Growing demand at UNLV immigration clinic by students, community
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) – As threats of deportation affect students and families across the country, there's a growing concern among the UNLV community.
On Friday, the university announced via an email sent to the campus community that the visas of four international students had been revoked by federal immigration authorities. Aubrey Maples, Esq., a staff attorney at University Legal Services at UNLV, said deportations and terminated visas are rare, but still a concern among the rebel community. For the past few months, UNLV's Immigration Clinic has seen a high demand for service requests and support from students and their families as the Trump Administration cracks down on visa holders in the United States. 'This is absolutely unprecedented,' Maples said. 'Since November, we have seen a nearly 300% increase for request in services.' The UNLV Immigration Clinic helps students and their families stabilize their immigration status so they can focus solely on their studies. The program offers free immigration legal services, including DACA assistance to current students, faculty and staff, and their families.' 'I have seen an increase in requests for just general knowledge from both people who are students who are affected directly by their immigration status and by the general community who wish to support their neighbors,' Maples said. While the future seems uncertain for many, Maples said it's important for students and their families to prepare and plan ahead. 'Yes, the house is on fire right now. The house is on fire, it's probably not going to be put out anytime soon, but there are things that you can do to help you and your family be safe,' Maples said. The clinic also helps students navigate immigration laws and processes. They encourage students to have a family safety plan, complete with important records and documentation should the unimaginable happen. 'Students are under a lot of stress,' Maples said. 'These recent changes by the administration are only escalating that stress and escalating the instability of these students making it more difficult to graduate.' The Immigration Clinic is booked through June as they continue to keep up with the demand for services.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
State bar wants new crack at disbarring Clark County Commissioner Justin Jones
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — The state bar wants another shot at stripping Clark County Commissioner Justin Jones of his law license, according to documents obtained by the 8 News Now Investigators. In March, a hearing panel charged with deciding whether to discipline Jones voted to reprimand him instead of revoking or suspending his law license. The state bar urged the panel to disbar Jones for deleting text messages related to a controversial real estate development project near Red Rock Canyon. Moreover, it rejected outright the state bar's claim that Jones bribed then-county-commissioner and eventual Democratic Governor Steve Sisolak. The panel — comprised entirely of volunteers — rejected outright the notion of bribery and explained to Jones, his lawyers and the state bar counsel that they opted to reprimand him because of so-called character evidence portraying Jones in a good light. However, in recent filings with regard to Jones' disciplinary matter, the state bar counsel, Dan Hooge, requested a new hearing based on what they refer to as 'misconduct' by Jones' attorney, who Hooge wrote made 'improper closing arguments' which prejudiced the jury. Hooge also argues, in his April 28 motion, that the panel ignored instructions 'against using character evidence to determine guilt or innocence.' 'The cumulative effect of these improper arguments prejudiced the State Bar's case, denying it a fair hearing,' Hooge wrote. 'Each tactic—golden rule arguments, emotional appeals, vouching, and mocking—individually and collectively undermined the panel's ability to impartially evaluate the evidence.' Hooge also said that Jones' attorney, former Clark County District Court Judge Rob Bare spoke for too long to the panel, indicating that Bare's four-hour closing argument 'was improper.' Included in the 22 pages of memorandum and exhibits is a signed declaration by one of the three volunteer panelists, which was comprised of two volunteer attorneys and one member of the public. Attorney Rachel Wise, under the pains and penalties of perjury, wrote that the panel's deliberations were 'influenced by Respondent's counsel's improper tactics, including name-calling, crying, and golden rule violations.' Wise wrote that the one member of the public empaneled to decide Jones' disciplinary matter 'voted emotionally.' 'I believe that the improper conduct from Respondent's counsel prejudiced the panel's ability to render a fair and impartial decision,' Wise wrote. Jones did not respond to a request for comment. His attorney, Bare, did respond to the 8 News Now Investigators' request for comment, writing, 'Please review our opposition to the motion you reference. It speaks for itself.' To that end, in his own motion, Bare did not mince words. 'The State Bar's motion seems to operate in an alternate universe where the Hearing Panel somehow gave Mr. Joens a free pass for the misconduct it ultimately found him guilty of, arguing that the decision to 'impose only a reprimand' suggests the panel was 'swayed' for improper reasons,' Bare wrote, calling the motion 'litigator's remorse.' Bare also signed a written declaration under the pains and penalties of perjury, in which he took issue with some of the allegations in a separate writing from Wise's, an anonymous survey which ultimately was made public, in which she wrote Bare 'screamed' at the state bar's expert witness, UNLV Law Professor Benjamin Edwards. The hearing, Wise wrote in the survey, gave her a 'two-day migraine.' Edwards testified about whether and why, in his opinion, Jones committed bribery. 'My closing argument was reflective of the fact that I was defending two different bar complaints combined into one, which alleged various serious charges against Mr. Jones, including that he had committed a felony criminal act,' Bare wrote in his declaration. 'As the State Bar was seeking to permanently disbar Mr. Jones, I felt it was entirely necessary and appropriate to give the closing arguments that I did. It is unfortunate that Ms. Wise felt the need to resort calling me a '2 -year-old.'' This case is currently under automatic review by the Supreme Court of Nevada, with briefs due on June 19. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Guns, voting: Lombardo rejects AB105, 6 other bills to bring total to 56 vetoes
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo on Monday vetoed a bill that would have outlawed carrying a gun at election sites. Assembly Bill 105 (AB105) was a second attempt to keep guns away from polling places, and it met the same fate as a bill (AB354) that Lombardo vetoed two years ago. Seven vetoes on Monday put Lombardo's total at 56, still 19 shy of the record he set in 2023 by rejecting 75 bills passed by the Nevada Legislature. Lombardo reasoned that there are already federal laws against intimidating, threatening or coercing others in ways that interfere with their right to vote. He also cited a state law making it a felony to interfere with the conduct an election. 'The provisions in AB 105 are therefore redundant and do not offer meaningful new protections. Instead, they simply create additional 'gun-free zones,' without clear justification,' Lombardo's veto message said. 16 new vetoes boost Lombardo total to 49; HOA limits, price fixing bill rejected Anti-gun groups criticized the veto and supported Democratic Assembly Majority Floor Leader Sandra Jauregui's efforts against guns. 'Free, fair, and safe elections are a cornerstone of our democracy. In vetoing a bill that bans guns from polling places, Gov. Lombardo puts Nevada communities and Nevada's elections in danger,' according to Kris Brown, president of Brady United. 'The presence of a firearm alone at voting booths can intimidate voters, especially in a country where so many people have experienced the devastating consequences of gun violence. Everyone deserves to safely cast their vote, and this veto will make it harder for Nevadans to exercise that right,' Brown said. Emily Persaud-Zamora, executive director of Silver State Voices, said, 'In our years of experience with conducting an election protection program, voters have repeatedly expressed that feeling safe at the polls is a crucial factor when casting their ballot. While this is unfortunate, this will not deter us from fighting for gun violence prevention and voting rights for Nevada voters.' Lombardo also rejected Senate Bill 156 (SB156), which would have set up a Special Counsel for the Prevention of Gun Violence under the Nevada Attorney General's Office. He argued it politicizes the issue of gun violence because the attorney general is an elected position. Another bill involving elections, SB100, was rejected as an overreach that imposed 'unnecessary state-level control' over local decisions. Democratic State Sen. Skip Daly sponsored the bill, which addressed a new wrinkle in the smooth operation of Nevada elections. Washoe County commissioners had refused to certify election results last year, prompting Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar and Attorney General Aaron Ford to file a petition with the Nevada Supreme Court to compel the commission to certify the vote. Daly's bill would have given that authority to the secretary of state. Two commissioners who were holding out eventually voted for certification. A third continued to refuse, but a 4-1 vote ended the matter on July 17. Lombardo's veto message emphasized the portion of SB100 that dealt with the selection of ballot-counting systems. He said local authorities should choose the vendors they use. Other bills vetoed on Monday: AB434, AB589, SB71 and SB428. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Fox News
15 hours ago
- Fox News
Non-citizen LA rioters could be deported under new House bill
FIRST ON FOX: Some House Republicans are now considering whether non-citizens who are found to have participated in violent anti-law enforcement riots have a right to stay in the United States. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, is leading a bill that would make non-U.S. citizens convicted of "actual or attempted assault, battery, or use of force" against any law enforcement officer eligible for deportation. Any immigrants deported under the legislation, if enacted, would be permanently barred from the United States. "The thing about breaking the law is, there's effectively a waiving of your constitutional rights that's sort of inherent in our system, right? When you go to prison, you're losing your liberty," Crenshaw told Fox News Digital in an interview Tuesday. "So this is a very normal thing, and in the case of say, people who are here legally, but then committing acts of violence – in this case, we're being really specific, during a national emergency, committing assaults against police officers, and destruction of property – that should have an effect and be on the list of things that allows for revocation of your status." Early bill text obtained by Fox News Digital shows the bill would apply to legal permanent residents, people here illegally, and beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy. It would go into effect when presidents, governors or local leaders make emergency or major disaster declarations. It comes amid continued tensions in Los Angeles, where protests against Immigrations and Customs Enforcement operations turned violent across the city this weekend. Rioters were seen burning American flags and cars stood on the street in flames, while police used pepper spray and rubber bullets on crowds outside federal buildings. President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard despite the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and ordered 700 U.S. Marines to Los Angeles as well. Those Marines will be training in Seal Beach for a few more days before deployment, a U.S. defense official told Fox News. Democrats have accused the Trump administration of escalating violence in Los Angeles, while Republicans argue that federal action is necessary based on the state's handling of the situation. Crenshaw said his legislation would help the administration restore order during such times. "What it would do is, it would give the administration the option to say, yeah we've rounded all these people up, half of them are U.S. citizens, okay, you're going to jail for rioting. Maybe another quarter are illegals, well that's easy you can deport them," he said. "But what about the other quarter? You know, that might be…a number of legal aliens here rioting against America for enforcing our immigration laws. In our minds, you've violated that sort of social contract with the United States at that point." Crenshaw said he spoke with the White House and that officials there were "excited" about the bill. The White House said it would not get in front of the president on legislative matters when reached for comment by Fox News Digital. Currently, legal U.S. residents, including green card holders, can have their status revoked by an immigration judge if they are found guilty of certain crimes or are found to have fraudulently misrepresented themselves in their application for residence. Crimes that would make legal U.S. visa holders and green card holders eligible for deportation currently include murder, drug trafficking and rape.
