Harrods challenges survivors' law firm's compensation cut
Harrods is urging lawyers acting for the largest group of survivors of abuse perpetrated by its former owner to reconsider plans to swallow a significant chunk of claimants' compensation payouts in fees.
Sky News has learnt that KP Law, which is acting for hundreds of potential clients under the banner Justice for Harrods, is proposing to take up to 25% of compensation awards in exchange for handling their cases.
In many cases, that is likely to mean survivors foregoing sums worth of tens of thousands of pounds to KP Law, which says it is working for hundreds of people who suffered abuse committed by Mohamed al Fayed.
Under a redress scheme outlined by the London-based department store on Monday, which confirmed earlier reports by Sky News, claimants will be eligible for general damages awards of up to £200,000, depending upon whether they agree to a psychiatric assessment arranged by Harrods.
In addition, other payments could take the maximum award to an individual under the scheme to £385,000.
A document published online names several law firms which have agreed to represent Mr al Fayed's victims without absorbing any of their compensation payments.
KP Law is not among those firms.
Theoretically, if Justice for Harrods members are awarded compensation in excess of the sums proposed by the company, KP Law could stand to earn many millions of pounds from its share of the payouts.
6:34
A Harrods spokesperson told Sky News on Tuesday: "The purpose of the Harrods Redress Scheme is to offer financial and psychological support to those who choose to enter the scheme, rather than as a route to criminal justice.
"With a survivor-first approach, it has been designed by personal injury experts with the input of several legal firms currently representing survivors.
"Although Harrods tabled the scheme, control of the claim is in the hands of the survivors who can determine at any point to continue, challenge, opt out or seek alternative routes such as mediation or litigation.
"Our hope is that everyone receives 100% of the compensation awarded to them but we understand there is one exception among these law firms currently representing survivors who is proposing to take up to 25% of survivors' compensation.
5:14
"We hope they will reconsider given we have already committed to paying reasonable legal costs."
Responding to the publication of the scheme on Monday, KP Law criticised it as inadequate, saying it "does not go far enough to deliver the justice and accountability demanded by our clients".
"This is not solely a question of compensation but about justice and exposing the systematic abuse and the many people who helped to operate it for the benefit of Mohamed Al Fayed and others."
Seeking to rebut the questions raised by Harrods about its fee structure, KP Law told Sky News: "KP Law is committed to supporting our clients through the litigation process to obtain justice first and foremost as well as recovering the maximum possible damages for them.
"This will cover all potential outcomes for the case.
"Despite the Harrods scheme seeking to narrow the potential issues, we believe that there are numerous potential defendants in a number of jurisdictions that are liable for what our clients went through, and we are committed to securing justice for our client group.
"KP Law is confident that it will recover more for its clients than what could be achieved through the redress scheme established by Harrods, which in our view is inadequate and does not go far enough to compensate victims of Mr Al-Fayed."
The verbal battle between Harrods and KP Law underlines the fact that the battle for compensation and wider justice for survivors of Mr al Fayed remains far from complete.
The billionaire, who died in 2023, is thought to have sexually abused hundreds of women during a 25-year reign of terror at Harrods.
He also owned Fulham Football Club and Paris's Ritz Hotel.
Harrods is now owned by a Qatari sovereign wealth fund controlled by the Gulf state's ruling family.
The redress scheme commissioned by the department store is being coordinated by MPL Legal, an Essex-based law firm.
Last October, lawyers acting for victims of Mr al Fayed said they had received more than 420 enquiries about potential claims, although it is unclear how many more have come forward in the six months since.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government stalling in efforts to cut foreign aid spent on asylum seekers
The government is struggling to cut the amount of money from the foreign aid budget it spends on asylum seekers in the UK, new figures show. Home Office figures show the department expects to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance (ODA) this financial year, of which £2.1bn is expected to be spent on asylum support. The predictions for this year are only slightly less than the £2.4bn spent in 2024/25. Official development assistance (ODA) – which was slashed earlier this year to 0.3 per cent of GDP to pay for a boost to defence spending - is used to promote the economic development and welfare in developing countries around the world. A portion of this money is handed to the home office to support asylum seekers after they arrive in the UK, most of which goes towards their accommodation. But the government's failure to cut back on this spending has led aid organisations to accuse ministers of 'robbing Peter to pay Paul', claiming they are in danger of a 'reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government.' Figures published in March revealed that the number of asylum seekers housed in costly hotels has increased by more than 8,000 since the general election, with 38,079 migrants being housed in hotels at the end of December. It comes despite Sir Keir Starmer previously saying a Labour government wouldn't use the foreign aid budget to pay for asylum seekers' hotel costs – but admitted that the government would not be able to stop doing so immediately. 'I'm not going to pretend to you we can do that in the first 24 hours', he said in May 2024. Meanwhile, Labour's election manifesto vowed to 'end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds'. Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at the Bond network of development organisations, warned that 'cutting the UK aid budget while using it to prop up Home Office costs is a reckless repeat of decisions taken by the previous Conservative government.' "Diverting £2.2bn of UK aid to cover asylum accommodation in the UK is unsustainable, poor value for money, and comes at the expense of vital development and humanitarian programmes tackling the root causes of poverty, conflict and displacement. "It is essential that we support refugees and asylum seekers in the UK, but the government should not be robbing Peter to pay Paul', he told the BBC. Meanwhile, Sarah Champion, chair of the International Development Committee, said: "Aid is meant to help the poorest and most vulnerable across the world: to alleviate poverty, improve life chances and reduce the risk of conflict. "Allowing the Home Office to spend it in the UK makes this task even harder." "The government must get a grip on spending aid in the UK. The Spending Review needs to finally draw a line under this perverse use of taxpayer money designed to keep everyone safe and prosperous in their own homes, not funding inappropriate, expensive accommodation here." The Home Office told the BBC it is committed to ending asylum hotels and is speeding up asylum decisions to save taxpayers' money. The department also said it had reduced overall asylum support costs by half a billion pounds in the last financial year, saving £200m in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. In April, The Independent revealed that the government had awarded a contract which allows for hotels and barges to house asylum seekers up until September 2027, despite Labour vowing to end the practice. The contract, advertised ahead of the election, was awarded by the Cabinet Office in October 2024 – just months after Labour won a historic landslide election victory - and runs up until September 2027. In June, the home secretary admitted she was "concerned about the level of money" being spent on asylum seekers' accommodation, adding: "We need to end asylum hotels altogether."
Times
an hour ago
- Times
FCA considers lifting ban on bitcoin ETNs for retail investors
The Financial Conduct Authority is poised to ditch a six-year ban on some crypto-based products for retail investors even as it warned that consumers could still stand to 'lose all their money'. The City watchdog said on Friday that it was exploring the means to allow retail investors to tap into crypto exchange-traded notes, or ETNs. The product has been prohibited for individual investors since 2019. Presently, only professional investors are able to deal in the product, which enables people to trade on the price of a cryptocurrency without owning the underlying asset. It is similar to an exchange-traded fund, which investors use to gain exposure to equities without owning the stock itself. David Geale, the executive director for payments and digital finance at the Financial Conduct Authority, said the plans were emblematic of its 'commitment to supporting the growth and competitiveness of the UK's crypto industry'. He added: 'We want to rebalance our approach to risk and lifting the ban would allow people to make the choice on whether such a high-risk investment is right for them, given they could lose all their money.' The FCA will take views from the crypto industry over the space of four weeks before lifting the prohibition of ETNs for retail traders. In April, the UK government said it would bring cryptocurrency into the parameters of regulation for the first time, aligning it with the United States and the European Union. The new regulatory framework was designed to 'crack down on bad actors while supporting legitimate innovation', the government said at the time of the announcement. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, said then of the new regulations: 'Through our 'plan for change', we are making Britain the best place in the world to innovate and the safest place for consumers. Robust rules around crypto will boost investor confidence, support the growth of fintech and protect people across the UK.' The price of bitcoin, the world's foremost cryptocurrency, has been hugely volatile this year owing to President Trump's erratic policymaking. In the first few months of the year, bitcoin rose sharply as traders braced for the Trump administration to launch policies that emboldened the crypto industry. However, these policies have yet to materialise which, alongside Trump's on-again-off-again tariffs, pushed bitcoin down sharply, before a recent rally that pushed it up to a record high of $112,000 last month. On Friday afternoon, one bitcoin could fetch $103,975, representing a 2.38 per cent daily increase.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Two private schools close in wake of Labour's VAT raid
Two prep schools have become the latest victims of Labour's VAT raid by announcing their closures as a result of the levy. Park Hill School in Kingston, Surrey, said the introduction of the 20pc tax on fees in January had led to a decline in pupil numbers meaning it was no longer financially viable to operate. Falcons School, a neighbouring school in Putney, south-west London, said a raft of tax changes including the VAT levy and increases to National Insurance alongside a higher minimum wage had 'intensified' a decline in pupil enrolment forcing it to close at the end of the academic year. It comes after figures this week revealed private school pupil numbers had fallen by more than 11,000 in England following the VAT raid on fees – four times more than government forecasts. There were around 582,500 pupils at English private schools in January compared to 593,500 at the same point last year, according to the Department for Education. Parents at Park Hill were told this week the 75-year-old school would be forced to close with children offered the opportunity to move to a nearby sister school. The decision came as a shock to many, with the school's website this week still advertising a recent open day for prospective pupils. The school had also written to parents in March to thank them for 'continued loyalty and support' in spite of the introduction of VAT and offered a 5pc discount to families who paid the following year's school fees early. However, on Wednesday, in a letter seen by The Telegraph, Amit Mehta, chief executive of Inspired Learning Group, which owns the school, said: 'Following careful reflection, we have made the strategic decision to relocate pupils from Park Hill to join our sister school, Westbury House, from January 2026. 'We are incredibly proud of everything Park Hill has achieved over the years. However, like many schools, it also faces challenges, and this evolution offers fresh opportunities for all our pupils.' Park Hill, which has 84 pupils aged between two and 11, will transition into a fully-fledged nursery which is exempt from VAT. Justin Spanswick, chief operating officer at Inspired Learning Group, said: 'The decision was made because of the downward trend in pupil numbers at Park Hill, due in part to the introduction of VAT on school fees.' He added the decision would also strengthen Westbury House 'in the current climate', with pupils moving to the school helping to shield it from the Government's tax rises. Falcons School decided to absorb the 20pc VAT levy in January and kept fees frozen at £6,270 per term in a bid to arrest a decline in pupil numbers. In March the school told the families of its 126 pupils that it was 'considering the future viability' of the school and that it was 'likely to close'. The school was taken over by Inspired Education Group in 2023 and made the decision to admit boys for the first time in an attempt to increase pupil numbers. A spokesman for the school said: 'As a result of the thorough consultation process, we have taken the difficult decision to close the school at the end of the academic year. 'The consultation took place as the school has been loss-making since we acquired it, with enrolment under 50pc over the last two years. THis has been intensified by the recent government changes such as VAT.' Ministers have admitted the Government expects 100 private schools to close as a result of its VAT raid.
