Nebraska would rev up role in curbing undocumented workers under bill targeting employers
In this aerial view, Mexican immigration officials and police escort deportees after they were sent back into Mexico on Jan. 22, 2025, as seen from Nogales, Arizona. U.S. President Donald Trump signed executive orders on his first day in office declaring a state of emergency at the U.S. southern border, halting asylum claims and launching a campaign of mass deportations. (Photo by)
LINCOLN — Nebraska would step up its role against illegal immigration under a newly proposed state law requiring businesses with at least 25 workers to use an online system aimed at ferreting out undocumented workers.
State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha, under Legislative Bill 532, wants to create graduated state penalties, including suspension of a business license, for employers that don't partake in the E-Verify program to check an applicant's eligibility to work and that knowingly hire people unauthorized to work in the United States.
Furthermore, the measure calls upon the Nebraska Department of Labor to develop and carry out random audit inspections and expose violators using a public-facing database.
'We're saying that every business should be doing this,' Kauth, chair of the Legislature's Business and Labor Committee, said of the electronic verification. 'I want them to do the right thing.'
The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 makes it unlawful under federal law to knowingly employ undocumented workers. Arizona in 2008 became the first state to require E-Verify as a further deterrent, using revocation of a license to do business in the state as a hammer, and some states and cities have followed suit.
Kauth said her proposal was inspired by constituent concerns, but that her intent is not only to curb the undocumented workforce. She sees it as protection for vulnerable workers who may be taken advantage of by employers because of legal status.
Pillen orders Nebraska agencies to fall in line with Trump immigration crackdown
The proposal comes as Gov. Jim Pillen issued a directive to state government agencies and law enforcement officials to adhere to President Donald Trump's executive orders cracking down on illegal immigration and border security. Trump's executive orders have created fear and concern in many communities. His effort to roll back birthright citizenship already faces legal challenges.
Lawyers in Nebraska who work in immigration and labor law fields question the effectiveness of a state E-Verify push. Currently, mandatory E-Verify checks in Nebraska apply to a smaller group: public contractors and employers that receive tax incentives from the state.
The Internet-based system is set up to compare and match information provided by a job applicant with records available to the Social Security Administration and U.S. Department of Homeland Security, essentially verifying a person's status to work. It's a free and fast service, according to a federal government website promoting E-Verify.
But a major criticism of the electronic verification system is that workers using fraudulent or borrowed identities can and have evaded detection, said Amy Peck, who manages the immigration practice of Jackson Lewis law firm.
Of LB 532, Peck said: 'Will it solve the illegal immigration problem for employers? No. Does it make everyone feel good? Maybe.'
Daniel Martin DeLoa, a trial attorney at Omaha-based Pesek Law, sees the Kauth proposal as opening the door to potential selective enforcement and posing a barrier to doing business in Nebraska.
He views the legislative proposal more as a show of support for the priorities of the president.
'This is one of many examples we will see when the Nebraska Legislature expresses clear agreement and alignment with the policies and priorities of the new Trump administration,' Martin DeLoa said.
Under the Kauth proposal:
An employer must verify a new hire's work eligibility using E-Verify or a similarly recognized program by the federal government. If the state labor commissioner detects noncompliance, the business has a certain amount of time to contest. Penalties include probation of a business' operating license or, for repeat violations, suspension of the license.
Employers that knowingly employ an unauthorized immigrant worker face suspension of their business license. The license can be reinstated if the employer fires the worker in question or pays the cost of either the Labor Department's investigation or $1,000. Suspensions are longer with repeat violations.
A business that 'in good faith' uses E-Verify is presumed not to be in violation, subject to rebuttal by evidence. And an employer who fires a worker to comply with the statute won't be subject to a civil action for wrongful termination of the employee.
The state Labor Department, in administering a statewide random auditing program, gains the authority to enter a business at 'reasonable times' and question bosses and workers, examine and photograph relevant records.
Bryan Slone, chief executive of the Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce, said that many businesses in Nebraska already use E-Verify.
While the chamber has not yet examined the bill, or taken a position, its leaders tend to take a practical point of view, he said.
One problem, Slone said, is that there is not a consistent approach to worker verification among all states and cities and, generally, a patchwork of regulations hampers business.
Some Nebraska businesses also have employees in multiple states, he noted.
'It means employers have to keep track of all these different provisions in different jurisdictions,' he said. 'It's always better to have uniform federal rules from a compliance standpoint.'
From a broader perspective, he said, businesses want a better federal immigration system that processes work visas faster and in ways that provide more legal workers to U.S. employers struggling with a shortage of applicants.
'This is nothing the State Legislature can fix,' he said, but it is a priority for an alliance of Nebraska organizations including the Nebraska Chamber.
Kauth said she recognizes that a legislative proposal is a work in progress, and she welcomes input from taxpayers and others during public hearings.
'We're going to find out what people think,' she said. 'Perhaps it's just the first step in, How do we make it better?'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. Appeals court decides
By Dietrich Knauth (Reuters) -A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati


Fox News
16 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump-backed Jack Ciattarelli captures GOP nomination for New Jersey governor
HOLMDEL, N.J. - The candidate President Donald Trump recently endorsed in New Jersey has won the state's Republican gubernatorial primary, in the 2025 race to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. The Associated Press projects that Jack Ciattarelli, a former GOP state lawmaker who is making his third bid for New Jersey governor, will capture the Republican nomination, topping four rivals in Tuesday's primary in a race that for months had been a battle for Trump's support. Among those Cittarelli defeated were former businessman and popular conservative talk radio host Bill Spadea and state Sen. Jon Bramnick, a lawyer who served for a decade as state Assembly GOP leader. Ciattarelli and Spadea spent months trading fire over which of them was a bigger Trump supporter. But last month the president endorsed Cittarelli, who ran unsuccessfully for the GOP nomination in 2017, but four years later he captured the nomination and overperformed in the general election, coming close to ousting Murphy. "I'm asking you to get out and vote for a true champion for the people of your state – Jack Ciattarelli. He's been a friend of mine, and he's been a real success story," Trump told supporters a week ago, as he dialed into a tele-rally on the eve of the kick-off of early voting in New Jersey. Trump's grip over the GOP is stronger than ever following his convincing White House re-election victory last November, and Cittarrelli, in a Fox News Digtal interview last week, said the president's endorsement was "a really big deal" and added "the president's doing very, very well in New Jersey." Spadea said that not landing Trump's endorsement "was certainly disappointing." "I mean, we made no bones about this. We absolutely wanted the president's endorsement. Unfortunately, the president endorsed a poll and not a plan," Spadea told Fox News Digital last week. "I have been a supporter of President Trump since he came down the escalator," as he referenced Trump's announcement in 2015 of his first presidential campaign. "There is no question that I am the common-sense conservative. I am the actual Republican in this primary," Spadea claimed. And Spadea questioned Ciattarelli's support for Trump, arguing that his rival "has disrespected him [Trump] for the better part of the last eight years…We thought that that endorsement would have been better served with me." Four years ago, after he won the GOP gubernatorial nomination, Ciattarelli, when asked if he was seeking the then-former president's endorsement, told Fox News Digital "there's only one endorsement I seek, and that's the endorsement of the voters of New Jersey. That's the only one that matters." Fast-forward to 2025, and Ciattarelli emphasized that "people really appreciate what he [Trump] is doing for New Jerseyans. He's put a temporary hold on the wind farms off the Jersey Shore. He's beating up on the New York Democrats over congestion pricing. He supports a quadrupling of the SALT [state and local tax] deduction on our federal tax returns. Those are big deals to New Jersey, and that's why he's got so much great support here. And I'm honored to have his endorsement." Asked why Trump endorsed him rather than Spadea, Ciattarelli said that "the president wants to win. He knows that I provide the best opportunity to win in November." "He knows we're going to raise the necessary money. We've raised more money than the other five Republican gubernatorial candidates combined," added Ciattarelli, a certified public accountant who started a medical publishing company before getting into politics. Ciattarelli's fundraising allowed him to dominate the GOP primary ad wars. The Democratic Governors Association, pointing to the rush to embrace Trump by the top two candidates, long described the 2025 Republican showdown as a "MAGA battle" and argued that there's "extremism in the GOP primary." While New Jersey has long leaned toward the Democrats, Republicans have had success in gubernatorial elections. "It's not a blue state when it comes to governor races, Republicans have won six of the last 11. That's better than 50%," Ciattarelli said. Trump, who for years has spent summer weekends at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, held a very large campaign rally last year in Wildwood, N.J. And he improved from a 16-point loss in the state in the 2020 election to a 6-point deficit last November. Ciattarelli, looking ahead to the general election campaign, said he's "really looking forward" to Trump's "active participation…I think New Jerseyans are anxious to have him on the campaign trail with me and help deliver a win for us in November."

NBC Sports
16 minutes ago
- NBC Sports
Stephen A. Smith: Failure to buy Bills sparked Donald Trump's first presidential run
Nearly 10 years ago to the day, a certain someone took a certain ride down a certain golden escalator and most certainly upended American politics. As Stephen A. Smith told it on Monday night's edition of The Daily Show, the rise of Donald Trump the politician is tied directly to his inability to buy the Buffalo Bills a year before he threw his hat in the presidential ring. 'In 2014, he wanted to purchase the NFL's Buffalo Bills,' Smith told Jon Stewart. 'The price tag was $1.4 billion. . . . My sources tell me he had $1.1 [billion]. . . . He literally called me in 2014 and he said, 'Stephen, I'm going to tell you this right now' — and this is a quote — 'if them mutherfuckers get in my way, I'm gonna get them all back. I'm gonna run for president.' Those are his exact words. 'And so the NFL often jokes with me, 'So it's our fault' when I tell them that story. And I say, 'Yeah.'' This prompted Stewart to make a direct plea to the camera: 'People of Buffalo. Give him the fucking team. Save us.' Smith explained Trump's viewpoint on the matter. 'He was putting the word out that if this doesn't happen — he wanted to do it, and this should happen, I'm Donald Trump, I'm very popular and well known, I'm worth over a billion dollars, I should be able to purchase an NFL team if I want it,' Smith said. 'And if I can't get it, it's because they're getting in my way. That was his position. Their position was, 'You didn't have enough money.'' And he didn't. Because at the end of the day that's all it takes to buy an NFL team: Come up with the best offer. Terry and Kim Pegula came up with a better offer than the twice future president. But, yes, there's an alternate universe in which Trump owns the Bills and he isn't the president and he calls in to PFT Live on a regular basis to complain that the league office is being very unfair.