Doctor-turned-civil servant whose ‘heart was always in politics', KG Arunraj set to join TVK
'Of course, he is here to take up a senior position in the party and that will be announced by the party leader, Vijay, very soon,' the aide said.
A close aide of Arunraj confirmed to ThePrint that the former civil servant was already in discussions with Vijay about party activities and an announcement would be made soon.
Chennai: Former Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer K.G. Arunraj—who served in the Income Tax department in Tamil Nadu, Bihar and Maharashtra—is all set to join actor-turned-politician Vijay's Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK).
Sources in the TVK told ThePrint that Arunraj is most likely to be given a post roughly equivalent to that of a general secretary.
Currently, N. Anand is the general secretary of Vijay's TVK, and Lottery Martin's son-in-law Aadhav Arjuna, who left the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) and joined the TVK, is the general secretary for elections. While Anand takes care of the party's functioning, Aadhav takes care of election work.
Arunraj, who belongs to Tamil Nadu's Salem district, got an MBBS degree from the Madras Medical College and was practising in the rural areas, including Krishnagiri district, before he joined the IRS.
He cleared the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) examination in 2009. After serving in Tamil Nadu and Bihar, Arunraj took voluntary retirement and his resignation was accepted with immediate effect on 22 May this year.
'Ever since he became a doctor, he has always wanted to be in the administration field, and that's why he chose the UPSC. However, his heart has always been in politics because that gives the ultimate power to serve the people,' a close friend of Arunraj told ThePrint.
Arunraj's close aide told ThePrint that the former civil servant's decision to join Vijay's party was long in the making. 'It was not a choice. He did not look for options. He had known Vijay for a long time and they had plans for a long time,' the aide said. 'He feels there is a need for a change.'
'Although he pursued medicine, he was not keen on practicing medicine. He had long-term plans and public life was his plan.'
Sources close to Vijay told ThePrint that Arunraj became close to Vijay after Income Tax officials raided the actor's houses and properties in connection with a tax evasion investigation.
I-T officials questioned Vijay in 2020 in connection with an alleged tax evasion case at a shooting spot in Neyveli in Cuddalore district. The inquiries briefly halted the shooting of his movie 'Master', directed by Lokesh Kanagaraj.
'Before the Neyveli raid, they did not have any connection. It was only after the raid, Arunraj became close to Vijay. In fact, when the party registration was getting delayed in the Election Commission, it was Arunraj, who guided the process for the team, even as he was in the service in Bihar,' a TVK insider told ThePrint.
Meanwhile, Vijay has hired JPACPersona founder Jhon Arokiasamy as his poll strategist. Arokiasamy successfully conducted Vijay's first conference at Vikravandi in Villupuram and is now in charge of the party's political strategy alongside Aadhav Arjuna.
Handled high-profile IT cases
Arunraj, who joined the I-T department in 2010, had a reputation for leading high-profile raids, including a 2016 raid that unearthed Rs 90 crore of cash – Rs 80 crore in demonetised currency and Rs 10 crore in new Rs 2,000 bills – from the premises of businessman Shekar Reddy and his associates Srinivasa Reddy and agent Prem. Apart from the cash, 100 kg of gold was also recovered.
After that, he was with the I-T investigation wing and handled many high-profile cases. In 2020, I-T officials raided actor Vijay's home; subsequently, in 2021, the Election Commission (EC) transferred Arunraj, who was then the Joint Commissioner.
EC director Pankaj Srivastava sent a letter to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), saying that Arunraj must be attached with the CBDT headquarters immediately and a compliance report must be furnished the next day at 10 a.m.
The transfer came after the EC reviewed the assembly election preparedness in Tamil Nadu.
An IRS official in the I-T department told ThePrint it was a disciplinary action against the official. Arunraj's close aide, who is privy to the developments, said that it was for the I-T department to answer.
Also Read: These Bihari sisters don't just speak fluent Tamil—use Chennai slang, draw kolams at home
Push for transparency in civil services exam
Arunraj also made headlines for his efforts to bring transparency to the Civil Services Examination and understand its method of evaluation.
Although Arunraj had cleared the UPSC in 2009 and joined the service, he took the exam again in 2014. After the results were declared, he filed an RTI application in 2015 to find out if the Civil Services Main Examination answer papers involved a single evaluation or double evaluation system and whether the board members knew the community of interview candidates along with the average marks awarded in personality tests to candidates from the OBC/SC/ST and general categories.
Arunraj fought till July 2017, filing appeal after appeal, and finally the case reached the Central Information Commission, which disposed of the petition saying the requested information was not part of the record of public authorities and such information was not legally required to be maintained.
Since 2009, Arunraj has been expressing his views on corruption, prohibition, electoral reforms and caste through his blog, https://arunjispeaks.blogspot.com/.
In one of his blogs titled 'Innovative Solution for a Better India', he suggested a presidential form of government at the state level while retaining a parliamentary form at the centre to solve corruption issues.
'There is one thing which is the common denominator in all our woes, it is corruption. Corruption cannot be solved unless there is a strong push from the highest level—the political executive. Corruption begins with electoral malpractices and criminalisation of politics. It is this original sin that spills over into other areas—the bureaucrats and below,' he wrote in March 2011.
Arunraj also took a dig at the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), saying it 'has innocuously bred laziness among the people'.
'It is a sad truth that presently no worthwhile work has come out of the rural employment scheme (except for some very rare cases)–one can see all the people sleeping or taking rest under the shades of trees,' he wrote in June 2015.
'Supporters of the scheme may argue that, in many places, substantive good work has come out of rural employment schemes. My argument is that it is at the cost of efficiency—what 10 people could have done in 10 days is done by 30 people in 30 days; secondly farmers are getting seriously affected.'
He also suggested linking the MGNREGS to agriculture to benefit the farmers.
(Edited by Sugita Katyal)
Also Read: PMK founder Ramadoss says son Anbumani 'held his feet & cried' for tie-up with BJP for 2024 LS polls
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
11 hours ago
- The Print
Eid celebrated across Kashmir; CM, Mufti offer prayers at Hazratbal
Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and former chief ministers Farooq Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti were among those who offered the prayers at Hazratbal. The biggest such assembly was at the Hazratbal Shrine, where over 40,000 people gathered for prayers, they said. Srinagar, Jun 17 (PTI) Eid-ul-Adha was celebrated across Kashmir on Saturday with people gathering at mosques in large numbers to offer prayers, officials said here. Smaller gatherings were reported at all Muslim places of worship across the valley, except for the historic Jamia Masjid in the old city, as the authorities refused permission to hold prayers at Eidgah. Thousands of sheep, goats and other animals were sacrificed across the valley as per tradition, they said. Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha greeted the Muslim community on the occasion. 'Let's reiterate our resolve to strengthen the foundations of unity, harmony & brotherhood and work with love and compassion for the well-being of all. May this festival spread peace & bring prosperity to all,' the Lt Governor said in a post on X. A police official said Eid prayers passed off peacefully, and there was no report of any untoward incident. Leaders of political parties in Jammu and Kashmir also extended Eid greetings to the people. PTI MIJ AMJ AMJ AMJ This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
The Print
13 hours ago
- The Print
Dear Sanjeev Bikhchandani, supporting Prof Mahmudabad is a matter of morality, not activism
Recently, I read your response to an alumnus of Ashoka University published in ThePrint. It is one thing to evade some issues for practical reasons and strategic concerns, but making that into a position paper, setting a certain precedent is a very different matter altogether. Hence, I feel there is something to be discussed here. My first memory of you is when you were addressing the first-year assembly at your alma mater and my workplace, St. Stephen's College, almost one-and-a-half decades ago. I have heard of and seen your support to the college, while also been a beneficiary of your positive responses to communications as a member of the college faculty. Let us look at the immediate concern: Ashoka professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad put up a Facebook post against terrorism of all kinds. Was it polarising and hateful? Did it attack the Indian Armed Forces at a time when a war between India and Pakistan was potentially looming large? I couldn't find anything against institutional interests, constitutional values or human rights in his post. Had you – the Ashoka administration – found anything problematic, your distancing yourself from his post would have been quite understandable. I couldn't find proof of that in your letter to the alumnus. Did Mahmudabad's post end up 'offending a whole bunch of people'? It must have, but then critical thinking (that one defining characteristic of liberal universities, as per the Google AI response in your letter) doesn't allow us to join the bandwagon of the feelings of a 'whole lot of people'. Does it? Some unanswered questions You call the faculty, students, alumni, and workers, including the founders, the 'Ashoka community'. One member of that community is remanded. Whatever the issue is, don't you have the responsibility to make sure he or she gets legal support, and work for the sustenance of an ambience in which his/her rights are protected? Wouldn't that be a position of institutional morality? Surely, the university shouldn't meddle with the legal processes. But providing legal support doesn't mean you support the views of the faculty or the student concerned. It only means you are trying to stand together as a community. The atmosphere of fear, which makes us avoidants in attending to certain duties of the community, will eventually make us shrink both individually and collectively. Isn't that concerning? I felt you avoided answering these specific questions by invoking larger, abstract questions of activism in a liberal university. Student collectives in universities have behaved in differently in three phases: when aristocratic young people were sent to medieval universities, they ganged up, created trouble, and ended up fighting with the local people – the infamous 'town and gown' quarrels that are associated with European universities in the Middle Ages. But the religious scholarship took a scientific turn through conflicts in the 17th century. Later, in the early 20th century, students supported the ruling establishment, famously in defeating Britain's 1926 General Strike and and in siding with Hitler in Germany. The anti-establishment common sense of universities is a thing of the '60s: female, coloured, lower-class, and minority students entering the previously guarded space of higher education en masse had a major role to play in it. They opposed capitalism where capitalism ruled, resisted communism in Eastern Europe where communism was in power, delegitimised the Cold War world order, brought out the limitations of socialist rhetoric of upper caste-dominant countries like India and formulated a new set of values for political rhetoric and academic inquiry. Essentialising liberal universities as activist in nature is not historically tenable. Universities have also never worked as per the intentions of their founders: the British government started colleges to produce clerks but the institutions became hotbeds of anti-colonial movements; Indira Gandhi's biggest academic investment, JNU, became a severe headache for her in a matter of six years. This is no surprise given the world does transform in ways we do not anticipate and universities are powerful ingredients and products of that process. In building a university, the community accumulates a culture beyond the topical and the immediate. But through all these phases, universities have been seen as critical habitats of ideation –spaces that gathered, stored, and disseminated those ideas – and produced new ideas and frames in the process. Both under monarchy and democracy, universities have come up with conversations, discussions and devices that caused paradigm shifts in the way we conduct our lives because there was a space in which people were able to actualise themselves. So, every university has had a need to establish communities that allow individuals to be ethically themselves and confident in their academic journey through life. Universities don't compulsorily have to be liberal – they could be neo-liberal or even conservative. But what it can't do is to say it's not a community. Creating a sense of belonging – not the university belonging to us but we belonging to the university – is central, would you not agree? Also read: There's a gap between what Ali Khan Mahmudabad said and what he's accused of—basic literacy Public and private institutions Ashoka University is a private university, and there is a school of thought that universities are best organised only in the public sphere. I have a different point of view. Given the huge leaps in technology and the very redefinitions of what it is to be human, a number of innovations are best done in private. For example, the Centre for Writing and Communication of Ashoka University is an effective and interesting innovation. Given the centre's structure and the numbers they have to deal with, a public university cannot do so and integrate new generational wisdom so easily. The idea of demonetising public universities to support private ones is not just dangerous but also completely impractical: Ashoka, given its financial requirements, cannot replace public universities. While one needs to be highly critical of the cynical heedlessness that public university leaders sitting in the executive and academic councils have been showing, it cannot be blamed on private entrepreneurs. That is another matter altogether. Without that, public and private universities can co-exist, compete, and even collaborate. A significant population of India has seen their financial condition improve in the last 20-25 years and private universities are one way to access that wealth. Academic orientation can function as a tributary in the field of art, nation-building, and knowledge production. Universities are spaces where people not only get degrees but acquire skills, develop perspectives, and learn to collectivise. While your initiative to start Ashoka University is appreciable, your translation of the current problem is potentially debilitating to the very possibilities a university promises. Lastly, a disagreement: St. Stephen's College had a very strong legacy of student activism – from CF Andrews, who taught at the college, raising his voice against British rule, to the women-led movements of the 2010s for equality and constitutional rights, especially the anti-CAA protests. You studied in a publicly funded college. You had enough sense of belongingness to come back and continue your engagement with the community. It is a function of its institutional value that prompts such an act. Do Indian private universities want such a possibility, of being a space of tomorrow, in another 20-30 years, seems to be the question that lingers on in this whole episode. Warmly, Ashley The author teaches English at St. Stephen's College, Delhi University. He tweets @NPAshley2. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
The Print
a day ago
- The Print
Manish Tewari on Congress's Narender Surrender jibe—‘nature of politics, back-channel talks nothing new'
'So whenever there is a crisis, and if that crisis is between two nuclear weapon states, obviously, the rest of the world does not or cannot ignore it. So there are active conversations which take place in the back channel,' Tewari said Thursday, pointing out that under US President Donald Trump, such talks have been foregrounded. In an interview to ThePrint, Tewari said the Congress leadership's position that the Modi government bowed to the US pressure could be an outcome of the 'bitterly contested' nature of the Indian politics where 'nobody is prepared to give any quarter'. The Chandigarh MP travelled to Egypt, Qatar, Ethiopia and South Africa as a member of the delegation headed by NCP (SP) MP Supriya Sule. New Delhi: Former Union minister Manish Tewari, who travelled as part of an Operation Sindoor multi-party delegation, has downplayed the Congress party leadership's claim that the US President forced India to 'surrender' during May's four-day military conflict with Pakistan, saying back-channel conversations during such tense events were nothing new. 'It has been going on since 1990 as I documented with the Robert Gates mission when Pakistan started flashing the N (nuclear) word even eight years before its nuclear test in response to some fantasized Indian buildup in the western deserts, to Operation Parakram in 2001, to the Mumbai terror outrage in 2008, to Uri to Pulwama, and to Pahalgam and its aftermath. The only difference is while earlier back channeling was a quiet process, but now you have an incumbent in the White House who believes that back channeling is front channeling,' Tewari said. His remarks assume significance against the backdrop of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's 'Narender Surrender' jibes, suggesting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave in to US pressure to call off the military operation against Pakistan on 10 May. Gandhi reiterated his allegation Friday while addressing a rally in Bihar. Tewari, who is also a lawyer, suggested that Trump's claims that his administration played the role of a mediator was likely to be a stretch as that was a completely different format altogether. In contrast, the UN's attempt to resolve the Kashmir dispute in 1948 at the insistence of New Delhi was an attempt at mediation, Tewari said. 'Mediation has a more structured connotation to it, but, fortunately or unfortunately these terms keep getting used alternatively. And therefore it leads to a certain sense of ambiguity. But as I was earlier pointing out that when we took the dispute to the United Nations in 1948, the Jammu and Kashmir question at that point in time in pursuance of the UN resolution, there was the UN group on India and Pakistan on Kashmir. 'There was an attempt at a structured mediation. You see, a mediation or an arbitration or an alternative dispute resolution is when two parties agree to the terms of reference of a dispute, which then they allow an arbitrator or a mediator to try and adjudicate,' said Tewari. Asked about the Congress's official position, Tewari said it could be the reflection of a 'bitterly contested political space' where 'nobody is prepared to give any quarter' to the other side. 'In fact, even when the delegation was traveling, the kind of rhetoric which was being articulated by certain sections of the NDA/BJP establishment, was also something which was completely avoidable. But that unfortunately is the nature of our politics, whether you like it or not,' said Tewari, serving his third term as a Lok Sabha MP. However, Tewari added, there needs to be consensus on the fact that Pakistan has been a chronic sponsor of low-intensity conflict which needs to be exposed in the court of global opinion, 'as against whatever may be your internal dynamics or the questions that you may have surrounding the events of 7th 8th of May, the night of 7th, 8th of May till the 10th of May.' 'I, for one, understand and appreciate that distinction, and that's why we were completely focused on exposing Pakistan and trying to tell our interlocutors that this is not only a threat to the stability of South Asia, this is a threat to the stability of the world, given the very nature and the the chronic disposition of that state to use violence as a means of trying to achieve its senses,' he said. Responding to a question on the Congress leadership being upset over the Centre picking leaders like him, Shashi Tharoor, Salman Khurshid for the delegations instead of the names suggested by Gandhi and party chief Mallikarjun Kharge, Tewari said such things do not bother him. 'Honestly, we have been in this contested, politically acerbic, bitter space for 25 years. And there is a larger national interest, which is at play, and that larger national interest is proscribing Pakistan, which uses terror as an instrument of state policy. And to me, that was the objective. And the rest of it, for someone who has been a card-carrying member of this noise for the last two-and-a-half decades, it's really no skin off my back,' he said. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: Ex-Congress minister who worked with Indira, Narasimha Rao, heads to RSS HQ to 'bridge Sangh-tribals gap'
