Free First Bus travel in Glasgow for Armed Forces Day
On Saturday, June 28, the bus company will allow anyone in uniform from the Royal Navy, Army, Royal Marines, Royal Air Force, and associated cadet forces free access to their services.
Also, individuals with a valid Ministry of Defence-issued card displaying their military service branch can benefit from the free travel.
Read more:
Affordable housing development containing 33 homes now complete
Woman flees from bus stop in fear after man followed her to home
First Bus employees who are former service personnel are being encouraged to wear their military attire while on duty.
Armed Forces Day is an event to celebrate the contributions of the Armed Forces community, including service families, currently serving troops, veterans, and cadets.
Martin Hirst, director of revenue and customer proposition at First Bus, said: "This is an important occasion for many people who want to remember family, friends and others who have been lost in military service.
"We have several veterans working for First Bus across our businesses, and we're very proud of their efforts and sacrifice.
"This is our way of saying thank you to them, as well as honouring all men and women who choose to serve and protect the freedoms of our country."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
It's also a ‘new era' for share prices in the defence sector
It's a miracle. Babcock International, the defence contractor with a specialism in kitting out the UK's nuclear submarines, has emerged from the depths. After about half a decade in which the story was mostly about cost overruns, acquisition indigestion, accounting woes, pension deficits and too much debt, Babcock is suddenly back in the FTSE 100 index and is a hot stock. The share price has more than doubled this year. Of course it's not really a miracle because the performance is easily explained. A fix-the-basics strategy started in 2020 under ex-Cobham boss David Lockwood and has worked. The last of the badly performing major contracts – to build first-of-a-kind Type 31 frigates for the Royal Navy – is no longer spitting out provisions. Meanwhile, the group has kept its promises to the City on cashflow et cetera and was able on Wednesday to lift its medium-term target for operating margins by a percentage point to 9%. The pension position is vastly improved, dividends are back and there's enough cash for a £200m buyback. Yet that progress alone would not have pushed the shares so high so soon. The other part of the tale, of course, is 'the new era for defence' as Lockwood put it, meaning the coming Nato splurge in spending. Babcock's full-year numbers happened to land on the day that Nato allies formally declared a commitment to invest of 5% of GDP annually on defence and security by 2035. 'Public market investors appear convinced this pivot in govt spending will happen. European defence stocks are trading like crypto/memes,' tweeted Simon French, the chief economist at Panmure Liberum. You can see what it means. If the share prices of Babcock, Rolls-Royce (up 56% this year) and BAE Systems (58%) are soaring, try Germany's largest arms company, Rheinmetall – 158% higher since January. It's true the Nato commitment is enormous. Analysts at Berenberg calculate the core defence spending element (ie not the whole) adds up to $600bn a year, of which $350bn would come from non-US allies, assuming the US and countries in Europe's north and east spend 3.5% of GDP, while countries in Europe's south and west only manage 2% and others do 3%. In Babcock's case, it is the second largest contractor to the Ministry of Defence so can hardly fail to benefit from the natural home bias in defence spending. The UK has already committed £6bn to upgrade nuclear submarine production and the list of what Babcock does elsewhere is long – from maintenance work with long-term contracts for all three armed forces, to technical trading and more. Meanwhile, on its civil nuclear construction side, the breezes are also strong, assuming Sizewell C and small modular reactors happen. This is specialist stuff; the world is not awash with competitors. Whether the 'new era' for defence really arrives as scheduled, and to the last percentage point, is open to question. Share prices in the sector may also be ahead of events. Defence companies, traditionally viewed as dull income stocks even when the contracts are free of hiccups, are now typically trading on 25-times earnings. That will take some getting used to. But it's hard to argue with the general direction. If even three-quarters of these spending commitments are fulfilled, a fundamental change is happening.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Top Meta exec joins US army's ‘next generation' tech team Detachment 201
Meta's chief technology officer has called it 'the great honor of my life' to be enlisted in a new US army corps that defence chiefs set up to better integrate military and tech industry expertise, including senior figures from top tech firms that also include Palantir and OpenAI. Andrew Bosworth, a long-term lieutenant to Mark Zuckerberg known widely as 'Boz', is one of several senior Silicon Valley executives commissioned to the rank of lieutenant colonel in the corps, called Detachment 201, which the US Army says will 'fuse cutting-edge tech expertise with military innovation'. Bosworth, who joined Facebook in 2006, was sworn into the army reserves earlier this month alongside Shyam Sankar, the chief technology officer of Palantir, a technology firm with extensive defence contracts, Kevin Weil, chief product officer of OpenAI, and Bob McGrew, an advisor at Thinking Machines Lab, a $10bn AI company. They wore military fatigues at the swearing-in ceremony but will not be full-time soldiers. The recruitment is a sign of the increasing importance of technology in modern warfare and growing commercial and research links between some of the largest tech firms and the military. The US army said it was 'just the start of a bigger mission to inspire more tech pros to serve without leaving their careers'. In an interview with Pirate Wires, Bosworth said he was joining in a personal capacity, but that some people at Meta had 'reservations' about the move. He said he was approached to join by Sankar. 'I don't think I waited 10 minutes,' Bosworth said. 'I was like, 'Yes, I would love to, it'd be the great honor of my life to do this.' Meta recently began a partnership with the defence technology company Anduril to develop augmented reality devices, such as headsets, for battlefield use, but Bosworth said his recruitment was separate to that project. Even before he was sworn in, Bosworth said he and the three other tech executives had visited Fort Irwin in California to observe what the US military calls 'next generation command and control'. 'We reviewed a large number of new technology initiatives they're developing, which I can't talk more about,' he said. 'Then we got in a helicopter and flew into what they call 'the box,' which is where Army battalions do training exercises. And they had a training exercise going where these battalions were using some of the next gen technology they'd been developing at the Army Futures Command, … there's tanks driving by, going through a field that has anti-tank impediments set up, and they figure out: how can they use new tools to overcome those? And like, instead of firing missiles or rockets, what if these things fire drones?' He said that on the drive back from the 'box' the army chief of staff's chief technology officer, Dr Alex Miller, gave them 'a lot of intelligence on what the army's trying to do, what has and hasn't been effective, and how he sees things going forward. At that point, even though none of us had been commissioned yet – we were still just private citizens who had been invited to observe the exercises.' Asked about the types of projects they might work on, Bosworth said: 'Some of those problems, the ones journalists like to write about, are around lethality and survival, but some of them are just logistical problems.' Sankar, meanwhile, said technologists were 'rediscovering Silicon Valley's roots in national defense during the second world war and wold war'. 'Wars in Europe and the Middle East and, above all, the threat of a war in the Pacific have focused the national mind and initiated a scramble for mobilization,' he said earlier this month. 'Exploding pagers and long-distance drone strikes from shipping containers prove that technology has once again changed the battlefield. Our military has to change with it.' Meta was approached for comment.
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Britain's super-deadly nuclear weapons in full after chilling government warning
British military commanders boosted the UK's nuclear and conventional deterrence by buying super-deadly F35A warplanes to dominate the skies and ward of growing threats from hostile states Britain's multi-billion expansion into being able to carry nuclear weapons on brand new F35A fighter jets could ward off threats from multiple hostile states in the future. Or they can be more conventionally armed, used as super-deadly warplanes, screaming into combat in support of UK ground troops, taking out enemy jets or attacking military targets. The fifth generation £85m warplanes will compliment the UK's F3B's that are the 'punching power' of the Royal Navy's £3.5bn aircraft carriers HMS Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales. But the F35A's will be more versatile, more deadly and agile in the air as they operate by taking off from conventional runways land and have far greater ability to fly distances in defending British interests. The new move means the UK will have a more versatile and potent nuclear defence system than ever before, protecting the UK in the air and also at sea. And the UK government calculates that they are needed as it means they can help other NATO allies with a nuclear deterrence and boost Britain's power in the alliance. This all comes during the NATO summit where European allied leaders are hoping to pin down US President Donald Trump into committing to Article Five. It comes amid warnings that Russia may expand its war in Ukraine, attacking a European ally, China is muscle-flexing and the two have relationships with North Korea and Iran. This crucial Article Five agreement is an 'attack one, attack all' deal meaning if a hostile state assaults one NATO ally then it is an act of war against the entire alliance. The article has been invoked only once in the 70-year history of the Alliance: in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States. But it is the cornerstone of the NATO alliance. Though capable of carrying nuclear weapons the 12 new F35A's will be on standby to defend the UK and perhaps go to war with conventional weapons. The UK has had nuclear weapons since the early 1950's as the Cold War threat f rom post WWII conflict Russia escalated tensions across the globe. We were the third country to acquire nuclear weapons, behind the US and the Soviet Union. Crucially the UK has always stated the weapons, now Trident Missiles fired from one of four submarines, exist under a strict 'no first use policy.' That means the nukes can only be fired in an act of defence in reaction to an enemy country letting loose an atom missile as the UK or its interests. Operations of our nuclear-armed Vanguard Class Submarines mean one of the beasts is lurking beneath the waves at a top secret location constantly. But it does mean that the UK's enemies know that it constantly has a deadly sub on standby to react to nuclear attack if a rogue state presses the nuclear button. The deterrence means an enemy attacking the UK with a nuclear weapon knows it could be obliterated in response by a submarine probably nowhere near the UK. The operations carried out by our Vanguard Submarines are top secret to give the UK an edge over enemies and prevent a pre-emptive attack on them. The RAF says: 'The F-35A aircraft will be available to fly NATO's nuclear mission in a crisis, deepening the UK's contribution to NATO's nuclear burden-sharing arrangements, and deter those who would do the UK and our Allies harm. It reintroduces a nuclear role for the RAF for the first time since the UK retired its sovereign air-launched nuclear weapons following the end of the Cold War. 'This complements the UK's own operationally independent nuclear deterrent, strengthens NATO's nuclear deterrence, and underlines the UK's unshakeable commitment to NATO and the principle of collective defence under Article Five.' Here we detail Britain's current secretive nuclear deterrence operation, delving into some of its history, its future and looking at how it will in future protect the UK. The F35A fighter jet The new warplane is immensely potent and travels a greater distance than its F35B cousin since it uses conventional runways. The F35B is a STOVL plane, meaning Short Take Off Vertical Landing as it takes off and returns to an aircraft carrier. The F35B uses so much power taking off and landing that it has limited range of just 900 miles - or roughly just under the length of Britain from Land's End to John O'Groats. But the F35A has a range of 1,200 miles, giving it an extra edge since it does not use as much power in take-off and landing. It can fly conventional and nuclear weapons. Our nuclear-armed Vanguard fleet The UK's Vanguard-Class subs are led by HMS Vanguard and include Victorious, Vigilant, and Vengeance, each capable of carrying up to 16 missiles each. These submarines are also nuclear-powered and can stay beneath the waves, fully operational for many months. At least one is on patrol somewhere in the world 's oceans at any one time. The Vanguards have a crew of 130 officers and sailors. The submarines operate with two separate crews, Port and Starboard, to ensure continuous patrols. While one crew is on patrol, the other is either training or on leave. The crew size is smaller compared to the older Resolution-class submarines they replaced, despite the Vanguard-class being larger. They will be replaced at some stage by the new Dreadnought-Class submarines which will also carry US-made Trident weapons. According to the MoD four new Dreadnought class ballistic missile submarines will be ready in the 2030s and were first announced in 2015. They will take over duty as part of Britain's operation Continuous at Sea Deterrence. The UK's nuclear weapons The UK has around 225 nuclear warheads and the Vanguard Submarines carries around 16 Trident II D5 nuclear missiles. Each missile can carry up to eight warheads, which means each missile can unleash on eight targets in mid-air. Interestingly the Vanguards also carry Spearfish Torpedoes to be used to defend itself against other enemy submarines and surface warships. Around 150 nuclear weapons are ready for operations and the rest are held in reserve. Our Trident missiles have a strength or yield of 100 kilotons - eight times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb. The Trident missiles are US made, US maintained and the UK leases them from America. Britain's new fighter F35A jets will, if needed, be armed with American-made B61 gravity bombs. These are low-to-intermediate yield strategic and tactical nuclear weapons so they can be used for massive blasts or local, smaller, blasts used on the battlefield to help friendly forces. They can have a yield of from 0.3 to 340 kilotons in its various modes.
