Ontario paramedic shouldn't have been fired over Israel comments: union, law experts
Katherine Grzejszczak is shown in this handout image. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout - CUPE (Mandatory Credit)
The Centre for Free Expression is calling for the reinstatement of a York Region paramedic whose union says she was fired over a social media post criticizing Israel's military operations in the Middle East.
An open letter from James L. Turk, the director of the centre at Toronto Metropolitan University, and a group of lawyers and professors, expresses 'deep concern' that the dismissal of Katherine Grzejszczak violates her Charter right to freedom of expression.
The letter, addressed to York Region Paramedic Services and several Regional Municipality of York officials, says the municipality has an obligation to uphold that right – even if it disagrees with the paramedic's comments.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees says Grzejszczak, who has been a paramedic since 2010 and is a member of CUPE Ontario's executive board, was fired on June 20 over a Facebook comment that criticized Israel.
A screenshot of the comment on a union post shared by CUPE shows Grzejszczak criticized Israel's bombing of Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, and accused the country of starving Palestinian children and killing health-care workers. The post also hailed CUPE for organizing a demonstration against Israel's bombing of Iran.
Patrick Casey, a spokesperson for the Regional Municipality of York, says officials launched an investigation into an employee's 'concerning comments on social media' on June 19 and that person is no longer working for the municipality as a result.
'York Region remains committed to fostering welcoming and inclusive communities, as affirmed by the Inclusion Charter for York Region,' Casey wrote in a statement.
But Turk said people should not be losing their jobs for exercising their right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.
'We wanted to speak out to say this way of responding to disagreement about a political matter is an unacceptable way to do so in a democracy,' he said in a phone interview on Monday.
He said some people might find Grzejszczak's comments 'reprehensible' but they could challenge her views and offer the opposite perspective, instead of 'summarily' firing her.
The paramedic did not engage in hate speech nor call for violence against any particular group, he added.
'We're always concerned when the constitutional limits are respected, but still people are penalized,' he said.
Turk said he has seen an increasing number of people in Canada being penalized or fired over their comments since the beginning of the Israel-Hamas war, 'and this seemed an egregious case of that.'
The war in Gaza began with the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, in which militants killed 1,200 people and took roughly 250 hostages.
Gaza's Health Ministry said that another 88 people had been killed by Israeli fire over the past 24 hours, raising the war's toll among Palestinians to 56,500. The ministry, which operates under the Hamas government, doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians in its count, but says more than half of the dead are women and children.
The United Nations entity UN Women estimated in May that more than 28,000 women and girls were killed in Gaza since the start of the war.
Israel says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas.
CUPE Ontario president Fred Hahn says the decision to fire Grzejszczak is 'deeply problematic.'
'It's clear to us that Katherine, as a paramedic, has dedicated her professional life to actually helping to save lives, to reducing harm, that's her job,' Hahn said.
Hahn said Grzejszczak's case has broader implications, as it might deter other workers from freely expressing their views.
'When people speak out against injustice, and war and genocide, they ought not to fear for their own livelihoods,' he said.
Hahn has faced criticism himself over social media posts related to the Israel-Hamas war but he rejected calls for his resignation last year.
He said the union has filed a grievance in Grzejszczak's case and believes the employer's 'very wrong' decision will be overturned.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025.
With files from The Associated Press
Sharif Hassan, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Will this be the most patriotic Canada Day ever?
The Canadian flag will be flown high this Canada Day holiday, after repeated threats made by U.S. president Trump to make Canada the 51st state. Oh, Canada. For years, the world has viewed our country in a certain light. Terms like polite, kind and nice come to mind. But between tariffs and annexation talk, Canada's evolving relationship with the United States seems to be changing attitudes, not just about Americans, but how we view our own country as well. Research released from the Environics Institute suggests Canadian pride and optimism is spiking in the months following the inauguration of U.S president Donald Trump. 'The sense of being proud to be Canadian was getting more muted,' Andrew Parkin, executive director of the Environics Institute told CTV News Toronto. Environics surveyed nearly 2,000 Canadians in May 2025. A key finding noted a significant rise in nationalism following what Environics described as a 'bottoming out' that began with COVID-19 lockdowns, culminating in September 2024. 'There was a 20 point drop in that strong feeling of national pride from 73 to 53 per cent over a few years. Now, that doesn't mean that half of the country didn't feel proud to be Canadian, right? They felt somewhat proud or they weren't sure,' explained Parkin. 'Up to 86 per cent of Canadians (now) say they feel somewhat proud to be Canadian. And there's a boost in the proportion who feel very proud.' The sense of national pride fluctuates according to region, with only 46 per cent of Quebecers describing themselves as 'very proud' compared to 67 per cent of other Canadians. Ontario and the Atlantic provinces reported the highest levels of patriotism. And while the numbers paint a rosy picture in some respects, Parkin says Canadians' opinions about the overall direction of the country remain lukewarm, at best. 'There's still more people who are dissatisfied than satisfied. We are more satisfied than we were last year. But it didn't flip completely. We didn't go from worried about inflation, worried about national unity to suddenly being not worried about any of these things. We know that political dissatisfaction affects these numbers. So if the new government is not successful at recharging the Canadian economy, and with some other issues, these numbers can go up and down.'
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
From lacrosse myths to kilts: 5 things you may not know about Canadian symbols
The Saskatchewan Rush celebrate their win over the Buffalo Bandits in game 2 of the National Lacrosse League finals in Saskatoon, Sask., on Sunday, May 18, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards OTTAWA — Parliamentarians likely will get a chance later this year to debate whether to adopt a livestock brand as an official national symbol. A bill to create the brand was introduced earlier in June by Saskatchewan Conservative MP Steven Bonk. If the bill passes, the brand will become Canada's 10th national symbol — joining O Canada, the coat of arms and the maple tree. Here are five things you may not know about the official symbols that say 'Canada.' 1. The beaver does not stand alone Everyone knows the beaver stands for ingenuity, craftsmanship and hard work. For 50 years, the beaver has been an official national symbol of Canada. These bucktoothed builders have long been associated with Canadian history. They were the foundation of the 17th century fur trade and have appeared on totem poles. The beaver even predates the Maple Leaf as a Canadian symbol. The animal appeared on the first Canadian postage stamp issued in 1851. But the beaver isn't the only animal on the list. While the loon that graces the dollar coin and the Canada geese that can be found hissing at joggers near almost every body of water in the country never made it to the official list, one breed of horse did. In 2002, the National Horse Act became law, making the breed known as the 'Canadian horse' a national symbol of equine excellence. The breed dates back to 1665, when King Louis XIV sent mares and stallions from the royal stables to New France. The Canadian horse emerged as a distinct breed about a century later, through the mixing of Norman, Breton, Arabian and other breeds. They're well adapted to Canada's harsh winter conditions. The Canadian horse typically has a dark coat and is relatively small. The versatile breed has been used in agriculture and logging and some were used as cavalry horses in the American Civil War. 2. This tartan is not just for Scots Canada's newest national symbol is the Maple Leaf Tartan, adopted through a ministerial decree in 2011. The tartan was first designed by Toronto businessman David Weiser in 1964, ahead of Canada's centennial in 1967. Weiser's design uses green, gold, red and brown to represent a maple leaf's life cycle. Canadian Forces pipers and drummers who don't belong to a specific military regiment wear the tartan when performing. The design is also officially recognized by Scotland in The Scottish Register of Tartans. 3. Red and white slight? What's more Canadian than red and white? The colours adorn the flag, athletes wear them proudly at international tournaments and many people will be wearing red and white face paint on Canada Day. But Canada has never formally adopted national colours. The belief that red and white are Canada's national colours comes from the Dec. 17, 1921 edition of the Canada Gazette, in which King George V issued a proclamation describing Canada's first national symbol — the coat of arms. The heraldic description of the shield talks about a wreath of maple leaves in 'argent and gules' — heraldic language used to describe white or silver and red respectively. The federal government says that while it was 'long believed' that this declaration made red and white Canada's national colours, the proclamation does not contain that language. While several countries do adopt their flag's colours as an official symbol, Canada never took that step. 4. National sport history obscured by Beers Contrary to popular belief, lacrosse was not Canada's national sport before hockey. In fact, both of them became national sports on the same day in 1994. For decades, many Canadians were convinced that lacrosse was the sole national sport — mainly because the father of modern lacrosse kept saying it was. William George Beers drafted the first known written rules for lacrosse in 1860, adapting them from games played by the Algonquin and Mohawk nations. Beers also established in 1867 the National Lacrosse Association of Canada — the country's first national sports governing body — and lobbied Parliament to adopt lacrosse as the national sport. The Canadian Encyclopedia says Beers began to claim lacrosse received this distinction but there is no evidence Parliament formally recognized the game as a national symbol. Almost 100 years later, a bill was introduced in April 1965 to make lacrosse Canada's national game. The text of that bill says 'there is an attempt' to appoint 'a lesser game' as Canada's national pastime. It does not identify that 'lesser game.' 'The purpose of this Bill is to rectify what was probably an oversight on the part of the Fathers of Confederation,' the bill reads. MPs debating the bill at the time noted the widely held belief that lacrosse was already the national sport, with sports publications and encyclopedias stating it as fact. The bill did not become law before Parliament was dissolved for an election later that year. It wasn't until 1994 that Parliament passed a bill making lacrosse Canada's national summer sport and hockey its official winter sport. 5. A Canadian icon doesn't make the cut Not all attempts to establish a new national symbol are immediately successful. Five versions of the National Horse Act went to the legislative glue factory between 1995 and 2002 before it finally became law. A bill to make the Maple Leaf Tartan a symbol was first introduced in the Senate in 2010 but did not make it past first reading. The tartan had to wait for the ministerial decree a year later. Two other national symbol bills never made it past first reading and it doesn't appear there was ever an attempt to revive them. A 1998 bill to adopt a 'symbol for the promotion of national unity' never passed. This apparently original symbol design, titled 'Canadian Unity Pledge,' shows two concentric circles, with the outer ring saying 'Canada' and 'strong free' in both English and French. The inner circle bears a maple leaf along with 'from sea to sea' in the official languages. Underneath the circles, a message reads 'Canada is Our Country, One Country, Strong and Free, From Sea to Sea.' A PDF version of the bill provided by the Library of Parliament only shows the symbol in black and white. There is no written description of what the colours were supposed to be, but the leaf was likely meant to be red. A legislative attempt to make the iconic dress uniform of the RCMP a national symbol also failed. A bill to make the red serge a 'symbol of Canadian sovereignty' was introduced in February 1990, but the Library of Parliament said it does not to appear to have progressed past first reading. While a Mountie wearing the red serge is an instantly recognizable Canadian image, the uniform is not in the roster of national symbols. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025. David Baxter, The Canadian Press
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
A subtle but noticeable shift in patriotism marks Canada Day in 2025
As Canada marks another birthday, a subtle but noticeable shift in patriotism is taking place. One that experts say not just reflects pride, but also complexity, critique and quiet defiance. Recent political rhetoric from south of the border, including U.S. President Donald Trump's comments about annexing Canada, has stirred something among Canadians. More flags are flying, locally made goods are being sought out, and some are rethinking travel across the border. 'There has definitely been a surge of patriotism,' Matthew Hayday, professor and chair of the Department of History at the University of Guelph, said in an email to 'And it is a defensive form of nationalism … [that] results from Canada seeming to be under threat from a country we have thought of for many decades as a close ally.' For Bradley Miller, associate professor at the University of British Columbia, this resurgence is about more than just outside pressure. 'We should also see what's going on right now in relation to where our national mood has been for the last few years,' he said in an email to 'All of this dampened many Canadians' belief in the goodness of this country.' He points to a long list of issues that have challenged national pride: the aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the discovery of unmarked graves at residential schools, a strained housing market, and divisions over COVID-19 policies and federal leadership. 'So, you could argue that what's happening right now is both a surge in patriotism and a right-sizing of it,' Miller says. 'We're emerging from some of the fog that we've been in about our country for at least half a decade, though no one knows how long this will last.' Reclaimed flag One of the clearest signs of this shift is the Maple Leaf flag. Once seen by some as a symbol co-opted by the Freedom Convoy movement, the flag is now being embraced by a broader group of Canadians. 'I do think that the current moment has meant that the Maple Leaf flag has been reclaimed for mainstream Canadians,' Hayday says. 'Flying the flag is no longer raising the same sorts of suspicions that the person displaying it harbours sympathies for right-wing causes.' He adds that the impact of this moment goes beyond symbols — it's influencing how Canadians shop, where they travel, and how they express pride in more personal ways. 'Voluntary patriotism' Miller says Canadian nationalism has often taken a quieter form, something he sees as a defining trait. 'Ours is a quiet, pragmatic, and voluntary patriotism,' Miller says. 'Lots of Canadians are enormously proud of this country that don't own any clothing emblazoned with a Maple Leaf and would never put up a flag on their porch.' He notes that even in 1867, opposition to Confederation was strong. New Brunswick and Nova Scotia elected anti-Confederation governments, and provinces like British Columbia and Prince Edward Island only joined later, when they had little choice. Others, particularly Indigenous peoples, did not view themselves as part of Canada at all. 'Our regional identities are often stronger than our national one,' Miller says. 'Canadians can choose for themselves how much to celebrate their country, or whether to do so at all. To my mind, that's one of the things that makes our country great.' Reflection as well as celebration While recent years have seen calls to 'cancel' Canada Day, particularly after the discovery of unmarked graves in 2021 — Hayday says those critiques are less prominent this year. 'I think those critiques have not been as visible this year, possibly because of the extent to which Canadians want to celebrate their country,' he says. Still, Hayday believes Canada Day remains a moment for reflection as well as celebration. 'There are aspects of the country's history and its present incarnation that are worth celebrating, but there are also ongoing problems,' he says. 'Not all people here share the same positive experiences of the country, especially Indigenous peoples.'
