My husband has the same terminal cancer as Joe Biden... here's the warning signs we wish we hadn't ignored
Joe Biden's sudden diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer has shocked the world.
Now, other men who have been blighted by late-stage disease, only being diagnosed after the disease had already spread, are stepping forward to share their stories.
When Eric White started experiencing testicular pain at 49, he blamed it on the hours he spent operating a forklift at work in a warehouse.
But when this was accompanied by extreme fatigue and weight loss, his wife Megan encouraged him to see a doctor.
The father-of-three from Alabama was initially diagnosed with epididymitis, an infection that causes swelling of a small tube at the back of the testicles that stores and transports sperm.
To treat the condition, Mr White was put on a three-week course of antibiotics and referred to a urologist, who then gave him another three-week course of the same drug.
But despite the medication, his condition deteriorated and his wife says he started experiencing 'flow problems' when he went to the bathroom.
She recalls: 'It was hard for him to start urinating [and] he was dribbling. When he went back to the urologist, they decided to check his prostate, and it was hard.'
This prompted doctors to order a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test to measure the amount of proteins produced by the prostate gland.'
At 49, he was slightly too young to be getting screened regularly (most doctors only recommend it after age 55)
Mr White's results showed high levels of PSA and he underwent a biopsy of his prostate, which revealed he had cancer.
PSA levels are generally measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).
In general, a level above 4 ng/mL is considered abnormal and may result in a recommendation for further examination.
Mr White's reading was 19.1 ng/mL and the biopsy confirmed cancer had spread throughout his entire prostate, a small gland found only in men located just below the bladder and in front of the rectum.
It produces a fluid that contributes to semen.
In May 2024 he was diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma. Also known as glandular prostate cancer, it is the most common type of prostate cancer, accounting for over 95 percent of cases.
It originates in the gland cells of the prostate, which produce prostate fluid.
Over 300,000 American men are diagnosed with prostate cancer every year, and 35,000 die from the disease. It's the most common cancer in men.
It's also considered one of the most treatable if caught early - with a nearly 100 percent survival rate if detected while localized in the prostate.
The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) states men ages 55 to 69 undergo prostate cancer screening every two to three years. However, those with a family history or who are at a greater risk, such as Black men, may need more frequent screening.
If cancer is found during the biopsy, MRI and CT scans may be used to determine if the disease has spread outside the prostate to other parts of the body.
The family was shocked to learn Mr White's cancer had spread to his neck, his femur and he had 'two spots on his liver'.
This meant he had stage 4 cancer, which has a five-year survival rate of around 30 percent.
Prostate cancer - also dubbed the 'silent killer' - is often diagnosed at later stages due to a combination of factors, including a misleading focus on urinary symptoms, a lack of awareness, and challenges in accessing or utilizing early screening methods.
Medical experts have declared it 'inconceivable' that former President Joe Biden 's 'aggressive' form of prostate cancer was not caught earlier by doctors.
The 82-year-old's office announced the devastating diagnosis on Sunday, saying the cancer had spread to his bones and his family were reviewing treatment options.
His cancer was given a Gleason score of 9 and a Grade Group of 5, a dire stage of the rapidly-spreading disease. The diagnosis came days after doctors found a 'small nodule' on his prostate.
After Mr White's cancer was diagnosed, an appropriate treatment plan was drawn up.
In a TikTok video, his wife says: '[After his diagnosis] he did 10 palliative radiation treatments to his neck and his femur to help with pain.
'His neck was really giving him a fit for a while. After that, his PSA was dropping and he was doing really good.
'The medication that they put him on was a testosterone blocker, and that caused him to lose a lot of muscle mass [and] made him really tired, but I mean, he was doing pretty good.'
Despite making good progress, around six months later, in October 2024, Mr White started experiencing extreme pain in his pelvis.
Mrs White said it was so bad he couldn't sleep and spent hours in the shower to try and soothe the pain.
She revealed: 'So the pain was so bad, he would practically live in the shower.
The Whites hope by talking openly about their story that more men will go to get tested sooner rather than later if they feel something is wrong
'He would take multiple showers a day. He didn't sleep at night. He slept in the shower.
'We went back to the oncologist and they put him on some strong pain medication, [but] it didn't touch the pain.
'So then when we went back again to the oncologist, they ordered a scan, and they found a tumor that was growing in his pelvis. The oncologist said that we need to get a biopsy ASAP.'
The Whites decided to go to a bigger cancer center in Georgia for the biopsy and Mr White was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of prostate cancer called a sarcomatoid carcinoma.
This form of the disease often develops in men who have had prior prostate cancer, and its prognosis is generally poor. There are less than 100 cases reported in literature and the average survival rate is typically around 10 months.
In her latest post, Mrs White reveals her husband had 18 more rounds of radiation to the mass in his pelvis and he is now undergoing chemotherapy.
Mr White is currently midway through his chemotherapy treatment.
Mrs White says: 'That's pretty much where we're at now. We just got to wait on these scans and pray to God that this chemo is working.
'So please, please, please keep him in your prayers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Chemtrails: why is RFK Jr battling a debunked conspiracy theory?
The Trump administration appears sceptical about the climate crisis but is deeply concerned about another weather phenomenon: chemtrails. To conspiracists, chemtrails are visible trails left by commercial airliners, lasting longer than the usual condensation trails from jets and containing unknown, sinister chemicals. To weather scientists, chemtrails are a myth based on misidentification and a lack of understanding about how different humidity levels cause contrails to disappear quickly or linger and grow. The US health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, is determined to take action on chemtrails. During a recent TV discussion, when an audience member said chemtrails were her biggest health worry, Kennedy affirmed that material was being added to jet fuel. 'I'm going to do everything in my power to stop it,' he said. 'Find out who's doing it and holding them accountable.' Kennedy said he was trying to discover which government department was responsible. He suggested the culprits might be Darpa, the Pentagon's advanced research arm. While there really has been military research into contrails, this was aimed at reducing them to make planes harder to spot. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Despite many claims, there is no evidence of nefarious substances being covertly added to commercial jet fuel. But to conspiracists, this only proves there must be a cover-up.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Popular morning snack and dinner staple found to contain alarming levels of autism-linked chemicals
People vying to be healthy may want to think twice before reaching for two popular nutritious staples. The Environmental Working Group, a health advocacy organization, recently released its 'Dirty Dozen 2025' list - where it ranked the fruits and vegetables covered in the most toxic chemicals. After analyzing the Department of Agriculture's data on levels of pesticide contamination in different fruits and vegetables, the group ranked 47 of them based on their toxicity levels. Of these, they found the top 12 fruits and vegetables covered in pesticides. While usual suspects such as spinach, strawberries and kale took the top three spots, researchers noted that blackberries were a new addition to the list. Over 80 percent of samples of the popular berry, which is usually priced at $6 for 12oz, were found to be covered in two or more pesticides, placing it 10th on the list. The agency noted the most common pesticide they found on blackberries was cypermethrin - a toxic synthetic insecticide linked to autism. Also new on the list, landing in 12th place, were potatoes - the most commonly eaten vegetable in the US. The researchers found nearly all of the 1,000 samples of potatoes had high concentrations of chlorpropham, a plant growth regulator banned in the European Union due to its hormone-disrupting and cancer-causing properties. Alexis Temkin, EWG's Vice President of Science told CNN: 'The guide is there to help consumers eat a lot of fruits and vegetables while trying to reduce pesticide exposure. 'One of the things that a lot of peer-reviewed studies have shown over and over again (is) that when people switch to an organic diet from a conventional diet, you can really see measurable levels in the reduction of pesticide levels in the urine.' Organic produce is grown without synthetic pesticides, with farmers opting for more natural options that are less persistent in the environment. She noted that her team found 50 different pesticides across a variety of fruits and vegetables that made the Dirty Dozen list. Coming in fourth were grapes, fifth were peaches and sixth were cherries. These fruits were followed by nectarines, pears and apples at seventh, eighth and ninth place, respectively. The EWG ranked blueberries in 11th place. The agency noted blackberries had never made it on the list before as they hadn't been tested prior to 2023. However, both the EWG and Department of Agriculture examined 294 non-organic blackberry samples from July through December 2023 and found at least one pesticide in 93 percent of them. Most notably, they discovered the presence of cypermethrin, which is banned in the EU to due to its dangers to human health. While cypermethrin has proven beneficial in killing harmful insects in berries, certain studies have shown that consumption by pregnant woman may increase the risk of autism. A 2019 BMJ study found that a baby had a higher risk of developing autism if its mother had been exposed to cypermethrin within 6,500 feet of their home during her pregnancy. Cypermethrin has also been found to disrupt thyroid hormones, which are critical to brain development. At times, direct exposure to the insecticide may also cause irritation to the skin and eyes, numbness, tingling, itching, a burning sensation, loss of bladder control, incoordination, seizures and in severe cases, death. Since fruits such as blackberries are promoted for being rich in antioxidants and vitamins, they are often included in recommended healthy diets for children and pregnant women to help improve their nutrition levels. However, this may put them at a higher risk of being exposed to the insecticide. While insecticides are added into blackberry fruits as they grow, potatoes are covered in pesticides after they are harvested and ready to eat. Temkin said: 'It's applied after harvest to essentially prevent potatoes from sprouting while they're in storage or in transit. 'Because it's applied so late after harvest and so close to when consumers might be exposed or eating potatoes, that's partially what leads to some of these really high concentrations.' Between 2022 to 2023, the Department of Agriculture collected and tested more than 1,000 samples of potatoes for pesticides after washing and scrubbing each piece. They found that over 90 percent of samples contained twice the acceptable levels of chlorpropham allowed by the Environmental Protection Agency even after washing and scrubbing. The toxic pesticide has been linked to causing changes in blood cells and harm to the thyroid by reducing the production of certain hormones such as thyroxine - which is responsible to maintain the growth of cells. Low levels of thyroxine can cause DNA mutations and excessive growth of cells across the body - which may pave the way for cancer development. Similarly to cypermethrin, a 2024 Medicina study also found that prenatal exposure to chlorpropham has been found to increase a baby's risk of developing autism. Chlorpropham was banned in the EU in 2019 after officials found that people, particularly children, were being exposed to more than acceptable levels of chlorpropham through non-organic potatoes. Despite the results, Temkin noted the annual report is not meant to discourage consumers from eating fruits and vegetables but instead to encourage people to buy organic food. Multiple studies have shown that those who consume organic food have lower exposure to synthetic pesticides as organic farming prohibits the use of such chemicals. The EWG recommends buying organic whenever accessible because food residues are a main source of pesticide exposures for many people. For people looking to eat cleaner fruits and vegetables, the EWG found pineapple to be the least contaminated produce tested, followed by sweet corn (fresh and frozen), avocados, papaya, onions, frozen sweet peas, asparagus, cabbage, watermelon, cauliflower, bananas, mangos, carrots, mushrooms and kiwi. If you do opt for a dirty dozen, be sure to wash it with water or solutions of baking soda or vinegar.
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
EPA says power plant carbon emissions aren't dangerous. We asked 30 scientists: Here's what they say
The Trump administration's Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed a new ruling that heat-trapping carbon gas "emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants do not contribute significantly to dangerous air pollution.'' The Associated Press asked 30 different scientists, experts in climate, health and economics, about the scientific reality behind this proposal. Nineteen of them responded, all saying that the proposal was scientifically wrong and many of them called it disinformation. Here's what eight of them said. 'This is the scientific equivalent to saying that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer,' said climate scientist Zeke Hausfather of the tech firm Stripe and the temperature monitoring group Berkeley Earth. 'The relationship between CO2 emissions and global temperatures has been well established since the late 1800s, and coal burning is the single biggest driver of global CO2 emissions, followed by oil and gas. It is utterly nonsensical to say that carbon emissions from power plants do not contribute significantly to climate change.' "It's about as valid as saying that arsenic is not a dangerous substance to consume," said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann. "The world is round, the sun rises in the east, coal-and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change, and climate change increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms, infectious diseases, and many other health threats. These are indisputable facts," said Dr. Howard Frumkin, former director of the National Center for Environmental Health and a retired public health professor at the University of Washington. Climate economist R. Daniel Bressler of Columbia University, said: 'We can use tools from climate economics, including the mortality cost of carbon and the social cost of carbon, to estimate the climate impacts of these emissions. For instance, in my past work, I found that adding just one year's worth of emissions from an average-sized coal-fired plant in the U.S. causes 904 expected temperature-related deaths and over $1 billion in total climate damages.' University of Arizona climate scientist Kathy Jacobs said: "Their statement is in direct conflict with evidence that has been presented by thousands of scientists from almost 200 countries for decades. 'It's basic chemistry that burning coal and natural gas releases carbon dioxide and it's basic physics that CO2 warms the planet. We've known these simple facts since the mid-19th century,' said Oregon State's Phil Mote. Andrew Weaver, a professor at the University of Victoria and former member of parliament in British Columbia, said: 'President Trump is setting himself up for international court charges against him for crimes against humanity. To proclaim you don't want to deal with climate change is one thing, but denying the basic science can only be taken as a wanton betrayal of future generations for which there should be consequences.' Stanford climate scientist Chris Field, who coordinated an international report linking climate change to increasingly deadly extreme weather, summed it up this way: "It is hard to imagine a decision dumber than putting the short-term interests of oil and gas companies ahead of the long-term inters of our children and grandchildren." ___ Matthew Daly and Michael Phillis contributed from Washington. The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
