
Supreme Court set to make rulings and CDC vaccine committee meeting: Morning Rundown
The Supreme Court will mark its final day with rulings on several cases, including the birthright citizenship dispute. A CDC panel meeting hints at the direction of the agency under Robert F. Kennedy's leadership. And why New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's social media campaign was more effective than Kamala Harris' memes.
Here's what to know today.
Supreme Court set to rule on a flurry of cases on term's final day
Today marks the last day of the Supreme Court's nine-month term — and that means the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, is preparing to issue rulings in six outstanding cases.
Of these, the most closely watched case concerns President Donald Trump's attempt to end automatic birthright citizenship, which is guaranteed under the Constitution's 14th Amendment. The longstanding interpretation of the provision is that anyone born on U.S. soil is an American citizen with a few minor exceptions.
This is Morning Rundown, a weekday newsletter to start your day. Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
The case before the Supreme Court doesn't focus on the lawfulness of the proposal itself, but rather on whether federal judges have the power to block it nationwide while litigation continues. It's a decision that could have wide-ranging impacts, as federal judges have frequently ruled against Trump's broad use of executive power.
The five other cases the court has yet to rule on are:
→ Whether conservative religious parents can opt their elementary school-age children out of LGBTQ-themed books in class
→ Whether congressional districts in Louisiana are lawful
→ A law enacted in Texas that imposes age restrictions for using adult websites
→ A challenge to the Affordable Care Act's preventive care task force
→ A Federal Communications Commission program that subsidizes phone and internet services in underserved areas
More politics news:
The White House plans to limit intelligence sharing with members of Congress after an early assessment of damage caused by U.S. strikes in Iran leaked this week.
Sen. Tom Cotton, the Republican chair of the Intelligence Committee, is proposing a sweeping overhaul of the intel office led by National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard that would slash its workforce by 60%.
Democratic voters in Virginia will head to the polls this weekend in a special primary election to choose a new representative to succeed the late Rep. Gerry Connolly. The candidates' pitch to voters has everything to do with Trump.
Former Trump lawyer Kenneth Cheseboro was disbarred in New York over his role in a scheme to overturn Trump's 2020 election loss.
The Social Security Administration has hired the 19-year-old former DOGE staffer nicknamed 'Big Balls,' who the White House earlier this week said had left the Trump administration.
Subscribe to Here's The Scoop, a new daily podcast from NBC News that will break down the day's top stories with our trusted journalists on the ground and around the world, all in 15 minutes or less. Listen wherever you get your podcasts, and read the stories behind each episode on NBCNews.com.
Republicans suffer setback on Trump's agenda bill
The Senate referee ruled yesterday that a series of health care cuts and savings in the One Big Beautiful Bill for Donald Trump's agenda are ineligible for the 'budget reconciliation' process Republicans are using to get around the chamber's 60-vote threshold. The setback throws into question whether senators will be able to start voting on the bill today, as Senate Majority Leader John Thune had hoped to do, with a goal of sending legislation to President Donald Trump's desk by July 4.
Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, who adjudicates procedural disputes between Republicans and Democrats, has disqualified several provisions, including Medicaid rules prohibiting funds without verification of immigration status, new limitations surrounding eligibility for Affordable Care Act funding and more. The disqualified provisions total $200 billion to $300 billion in savings over a decade, one expert said.
So, now what? Republican aides said the rulings aren't fatal to the overall bill. Senate Republicans will return to the drawing board on some issues and accept the outcome of revoked provisions in other cases. But some conservatives angered by MacDonough's rulings suggested she should be fired. Read the full story here.
A sign of CDC's shift under RFK Jr.'s leadership
A mercury-based preservative called thimerosal — which is the subject of widely debunked claims linking the ingredient to autism and hasn't been used in nearly all vaccines made in the U.S. since 2001 — was the subject of a presentation at the CDC's vaccine advisory committee meeting. The presentation over an issue that has long been considered settled science signaled how meetings of the panel have already changed drastically under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s leadership.
During the meeting, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices heard from Lyn Redwood, president emerita of the Kennedy-founded anti-vaccine group Children's Health Defense about thimerosal. Afterward, the committee voted 5-1 to recommend that children, adults and pregnant women get single-dose thimerosal-free flu vaccines.
A pediatrician who represented the lone dissenting vote said, 'This is an old issue that has been addressed in the past.' Medical experts who also participated in the meeting questioned the veracity of Redwood's claims.
In a separate vote, the committee reaffirmed the existing recommendation that people ages 6 months and older should get annual flu shots. The committee also voted in favor of recommending an RSV drug for infants younger than 8 months. Read the full story here.
A fireball seen shooting through the sky in the southeastern U.S. was confirmed to be from a meteor shower.
American Vogue is set to hire a new head of editorial content, a role held by Anna Wintour for nearly 40 years.
There's a new record for the fastest mile ever run by a woman, but it's 6.42 seconds short of the time Faith Kipyegon hoped to achieve.
Staff Pick: Why Zohran Mamdani's online campaign was so effective
While the final results won't be known for a few more days, Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old state legislator, appears to have pulled off an upset in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. I say 'upset,' because whenever a candidate's win seems like a surprise, there are almost always missed signs that victory was likely.
In this story, reporters Angela Yang and Bruna Horvath explain how Mamdani's social media presence foretold his apparent primary victory. What really struck me in their reporting is not just that he had built a sizable social media following, but how he did it with substance and how he parlayed his social media virality into money, political engagement and votes. And they explain how his success online differed in key ways from the early social media success of Kamala Harris' failed presidential campaign. Ultimately, it's a nice snapshot of the character and strategic savvy of a man who could wind up running the biggest city in the country. — Richie Duchon, deputy platforms editor
NBC Select: Online Shopping, Simplified
If you're looking for an alternative to the Amazon Kindle, the NBC Select team has a roundup of the best e-readers. Plus, we have all the details on the deals to expect during this year's Target Circle Week, which runs from July 6-12 online and in stores.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court decision hands Trump citizenship powers victory
The Supreme Court 's conservative majority, in a 6-3 ruling, limited federal courts' authority to issue nationwide injunctions that have blocked key parts of Donald Trump 's agenda. Written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the ruling stated that federal judges exceeded their authority by blocking Trump's executive order attempting to redefine who gets to be a citizen. Liberal justices, including Ketanji Brown Jackson, strongly dissented, warning the decision put the legal system and government in 'grave jeopardy'. Critics argue the ruling could lead to a patchwork system of constitutional rights and citizenship benefits, potentially denying citizenship to over 150,000 newborns annually under Trump's order. The administration sought to curb nationwide injunctions, which have significantly impeded its executive actions.


BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
US Supreme Court allows parents to opt out of lessons with LGBT books
The US Supreme Court has sided with parents in the state of Maryland who wanted to opt their children out of reading books with LGBTQ justices voted 6-3 in support of the group of parents who said a curriculum adopted in 2022 by the Montgomery County Public Schools for elementary age children violated their religious rights. The court's majority said the parents who brought the case are entitled to a preliminary injunction while it introduction of the books "along with its decision to withhold opt-outs, places an unconstitutional burden on the parents' rights to the free exercise of their religion", Justice Samuel Alito wrote. The ruling allowed the preliminary relief, arguing the parents showed their case is likely to succeed on its merits, they are likely to suffer irreparable harm in its absence and that an injunction would be in the public interest. The three liberal justices dissented. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissenting opinion that the result of the case will be "chaos for this nation's public schools"."Given the great diversity of religious beliefs in this country, countless interactions that occur every day in public schools might expose children to messages that conflict with a parents' beliefs," she parents involved represent several different faiths, but all oppose their children being introduced to LGBTQ themes. The US Constitution's First Amendment protects the right to freely exercise one's religious beliefs, which the parents argued includes the right to pull their children out of lessons they find also pointed to school rules that allow parents to opt older children out of sex education. The books include Uncle Bobby's Wedding, which tells the story of a girl being told about her uncle's planned gay wedding, and Born Ready: The True Story of a Boy Named Penelope, about a transgender boy. The parents argued they have no objection to the books being on the shelf or available in the County Public Schools, Maryland's largest school system, added the books in an effort to provide greater diversity in the stories children read. In 2023, it removed the opt-out option because it caused classroom disruption and could expose LGBTQ students to social stigma and a hearing for the case earlier this year, the justices appeared split along ideological lines. The court's conservative majority expressed sympathy for the group's argument. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X to get the latest alerts.


BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
US Supreme Court rule on birthright citizenship case
Di US Supreme Court today don issue ruling wey go curb judges' powers to block President Trump orders nationwide. Di case na from President Donald Trump order to end di constitutional right of birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants Almost everyone dem born on US territory dey granted automatic citizenship Afta plenti courts suspend Trump order, im administration bin appeal to Supreme Court, argue say lower judges no get di right to block presidential actions E bin get one conservative majority in di Supreme Court and na Trump appoint three of di nine justices. Justices split along ideological lines Di justices bin vote 6-3, wit di liberals dissenting. Di conservative justices bin stress say dem no dey address di merits of Trump attempt to end birthright citizenship for non-citizens and undocumented migrants. We dey read through di 119-page decision wey dem split along ideological lines. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, di senior most liberal justice, bin deliver different opinion wit justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson wey join. Here na wetin she write: Undeterred, di Government now ask dis Court to grant emergency relief, insist say e go suffer irreparable harm unless e fit deprive at least some children wey dem born in di United States of citizenship... Di gamesmanship in dis request dey apparent and di Government make no attempt to hide am. Yet, shamefully, dis Court dey play along. One majority of dis Court decide say dis applications, of all cases, provide di appropriate occasion to resolve di question of universal injunctions and end di centuries-old practice once and for all. For im rush to do so di Court disregard basic principles of equity as well as di long history of injunctive relief grant to nonparties. Justice Sonia Sotomayor Supreme Court limit lower judges ability to block presidential orders Di Supreme court from dia rulling don limit di ability of judges in lower courts to block presidential orders nationwide. E appear to be win for di Trump Administration, wey don appeal to di Supreme Court say lower courts do no get di right to block presidential actions. According to di 119 pages long document, we di BBC bin read through. E show say e no go be clear upheld or rejected decision from di court. Trump win, but e fit be double-edged sword for future Republicans BBC chief North America correspondent, bin report from Washington DC Say di rulling na significant win for di Trump administration and di president. Nationwide injunctions on Donald Trump blizzard of executive orders don anger am and frustrate im agenda. And while dis injunctions no dey removed entirely, dia scope dey being significantly limited. E go dey harder for individuals and groups to prevent controversial policies like di ending of birthright citizenship to dey enforced. Importantly though, di challenges to dis policies go still proceed through di courts, potentially right up to di Supreme Court – and di merits or constitutionality of each case na separate question to wetin been dey decided today. To tok true, dis na issue wey administrations of both complexions don complain about, so expect Republicans to see dis as a double-edged sword. Wen and if a Democrat enter di White House, dey go enjoy di same legal advantages as Donald Trump go now make di most of. There go also be much more work for lawyers – and who no dey in favour of dat! Wetin dey di birthright citizenship case? On im inauguration day for January, President Trump bin issue one executive order to repeal birthright citizenship for babies wey dem born to pipo in di US temporarily and undocumented migrants. Many legal experts tok say di president no get di power to end birthright citizenship sake of say e dey guaranteed by di 14th Amendment of di US Constitution. Di amendment tok say "all pesins wey dem born or naturalise in di United States, and subject to di jurisdiction thereof, be citizens". Trump order argue say di phrase "jurisdiction thereof" mean say automatic citizenship no apply to di children of undocumented immigrants, or pipo in di kontri temporarily. Federal justices in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington, however, issue nationwide - or universal - injunctions wey block di order make e no dey enforced. Di injunctions, in turn, bin prompt di Trump administration to argue say di lower courts pass dia powers. Di administration ask di court to rule say di injunctions fit only apply to those immigrants wey dey named in di case or to di plaintiff states – wey go allow di government to at least partly carry out Trump order even as legal battles continue.