Prison task force plans to take public testimony
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — The agenda is out for the first meeting next week of the group that will recommend what direction South Dakota should head on a new men's prison.
The Prison Project Reset task force, appointed last month by Gov. Larry Rhoden, is scheduled to gather on the morning of Wednesday, April 2, for an 8 a.m. tour of the current State Penitentiary and Jameson Annex in Sioux Falls that the new prison would largely replace.
State Supreme Court hears NOPE case Tuesday
After a lunch break, the group will tour the state government-owned site between Harrisburg and Canton in Lincoln County, where the state Department of Corrections had planned construction of the new prison.
The group will meet for a second day on Thursday, April 3, starting at 8 a.m., at the South Dakota Military Heritage Alliance building in Sioux Falls, located at 1600 W. Russell Street.
The members are scheduled on that second morning to receive an overview of South Dakota's current DOC facilities and four presentations before breaking for lunch.
Starting at 12:30 p.m. on April 3, the group plans to take public testimony. The group's chair, Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen, is in charge of deciding the duration of time each person can testify.
4.02.25.Meeting.AgendaDownload
'My hope is that I don't have to be too restrictive,' Venhuizen told KELOLAND News on Wednesday, March 26. 'I will ask testifiers to try to stay at ten minutes or so, and not to repeat prior testimony. We should have a couple hours and I want to be sure everyone is heard.'
Venhuizen said written comments and materials can also be submitted for distribution to the committee. Emailed comments and materials can be sent here.
How we got here
In her December 2021 budget address to the Legislature, then-Gov. Kristi Noem referred to a study that showed South Dakota had some $600 million in Department of Corrections needs. She suggested that state lawmakers start setting aside funds to meet those needs. In response, during the 2022 legislative session, the state incarceration fund was established.
In February 2022, Gov. Noem announced the appointment of Kellie Wasko as state secretary of corrections. Wasko began on March 7 of that year, and DOC officials worked several years developing the plan for a new men's prison.
In October 2023, Noem's office announced the purchase of 300 acres of farm land in Lincoln County from the state Office of School and Public Lands.
But in 2024, the Legislature passed and Noem signed into law Senate Bill 201, dealing with pipelines. SB 201 was referred to a statewide vote and was rejected in all but one of South Dakota's 66 counties.
Just as significantly, a dozen incumbent lawmakers who had voted yes on SB 201 during the legislative session lost in the June 2024 primary elections. That turnover brought in a new crop of legislators who hadn't been part of the previous plan to set money aside for a new prison.
Then Noem resigned as governor in January, with Rhoden automatically moving up from lieutenant governor. Secretary Wasko meanwhile raised eyebrows among lawmakers when she revealed that ongoing operational costs for the new prison would be significantly higher.
All of that led to the House of Representatives deadlocking on House Bill 1025 that originally called for authorizing construction of the new men's prison and transferring $763 million to the Department of Corrections to pay for it. An attempt to keep HB 1025 alive by amending it to only transfer $148 million into the incarceration fund also failed.
A local group calling itself Neighbors Opposing Prison Expansion aka NOPE Lincoln County meanwhile had sued state government, claiming due process wasn't followed in choosing the proposed site. The South Dakota Supreme Court heard arguments in the case earlier this week.
How the Rhoden administration responded
Gov. Rhoden then issued his first executive order establishing the Prison Project Reset panel on February 27. The order called for the group to deliver its recommendations and propose legislation to the governor by July 15. Rhoden told news reporters that he plans to call a special legislative session on July 22 regarding the matter.
Rhoden appointed the following people to the prison task force:
Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen, Sioux Falls, as its chair.
Yankton Police Chief , who has been with the Yankton Police Department since August 1998.
Minnehaha County Sheriff , who served in the Sioux Falls Police Department from 1973 to 1997, when he was sworn in as Minnehaha County sheriff.
Minnehaha County State's Attorney , who took office in January 2021 and has served in various public roles as a lawyer since 2011.
Tiffany Wolfgang, CEO at Southeastern Behavioral Health Center in Sioux Falls since 2024 and previously director at South Dakota Division of Behavioral Health Services in Pierre.
Jane Wipf Pfeifle, a retired state Seventh Circuit judge based in Rapid City.
South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley, Pierre.
Rep. Jon Hansen, Dell Rapids, attorney.
Rep. Erin Healy, Sioux Falls, philanthropy officer.
Rep. Joy Hohn, Hartford, professional pilot/farmer/business owner.
Rep. Greg Jamison, Sioux Falls, commercial real estate broker associate.
Sen. Chris Karr, Sioux Falls, business valuation analyst/financial consultant.
Rep. Jack Kolbeck, Sioux Falls, key account manager, Beal Distributing.
Sen. Steve Kolbeck, Brandon, Xcel Energy principal manager for South Dakota.
Sen. Mark Lapka, Leola, farmer/rancher.
Rep. Karla Lems, Canton, family-owned agri-businesses owner and manager.
Sen. Jim Mehlhaff, Pierre, retired, former director of state Grain Warehouse Division.
Rep. Brian Mulder, Sioux Falls, managing director at Volunteers of America-Dakotas.
Rep. Scott Odenbach, Spearfish, attorney and real estate managing broker.
Sen. Ernie Otten, Tea, retired home builder.
Rep. Tim Reisch, Howard, retired South Dakota Dept. of Corrections secretary, retired South Dakota adjutant general, former Miner County sheriff.
Sen. Jamie Smith, Sioux Falls, real estate agent and former teacher.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
3 hours ago
Arizona governor vetoes bill banning teaching antisemitism, calls it an attack on educators
PHOENIX -- Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would have banned teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and exposed educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. The proposal would have prohibited teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would have barred public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Educators would have personally been responsible for covering the costs of damages in lawsuits for violating the rules. Hobbs, a Democrat, said Tuesday that the bill was not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits," she said in a statement. "Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff." Hobbs described antisemitism as a very troubling issue in the U.S., but said students and parents can go through the state's Board of Education to report antisemitism. The measure cleared the Legislature last week on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with 'unlawful discrimination' to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, called the veto 'disgraceful,' saying on the social media platform X that the legislation was meant to keep 'egregious and blatant antisemitic content' out of the classroom. 'To suggest that it threatened the speech of most Arizona teachers is disingenuous at best,' he added. Opponents said the bill aimed to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opened up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would have been able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. Last week, Lori Shepherd, executive director of Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, wrote in a letter to Hobbs that if the bill were approved it would threaten teachers' ability to provide students with a full account of the holocaust. Under the bill, 'those discussions could be deemed 'antisemitic' depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intent or context,' she said. The bill would have created a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a second offense to a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate and a third offense to a revocation of the certificate. At colleges and universities, violators would have faced a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would have required colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum ‘not off the table,' Cox says
SALT LAKE CITY () — Governor Spencer Cox is mulling whether to call a special statewide election this November that would allow Utahns to vote on repealing that bans public labor unions from collective bargaining. 'It's not off the table,' . 'We could have a special election this year, it's still possible.' During a monthly news conference with reporters, the Governor was asked about whether he would call a special election in 2025 or hold off until Utah has a scheduled statewide election in 2026. State law requires the referendum to be placed on a statewide ballot, but state law allows him to decide whether that's in the 'next regular general election' or whether he calls a special election. The Governor said he's still having conversations with the legislature and county clerks who would be tasked with overseeing a statewide election in a municipal year, to analyze the cost and other factors like whether it's a burden to cities that may cancel elections in 2025. 'Just trying to see what's best — is it best to get it on now and get it over with, is that easier? Is it too much pressure on places that won't be having an election?' Cox said. 'What kind of burden with that add? We're looking at all of those things, and we'll make a decision when that deadline gets closer.' Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' The Governor has until June 21 to make that call; that's when the Lt. Governor declares whether the referendum signature gathering effort was sufficient, which is all but certain after public labor unions . The office has from taking effect. 'No matter when this issue appears on the ballot, we are confident that when Utah voters decide, public workers will win. We are strong, ready, and united,' said a spokesperson for the Protect Utah Workers coalition — the group of labor unions that organized the referendum effort. 'The HB267 referendum made history with nearly 10% of Utahns signing the petition in just 30 days to put it on the ballot. Our success sends a powerful message: Utahns believe in the right to organize and stand with public workers,' their statement said. 'HB267 is a power grab by politicians trying to silence the voices of everyday working people. But more than a quarter million Utah voters saw through it and pushed back.' Neither the public labor unions nor Governor Cox elaborated on which year they would prefer, but it's almost certain that politics are at play for both sides. 'Somebody has to stop it:' Gov. Cox defends Trump's decision to deploy troops to LA Political insiders have told that holding a special election in 2025 could favor the law staying in place because turnout is lower in a municipal year, meaning there might be less support overall for the teachers, firefighters, and the other public workers whom voters, by and large, want to support. However, a recency bias from this past legislative session and the momentum from their signature gathering efforts, coupled with perceived injustices to those public workers, may also be a factor, those insiders noted. A 2025 election also gets the issue decided on faster. However, paying for a statewide election would come at a cost to taxpayers, likely in the millions. A 2026 election, however, could be the preferred path as it gives both sides more time to message and raise more money to fight off any counter-messaging. Bureau of Land Management approves construction of Millard County potash mine November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum 'not off the table,' Cox says Family, police seeking information on missing 15-year-old girl from West Jordan RSL hoping to make a run in second half of season Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wyoming lawmakers on gaming committee revisit local control of HHR machines
CHEYENNE — Local control over simulcast permits will be the primary focus of Wyoming's new Select Committee on Gaming this year, as lawmakers prepare to draft a bill for the next legislative session. Chairman Sen. John Kolb, R-Rock Springs, reminded committee members the next session — which begins in early February — is a budget session. This means all non-budget bills will need to pass a two-thirds introductory vote for the Legislature's consideration. 'In the past, you know, we have not been successful legislatively (with gambling),' Kolb said during the committee's first meeting in Casper on Monday. Sen. John Kolb, R-Rock Springs (2025) Sen. John Kolb, R-Rock Springs Last year, members of the Legislature's Joint Appropriations Committee voted to sponsor five gambling-related bills for this year's legislative session. Four of the five bills died immediately, and one made it through the House of Representatives before dying in the Senate. Gambling in Wyoming recently exploded into a billion-dollar industry, and lawmakers are scrambling to decide what action is needed from the state to further regulate it. Legislative leadership assigned gambling as a study topic to the JAC last year, and a working group was formed, led by former Rep. Tom Walters, R-Casper. Since then, it's become apparent to lawmakers that gambling is a complicated issue. In response, the Management Council created a new select committee entirely focused on gambling in April. The committee has three meetings scheduled during the Legislature's off-season, formally known as the interim. Given the short amount of time, Kolb suggested starting with the framework of House Bill 85, which promotes local control over simulcast permits. HB 85 made it the farthest last session before dying in the Senate. 'Local control is very high on the list of things that need to be dealt with first,' Kolb said. 'We have to keep our eye on the ball and focus on what's achievable.' He also urged unified support between the two legislative chambers once this bill is drafted and filed for the session. 'We need the House, as we need the Senate, to work on a product,' Kolb said. 'We may not always have 100% agreement with that, but we need to have enough agreement that we want to move this forward.' HB 85 background A simulcast permit is needed to establish off-track betting sites (OTBs) and historic horse racing (HHR) machines. County commissioners reserve the sole authority to approve or deny these permits. However, state statute doesn't give the county any power to regulate gambling beyond the initial approval. Still, commissioners have incorporated limitations within approved simulcast permits, but these have yet to be challenged in court, said Wyoming County Commissioners Association Executive Director Jerimiah Rieman. It's unclear whether regulations imposed by commissioners would survive litigation. The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled in 2023 under the 'the plain and unambiguous language of the Pari-Mutuel Act' that county commissioners cannot revoke permits after granting approval. 'Once the commissioners say yes, they have no other authorities,' Rieman said. 'They've transferred that responsibility to the (Wyoming) Gaming Commission.' Rieman proposed a bill draft before the JAC in 2024, the original version of HB 85, that initially outlined regulatory authority to county commissioners once a simulcast permit is approved, including the ability to revoke a permit 'if there's good reason to do so.' The draft underwent several revisions, including an amendment that extended approval authority to city and town governments for simulcasting permits within city limits. 'Do I like where HB 85 got to? No,' Rieman said, although he mentioned his support for extending approval authority to city and town governments. 'But this is an important issue for us.' Rep. Jayme Lien, R-Casper (2025) Rep. Jayme Lien, R-Casper Co-Chairwoman Rep. Jayme Lien, R-Casper, asked Rieman if counties could regulate gambling entities through zoning laws. The county commissioner said he spoke with 11 of the counties with HHR machines last week, and none of them have specific zoning for HHR operations. 'It is important to note that there are a number of counties where zoning is not part of a lexicon,' Rieman said. 'And I doubt we'll have zoning anytime in the near future, and I suspect most of the others will not.' He added that most HHR machines operate within city and town limits, which are outside of county jurisdiction to implement zoning policy. Furthermore, zoning regulations do not grant authority to revoke simulcasting permits. 'You're gonna have to give us that,' Rieman said. City, town control City and town government leaders have also been frustrated by their inability to control how many HHR machines pop up within their jurisdiction. Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins previously told the Wyoming Tribune Eagle he supported HB 85. 'My frustration right now is that we have 10 approved casinos inside the city limits, and our governing body had no input on their approval,' Collins said. 'We're the governing body closest to the people living in Cheyenne, and I think we should have had the responsibility for making that decision.' Wyoming Association of Municipalities (WAM) Executive Director Ashley Harpstreith said OTBs impact city resources, including law enforcement, first responders, street maintenance and other public services. Ashley Harpstreith Ashley Harpstreith She added that city zoning ordinances are not enough to regulate the social and welfare issues from this industry. 'We need legislation to allow local governments (the) ability to impose specific conditions on permits, such as hours of operation or location restrictions based on their unique needs and concerns,' Harpstreith said. Cheyenne City Council President Mark Rinne said six of the seven properly zoned HHR sites in the city were approved through the Cheyenne Board of Adjustment. However, members of this board are not elected by the public, he said. 'They are not beholden to the public as (city) council members are,' Rinne said. 'Unless you have to go to the Board of Adjustment for something, you don't even know they exist. We may indirectly have control through zoning, but honestly we do not.' 100-mile rule Under the 100-mile rule, no simulcasting may be conducted within 100 miles of a live horse racing event. The Gaming Commission may waive the 100-mile limitation 'if the simulcast permit application includes written approval from the permittee whose permitted premises is within the 100-mile limitation,' according to W.S. 11-25-102(a)(vii)(C). Kolb recalled his days as a county commissioner, when the 100-mile rule first came about. Race tracks in Uinta and Sweetwater counties were going out of business due to lack of public attendance, he said. 'Now, with HHR, we don't have that issue anymore,' Kolb said. 'It's certainly a new day.' 307 Horse Racing President Kyle Ridgeway previously testified in February, during the session, that the 100-mile rule 'hurt our business' by forcing OTB vendors to close during a live horse racing event. Both Reiman and Harpstreith, representing county commissioners and local municipalities, respectively, said their organizations supported getting rid of the 100-mile rule entirely. However, attorney and former Cheyenne Republican lawmaker Affie Ellis urged caution against wiping out this rule. Former Sen. Affie Ellis Former Sen. Affie Ellis. 'I think it's a very effective tool that ties the HHR activity to the growth of Wyoming's horse racing industry,' Ellis said. Revenue from HHR machines contributes to the purse of horse racing events, which is key to the survival of horse racing tracks in Wyoming, Ellis said. The purpose of the 100-mile rule is 'to incentivize more horse tracks coming online.' In a follow-up phone call on Tuesday, Ellis told the WTE the rule is an opportunity for purse contribution negotiations between track operators and OTB vendors. She added it's not the intention of Cowboy Racing, her client, to shut down OTB vendors during race days. Cowboy Racing recently completed construction of Wyoming's first full-size live horse racing track 10 miles east of Cheyenne at Thunder Plains Park. The company has said it intends to operate at least three gaming facilities within the city limits of Cheyenne. 'We don't want anyone to close during our race times and race days,' Ellis said. 'If the agreement has a reliance on a percentage of that gaming revenue, we want that (OTB) to be open because that supports the purse.' Lawmakers will consider different bill drafts regarding local control at their next meeting in Evanston on Aug. 8-9.
