The contrast between Kneecap charges and flag-festooned Northern Ireland is absurd
Under the
UK
's main counter-terrorism legislation, the Terrorism Act 2000, it is an offence to arrange, assist or attend a meeting with knowledge that it will be addressed by a member of a proscribed organisation.
This is a serious offence, punishable by up to 14 years in jail. The maximum sentence was raised from 10 years in 2021, so it is supposedly becoming more serious.
Yet scarcely a week goes by in
Northern Ireland
when this law is not apparently broken by civic leaders, public officials, elected representatives and police officers as they pursue what is delicately termed 'community engagement' or 'paramilitary transition'.
While some of these meetings are furtive, others will be reported as routine news. Some meetings will be condemned but others will be praised as courageous, or at worst as a regrettable necessity. Almost none will be described as a crime because that would criminalise peace-processing itself, along with all the great and the good, and the not-so-good, who participate.
READ MORE
Ironically, the Terrorism Act was passed in the wake of the
Belfast Agreement
to create consistent law across the UK. It was believed the end of the Troubles should mean the end of emergency laws that applied only to Northern Ireland. Instead, the UK has acquired counter-terrorism laws that are uniquely ignored in Northern Ireland because the authorities consider enforcement impossible or unwise.
As the illegality of peace-processing is too awful to contemplate, it has taken a lesser absurdity to bring the inconsistency into focus.
Kneecap
member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh has been
charged by the Metropolitan Police
for allegedly holding up a
Hizbullah
flag during a performance in London. The specific offence under the Terrorism Act is displaying an item that arouses reasonable suspicion of supporting a proscribed organisation.
The contrast with flag-festooned Northern Ireland is absurd. The
PSNI
has made just 13 arrests for the same offence in the past 24 years, despite the charge also covering paramilitary-linked clothing and publication of images.
Many people have immediately asked why this law is applied differently on either side of the Irish Sea. A question so naive is rarely sincere. The PSNI cannot play flag whack-a-mole around thousands of lamp-posts, putting its officers in danger to little or no end.
[
Kneecap review: Mo Chara tells 20,000-strong crowd 'you have no idea how close we were to being pulled off this gig'
Opens in new window
]
A strong case can be made for taking a stand against egregious breaches of the law, such as flying paramilitary flags beside mixed housing, but using a catch-all terrorism offence may not be the best approach. It might only highlight inconsistency, as the law would still be unenforced everywhere else.
Many of those complaining about the charge against Kneecap are republicans comparing it to official indulgence of the Orange marching season or of loyalist paramilitarism. Not everyone seems to appreciate the Terrorism Act also criminalises showing support for the
Provisional IRA
, potentially including most forms of commemoration. Amendments to the Act in 2006 outlawed 'glorification' of terrorism, 'whether in the past, in the future or generally', where this is intended to encourage support for terrorism today.
The realistic route to consistency is to admit a single UK-wide approach has been prematurely applied to Northern Ireland
Republicans do not accept this relates to them because loyalist paramilitaries remain active while the IRA has 'gone away'. That is not quite how the law sees it, however: all groups are equally proscribed.
Complaints of one-sided treatment may often be insincere, simplistic or partisan, but that only underscores the corrosive effect of inconsistent application of the law.
One way to resolve this would be to de-proscribe the Provisional IRA. Unlike Ireland, the UK bases its terrorism laws around a list of banned organisations. There is a statutory process to request removal from the list. A loyalist group attempted this unsuccessfully in 2017 and lawyers in London are seeking the same for
Hamas
; among their arguments is a comparison of Hamas to
Sinn Féin
.
Any hint of legalising the Provisional IRA would be enormously contentious, to an extent that could prove counterproductive for political stability. Although de-proscription appears unfeasible for the time being, it is a genuine mystery why the prospect has not been suggested by republicanism. Perhaps acknowledging the IRA's continued existence is too awkward, or seeking British permission for its existence is intolerable.
[
EU-UK deal is a gift to unionists. Shame they can't all see it
Opens in new window
]
The realistic route to consistency is to admit a single UK-wide approach has been prematurely applied to Northern Ireland. The region still requires special treatment, although this is a positive opportunity to craft laws and approaches to the law that reflect present circumstances and help the move away from paramilitarism.
That might involve recognising steps towards lawfulness rather than the binary nature of the banned list. Unenforceable offences could be narrowed down to achievable goals – removal of all murals glorifying violence, for example.
During the Troubles, counter-terrorism legislation was enacted as temporary and had to be renewed every year. Parts of contemporary law may need to be temporarily suspended until Northern Ireland is ready for them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
23 minutes ago
- Irish Times
‘Arts' dropped from department's title after series of renamings following Coalition shake-up
Arts has been dropped from the name of a Government department as part of series name changes in recent days to reflect a shake-up of their responsibilities following the formation of the new Coalition. The old Department of Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media is now known as the Department of Culture, Communications and Sport. The Tourism and Gaeltacht responsibilities now come under the remit of the, now renamed, Department of Enterprise, Tourism and Employment and the Department of Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht. Those functions officially transferred on June 1st. READ MORE Asked about the dropping of the word 'Arts' from the Department's name – and whether this signalled any downgrading of priorities in this area – a spokeswoman said: 'The title Department of Culture, Communications and Sport more succinctly captures the full remit of the Department. 'The word Culture includes the Arts and is a common term used in the title of equivalent Ministries in the EU, noting also that EU Ministers meet at the Education, Youth, Culture and Sports Council.' She also said: 'It should be noted that a previous format of the Department was the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht.' The old Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications is now known as the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment. The Department of Justice is now called the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, reflecting a significant change in function with the responsibility for housing asylum seekers transferring from the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth . It is now known as the Department of Children, Disability and Equality. A Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration spokesman said the order changing its title took effect on Thursday. The transfer of functions from the Department of Children took effect on May 1st and 'this included responsibility for all aspects of international protection accommodation, Ukraine accommodation and integration'.
Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Leaving Cert maths: Some students left deflated by ‘off-putting' higher-level exam
Many higher-level Leaving Cert maths students were left deflated by paper one, but it had many manageable elements and was less wordy than in previous years, teachers have said. Eoghan O'Leary, a teacher at Hamilton High School in Cork and head of maths at , said students welcomed a return to more maths and less writing. In recent years, teachers and dyslexic students have repeatedly raised the wordiness of the maths paper, saying that it disadvantages them and is unnecessary. 'The paper was dominated by calculus, sequences & series and algebra,' said Mr O'Leary. READ MORE 'Students who hadn't revised sequences were in trouble because they featured in two long questions, so therefore could not be avoided.' Louise Boylan, a maths teacher at the Institute of Education, said that paper had an off-putting appearance, but was approachable. 'Students likely won't feel triumphant as they leave the exam hall, but they shouldn't feel defeated,' she said, adding that there were many novel elements on the paper. 'While there was a lot that was out of the box – logic puzzle style questions, material that hasn't appeared since the course's overhaul – there was much that would be welcome. Algebraic skills, rates of change, differential calculus, and sequence and series would all have fallen into the familiar,' Ms Boylan said. Stephen Begley, subject expert and head of maths at Dundalk Grammar School, said that the paper was more prompted and scaffolded than usual, and didn't appear as dense as it had in the past. 'While the short questions were rather delightful in ways, the long questions were a little light in parts and were heavily scaffolded,' Mr Begley said. 'Beneficial in ways, the examiner was generous throughout in pointing out what methods and techniques students should use to approach a question, for example by indicating to use a certain formula or technique.' This view was echoed by other teachers, including Ms Boylan. 'Later in the paper, question seven's wall of text will have caused some to pause, but once that was parsed, the underlying sequences and series were familiar,' she said. Overall, Ms Boylan said it was a challenging paper for everyone sitting it as the question setter continues the trend of drawing from all corners of the course. 'As such there was material examined on the paper that simply wasn't present in past exams and some students will rightly feel that they were pushed beyond their comfort zone. However, with much that will earn them marks, they shouldn't focus solely on the negative – the marking will reflect the challenge,' she said. Mr O'Leary said that some students were concerned that, with some students finding it too easy, there was concern that it would be harshly marked. 'I hope there will be fairness there,' Mr O'Leary said. On the ordinary level paper, Mr Begley said that it was a fair paper spanning the usual suspects of financial maths, complex numbers, algebra, calculus, functions, patterns and area. 'While parts were certainly not without challenge, the short questions in section A were quite nice and students could play to their strengths answering any five of the six,' he said. 'Those who prepared using past papers would have benefitted from the familiarity of question styles from years gone by. 'The long questions in Section B had students answer any three of the four. The topics covered here were functions, differentiation, financial maths, number patterns and area. 'Topic wise it followed suit with previous exams and students were well prompted and guided in parts. Overall, a good start to the ordinary level maths exams and all eyes will be on paper two on Monday, for which I advise students to take a look at their statistics, trigonometry, coordinate geometry of the line and circle and probability over the weekend, as these are always the main players,' Mr Begley said. Try this one at home: Leaving Cert maths, higher level, Q6(a) Write down, in descending powers of 𝑝𝑝, the first 3 terms in the binomial expansion of: (2𝑝𝑝 +3)7 Give each term in its simplest form. For example, the first term should be of the form ap 7, where a is a constant.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Co Limerick garda acquitted of charges he fixed motoring offences for drivers
A Limerick-based garda has been found not guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice after allegations he fixed motoring offences for drivers. Garda Thomas Flavin was acquitted of a total of 22 counts of allegedly attempting to pervert the course of justice by a jury at Limerick Circuit Criminal Court following an eight day trial. The jury returned unanimous not guilty verdicts on 17 of the charges. Earlier, the jury was directed by the trial judge, Colin Daly, to return not guilty verdicts in respect of five counts against Garda Flavin. The garda, who had denied all of the charges, was supported in court throughout the trial by family friends and colleagues. READ MORE Garda Flavin was arrested following an investigation by the Garda National Bureau of Criminal Investigation (GNBCI). He was accused of knowingly entering false motor insurance details on the Garda Pulse computer records system, in an attempt to frustrate potential prosecutions against people for driving without insurance. His trial heard the drivers involved were stopped at routine Garda checkpoints around the country and asked by the garda present to produce their insurance and licence details at a nominated Garda station within 10 days of the traffic stop. All of the drivers involved nominated Rathkeale Garda station, and, later, when the investigating garda in each of the traffic stops carried out follow up checks of Pulse they were satisfied the details entered indicated that the driver in each case was insured. However, the court heard some of the drivers were actually not insured and had been prosecuted in court after pleading guilty to driving without insurance. On Thursday, Garda Flavin's barrister, senior counsel Mark Nicholas, instructed by solicitor Dan O'Gorman, urged the jury to acquit his client of all of the charges and said there was no evidence of wrongdoing. Mr Nicholas told the jury Garda Flavin was an exemplary garda who had served with dedication in Croom and Rathkeale, Co Limerick, for many years. Mr Nicholas spoke of the 'unique challenges' gardaí face in Rathkeale as opposed to other jurisdictions. 'People who live down here know it has an enormous population, transient, in and out at various times of the year. 'One policeman said (the population) quadruples and with that comes its own set of problems and own sets of vehicles – UK car registrations, UK insurance, some not insured, some not being entirely truthful," he said. 'We know that a certain number of times that people who were pulled up and stopped and asked for their documentation, produced bogus insurance certificates.' The court heard evidence that people had provided certain documents at Rathkeale Garda station, where Garda Flavin was based at the time. However it was unclear who produced the documents nor was it clear what documents they produced. Fiona Murphy SC, prosecuting, had alleged that the evidence would show that Garda Flavin had 'sorted out' the uninsured drivers by inputting data into Pulse to try to frustrate prosecutions against them. Ms Murphy had told the jury that the prosecution case was 'a circumstantial case' with 'no direct evidence'. 'Instead, the prosecution relies on indirect evidence,' she said. She had argued that all of the relevant data entries into Pulse 'were entered under the ID of Thomas Flavin'. She alleged Garda Flavin knew the drivers were not insured and that he entered their details on to Pulse to ensure they appeared covered. 'Mr Flavin knew what he was doing, and he did so to ensure those people were insured (on Pulse) when they were not, in order to ensure there was no prosecution,' Ms Murphy said. However, after deliberating for three hours and 21 minutes, the jury unanimously dismissed all of the allegations.
