Trump has declared war on Harvard, but there are degrees of concern in Australia
On April 11, Harvard received a letter from the Trump administration with a series of demands, ordering them to cancel diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, allow in an external auditor to vet the political views of staff and students, and to bar any students found to be 'hostile to the American values and institutions inscribed in the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence.' The question then, is if 'American values' are considered to be the same as Trumpian values. What about freedom of speech?
Harvard refused. Other universities lined up to support them.
Since then, Trump has moved to cancel Harvard's federal contracts, ban foreign students and threatened to cancel the university's tax-exempt status. A temporary order has paused the foreign student ban, but a chill has gone through all future and current Ivy League students.
Many Australians are scratching their heads at what seems like, at its heart, a further muffling of any potential critics, along with the media, the courts, various experts and veteran bureaucrats.
Why wouldn't you want the best minds in the world working on your problems?
Cramping – let alone ideologically controlling – higher research simply undercuts potential economic growth and leadership, productivity, innovation, scientific advances, and a free contest of ideas essential in any pluralistic democracy. Harvard has seeded breakthroughs in health, artificial intelligence, astronomy, and epidemiology, and educated the thinkers and dreamers who have shaped the way we see the world.
Loading
Harvard has educated eight presidents, Republican and Democrat, as well as Bill Gates, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mark Zuckerberg, T. S. Eliot, Helen Keller, Robert Oppenheimer, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Margaret Atwood, Michael Bloomberg and Ben Shapiro.
Australians who have studied there have gone on to be cabinet ministers, premiers, silks, magazine editors, authors, economists, corporate leaders, a president of the World Bank.
We cannot be naive about how this might affect us. America is also our most significant research partner, especially in STEM. Last year, Australian research partnerships with the US drew almost $400 million in biomedical and clinical science funding.
Ten Australian universities have already had US federal funding for research cut off, following Trump's declaration in March that support must go only to researchers who promote 'American influence, trust, and reputation'. Numerous Australian academics across a range of disciplines have cancelled trips to academic conferences in the US.
Loading
Here, the problem is not contempt for universities – in the main we do not, thankfully, have the same culture wars – but an erosion of quality and lack of funding. Overall, we spend significantly less than other countries on R&D. The OECD average is 2.7 per cent of GDP – we spend 1.7 per cent. It's not enough. Academics report being stretched, with months regularly wasted crafting research proposals that are routinely rejected, fighting for a narrow pool of funds. Morale is low. Have we too forgotten this is our future? That these are the minds we rely on to cure cancer, combat climate change, forge new ways to solve problems?
As the US grows more insular and antagonistic towards creative, diverse global research, we should be throwing open our doors and inviting the brightest minds into our labs, libraries and lecture halls, and creating a climate in which they, and we, can flourish. And we can't flourish if we treat the curious, clever and hungry with suspicion.
This week, Chinese graduate Yurong 'Luanna' Jiang, who studied international development, spoke at the Harvard graduations. She said she grew up believing that the 'world was becoming a small village' and that she could become part of the generation that would 'end hunger and poverty for humankind.' At Harvard, surrounded by students from countries around the world, 'global challenges suddenly felt personal'.
But now, she said: 'We're starting to believe those who think differently, vote differently or pray differently – whether they are across the ocean or sitting right next to us – are not just wrong: we mistakenly see them as evil,' she said. 'But it doesn't have to be this way.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Energy Minister Chris Bowen branded a 'snake' by Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce over net zero 'guilt trip'
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce has branded Energy Minister Chris Bowen a "snake" as he claimed Labor was attempting to "swindle" Australians with its net zero push. Following the Labor's resounding victory at the last federal election, Mr Bowen has doubled down on the party's controversial push to overhaul the nation's energy grid. On Sunday, the Energy Minister recommitted to expanding renewables developments across the country in order to meet ambitious emissions reductions targets and reach net zero by 2050. Mr Bowen also suggested Australia could soon introduce targeted tariffs on imports deemed emissions-intensive. In response, Mr Joyce, a longtime critic of net zero, told Sky News Australia Labor's plans would soon see Australians "pay through the teeth" for energy. "What are we doing this for? The majority of the globe in population and the majority of the globe, in economics, does not participate in net zero," he said. "What we've got to clearly understand is this is the most appalling virtue statement that signs you up for the greatest swindle, and I really mean that, in modern times. "What happens at the end is the pensioner, poor old Australians, they pay through the teeth. "We have put our nation at risk because of this mythical guilt trip and this huge swindle on us." Mr Joyce and Nationals colleague Matt Canavan have stepped up their attacks on net zero since the election, with Senator Canavan even challenging for the leadership of the party in order to dump the Coalition's commitment to emissions reductions. While that challenge was ultimately unsuccessful, new Liberal leader Sussan Ley has been coy on whether the Coalition will continue to stand by net zero, leading to fresh suggestions of climate change denialism from Labor. Mr Joyce, however, hit back at those claims, criticising the way in which the government was engaging in the debate over energy. "Don't you just hate the way that they go about this?" he said. "With a guile of a snake, they create this guilt trip. "They say: 'Well, if you disagree with me, the kitties will instantaneously combust and everything will die and the beaches will go and the houses will be flooded'." The Nationals MP also speculated on what might happen if Labor's plan proved ineffective at reducing the effects of climate change, suggesting it could even jeopardise the political future of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. "Mr Bowen and Mr Albanese, we're so far down the track," he said. "Is it going to be the case that if the floods and the cyclones don't stop, they'll resign?" While such an outcome is unlikely, Labor does face pressure over power prices, which have remained elevated despite its claims the renewables push would lower household bills over time. That pressure is likely to grow further once federal energy rebates end next year.
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Carbon tariff on the table for overseas businesses
Labor has left the door open to a tax on cement and steel coming in from places not taking sufficient climate action. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said Australia remained on-track to meet its legislated 43 per cent by 2030 emissions reduction target but that the nation needed to do more to achieve it. Asked if a carbon tariff - a tax charged on imports - was still a prospect, Mr Bowen flagged particular sectors were being considered. But consultation with Australian industry was still underway, he added. "I've had lots of meetings with steel makers and cement makers about these things over the past 12 months ... getting their feedback, and we'll have more to say during the course of this term," he told the ABC on Sunday. Mr Bowen said gas giant Woodside will be required to ensure the North West Shelf project meets net-zero emissions by 2050. Woodside hosts Australia's biggest gas export plant, and last week was given approval by the Albanese government to keep operating until 2070. The move has been slammed by environmental groups. "In effect, all the facilities covered, the more than 200 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism are obliged to have a pathway to net-zero," the minister said. The mechanism is a policy designed to limit emissions at Australia's largest industrial facilities in line with the nation's climate targets. Religious leaders in Western Australia have expressed their disappointment at the 40-year expansion given to the energy giant. Reverend Ken Devereux, from the Australian Religious Response to Climate Change, said the next test for the government was to make sure the Browse project does not go ahead. Woodside has been trying to get environmental approvals for the $30 billion Browse gas project off the Kimberley coast since 2018. "We believe that moral and ethical choices for the greater good for humanity and creation need to take precedence over the benefits to fossil fuel corporations and the short-term economy," Rev Devereux said. Asked if approving gas projects would make it harder for Australia to win a global climate summit it is bidding to co-host with Pacific Island nations next year, Mr Bowen said these decisions would always be controversial. "I don't deny that, but we'll always set Australia's domestic policy in Australia's domestic best interest," he said. "There's a great opportunity for our country, (it) restores Australia's leadership in climate against the bad years of the decade of denial and delay, (and) shows we're back in a very meaningful way". Turkey is also bidding for the climate talks, with the energy minister hopeful the issue is resolved soon. Mr Bowen said Australia remains on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite a small increase in emissions last year. He also ruled out a retrospective domestic gas reservation policy to existing fields. Labor has left the door open to a tax on cement and steel coming in from places not taking sufficient climate action. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said Australia remained on-track to meet its legislated 43 per cent by 2030 emissions reduction target but that the nation needed to do more to achieve it. Asked if a carbon tariff - a tax charged on imports - was still a prospect, Mr Bowen flagged particular sectors were being considered. But consultation with Australian industry was still underway, he added. "I've had lots of meetings with steel makers and cement makers about these things over the past 12 months ... getting their feedback, and we'll have more to say during the course of this term," he told the ABC on Sunday. Mr Bowen said gas giant Woodside will be required to ensure the North West Shelf project meets net-zero emissions by 2050. Woodside hosts Australia's biggest gas export plant, and last week was given approval by the Albanese government to keep operating until 2070. The move has been slammed by environmental groups. "In effect, all the facilities covered, the more than 200 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism are obliged to have a pathway to net-zero," the minister said. The mechanism is a policy designed to limit emissions at Australia's largest industrial facilities in line with the nation's climate targets. Religious leaders in Western Australia have expressed their disappointment at the 40-year expansion given to the energy giant. Reverend Ken Devereux, from the Australian Religious Response to Climate Change, said the next test for the government was to make sure the Browse project does not go ahead. Woodside has been trying to get environmental approvals for the $30 billion Browse gas project off the Kimberley coast since 2018. "We believe that moral and ethical choices for the greater good for humanity and creation need to take precedence over the benefits to fossil fuel corporations and the short-term economy," Rev Devereux said. Asked if approving gas projects would make it harder for Australia to win a global climate summit it is bidding to co-host with Pacific Island nations next year, Mr Bowen said these decisions would always be controversial. "I don't deny that, but we'll always set Australia's domestic policy in Australia's domestic best interest," he said. "There's a great opportunity for our country, (it) restores Australia's leadership in climate against the bad years of the decade of denial and delay, (and) shows we're back in a very meaningful way". Turkey is also bidding for the climate talks, with the energy minister hopeful the issue is resolved soon. Mr Bowen said Australia remains on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite a small increase in emissions last year. He also ruled out a retrospective domestic gas reservation policy to existing fields. Labor has left the door open to a tax on cement and steel coming in from places not taking sufficient climate action. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said Australia remained on-track to meet its legislated 43 per cent by 2030 emissions reduction target but that the nation needed to do more to achieve it. Asked if a carbon tariff - a tax charged on imports - was still a prospect, Mr Bowen flagged particular sectors were being considered. But consultation with Australian industry was still underway, he added. "I've had lots of meetings with steel makers and cement makers about these things over the past 12 months ... getting their feedback, and we'll have more to say during the course of this term," he told the ABC on Sunday. Mr Bowen said gas giant Woodside will be required to ensure the North West Shelf project meets net-zero emissions by 2050. Woodside hosts Australia's biggest gas export plant, and last week was given approval by the Albanese government to keep operating until 2070. The move has been slammed by environmental groups. "In effect, all the facilities covered, the more than 200 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism are obliged to have a pathway to net-zero," the minister said. The mechanism is a policy designed to limit emissions at Australia's largest industrial facilities in line with the nation's climate targets. Religious leaders in Western Australia have expressed their disappointment at the 40-year expansion given to the energy giant. Reverend Ken Devereux, from the Australian Religious Response to Climate Change, said the next test for the government was to make sure the Browse project does not go ahead. Woodside has been trying to get environmental approvals for the $30 billion Browse gas project off the Kimberley coast since 2018. "We believe that moral and ethical choices for the greater good for humanity and creation need to take precedence over the benefits to fossil fuel corporations and the short-term economy," Rev Devereux said. Asked if approving gas projects would make it harder for Australia to win a global climate summit it is bidding to co-host with Pacific Island nations next year, Mr Bowen said these decisions would always be controversial. "I don't deny that, but we'll always set Australia's domestic policy in Australia's domestic best interest," he said. "There's a great opportunity for our country, (it) restores Australia's leadership in climate against the bad years of the decade of denial and delay, (and) shows we're back in a very meaningful way". Turkey is also bidding for the climate talks, with the energy minister hopeful the issue is resolved soon. Mr Bowen said Australia remains on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite a small increase in emissions last year. He also ruled out a retrospective domestic gas reservation policy to existing fields. Labor has left the door open to a tax on cement and steel coming in from places not taking sufficient climate action. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said Australia remained on-track to meet its legislated 43 per cent by 2030 emissions reduction target but that the nation needed to do more to achieve it. Asked if a carbon tariff - a tax charged on imports - was still a prospect, Mr Bowen flagged particular sectors were being considered. But consultation with Australian industry was still underway, he added. "I've had lots of meetings with steel makers and cement makers about these things over the past 12 months ... getting their feedback, and we'll have more to say during the course of this term," he told the ABC on Sunday. Mr Bowen said gas giant Woodside will be required to ensure the North West Shelf project meets net-zero emissions by 2050. Woodside hosts Australia's biggest gas export plant, and last week was given approval by the Albanese government to keep operating until 2070. The move has been slammed by environmental groups. "In effect, all the facilities covered, the more than 200 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism are obliged to have a pathway to net-zero," the minister said. The mechanism is a policy designed to limit emissions at Australia's largest industrial facilities in line with the nation's climate targets. Religious leaders in Western Australia have expressed their disappointment at the 40-year expansion given to the energy giant. Reverend Ken Devereux, from the Australian Religious Response to Climate Change, said the next test for the government was to make sure the Browse project does not go ahead. Woodside has been trying to get environmental approvals for the $30 billion Browse gas project off the Kimberley coast since 2018. "We believe that moral and ethical choices for the greater good for humanity and creation need to take precedence over the benefits to fossil fuel corporations and the short-term economy," Rev Devereux said. Asked if approving gas projects would make it harder for Australia to win a global climate summit it is bidding to co-host with Pacific Island nations next year, Mr Bowen said these decisions would always be controversial. "I don't deny that, but we'll always set Australia's domestic policy in Australia's domestic best interest," he said. "There's a great opportunity for our country, (it) restores Australia's leadership in climate against the bad years of the decade of denial and delay, (and) shows we're back in a very meaningful way". Turkey is also bidding for the climate talks, with the energy minister hopeful the issue is resolved soon. Mr Bowen said Australia remains on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030, despite a small increase in emissions last year. He also ruled out a retrospective domestic gas reservation policy to existing fields.
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
PM dodges $3m super tax question
Anthony Albanese has sidestepped a question on whether he and politicians with more than $3m in their super balances will be required to immediately pay Labor's proposed tax. This follows comments from Employment and Industrial Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth stating that there will be provisions that mean people on defined superannuation funds won't have to immediately pay tax even if their balance is above $3m. Labor's proposed plan is tipped to generate $2.7bn annually and hit superannuation balances over $3m with a 30 per cent tax, a doubling of the current rate. As it stands, about 0.5 per cent or 800,000 Australians will be affected by the policy. However unlike Australians on ordinary and self-managed super funds, long-serving politicians on defined benefit pensions like Penny Wong, Sussan Ley, Tanya Plibersek and the Prime Minister who entered parliament in 2004 will be able to defer paying the tax until after they retire. Speaking to Sky, Ms Rishworth was repeatedly asked whether Australians on defined benefit would be required to pay their tax while still working, or whether they'd only be liable once they retire. While she didn't directly answer the questions, she said that 'the same provisions that have been used to treat, defined benefits schemes in the past under the Coalition and under previous governments have been applied,' and that the accounts are 'treated differently'. 'What I'm saying is we have applied the exact same rules as in the past that had been how you treat defined benefit schemes to this provision as well,' she said. 'It's entirely consistent and long standing and applies across the board to defined benefit schemes which the Commonwealth has constitutional power over.' When asked later, Mr Albanese also deflected a question on whether he would be subjected to the tax immediately, telling a journalist: 'Look it applies to us as it applies across the board, but the legislation, of course, has yet to be carried by the parliament'. The Coalition's finance spokesman James Paterson, who has objected to the tax as it hits unrealised gains, said the government needs to be more 'open and transparent' on the plan. He specifically called on Mr Albanese to explain the 'different treatment between different categories of retiree,' questioning whether he influenced the policy. 'Every other taxpayer, if they exceed the threshold, has to pay it in their working life but people like Anthony, on a defined benefit pension, only have to pay it after they retire,' he said. 'Now I think there is a very important question that arises out of this. Jim Chalmers has written rules which are favourable to his boss. Did Jim Chalmers ever discuss this with Anthony Albanese? Was it ever discussed in Cabinet or the Expenditure Review Committee of Cabinet? 'Did the Prime Minister exempt himself from that discussion? Did he remove himself from the room because of the significant personal conflict of interest that he has?' Originally published as Anthony Albanese deflects question on whether he'll be immediately hit with proposed $3m super tax
