Minister claims some people have 'weaponised' judicial reviews to stop housing projects
Judicial reviews have been "weaponised" by some people to prevent housing developments from going ahead, housing minister James Browne has claimed.
The housing minister has criticised individuals who use the courts to 'prohibit very badly needed homes'. Some people instigate proceedings with the view that "simply, if you delay a project long enough, the project will fall," Mr Browne said.
Mr Browne said he didn't believe everyone taking a judicial review on a planning application was doing so maliciously, adding it is a 'legitimate part of our legal process'.
He said the Government was introducing changes to judicial reviews through its new Planning and Development Act, most of which is yet to be commenced.
'What we are doing is tidying up judicial reviews to ensure that only those who have a legitimate interest in a project can bring forward their objections to it,' Mr Browne said.
'I think the Planning and Development Act will really help to curtail the weaponising of judicial reviews, while allowing people who have legitimate concern exercise their concerns around that.'
Mr Browne said he did understand people's concerns and he did not believe it was an ideological matter.
Mr Browne said:
Not to say their concerns are not real, but I think using the courts in that manner to perhaps prohibit very badly needed homes. I think that's the concern I have in terms of weaponising.
'When I say weaponising, it's not with a view to getting an actual legal result. It is simply slowing down the process enough to prohibit the delivery of the project.'
It comes as Mr Browne on Tuesday announced new emergency legislation to extend the life of planning permissions. This will allow developers who have just two years left on their planning permission to apply for a three-year extension.
However, these applications must be made within six months of the law commencing and development must begin within 18 months.
It will also mean that for the duration of a judicial review, time allocated to the planning permission will not expire.
Mr Browne said he aimed to have the legislation passed by the Dáil before the summer recess.
It comes as the housing minister admitted it would be 'extremely challenging' to meet housing targets for 2025, after the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) warned that delivery for this year would likely be around 34,000 houses.
Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
10 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Govt moves to change Rent Pressure Zones system
The Government is moving towards changing the current Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs) system ahead of a crunch Cabinet meeting on the matter next Tuesday. Intensive discussions have already taken place on this politically sensitive issue between the Taoiseach, the Tánaiste and a number of ministers. Further talks are set to take place on Monday night in advance of the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning. The current legislation on RPZs caps annual rent increases at 2% or at the rate of inflation, whichever is lower. However, it will lapse at the end of December and the Government is now likely to begin preparing new legislation which will change the present system. This will, the Government believes, "give certainty to the market". The Taoiseach has consistently stated that a stable climate has to be created to incentivise developers to invest in the domestic rental market. Senior figures in the coalition believe that "doing nothing" is not an option and if the RPZs legislation is allowed to lapse, then it would be a return to market rents for tenants. To avoid this, new legislation will be brought before the Oireachtas. The Housing Commission last year recommended "reference rents" which would tie rates to local homes of a similar quality. However, opposition parties have warned that any move to abolish the "modest protections" provided by the RPZs will be strongly resisted.
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Housing Minister pulls plug on almost 500 social homes across six sites over rising costs
ALMOST 500 HOMES have been delayed after Housing Minister James Browne pulled the plug over concerns about the costs involved in the multimillion euro project. The social housing developments were understood to be near shovel-ready and were to be delivered under a public private partnership (PPP) scheme across six sites. Up to 244 of the homes were planned for Dublin and the others are spread across Kildare, Wicklow and Sligo. It is unclear when the homes will now be delivered, but the Housing Minister stressed tonight in a statement to The Journal that the government aims to to deliver them 'as expeditiously as possible' through an 'alternative procurement and delivery strategy'. The decision is set to have significant ramifications, as the department confirmed this evening that housing officials will now carry out a review of four upcoming PPP bundles – each earmarked to contain hundreds of homes. 'After careful evaluation of the costs associated with the 486 homes which were to be delivered under PPP Bundle 3, the Department has decided not to proceed with contract award on a value for money basis,' Browne said tonight. 'The department and the relevant local authorities remain fully committed to delivering the social housing that PPP Bundle 3 was designed to provide. These social homes are very much needed and remain a priority for Government, my Department and the relevant Local Authorities.' Brown said that all six sites have 'full planning permission' and that the department is determined to deliver the homes quickly under a new procurement and delivery strategy. The sites that have been hit by the delay are: 68 homes at the Ready Mix Site, East Wall Road, Dublin 3; 93 homes earmarked for older people in Shangan Road, Ballymun, Dublin 9; 83 homes in Collins Avenue, Whitehall, Dublin 9; 73 homes in Ardrew, Athy, Co. Kildare; 106 homes in Burgage More, Blessington, Co. Wicklow; and 63 homes in Rathellen, Finisklin, Sligo. Advertisement It is not yet known how much the project was set to cost the taxpayer but inflation has been an increasing issue in the housing sector in recent years. In the two previous public private partnership projects, delivered under the same process, final capital spend was €119 million and €129 million respectively. Homes in the latter of those projects costed on average €277,000, excluding VAT. Sinn Féin housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin said the sudden reversal means the minister needs to provide funding to local councils to deliver the homes directly with contractors 'without any further delay'. 'I have always argued that PPPs don't represent value for money for the taxpayer. It's somewhat ironic the government are now saying they don't believe PPPs are good value for money,' Ó Broin told The Journal . He said that the schemes are a poor way to deliver social housing, partly due to the complex structure requiring up to five different partners for each housing project. 'The most important thing now – on foot of the minister's decision – is what he's going to do to deliver, as a matter of urgency, these homes which are badly needed,' Ó Broin added. 'Homelessness is rising, house prices are rising, waiting lists are rising, council waiting lists are rising. This needs to be resolved as soon as possible.' This week's halting of the PPP scheme is likely to pile further pressure on the government over its housing delivery numbers. The government came under fire in recent months for missing its overall 2024 housing target of 40,000 homes by a margin of 10,000. And it came in for further criticism in April when it emerged that it had fallen short of its social housing target for last year by 18%, amounting to 2,345 homes. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on domestic planning exemptions: room to improve
Reports this week on on proposed adjustments to current planning exemptions brought to Cabinet by Minister for Housing James Browne have focused on the idea of making it easier for families to make alterations to their proerties in order to facilitate accommodation for older relatives. The proposal follows earlier musings by Minister of State John Cummins about the merits of permitting modular living spaces to be installed in gardens for this purpose. The details that emerged this week added the spectre of older family members being dispatched to the attic to that of them being banished to the bottom of the garden. In truth, the idea is a good one if executed well, offering greater flexibility for families to make appropriate changes to their properties at different life stages. Increased longevity and smaller family sizes mean the standard three or four-bed 20th century suburban home may no longer be appropriate for some 21st century lifestyles. If the new exemptions were to lead to a moderate increase in population density in mature suburbs, that would be no bad thing, although some research from Australia suggests measures of this sort can drive up house prices even further, deepening the emerging generational divide between property owners and those who can never afford to buy. All of this should be taken into account in the public consultation which is due to take place over the summer. Whatever the outcome of that process, the regulations need updating. Much has changed since they were last amended. In particular, the State has been eager to encourage lifestyle changes that protect the environment and mitigate climate change. Many of these have implications for domestic residences. Current restrictions on insulation or structures to house bikes and bins should be adjusted accordingly. READ MORE A further benefit would be to remove some of the pressure on the over-burdened planning system. In fact, dispensing with excessive or archaic regulations wherever they occur should be an absolute priority across the system as a whole.
