logo
The construction of a road in Brazil draws criticism before first-ever climate talks in the Amazon

The construction of a road in Brazil draws criticism before first-ever climate talks in the Amazon

Globe and Mail08-05-2025

BELEM, Brazil (AP) — In the run-up to the annual U.N. climate conference, set to take place in Brazil's Amazon in November, the construction of a road is drawing attention, with critics arguing it will lead to environmental degradation.
Before the talks, called COP30, the state government of Para is building a 13-kilometer (8-mile) avenue designed to ease traffic on a major highway that runs parallel.
The road was planned long before Belem, a metropolitan area of 2.5 million people that sits on the edge of the Amazon, was chosen as conference host. That hasn't spared it sharp criticism, however, because the road is expected to cut across the last remnants of rainforest in Belem.
Road building in the Amazon, which historically has often led to deforestation and development of surrounding areas, also stands in stark contrast to a central aim of climate conferences, and in particular this one: conservation of biodiversity.
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who has made the slowing of deforestation a central focus of his administration, has frequently boasted that this will be the first such conference in the Amazon rainforest.
The Amazon is key to regulating the climate, because trees absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that heats the planet when released into the atmosphere.
'We will hold the best COP in history because the topic of all the ones held in other countries was the Amazon," Lula said while visiting Belem worksites in February. 'This one will be in the Amazon.'
An official project map shows a straight line dividing a green area through the city's outskirts. This protected area is slightly larger than Manhattan. It was designated in 1993 to protect two lakes, a river basin and to restore a degraded rainforest. However, its rules allow private properties, government-approved deforestation and public works. Two university campuses are located within its limits.
'Even with measures to reduce the damage, there are tough issues to address,' said Roberta Rodrigues, a professor of architecture at the Federal University of Para. 'It's hard to imagine a road being built along the banks of the Guama River without it leading to illegal development. It may lead to the end of this protected area."
The project dates back to 2020. Construction began in mid-2024, despite criticism over its impact on one of the city's few remaining green areas. The project drew wider attention in March, when the BBC reported that the avenue was "being built for COP30.' As the story was picked up by news outlets around the world, Brazil's government issued a statement saying the avenue wasn't among the 33 infrastructure projects planned for COP30.
In a statement to The Associated Press, the state government of Para said that the avenue, named Liberdade, or Freedom, will be an expressway and development around it won't be permitted.
The chaotic growth of Brazilian cities, however, suggests it's a promise that will be hard to keep. Countless public areas have been occupied for the irregular construction of housing — from modest structures to luxury condos — with the expectation that they will eventually be legalized, which often ends up happening.
Belem is the capital of Para, which is run by Gov. Helder Barbalho, a politician from a traditional family who is an ally of Lula. Both support oil drilling in the nearby mouth of the Amazon River, likely a point of contention during COP30.
The road is scheduled to be inaugurated just before the conference kicking off on Nov. 10.
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Neymar apologizes for red card in what could be his last game with Brazilian club Santos
Neymar apologizes for red card in what could be his last game with Brazilian club Santos

CTV News

time3 days ago

  • CTV News

Neymar apologizes for red card in what could be his last game with Brazilian club Santos

Brazil's Neymar walk onto the pitch during his debut for Santos FC in a Sao Paulo league soccer match against Botafogo-SP, in Santos, Brazil, Feb. 5, 2025. (AP Photo/Andre Penner, file) SANTOS, Brazil — Neymar has apologized for a red card that he says cost Santos a victory in the Brazilian league, claiming that 'desperation' to score led to the mistake in what could be his final match with the club. Neymar was sent off in the 76th minute of Santos' 1-0 loss to Botafogo at home on Sunday after using his hand to score a goal. Neymar's contract with Santos ends at the end of June and Santos plays only one more league game before the break for the Club World Cup. Since Neymar is suspended for the next match and there's still no deal to extend his contract, he may not play for the club again in this stint. Realizing he was not going to reach the ball with his head before a defender could clear it away, Neymar used his right hand to push the ball into the net. The Brazil forward already had a yellow card and was shown his second by the referee, which immediately disallowed the goal. Botafogo then scored the winner in the 86th. 'Desperation to score a goal sometimes leads to mistakes,' Neymar said on Instagram. 'I want to apologize to my teammates and to the fans. I made a mistake, forgive me. If I hadn't been sent off, I'm sure we would have gotten the three points. Congratulations to the team for today's game. You can put these three points on my account.' Neymar did not have a problem with the second yellow but complained about the first one, which came for a foul late in the first half. 'The second yellow card has to be shown, but the referee has to be kidding about the first one,' he said. 'It's one foul and I'm already being shown a yellow.' 'It's incredible how many bad referees there are out there. That's my opinion, please don't punish me even more,' he said, along with a laughing-face emoji. Santos has only two wins in 11 league matches this year and sits in 18th-place in the 20-team standings, inside the relegation zone.

Tariff turmoil could continue for months. Here are five suggestions for what to do with your money
Tariff turmoil could continue for months. Here are five suggestions for what to do with your money

Globe and Mail

time3 days ago

  • Globe and Mail

Tariff turmoil could continue for months. Here are five suggestions for what to do with your money

There are two things that give Donald Trump fits these days. The first is adverse court rulings. There have been several, ordering the roll-back of some of his most controversial executive orders. The biggest one came last week when a three-judge panel of the New York-based Court of International Trade ruled that many of his tariffs exceeded the authority granted to him under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. These included the so-called 'fentanyl and border tariffs' aimed at Canada, Mexico, and China, and the reciprocal tariffs announced April 2, the so-called 'Liberation Day'. A day after the Trade Court ruling, an appeals court ordered a stay that will allow the U.S. government to continue collecting the disputed tariffs until the legal process plays out. But that didn't stop the White House, which is appealing all the negative verdicts, from reiterating that judges should not be allowed to overturn federal government policies. Mr. Trump has even suggested impeaching judges who have ruled against him, prompting a rare public rebuke from Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts. Mr. Trump's other pet hate these days is business leaders who suggest his beloved tariffs will increase consumer prices and exacerbate inflation. He has always tried to maintain the fiction that tariff costs are borne by the exporting countries rather than U.S. businesses and consumers. Recently, he was outraged over a report that Inc. (AMZN-Q) was going to display the cost of tariffs alongside the prices of items on its website, a move his press secretary described as 'a hostile and political act'. The plan was squelched after Mr. Trump got Amazon founder Jeff Bezos on the phone and gave him an earful. Since the Amazon incident, many business leaders have tried to keep a low profile when it comes to tariffs. Home Depot's chief financial officer said recently the company will not raise prices due to tariffs. Customers should take that statement with a large grain of salt. Lumber, steel, and aluminum have already been hit with tariffs and the company should expect to see higher prices for many more foreign-sourced items including lighting and electrical components. Home Depot (HD-N) imports many of its products from China and, while it is trying to diversify its sources, it may be difficult to do so. The result could be a squeeze at both ends. Many of Home Depot's customers are professional tradespeople and contractors. They tend to be particularly price-sensitive because they buy in large quantities and often work on fixed budgets. While Home Depot is staying under Mr. Trump's radar, Walmart is being straight-up about what's going on. During the company's recent earnings call in mid-May, CEO Doug McMillon said Walmart won't be able to absorb all the additional costs 'given the reality of narrow retail margins'. Predictably, Mr. Trump reacted angrily, telling Walmart in a Truth Social post to 'EAT THE TARIFFS' and hold the price line. That's not easy when your profit margin is 2.75 per cent, as Walmart's was in April, according to The Wall Street Journal. Boiling it all down, we're left with probability that the turbulence and uncertainty created by the President's attempt to reconfigure global trade is going to drag on for months, if not years. Mr. Trump is unlikely to back down from his position, although he may soften it somewhat over time. His opponents will continue to attack by every means open to them. For investors, this implies volatile stock markets for the foreseeable future, with huge day-to-day swings depending on Mr. Trump's latest Truth Social posting, Oval Office musing, or out-of-the-blue policy changes like his Friday announcement that he's doubling the tariffs on steel and aluminum. So, what should you be doing with your money? Here are five suggestions. Focus on Canada. In the past, I've advised overweighting portfolios to U.S. securities and underweighting Canada. Now keeping more of your money at home seems like a better plan. So far this year, the TSX has outperformed the S&P 500 by a wide margin and recently reached a new record high. The weak U.S. performance may reflect a stronger reaction by American investors to Trump's declarations and maneuvers, thereby increasing volatility, but the upshot is Toronto seems to be calmer than New York at present. Add to Europe. The STOXX Europe 600 Index is performing much better than expected, with a gain of about 8 per cent so far this year. Most Canadians have little or no European exposure in their portfolios. Reduce risk. The coming months are going to be stressful. Both Canada and the U.S. face the risk of a recession and the market volatility we've seen so far in 2025 will almost certainly continue. Low-risk investments I recommend include shares in Canada's big six banks and a significant position in a utilities ETF, such as the BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT-T), which is up 7.4 per cent this year, including distributions. Buy gold. The precious metal thrives in uncertain times, and this is about as uncertain as it gets. The S&P/TSX Global Gold Index is ahead 41.59 per cent year-to-date. Keep your cool. There will be times in the coming months when you may be ready to abandon the markets altogether and opt to put your money into safe GICs. Unless you are very elderly and/or can't sleep at night, that's probably not a good plan. Suck it up and ride out the storms. If you have a well-constructed portfolio, you'll come out fine. Gordon Pape is editor and publisher of the Internet Wealth Builder and Income Investor newsletters. Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Trump's new tax bill contains ‘sledgehammer' to hit back against foreign digital taxes
Trump's new tax bill contains ‘sledgehammer' to hit back against foreign digital taxes

Globe and Mail

time6 days ago

  • Globe and Mail

Trump's new tax bill contains ‘sledgehammer' to hit back against foreign digital taxes

U.S. President Donald Trump would have the power to retaliate against countries that impose special digital service taxes on large U.S. technology companies like Amazon AMZN-T and Alphabet GOOG-Q, under a provision in the sweeping tax bill that Congress is considering. 'If foreign countries want to come in the United States and tax US businesses, then those foreign-based businesses ought to be taxed as well,' said Rep. Ron Estes, a Kansas Republican who helped craft the provision. Some 17 countries in Europe and others around the world impose or have announced such taxes on U.S. tech products like Meta's META-Q Instagram. Germany announced on Thursday it was considering a 10% tax on platforms like Google. Canadian business groups press Ottawa on digital tax as U.S. bill targets investors Trump signs memo to impose retaliatory tariffs for digital taxes The levies have drawn bipartisan ire in Washington. Democrats who oppose much of the tax bill have not spoken out against the retaliatory tax provision, found in Section 899 of the 1,100-page bill. Trump has been pressing foreign countries to lower barriers to U.S. commerce. Under the bill, Congress would empower his administration to impose tax hikes on foreign residents and companies that do business in the U.S. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the power to decide on taxes and spending. The provision could raise $116 billion over the next decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. But some experts warned that an unintended consequence of retaliatory taxes could be less foreign investment in the U.S. 'This new Section 899 provision brings a sledgehammer to the idea that the United States will allow itself to be characterized as a tax haven by anyone,' said Peter Roskam, former Republican congressman and head of law firm Baker Hostetler's federal policy team. The House of Representatives narrowly passed the bill on May 22, and it now heads to the Senate. Democrats broadly oppose the Republicans' tax and spending bill, which advances many of Trump's top priorities such as an immigration crackdown, extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts and ending some green energy incentives. Section 899 would allow the Treasury Department to label the foreign tech taxes 'unfair' and place the country in question on a list of 'discriminatory foreign countries.' Some other foreign taxes also would be subject to scrutiny. Once on the list, a country's individuals and its companies that operate in the U.S. could face stiffer tax rates that could increase each year, up to 20 percentage points. Joseph Wang, chief investment officer at Monetary Macro, said Section 899 could help Trump reduce trade imbalances because if foreign investment decreases it could depreciate the U.S. dollar. This in turn could spur exports of U.S. products by making them cheaper overseas. Portfolio interest would remain exempt from any tax Trump imposes, but some experts cautioned that taxing foreigners could quell foreign investment in the U.S. 'Foreign investors may change their behaviour to avoid the taxes in various ways, including potentially by simply investing elsewhere,' said Duncan Hardell, an adviser at New York University's Tax Law Center. Wall Street analysts also predict this tax provision could pick a fight over foreign capital. The new approach follows the 15% minimum global corporate tax deal negotiated by the administration of Democratic former President Joe Biden. Republicans, led by Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chairman of the House tax committee, opposed that approach, arguing it unfairly benefits Chinese companies. Foreign countries have invoked that global minimum to slap higher taxes on U.S. tech firms, if they concluded that generous U.S. tax credits for research and development pushed their tax burden below that 15% threshold. Trump in February directed his administration to combat foreign digital taxes, but they were not addressed in the trade deal announced in May between the U.S. and the United Kingdom, which imposes a 2% levy on foreign digital services. It was unclear if the Treasury Department would actually use the new authority if it becomes law, or if the mere threat of action would convince other countries to change course. The department did not share its intended strategy when asked.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store