Chesterfield man reverses diabetes after losing seven stone
A man who once weighed 30 stone (190.5kg) says he has reversed his diabetes diagnosis less than a year after starting an NHS diet programme.Luke Milner, 35, was told he had a 75% chance of a heart attack in the next five years if he did not make any changes to his lifestyle. A father to two young children, Mr Milner, from Chesterfield in Derbyshire, said the prospect of having a heart attack at the age of 39 was a "shock to the system".He started the NHS type 2 diabetes remission programme in September 2024 after being diagnosed earlier in the summer and has so far lost seven stone (44.5kg).
"It's just been a massive weight off my mind, knowing that I'm now able to live better, healthier, and possibly longer for my two kids as well," he said."When I think back to what I was doing before it shocks me, knowing that I could just eat the stuff I was eating and just not care."When I was 30 stone, I didn't want to go out of the house, I just struggled, I struggled to walk more than 10 minutes without getting out of breath."
Mr Milner, who said his mental health was "at an all time low" before his diagnosis, is one of 4,800 patients in the East Midlands who have been referred to the programme since its inception in 2020.The 12-month regime - fully funded by the NHS - helps kickstart weight loss by providing patients with low calorie, diet replacement products, such as soups, shakes and bars, consisting of 800 to 900 calories a day, for the first three months.Alongside this, participants also receive support and monitoring for a year, including help to re-introduce food after the initial 12-week period.Mr Milner said that when he first started doing the programme, it took him an hour and a half to walk around his local park."I did it a couple of weeks ago with my kids, and we did it twice in 35 minutes so for me its helped improve my life to be able to go outside with my kids and actually do things with them," he added.
Type 2 diabetes is a common condition where the level of sugar in the blood becomes too high.It happens if the body cannot make enough of, or cannot correctly use, a hormone called insulin, which controls blood sugar.Some cases are linked to being overweight, and losing weight can reverse the entire process.Type 1 diabetes, meanwhile, is an autoimmune disease that is not linked to being overweight.Dr Azhar Farooqi, a GP at East Leicester Medical Practice, said: "What we are seeing in recent years is that more younger people are being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. "Traditionally a disease that happened in middle age or in older people, now we're getting people in their 20s, even teenagers who are developing type 2 diabetes, and this is largely related to lifestyle changes and to obesity."Mr Milner said he would not have been able to turn things around without the NHS programme.He added: "Getting their expert advice and help, pushed me to my limits, don't get me wrong, but if I'd have done this all on my own I'd probably still be thirty stone now."This journey has completely changed my life. If I can inspire even one person to take that first step, it's all been worth it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hundreds of student doctors oppose assisted dying Bill
Hundreds of student doctors have come out against the assisted dying Bill. More than 300 medical students from universities across the country, including Oxford, Cambridge, Manchester, Edinburgh and London, have said they are against Labour MP Kim Leadbeater's Bill. Writing to MPs ahead of the Commons vote on the Terminally Ill Adults Bill on Friday, the students said the legislation 'risks offering death in the place of care' and 'places vulnerable patients in danger'. The Bill will allow adults in England and Wales who are terminally ill with fewer than six months left to live to seek assistance to end their lives. The group raised concerns about the uncertainties of predicting life expectancy and how the Bill will judge someone capable of making the decision to end their life. In a letter on Monday, the medical students said: 'We oppose a Bill that risks offering death in place of care, that widens health inequalities, that places vulnerable patients in danger, and that reshapes the ethical foundation that our profession is built upon without any clear support. 'As future doctors, we may not yet be the voice of this profession – but we will be. And we are asking to be heard.' It comes after the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Pathologists voiced concerns over the Bill. Around 1,000 doctors from across the NHS wrote to MPs earlier this month to warn that the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. The students told MPs: 'Being asked to take a life – even under legal framework – poses a deep moral conflict for many clinicians. 'It risks long-term emotional harm, burnout, and attrition from an already overstretched workforce. Medical school does not prepare us for this burden, leaving a future generation of doctors unsupported and exposed.' They added: 'We write not only as future doctors, but as the next generation of advocates for patient care and safety.' The letter cited 2023 research that showed in up to four in 10 cases of terminal illness medical professionals were wrong with predicted life expectancy. The students also raised concerns about a 'complete lack of standardisation' of proposed drugs for ending a patient's life, adding: 'This lack of guidance is alarming and not consistent with good medical practice.' Emma Lewell-Buck, the Labour MP for South Shields who opposes the Bill, said: 'Existing doctors and those who will soon qualify are united in their opposition to this dangerous Bill. 'Not only will this Bill fundamentally change their role, it will also change the fabric of our society as a whole.' The Bill passed a vote in the Commons last year with a majority of 55, but in recent months more than a dozen MPs are believed to have switched from supporting or abstaining on the vote to opposing it. But Ms Leadbeater, the Labour MP for Spen Valley, has said she remains confident the Bill has sufficient support to pass through to the House of Lords.
Spectator
18 minutes ago
- Spectator
Will the assisted dying vote be delayed?
All is not well with the Labour lot. It has emerged that more than 50 lefty MPs submitted a letter to the Leader of the Commons, Lucy Powell, at the weekend – demanding she intervene to delay this Friday's final third reading vote on Kim Leadbeater's controversial assisted dying bill. The letter blasts the limited opportunities afforded to parliamentarians to speak on the bill and fumes that 'several movers of amendments haven't been able to speak to the changes they have laid'. Oo er. The concerned crowd includes, as reported by the Independent, a group of 2024ers alongside some longer-serving MPs. Former journalists Paul Waugh and Torcuil Crichton have added their signatures to the letter, alongside politicians Florence Eshalomi and Dawn Butler. Their memo makes the case for why the private members bill process is simply not a sufficient way of dealing with such a significant issue. The MPs refer to the assisted dying bill as 'perhaps the most consequential pieces of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations', before going on: This is not a normal Bill. It alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future health secretaries. The sponsor of the bill has proudly stated that it has received more time in parliament than some government bills have. And yet MPs have had the opportunity to vote on just 12 of 133 amendments tabled at report stage. Just 14 per cent of MPs have been afforded the opportunity to speak in the chamber on this bill. Several movers of amendments haven't been able to speak to the changes they have laid. The fact that such fundamental changes are being made to this Bill at the eleventh hour is not a badge of honour, it is a warning. The private member's bill process has shown itself to be a woefully inadequate vehicle for the introduction of such a foundational change to our NHS and the relationship between doctor and patient. This is no longer about debating the abstract principle of assisted dying. The bill before parliament has created real concern with medical experts and charities. MPs and the government should listen to their expertise. Strong stuff. As Mr S has long reported, the controversial bill has come under significant criticism this year. The replacement of the high court judge safeguard with Leadbeater's proposed 'expert panel' prompted angry outbursts from psychiatrists and their Royal College – one of the medical professions that was expected to make up this panel. The suggestion that the euthanasia process could see a 'voluntary assisted dying commissioner' – dubbed the 'death czar' by online critics – oversee cases provoked more fear. More concerningly, the bill committee struck down an amendment that called for support for those with Down's syndrome when initiating conversations on assisted suicide. And one of the many amendments not voted on was Labour MP Naz Shah's demand for protection for those with eating disorders like anorexia. So will Sir Keir's top team intervene at the final hour? Watch this space…
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Lilly to offer higher dose versions of weight-loss drugs on website
June 16 (Reuters) - U.S. drugmaker Eli Lilly (LLY.N), opens new tab said on Monday it will offer the higher dose versions of its popular weight-loss drug Zepbound on its website LillyDirect. The company said 12.5 milligrams and 15 mg doses of the drug will be available for $499 per month on the website with shipments to patients beginning in early August.
