logo
Contraband Cell Phones Are Costing The Bureau Of Prisons Millions

Contraband Cell Phones Are Costing The Bureau Of Prisons Millions

Forbes21-05-2025

For those surrendering to prison, they often consider the trouble that got them there when faced with participating in any activity that would get them in more trouble. In many prison camps, the lowest level of security in the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), cell phones are so prevalent that those who recently surrender can have one within days of arriving on the compound. According to a report by the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) recovered at least 8,700 contraband cell phones during fiscal years 2012 through 2014. In 2024, staff at Thomson Federal Prison recovered over 400 contraband phones and industry experts estimate that as many as 25% of all federal inmates may have access to contraband cell phones. That percentage is believed to be much higher at minimum and low security prisons.
In response to the growing problem of contraband cell phones, legislative measures such as the Lieutenant Osvaldo Albarati Stopping Prison Contraband Act were introduced to increase penalties for smuggling contraband into prisons. In 2013, after completing his shift at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, Albarati, a BOP corrections professional, was shot and killed while he was driving on the Jose De Diego Expressway. The shooting was coordinate by federal inmates housed at MDC Guaynabo who coordinated the hit with cell phones.
Contraband phones are easy to get into prison camps. Corrupt staff, drones and drop-offs near the prison are the most common ways phones are introduced. Many camps have no fence or an unguarded perimeter that makes it easy for someone to pass contraband goods into the compound. The BOP has also had problems with its security cameras working, making breaches to the camp that much easier.
A contraband phone can carry a price of over $2,500 with Cash App or Venmo are used to complete the transaction. These transactions often pass through multiple accounts as a way of masking the receipt of payment. The high price demonstrates the demand and the risk associated with being caught with a cell phone. Inspector General Michael Horowitz stated in comments related to removing cell phones from prison, 'A cell phone in a prison is a deadly weapon. Yet, as our investigative work continues to demonstrate, contraband cell phones have proven to be pervasive inside many federal prisons, a reality that undermines the safety and security of these institutions for BOP staff, inmates, and the public."
Inmates' means of communication with the outside world are severely restricted, a privilege that can be revoked and is often unreliable. Federal prisoners have access to Corrlinks, an email system that only allows text-based messages—no hyperlinks or attachments. These emails are monitored, meaning all communication is saved and is not protected by attorney-client privilege.
Phone calls are also allowed, but they are recorded and limited to 15 minutes before being cut off. The experience resembles using a pay phone at an airport in the 1990s: several phones in a small area, with long lines and noisy surroundings, where anyone passing by can overhear the conversation. While regular mail is becoming less common in prison, it is still used, but it is always opened and read by authorities.
In-person visits are monitored but with limited supervision, typically by one or two correction officers stationed at a desk to ensure order is maintained. During visits, inmates cannot exchange papers or information. However, in the loud, crowded environment of the visiting area, many conversations remain private. That said, in-person visits come with a significant cost in terms of time and travel to reach the prison.
The punishment for individual inmates has not been effective in reducing demand. The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has faced such a severe issue that it has resorted to mass punishments, locking down the entire prison until searches are completed and inmates provide information about how the phones are circulating within the facility. For the inmate caught with a phone, there are two major consequences. First, they will face punishment from the BOP, usually a 41-day loss of Good Conduct Time. Second, there is a social cost among the inmate population: the person caught is expected to purchase a replacement phone for those who were impacted by the incident.
The presence of contraband cell phones comes with a significant cost to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and, by extension, to taxpayers. While some phones are sent to FBI labs for analysis, not all phones are processed due to the sheer volume, far exceeding the resources available for proper investigation. Each time a phone is discovered, the BOP conducts an investigation and holds a disciplinary hearing, all while staff is already stretched thin. The BOP spends over $300 million annually to compensate for staff shortages.
A significant cost of cell phones in federal prisons is the 41-day loss of Good Conduct Time imposed as punishment. When the BOP adds 41 days to a prisoner's sentence, it means an additional 41 days of incarceration costs. At an average cost of $120 per day (a typical figure for the BOP), that adds $4,920 in expenses for a single prisoner. With around 78,000 prisoners in minimum and low-security facilities, and if 25% of them have access to a cell phone, that equals nearly 20,000 phones. If half of those phones are confiscated and the prisoners receive the 41-day sanction, the total cost in additional incarceration would be $49.2 million.
When an inmate or group of inmates is caught with a cell phone, it often results in sanctions against the entire prison population. This typically includes the suspension of visitation, phone use, and email privileges. Families are not notified about these lockdowns or the suspension of privileges, leaving many to show up for scheduled visits only to find them suddenly cancelled. The only way for inmates to communicate with their families during these lockdowns is through contraband cell phones. In their desperation to reassure their loved ones, inmates often risk making calls to let their families know they are okay. One phone call can quickly lead to more.
These phones are more than just communication tools—they are essentially mini-computers that allow inmates to access news and legal information to assist with their own cases. Many attorneys are conflicted about whether or not to take calls from their clients, but the difficulty of arranging legal phone calls often leads to shortcuts or compromised communication.
There is no easy solution to this. The BOP cannot condone the use of cell phones, though they do allow tablets that have very limited features such as movies, games or books. However, federal law prohibits the use of certain scrambling devices because it limits access to emergency services such as 911. Congress is now getting involved with a proposed bill that will lift the restriction allowing some scrambling devices to be used. Until then, the cat and mouse between inmate and BOP will continue.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former UFC fighters file lawsuits, alleging the MMA promotion restricts their earning potential
Former UFC fighters file lawsuits, alleging the MMA promotion restricts their earning potential

Associated Press

time21 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Former UFC fighters file lawsuits, alleging the MMA promotion restricts their earning potential

LAS VEGAS (AP) — Two former UFC fighters have filed antitrust lawsuits against the mixed-martial arts behemoth, alleging it operates as a monopoly that restricts their ability to maximize earnings. Phil Davis and Mikhail Cirkunovs, who fought under the name Misha Cirkunov, filed their lawsuits in U.S. District Court in Nevada against the Las Vegas-based UFC. Cirkunovs' complaint was filed on May 23, and Davis' was filed six days later. Philadelphia-based Berger Montague, which is represented locally by Las Vegas' Claggett and Sykes, is the law firm for both fighters. A message left with the Las Vegas firm on Monday was not immediately returned. Cirkunovs is seeking $75,000 in damages. Davis didn't specify how much money he is suing for. The UFC reached a $375 million settlement in September in a class-action antitrust lawsuit brought by Cung Le, who filed his claim in 2014. The UFC has not reached an agreement with Kajan Johnson, who filed his lawsuit in 2021. Both recent complaints made references to the Johnson case, with the Cirkunovs' suit saying they were similar. 'In previous hearings, Plaintiffs' own counsel expressed strong concerns to the Court about the weaknesses of the Johnson claims,' the UFC said in a statement. 'This new complaint (Cirkunovs) confirms that the plaintiffs in the Johnson case lack the standing to represent the proposed class. 'In addition, it confirms that the majority of fighters signed class-action waivers and agreed to arbitrate their claims instead of resorting to court procedures. We are confident that the facts and the law are on our side in opposing approval of both of these proposed classes.' Davis fought in the UFC from 2010-15 before signing with Bellator MMA, which became the Professional Fighters League this year. He argues that the UFC's presence prevents fighters who aren't even in the organization from receiving competitive wages. Cirkunovs was in the UFC from 2015-22. ___ AP sports:

F.T.C. Investigates Ad Groups and Watchdogs, Alleging Boycott Collusion
F.T.C. Investigates Ad Groups and Watchdogs, Alleging Boycott Collusion

New York Times

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Times

F.T.C. Investigates Ad Groups and Watchdogs, Alleging Boycott Collusion

The Federal Trade Commission is investigating whether roughly a dozen prominent advertising and advocacy groups violated antitrust law by coordinating boycotts among advertisers that did not want their brands to appear alongside hateful online content, three people familiar with the inquiries said. The inquiry includes the agency's previously reported investigation of Media Matters, a liberal advocacy organization that has published research on hateful and antisemitic content on X, the social media company owned by Elon Musk, along with other advocacy groups and advertising industry organizations. Vanessa Otero, the chief executive of Ad Fontes Media, a media watchdog group, said the organization received a letter from the F.T.C. on May 20 demanding information about its business in relation to an investigation about 'possible collusion.' Nearly a dozen other organizations also received such letters, two people familiar with the matter said. The F.T.C.'s investigation into Media Matters, which is aligned with Democrats, required the organization to share copies of its budgets, documents showing the effects of 'harmful' online content on advertisers and communications with other watchdog groups. Advertisers have cut and frozen spending on X and several other conservative social media platforms in recent years as brands worried about appearing alongside inflammatory content. Mr. Musk, who has been a close adviser to President Trump, sued Media Matters in 2023 over claims that it tried to damage X's relationship with advertisers. That lawsuit continues. The F.T.C. declined to comment, citing its practice of not commenting on active investigations. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

NYC files legal challenge against ICE over arrest of Bronx student
NYC files legal challenge against ICE over arrest of Bronx student

CBS News

time22 minutes ago

  • CBS News

NYC files legal challenge against ICE over arrest of Bronx student

New York City is taking legal action against federal immigration officials after a Bronx public school student was arrested and sent for expedited deportation after a routine asylum hearing. The suit against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Todd Lyons and their departments seeks the student's release from ICE custody. New York City challenges federal immigration officials New York City claims the student, identified as Dylan, is being detained without cause and in violation of his right to due process. The 20-year-old Ellis Prep High School student was arrested two weeks ago at federal immigration court in Lower Manhattan. His arrest sparked chaotic protests in the city. Mayor Eric Adams, who has a close working relationship with President Trump and White House "border czar" Tom Homan, took issue with the arrest Monday, saying the student went through the "exact legal proceedings" he was supposed to in order to get work papers and be able to provide for his family. "But instead of being rewarded for following the law, he was punished for doing what we all asked him to do," Adams' statement said. "For generations, New York City has been defined by its diverse immigrant communities, and we are sending a message to those communities. We stand with you, and you deserve to live your lives freely." When asked about the case last week, Adams told CBS News New York the city had no role in the student's arrest and that sanctuary laws prohibit coordinating with ICE. Uptick in ICE arrests NYC The suit, backed by Adams, comes amid a major uptick in ICE arrests at courthouses over the last two weeks, apparently to meet Mr. Trump's demand to increase arrest quotas. Congressman Dan Goldman said he confronted ICE agents arresting asylum seekers at routine court appearances last week. "These are people seeking legal status here the right way," Goldman said Sunday on "The Point with Marcia Kramer." "None of these people are criminals, none of them are murderers or child rapists. None of that." There's concern the arrests will drive other immigrants into the shadows. "It also creates really perverse incentives," Goldman said. "So other people must react to this and say, well, if I go to court, I'm gonna get picked up and kicked out, so I'm not gonna go to court, and I'm gonna go further underground, and I'm not gonna pay taxes through my work visa, and I'm not gonna pay social security ... which creates more desperation." New York City is home to more than 3 million immigrants, that's 40% of its population, who are key to the local economy. The city's lawsuit argues it is wrong to arrest people who are following immigration laws.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store