an awakening for some California protesters who later became prominent leaders, including former Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León. Angelica Salas, a prominent activist in the state and executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, noted protesters also hoisted the flag in 2006, during massive demonstrations against George W. Bush-era legislation to crack down on illegal immigration. 'When you attack the undocumented community, when you attack the immigrant community, there is a sense that — I mean, it's a reality — the majority of the folks are Mexican,' she said. Salas spoke with California Playbook about why the Mexican flag continues to be an important symbol for demonstrators. On what the Mexican flag means to protesters … It's really about saying we're American, Mexican American, and we're not ashamed of being Mexican …There's a very popular refrain amongst our community that you can't just like our food and our culture — we also demand that you like the people. Because it's sort of a very, very strong sentiment that there's a like for what we produce and [for] our culture and our foods and everything else, but not of the people. So there's a sense of the deep level of discrimination against the Mexican people. So when people carry the flag, it's really a symbol of pride and a symbol of 'We're not going to be ashamed to claim our heritage, our Mexican heritage. We're not going to be bullied to hide an aspect of who we are.' On young protesters' attachment to the flag … When you see a lot of young people with their flags, it's also claiming and [showing] support for their parents. So many of the young people who are marching are U.S. citizens, they're second-, third-generation, maybe they are the first who were born in this country. Very much U.S. citizens by birth, but they want their parents to also know that they're standing with them. I feel like every time I ask a young person — whether they're carrying a Mexican flag, a Salvadoran flag, a Guatemalan flag, or any other flag — it's just about, 'I want people to understand I'm proud of who I am. I'm not ashamed to be Mexican, and I'm certainly not ashamed of my parents. And I want them to know that I will not reject them.' Because there's a lot of pressure to reject the Mexican heritage. On California's connection to Mexico … Thirty percent of the population is people of Mexican descent — 12 million individuals who live here. We are proudly a multigenerational community. That means that we have recent arrivals as well as people who are immigrants who've been here for many years. And then [the] majority of the people actually are second-, third-, fourth-generation Mexican American. There's a lot of pride in our deep roots in the region.
