logo
Say it with humour

Say it with humour

Stress. Tension. Friction. Conflict. Strain. Pressure. Everybody is on the edge. There is venom. There is anger. There is fire. There is furor. And, in this boiling, fuming environment, somebody cracks a harmless joke. Many, taken unawares, burst into laughter, others suppress smiles, some become even more incensed. This is as true for individuals, companies, and countries. Case in point is the menacing war environment that took place between India and Pakistan. While the Indian government and media were spitting threats, with mudslinging at its highest, Pakistani public almost disarmed them with memes that have become more popular than the warring statements themselves. Memes are now part of the micro propaganda in wars. They colour perceptions and actions. They mock fake stuff. They create caricatures of the most thunderous claims. The Indians are totally baffled. They do not know whether to laugh or lash out. They are speechless. They are 'disarmed'. They do not know how to deal with this laugh it off meme war.
The use of humour to defuse situational stress is well recognized in psychological studies. Jokes and witty conversation can make you feel closer to the people around you. In addition, a key element of jokes is that they force you to look at the same situation in different ways. Humour done well, tends to make people think that it is not the end of the world. Humour conducted with respect brings people closer. Think of that witty friend you have, who always sees the funny side of the situation and gives such funny remarks that everybody has to smile and respond. Think of the fun Uncle you have who defuses a family conflict by telling a hilarious story. Think about a witty boss who bridges the gap between two conflicting team members by doing creative mimicry. Humour needs to be used sensitively. It can backfire if it is used not for fun but to make fun of somebody. Humour with a negative intent includes sarcastic or taunting repartees, belittling comparisons, mocking imitations, etc. These are intentional attempts to put somebody down. Let us look at some ways of using humour positively:
Humour as a cultural norm — While most cultures have their own laughing traditions, some cultures by nature nurture funny interactions. Pakistani humour is part of our culture. The tradition of having a court jester has influenced this region. We have a lighthearted community culture where 'bhand' (the street joker) would visit houses during weddings or childbirth and would create laughter as part of celebrations. Pakistan film and theatre industry has produced giants like Munawwar Zareef, Amanullah, Lehri, etc. The Punjabi tradition of juggat bazi is almost a household tradition. People tend to throw funny repartees at each other as a norm. In today's world, some of it may be termed discriminatory or defamatory, but it was the best way to bring a chuckle in a normal conversation. The use of puns, the use of wit, the use of mimicry were all part of this culture of self-deprecating humour that made people grin and chuckle. In more recent times, the late and great Omar Sharif had become a recipe of laughter in the subcontinent. The satirical humour of Anwar Maqsood is still the most looked forward to session in literary events. Pakistan despite its terribly depressed economy and oppressive government continues to fare better on the World Happiness Index than all its subcontinent neighbours. Humour may have some part to play in it.
Workplace culture that smiles — Organisations constantly strive to make their companies a fun place for their people. They work on building café corners, gyms, games room etc. However, the ability to have fun is more in the style of management prevailing in the organization. If people come in looking serious and strained, these facilities will be just ornamental. Many organizations introduce the 'happy hour' where weekly teams get together and become a Hyde Park corner type gathering where staff is allowed to do fun stuff. There is always a jester in the team. Use him to defuse tension in meetings. There are humour bulletins sometimes that are used for people to post fun stuff. For all this to happen the boundaries have to be very clearly spelled out. Humour should not be used to make snide personal remarks. Humour should not be used to target people. Humour should be used to ease up the daily grind. Humour needs to lighten up the dreariness of routines.
Leaders with sense of fun — Humour when used with courtesy can make leaders more charismatic. It not only helps in ice breaking, but reduces stress, increasing the creativity and engagement of the team. A smile is way better than a frown, and a laugh is way more effective than a yell. Even if you are not naturally witty, learn a few humour tricks. Firstly, a good leader will start by making a joke about himself. Instead of criticizing a complicated IT presentation, the leader may say, 'My IT illiteracy has just set a Guinness Book record'. Start with a short fun personal story of how you misunderstood your wife's/son's message, etc. It has to be something everybody can relate with. Do some fun stuff on time management. When making rules for team meetings, include the team in the rule making. Instead of being sarcastic to late comers, ask the team to decide what penalty to give to people who are late and let them execute it. This switch of boss to team creates hilarity as late comers are asked to sing a song or give money, etc.
Everybody is not born with a sense of humour. Everybody does not possess wit. So can humour be learned? Yes. It is a skill. Skills need knowledge and practice. There are certain techniques that need to be learned. Start by making fun of yourself. Have a few light, short, harmless funny stories. Learn some witty quotations. Try some funny puzzles. Keep the audience in mind. Be culturally sensitive. Keep adding to your harmless one-liners. Remember, you are not acting in Sitcoms or doing Standup comedy. All you are doing is creating a lighthearted banter that keeps things alive and kicking.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Khawaja Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document'
Khawaja Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document'

Express Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Express Tribune

Khawaja Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document'

Listen to article Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has declared the 1972 Simla Agreement 'dead' in the current geopolitical context, stating that Pakistan has effectively returned to the 1948 position regarding Kashmir, and the Line of Control (LoC) should now be viewed as a ceasefire line. In an interview with a private television channel on Wednesday, the minister said that while the Simla Agreement had initially committed both India and Pakistan to resolving disputes bilaterally, that framework had collapsed due to unilateral Indian actions in recent years. 'The Simla Agreement is now a dead document. We are back to the 1948 position, when the United Nations declared the LoC a ceasefire line following the ceasefire and resolutions,' he said, referring to the UN-mediated cessation of hostilities in the first India-Pakistan war. 'Going forward, these disputes will be dealt with multilaterally or internationally.' He also cast doubt over the status of other bilateral arrangements, stating that "whether the Indus Waters Treaty is suspended or not, Simla is already over." Commenting on regional tensions, Asif said the threat of war with India remains present. 'Pakistan does not desire war, but if it is imposed on us, the response will be even stronger than before,' he warned. The minister touched upon post-conflict developments, stating that Pakistan had emerged as a strengthened defensive power after its past wars with India. "We have become a defensive force. Orders for our JF-17 Thunder fighter jets are coming in," he said, highlighting Pakistan's growing defence capabilities. Also Read: 'Ready but not desperate' for talks with India: Dar On the issue of Afghan refugees, Asif reiterated that Afghans should now return to their homeland. 'Afghans must settle in their own country. They have no loyalty to our soil,' he remarked, adding that the time had come to address this issue firmly. The defence minister also highlighted the issue of tax evasion in the country, stressing that billions of rupees are lost to tax theft annually. 'We must plug this leakage and divert these funds towards national defence,' he concluded.

Military notes; Indo-Pak conflict: deterrence, pre-battle manoeuvres
Military notes; Indo-Pak conflict: deterrence, pre-battle manoeuvres

Express Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Express Tribune

Military notes; Indo-Pak conflict: deterrence, pre-battle manoeuvres

The writer is a retired major general and has an interest in International Relations and Political Sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@ and tweets @20_Inam Listen to article We continue to discuss various aspects of the recent Indo-Pakistan military standoff. Third, deterrence per se. More than a billion lives escaped Modi's madness in a closer than ever nuclear Armageddon. Besides the conventional side of warfare, the more dangerous 'nuclear parity' still overhangs South Asia perilously. With deterrence in 'conventional terms re-established', one hopes India under Modi would avoid another wasteful adventure of humiliation, and resume talks over the table, rather than in the skies and through brinkmanship. The future India-Pakistan conflict scene will no longer be unilateral. It will be dictated and decided by Sino-Pak military alliance especially in collaboration with China's Western Theater Command. And this would augment deterrence for rational players on the Indian side, if any. Pakistan's Military, in South Asia's modern history, showcased the most integrated defensive strategy and real-time coordination. And just to reiterate, in military literature, a weaker side is supposed to have won an asymmetrical contest, if it denies outright victory or the attainment of war's aims and objectives to the stronger side, which Pakistan did to a larger India. So perceptually speaking, deterrence in the Indo-Pakistan context would, henceforth, be defined by the conventional military capabilities plus nuclear arms, and the fragility of psychological threshold on both sides, as discussed in my piece, 'India, Pakistan — redefining deterrence', printed in this space on May 22, 2025. And in Pakistan's context, deterrence would remain to be fortified by the Sino-Pakistani alliance, and the resolve of Pakistan's civil and military leadership, through Islamabad's 'quid-pro-quo Plus' strategy, to never let India prevail. So, peace, the perusal of which now squarely lies with a mellowed but bellicose India that still pursues its intended water wars, would remain elusive if we do not recognise each other's capabilities, and do not engage each other with dignity, mutual respect and patience, and not with ignorance or arrogance. Fourth. The Exterior Manoeuvre. Without going into the nuts and bolts of the diplomatic war, the Indian efforts to paint Pakistan into endemically bad light and as a state sponsor of terrorism, had very few takers, regionally and internationally. Indian diplomatic overtures focused on painting itself taller by telling the world its military response was calculated and non-escalatory and that this 'new India' would respond muscularly to the so-called terrorist attacks, without wanting a wider war with Pakistan and its people. Essentially contradictory iterations. No country condemned Pakistan for the 'alleged' terrorism; none appreciated India's 'carefully calibrated' military response. The world, contrarily, was preoccupied with the IAF's French Rafael jets being shot down by PAF's Chinese J-10C fighters using PL-15 E air-to-air missiles. Even the US after some initial ambivalence from VP Vance had to forcefully intervene to affect a ceasefire, without giving India the blank cheque of unilateralism and brinkmanship. Russia, India's traditional friend, withheld the 'expected' diplomatic support for India. And Türkiye, Azerbaijan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and the entire OIC, the UN all called for restraint and then ceasefire. Major capitals responded with studied neutrality despite India sending seven diplomatic delegations to 32 countries. Beijing's signalling and posturing in support of Pakistan were overtly clear. Washington's ceasefire appeal re-hyphenated the two nuclear neighbours, to India's great chagrin. New Delhi even refused to acknowledge any US role, for which Trump had publicly taken credit. The paradox of Indian 'Exterior Manoeuvre' was laid bare, as to why was it accepting a ceasefire, irrespective of whether it was reached bilaterally (as India claimed) or under US interlocution (as Trump tweeted), if it had an upper hand militarily. During the conduct of operations, fiasco after fiasco derided New Delhi's aspirations and outsized ego. From denial to acknowledging downing of planes including Rafaeles, to persistent lies on the state and social media, greatly diminished India's shine, sheen and diplomatic weight. New Delhi's comical effort to influence the World Bank under its Indian-origin president, Mr Ajay Banga, from sanctioning loan to Islamabad failed spectacularly. The extent of India's hostility towards Pakistan permeated not only its body politics, but also its cultural elite (read Bollywood), its state behaviour; and resulted in a compulsive obsession with Pakistan, whom India's intellectual wizards proudly claim to have pushed into irrelevant ignominy. This paradox - Pakistan's irrelevance and Islamabad being an uncomfortable reality - remains unresolved and has been damaging India's 'perceived' important power aspiration and status, without pundits realising it. Fifth, The Inner Front. India whipped up its jingoist anti-Pakistan narrative in order to jell its inner front, silencing opposition, muzzling rationality and suppressing truth in the process. And it failed. The Modi Government had to launch Operation "Tiranga Yatra (tricolour journey)" for intense domestic messaging, to manipulate outcomes during Operation Sindoor. From annihilating Pakistan to dominating South Asia as the new hegemon, its efforts, however, could not convince most of its 200 million Muslims, who constitute 10.9 per cent of its population, is the world's 3rd largest Muslim population, and the largest Muslim-minority globally. Its illegally occupied Kashmir, the expected battle zone, simmers with hate, discontent and a resurgent anti-India sentiment, making operations and rear-area security a nightmare for the Indian Military. Assam, Christian Mizoram, Nagaland, the Naxalite insurgency in the 'Red Corridor', Khalistan Movement in Punjab and abroad, and other insurgencies drive wedges in the India Union. Even the Brahman-dominated decision-making elite had and have reservations on the direction secular India has taken under Hindutva-laced Modi Sarkar. Indian security sector and armed forces saw removals, arrests and demotions during the stand-off; and its population is still experiencing arrests for supporting Pakistan, as per press reports. By comparison, Pakistan's inner front jelled like it always does in a crisis with India. RAW-financed terrorism in KP and Balochistan, and the expected political uprising by some political forces against the armed forces, in hilarious formulation of Indian intelligence, failed and failed miserably. Pakistan's national will, determination, resolve and motivation across the political spectrum and across the nation was tougher and firm. Pakistan's 'relative' demographic homogeneity compared to India's heterogeneity is always an asset and a force-multiplier. Such demographic truism also permeates Pakistan's armed forces, making it a formidable fighting machine. Continues...

FO confirms killing of two Pakistanis in Iran's Sistan-Baluchistan
FO confirms killing of two Pakistanis in Iran's Sistan-Baluchistan

Express Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Express Tribune

FO confirms killing of two Pakistanis in Iran's Sistan-Baluchistan

Listen to article The Foreign Office on Thursday confirmed that two Pakistani nationals were killed in Iran's Sistan-Baluchistan province, marking the second such incident involving Pakistani citizens in as many months. In a statement, Foreign Office spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said that the Iranian authorities had confirmed the deaths of Mujahid and Mohammad Faheem. He added that Pakistan's Embassy in Tehran and the Consulate in Zahedan were in active communication with Iranian officials and were receiving necessary assistance and support. 'Efforts are being made to repatriate the dead bodies as soon as necessary administrative and legal requirements are fulfilled,' the spokesperson concluded. Also Read: Eight Pakistani workers killed in attack in southeast Iran The motive behind the attack remains unclear, and Iranian authorities have yet to issue a detailed statement on the investigations. This is the second incident this year involving the killing of Pakistani nationals in the region. In April, eight Pakistani citizens were brutally murdered in the same province when unidentified assailants stormed an automobile workshop in Hazerabad, a remote village in Mehrestan district, and opened fire during the night. All eight victims, who hailed from Bahawalpur district in Punjab, were employed at the workshop where they carried out vehicle painting, polishing, and repair work.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store