logo
OpenAI's former head of research said vibe coding isn't going to make engineering jobs obsolete — for now

OpenAI's former head of research said vibe coding isn't going to make engineering jobs obsolete — for now

Business Insider12 hours ago

AI is not going to replace human software engineers just yet, says OpenAI's former research chief.
Bob McGrew, who left OpenAI last year, said product managers can vibe code "really cool prototypes."
But engineers still have to build the products in case they need to troubleshoot it, he said.
McGrew, who left OpenAI in November, said on the latest episode of Sequoia Capital's "Training Data" podcast that product managers can make "really cool prototypes" with vibe coding. But human engineers will still be brought in to "rewrite it from scratch."
"If you are given a code base that you don't understand — this is a classic software engineering question — is that a liability or is it an asset? Right? And the classic answer is that it's a liability," McGrew said of software made with vibe coding.
"You have to maintain this thing. You don't know how it works, no one knows how it works. That's terrible," he continued.
McGrew said that in the next one or two years, coding will be done by a mix of human engineers working with AI tools like Cursor and AI agents like Devin working in the background.
He added that while the liability that comes with using agents to code has gone down, it is "still, net, a liability."
Human engineers are needed to design and "understand the code base at a high level," McGrew said. This is so that when something goes wrong or if a project "becomes too complicated for AI to understand," a human engineer can help break the problem down into parts for an AI to solve.
McGrew did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
The rise of AI has spurred fears of companies replacing their software engineers with AI.
In October, Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google, said on an earnings call that the search giant was using AI to write more than 25% of its new code.
Garry Tan, the president and CEO of Y Combinator, said in March that a quarter of the founders in the startup incubator's 2025 winter batch used AI to code their software.
"For 25% of the Winter 2025 batch, 95% of lines of code are LLM generated. That's not a typo," Tan wrote in an X post.
On Tuesday, Andy Jassy, the CEO of Amazon, said in a memo to employees that AI will " reduce our total corporate workforce" and provide "efficiency gains."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI can empower agriculture retailers, farm supply cooperatives
AI can empower agriculture retailers, farm supply cooperatives

Business Upturn

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

AI can empower agriculture retailers, farm supply cooperatives

DENVER, June 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — New artificial intelligence technology is enabling agricultural retailers and farm supply cooperatives to optimize their operational performance while strengthening all-important customer relationships. In addition to broad-based AI platforms that can be leveraged to simplify everyday business operations, farm suppliers now have access to AI apps specifically designed to support field agronomy and crop production. According to a new research brief from CoBank's Knowledge Exchange, AI technology offers ag retailers a new set of tools to optimize workflows, inventory management, employee performance and other key business functions. Farm supply businesses that rise to the challenge of adopting AI can also enhance their position as trusted advisors and essential partners in the ag supply chain. 'AI in agriculture can be utilized in a company's back office, front office as well as within agronomy and supply chain operations divisions,' said Jacqui Fatka, farm supply and biofuels economist with CoBank. 'Early adoption and reliable partnerships will provide an advantage for those willing to test the AI landscape. Ag retailers should research companies and pick AI partners who understand agriculture and promise value beyond just lofty ROIs.' Agricultural cooperatives and retailers serve as a critical relationship bridge between farmers and input providers. The potential erosion of those relationships due to alternative distribution models, disruptive technologies or other competing forces is one of the biggest challenges ag retailers face moving forward. Early adoption of AI can help the ag retailer sector stay ahead of competitors while maintaining and strengthening customer relationships. Fatka suggested ag retailers start with easy-to-implement, low-stakes AI applications for things like email and presentation assistance and customer interaction summaries before tackling more complex tasks. 'Testing out different pathways to gain internal acceptance can lead to greater long-term success. For instance, an easy initial test might be recording virtual meetings with CoPilot. Within minutes, it can deliver an AI-generated summary of the meeting with key takeaways, immediate action items and future tasks.' Ag retailers can also start leveraging AI to optimize workflows for standard business functions like human resources, accounting, operations and sales. Using AI to evaluate and streamline these functions offers a high return on investment relative to the efforts required to build or implement such tools. Fatka stresses, however, that companies should establish guardrails for the use of customer information and understand privacy changes with the use of AI tools. While AI is unlikely to eliminate ag retail jobs, it can help simplify tasks and reduce human error or bias. In addition, as labor continues to be a challenge for many rural enterprises, it can provide continuity during labor turnover. AI can also help agronomists and other staff cover more acres or customers. Apps like AgPilot enable agronomists to interact with AI verbally while traveling between customers, allowing them to input crop protection recommendations and smoothly advance potential sales from one stage to another. 'The stakes are high for agribusinesses operating in an environment where margins are tight,' said Fatka. 'However, ag retailers will need to ensure AI costs do not outweigh the benefits. The cost of experimentation is minimal and delaying a trial adoption of these promising tools could result in missed opportunities for growth.' Read the research brief, How AI is Empowering Agriculture Retailers. About CoBank CoBank is a cooperative bank serving vital industries across rural America. The bank provides loans, leases, export financing and other financial services to agribusinesses and rural power, water and communications providers in all 50 states. The bank also provides wholesale loans and other financial services to affiliated Farm Credit associations serving more than 78,000 farmers, ranchers and other rural borrowers in 23 states around the country. CoBank is a member of the Farm Credit System, a nationwide network of banks and retail lending associations chartered to support the borrowing needs of U.S. agriculture, rural infrastructure and rural communities. Headquartered outside Denver, Colorado, CoBank serves customers from regional banking centers across the U.S. and also maintains an international representative office in Singapore. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash

AI's energy appetite exposes a renewables rift in Washington
AI's energy appetite exposes a renewables rift in Washington

Politico

time35 minutes ago

  • Politico

AI's energy appetite exposes a renewables rift in Washington

With help from Aaron Mak The astronomical energy needs of data centers for the fast-growing artificial intelligence industry have triggered a huge buildup of new power generation across the country — but the role that renewable energy will play in that mix is still very much up for grabs. Tech companies, which have long touted their public commitments to climate goals, have leaned heavily on renewable energy as a way to ramp up their power-hungry data centers without pumping more carbon into the air. In late 2024, U.S. data centers accounted for half of total US corporate clean energy procurement, according to an analysis by S&P Global. Now, however, the energy politics of Washington are changing — and this week's horse trading over the Senate's megabill showed that the tech industry may be shifting its stance. At the center of the debate are the tax credits for solar, wind and energy storage that were part of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act. Republicans running the reconciliation process on the tax bill in the House and Senate have pledged to eviscerate the subsidies. The tech industry has publicly pressed Congress to preserve those tax incentives — an issue that became urgent when the House tried to gut clean energy subsidies far sooner than the IRA timeline. A group called the Data Center Coalition — whose 38 members include Amazon Web Services, Google, Meta, and Microsoft — sent a letter last month to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, asking him to extend the deadline for building new clean energy facilities with the subsidies. The letter warned that energy constraints could hinder or delay the buildout of data centers vital to U.S. leadership in AI, and that the credits were important to being sure that new power got built. 'We urge you to take a pragmatic approach to ensure we can meet the energy needs of data centers at a pivotal moment for our industry and country,' the letter reads. The Senate did not exactly comply. In its tax proposal, the Senate Finance Committee took a more moderate approach than the House of Representatives, but still issued a plan to wind down subsidies for most renewable energy by 2028. Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) said in a statement that his committee's portion of the megabill 'achieves significant savings by slashing Green New Deal spending and targeting waste, fraud and abuse in spending programs.' Instead of solar and wind tax incentives, the legislation bolstered nuclear and geothermal energy. DFD asked Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Meta — some of the biggest members of the Data Center Coalition — for a response to the Senate's latest moves. None provided an answer. The Data Center Coalition, which initially pressed the Senate to keep the credits, also didn't comment on the Senate's bill. One industry player willing to address it this week was Chris Lehane, chief global affairs officer for OpenAI, whose CEO Sam Altman is an aggressive investor in clean energy. Lehane did not critique the Senate or House moving to sunset off the tax credits. Instead, he focused on permitting delays as an impediment to building new power sources. 'Ultimately … the big challenge in all of this is time,' he said, saying that slow permits were the bigger threat to getting new energy online for data centers. That view dovetails with Republican perspectives on the industry. A senior Senate GOP aide called wind and solar 'mature industries' that no longer need federal support, especially given the high demand for electricity for AI, and said Republicans were more focused on removing permitting hurdles. Climate change used to be a central tenet of tech companies' energy policy. Both Microsoft and Google once said they would be at net-zero or negative carbon emission by 2030, and invested heavily in wind and solar to meet their targets. AWS, Meta, Google and Microsoft did not provide a response on where their climate goals stand right now. OpenAI just agreed to help build data centers in the United Arab Emirates — and the source of energy for those data centers remains unclear. The apparent industry shift is frustrating to some longtime clean-energy advocates. 'Companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have increasingly moved toward an 'all-of-the-above' energy strategy,' said Evan Chapman, senior director of policy at the nonprofit Clean Tomorrow. That includes nuclear, gas, geothermal and utility-owned generation — especially as AI workloads strain power systems. The final shape of energy policy in the AI era is still under construction; the reconciliation bill needs a full Senate vote and House approval before it's passed. But one thing is clear: Big Tech's original ask for keeping renewable energy tax credits isn't likely to be heeded. Lehane said OpenAI would be fine under the new policy and had not been planning to use IRA incentives as part of its massive Stargate data center project in the U.S. The company expects some of its early sites to be natural gas and solar powered, but will look to include nuclear and geothermal energy where possible, a spokesperson said. Observers say the tech sector hasn't turned against renewables. But it's not fighting for them, either — suggesting that in 2025 Washington, there's more to be gained from playing ball with Republicans than from sticking their necks out for clean energy. Local news' tech blues As Donald Trump feuds with journalists and cuts funding to public broadcasting, several blue states are scrambling for ways to protect their local newsrooms as they lose revenue to tech companies like Google and Meta. POLITICO's Tyler Katzenberger reports that Democratic legislators from five states – Hawaii, Illinois, New York, Oregon and Washington – are engaged in parallel efforts to get tech companies to compensate news outlets for using their content. These lawmakers fear that aggregating articles and posting them on Google search results and various social media platforms deprives local outlets of revenue. But it's been an uphill battle. Bills in four of those states failed this year, with only Oregon's proposal still alive. Lawmakers who pushed for the failed bills have pledged to try again. The journalism industry has a long history of trying and failing to get help from governments to stanch the bleeding brought on by digital media. In 1980, Washington Post Publisher Katharine Graham lobbied senators to block a proposal from AT&T to develop electronic yellow pages. The company was able to launch the product only a few years later. More recently, Australia and Canada passed laws requiring the likes of Meta to pay outlets for their content, though pushback from the industry has diminished their intended effects. Prosecutors seize millions in cryptocurrency The Trump administration is asking a federal judge to let it keep $225.3 million in seized cryptocurrency allegedly connected to fraud. On Wednesday, the Department of Justice filed a civil forfeiture complaint allowing the government to keep cryptocurrency confiscated during an investigation into an alleged investment fraud scheme. The department believes more than 400 people were tricked into forking over money for what they thought were legitimate cryptocurrency investments. The department conducted the investigation in conjunction with the U.S. Secret Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The cryptocurrency seizure is the largest in the history of the Secret Service, which investigates the illicit exploitation of U.S. financial systems. Crooks on the blockchain have been stealing and scamming people out of cryptocurrency since the early years of the technology. By 2018, about 80 percent of initial coin offerings – the first round of token sales for a new cryptocurrency – were fraudulent according to estimates from the digital asset investment bank Satis Group LLC. President Joe Biden tried to rein in these scams, and issue a 2022 executive order directing federal agencies to implement new industry regulations and consumer protections. President Donald Trump repealed that order in January. Initially a skeptic of the technology, he's now become an outspoken booster – loosening crypto restrictions and pushing a law passed on Tuesday that would make it easier to launch stablecoins, or tokens pegged to another asset. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@

A former firefighter went from earning $1,600 a month to owning over 30 properties. He explains how he used creative financing to land his first $3 million deal with $30,000 in savings.
A former firefighter went from earning $1,600 a month to owning over 30 properties. He explains how he used creative financing to land his first $3 million deal with $30,000 in savings.

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A former firefighter went from earning $1,600 a month to owning over 30 properties. He explains how he used creative financing to land his first $3 million deal with $30,000 in savings.

Jeremy Barker started a hidden-door company, Murphy Door, to supplement his firefighter income. The company grew rapidly, prompting him to look into large commercial spaces. He bought a $3 million building with just $30,000 of his own money and expanded his portfolio from there. Jeremy Barker spent much of his career bouncing between construction, working as a paramedic, and working as a fireman, as well as experimenting with startups. "I kind of played ping-pong for the first 35 years, trying to decide what it is that I loved, which was fire," he told Business Insider. "Unfortunately, it doesn't pay. I didn't want to live on $1,600 take-home a month." Unwilling to give up his firefighter career completely, he decided to supplement the modest salary with a side hustle. He started making hinges for hidden doors — an idea inspired by a DIY home theater project for his kids — and called the company Murphy Door. "That escalated quickly from 2013 into 2016," he said. "We signed Home Depot. It just grew really fast." While Murphy Door created an additional revenue stream, he put most of the profit back into the business. It wasn't until he stumbled into real estate that his wealth started to snowball. Besides his primary home in Utah, Barker had no experience buying real estate. But as Murphy Door took off and outgrew its original space, he and his real estate agent started looking at larger buildings. His agent found a deal on a 90,000-square-foot building that he told Barker was too good to pass up and pitched it as a space the company could grow into. It was listed for $3 million. "I looked at him and I'm like: 'Are you freaking crazy? $3 million? I work at a fire department. I have no idea how to get a loan.' My mortgage was difficult enough," Barker said. "He goes: 'You sign this LOI. I'll help you figure out the money.'" That night, Barker turned to YouTube to learn about financing commercial real estate. He learned a couple of things: One, he'd need to raise capital. His $30,000 in savings was a start, but not enough for a down payment. Two, he could lease a large portion of the space, about 70,000 square feet, that he didn't need for Murphy Door. Once he understood how letters of intent, or LOIs, and purchase and sale agreements, or PSAs, worked, he realized he could take advantage of the time between signing one and the closing date to get a head start on leasing. After some back-and-forth with the seller regarding terms, he got the green light to list the building for lease before closing. "I had to sell them a little bit," he said. "I said: 'Look, I only use a small space, but if I could put it up for lease, you're not committed to anything. I'll let everybody know early that it's not bought yet, but there's a 90% chance it closes.'" He signed the PSA, put a "for lease" sign outside the building, and, "within 24 hours, I had my first tenant that was like 22,000 square feet," he said. "Within the next couple of days, I got another big tenant, and before I closed, I had a full package of lease rent roll equivalent to about $140,000 at that time annually in that space." The lease agreements helped him secure the rest of the capital he needed — a couple of hundred thousand dollars — for the down payment, as he was able to show investors the expected net operating income. It also helped secure a loan. "I went back to Bank of Utah, and I said, 'Here are my rent rolls.' They did the first mortgage," he said. "Within 12 months, I retabled it over to Golden West Credit Union and pulled $2 million out — and I'd only put in $30,000." He said he paid his investors back within 24 months, and the building's value has more than quadrupled over the past decade. Recognizing the tremendous wealth-building opportunity in real estate, Barker "just rinsed and repeated" from there, he said. He's fine-tuned his strategy, but it's not dissimilar to his first deal: Find an overlooked or undervalued property — ideally a building that has been on the market for years in order to gain negotiation leverage — and build a long enough closing period into the terms with the seller in order to have time to set up lease agreements with future tenants. As of June, Barker owns more than 30 commercial and residential properties. BI confirmed his ownership by reviewing his 2024 property tax notices and his lease agreements. Barker, who said he faced bankruptcy twice early in his career, didn't have much savings to work with when he started buying real estate. "I knew that I had to think outside the box," he said. What he didn't have in capital, he made up for in research. His edge, at least in the beginning, would be understanding his market better than anyone else, and using that knowledge to pitch investors. "Spend a whole bunch of time understanding the marketplace," he said. "I've learned about buildings. I learned what rent goes for around here. And you don't have to get complicated. I'm looking at: What is the average rent rate? OK, it's going for $12 to $15 a square foot. If I buy this property, my hard costs are going to be $4 a square foot." Once you find a deal that you're confident will work, start pitching to any prospective investors within your networks. Barker said he'd frame it as: "I don't have any money to bring to the table, but you have all my time. I'm willing to give away X% of the equity to just pull off my first deal." Pitch with confidence, not arrogance, he added. "I would understand the market really well and talk at a super basic level, not to sound like you're smarter than you are," he said. "Just be confident. You don't have to talk outside your scope." Barker said he reached financial independence years ago, thanks to his real estate portfolio, which brings in about $2.5 million in annual revenue. It's freed him up to spend his time exactly how he wants: in the fire department, where he still works part time, and at Murphy Door. When it comes to real estate investment, "we get stuck on the reasons not to do it rather than figuring out how and why to do it," he said. "Quit saying, 'I can't because I don't have money.' Or, 'I can't because I've never done it.'" "I think we have to just do the homework and spend a little time to reverse engineer stuff, think about pricing, and think about 'what is the opportunity?'" Barker said. "When other people see a lack of opportunity, a different lens could probably see some opportunity there." Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store