logo
Climate change is raising costs for federal hurricane insurance for farmers

Climate change is raising costs for federal hurricane insurance for farmers

Miami Herald04-06-2025

He hates to say it, but Ernest Fulford is hoping for a hurricane.
Storms tore through the Jefferson County grower's 1,600 acres last fall, submerging thousands of pounds of freshly-dug peanuts in floodwaters and dropping fluffy white cotton bolls, weeks away from harvest, into the mud.
A crop insurance payout kept his Florida farm, a family legacy since the 1940's, in business.
The Federal Crop Insurance Program, so far spared from the Trump Administration's sweeping cuts, costs the government an average of $9 billion annually. Climate change could raise its price tag by up to a third by 2080, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Despite the increasing investment, the program struggles to accommodate small farmers and those, including Fulford, hit by back-to-back storms.
That worries agricultural economist Anne Schechinger of the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit in favor of crop insurance reform.
'The crop insurance program really is not helping farmers adapt to extreme weather from climate change,' she said, noting that the program relies on past crop and weather data instead of forward-looking climate models.
'The past 20 years, specifically in historical yields, is not the next 20 years for these farmers.'
The program's origins
Crop insurance, born from the Dust Bowl-era urgency to help farmers in times of disaster, operates through a partnership between the USDA Risk Management Agency and private insurance companies.
Growers buy policies from the private companies and front about 40% of the cost. The federal government contributes the other 60% and covers a portion of the insurer's operating expenses.
The Congressional Budget Office and Government Accountability Office have both recommended decreasing premium subsidies and curbing administrative funding within the program, citing private companies' above-average profits, but Congress hasn't taken any such action.
The program's cost to the federal government rose between 2014 and 2023, totaling $89 billion.
The feds introduced a hurricane-specific policy add-on in 2020 in response to pressure from storm-battered farmers in the Southeast and extended the program to tropical storms in 2023.
Last year, climate-friendly measures were added to the program's list of accepted farming practices. 'That was a really great change,' Schechinger said, but it didn't fix everything.
A small farmer's dilemma
The number of insured acres nearly doubled between 2014 and 2024 while the number of policies increased by less than 1%.
Nationally and locally, big farms got bigger while smaller farms disappeared.
'What we're seeing in our area in Florida is there's farmers getting bigger or there's farmers going out of business,' said Lance Braswell, an insurance agent with Big Bend Farm Bureau. 'So the number of farmers is going down, but the ones that we have are growing their production levels.'
Small farmers are disproportionately affected by climate change. They have fewer reserves to fall back on and are more likely to grow in disaster-prone areas.
They need the resilience provided by crop insurance the most, but are less likely than larger farmers to get coverage. Around three-quarters of farms with 500+ acres carry crop insurance, while less than 10% with 10 acres or fewer do.
'If you have more acres, you're going to be receiving larger payments,' said Schechinger. 'It's really built into the program to benefit these large and oftentimes wealthy farms.'
In 2022, the 1% of farmers with the most expensive crop insurance policies received about a fifth of government subsidies, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office. A single nursery received a $7.7 million subsidy while most policyholders averaged $3,200.
Lower subsidies mean higher out-of-pocket costs to farmers, which can deter growers.
'It won't matter if you're in a county with hurricane winds if you weren't able to get a policy or you couldn't afford a policy,' Schechinger said.
When historical yields face historic storms
Insurers determine how much of a farmer's crop they'll cover depending on the grower's past few years of production.
In a non-hurricane year, Fulford expects to harvest 1,200 pounds of cotton lint per acre. But hurricanes Idalia, Debby and Helene decimated his yields. Looking at his historical production, now agencies will only insure Fulford for half that much.
If a grower files a claim during a particularly bad season, most crop insurance policies will exclude that year's yield in their calculations. But when areas face repeated catastrophes, record lows become new normals.
That's why Fulford hopes for two extremes. If the growing season is perfect and he harvests all 1,200 pounds, he can rebuild his yield history and turn a profit despite low market prices. If a hurricane comes, he'll at least get a crop insurance payment.
But if conditions are somewhere in the middle, say, a drought or a flood, Fulford could lose up to half of his crop and not get compensated despite paying for a policy.
'Basically, I don't have insurance this year,' he said, referring to how much damage it'd take for him to see a return on his purchase. 'It's hard to put all that money into your crop knowing you're most likely gonna have a loss at the end of the year. It's hard to keep doing that year after year.'
A hurricane haven turned hotspot
Braswell, the Big Bend insurance agent, thought he had picked a quiet region in which to work.
'For the last hundred years, we had not seen a major storm,' he said. 'We were in an area that we thought was not susceptible.'
Most farmers in the area didn't carry any crop insurance. Those who did opted for the lowest level, called catastrophic coverage, just to qualify for other USDA programs and benefits.
Fulford himself carried only catastrophic coverage for decades and 'never, ever' got a payment.
Florida experienced a hurricane drought between 2006 and 2015, with storms sparing the Sunshine State. Then Hurricanes Hermine, Irma and Michael hit the Big Bend between 2016 and 2018.
'When Michael hit us,' Fulford said, 'if I hadn't bought that extra insurance, it would've put me out of business.'
Hurricanes continued to ram the region. Hurricane Idalia arrived in 2023, followed by the one-two punch of Hurricanes Debby and Helene in 2024.
'When you have three hurricanes in two years [farmers] start to realize 'we're not immune',' Braswell said. 'We have to make sure we're paying the extra premium to protect against that risk.'
The back-to-back hurricanes that struck Fulford's farm last fall happen in West Florida an average of once every decade, but could occur as frequently as every one to two years by 2100 because of climate change, according to Princeton researchers.
Despite the rising frequency of double hurricanes, the insurance add-on allows for a maximum of one hurricane payout and one, lower, tropical storm payout per policy per season. It doesn't use hurricane season forecasts or predictions like those from the Princeton researchers when setting premiums.
'It's not really fair,' Fulford said. 'Especially for areas like us that get hammered by hurricanes. Other areas of the country are not taking those yield hits.'
Fighting to farm
Even with last season's hurricane payment and base crop insurance coverage, Fulford ended the year at a loss. He drives 'an '09 truck that's beat up', waiting for a high-yield year to replenish his savings.
'I just wish things financially for farms were better right now,' Fulford said. 'I've seen more farms go out of business this year because of low commodity prices and high input prices than I've seen my whole life.'
Fulford can't describe why he has stuck it out other than the fact that farming is in his blood.
'I wish I didn't love it so much,' he said. 'I wish my kids didn't love it so much.'
He's tried to talk two of his sons out of the industry, telling them, 'look, this is too hard of work for so little money and sometimes no money.'
They don't listen.
His eldest son, Clay, is a partner on the farm and his 15-year-old is heading that route, too.
As their father finishes greasing some equipment, he thinks back to his wish for a hurricane. 'Just a small one,' he amends, 'that won't destroy my crops.'
He laughs at the idea's dissonance. 'We've got to do what we've got to do to survive.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Resilient as U.S.-Canada Trade Talks End, Inflation Rises
Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Resilient as U.S.-Canada Trade Talks End, Inflation Rises

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Resilient as U.S.-Canada Trade Talks End, Inflation Rises

Both the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) secured new intraday all-time highs on Friday, although some of the gains were erased after President Trump said that the U.S. had terminated its trade talks with Canada. Confident Investing Starts Here: Following Canada's decision to proceed with its digital services tax on U.S. technology companies, Trump announced a halt to all U.S.-Canada trade discussions. The tax charges a 3% fee on all U.S. tech revenue above C$20 million, or about $14.6 million, collected from Canadian users. 'We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,' said Trump on Truth Social. Trump also said that the U.S. would no longer consider removing sanctions on Iran following a speech from Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Khamenei downplayed the damage of the U.S. strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites and said that the country had delivered a 'slap to America's face.' Meanwhile, the core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) index, the Fed's preferred gauge of inflation, showed a monthly rise of 0.2% and a yearly rise of 2.7%. Economists were expecting growth of 0.1% and 2.6%, respectively. Furthermore, April's core PCE was revised upward to 2.6% from 2.5%. Core PCE excludes food and energy prices from the regular PCE index given their volatility. Shifting gears to more optimistic news, Trump is preparing executive orders to support AI development, according to Reuters. The orders could include green-lighting the construction of AI data centers on federal land and easier grid access for new energy projects, said sources close to the matter. What's more, consumer sentiment could be in the early stages of a recovery. The June Index of Consumer Sentiment rose by 16% month-over-month to 60.7, reversing six consecutive months of declines. Economists were expecting 60.5, with a higher figure representing a more positive economic outlook. At the same time, fears over tariff-driven inflation and economic uncertainty still persist. 'Despite June's gains, however, sentiment remains about 18% below December 2024, right after the election; consumer views are still broadly consistent with an economic slowdown and an increase in inflation to come,' said Survey of Consumers Director Joanne Hsu.

Trump pushes Thune to crack down on wind and solar in megabill
Trump pushes Thune to crack down on wind and solar in megabill

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Trump pushes Thune to crack down on wind and solar in megabill

President Donald Trump is urging Senate Majority Leader John Thune to crack down on tax credits for wind and solar energy as part of the GOP megabill, siding with House conservatives who want to phase out those credits more quickly, according to three people familiar with the negotiations. The late-stage effort has involved direct conversations between Trump and Thune over the past two days. The intervention from Trump centers around a technical provision that could determine whether hundreds of planned projects are able to qualify for the wind and solar incentives, according to the people granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the conversations. The president's involvement has emerged as a complicating factor as Republicans aim to start voting on the megabill as soon as Saturday. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), a close Trump ally, confirmed that Trump is directly involved in the push to further temper the Inflation Reduction Act credits. 'I talked to POTUS about it this morning and he certainly wants the renewables out ASAP,' Cramer said Friday. The approach pushed by Trump would match restrictive language in the House-passed reconciliation bill, H.R. 1, that would determine eligibility for wind and solar investment and production tax credits based on when those projects enter into service. It's a departure from Senate Finance Committee language backed by moderates allowing projects to receive credits based on when they begin construction. It's unclear whether Thune plans to include the so-called 'placed in service' standard in the final bill text. Doing so would put moderate senators who have pushed a slower schedule for sunsetting those incentives in a major bind, forcing them to choose between rejecting Trump's agenda or allowing the gutting of tax credits that could lead to canceled projects, job losses and higher electricity prices in their states. Thune's office and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday. Trump's new push follows his Truth Social post last weekend declaring, 'I HATE 'GREEN TAX CREDITS' IN THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL.' Renewable energy industry officials and advocates argue that a 'placed in service' requirement is difficult for energy project developers because their timelines could be derailed by permitting delays, snags in connecting projects to the grid and other factors outside their control. Such a requirement would functionally end the credits for many planned projects, they say. Reverting to more restrictive placed in service language would likely see pushback from moderate senators such as Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who said Thursday that such a move would be 'disastrous in my state.' Another moderate who has pushed back on IRA rollbacks, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), declined to say Friday night whether he had heard about a decision on placed in service language, but called the Senate Finance Committee's approach 'a more rational way of doing it.' 'There are lawsuits, regulatory hurdles and other things that would make it virtually impossible to get [projects] in service' even if they are essentially complete and would otherwise qualify, Tillis said. Some Senate conservatives have backed the change, which they said will help keep Republicans' campaign promise to end the Inflation Reduction Act subsidies. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said earlier this week 'there is a strong commitment to end the Green New Deal subsidies by the end of President Trump's term' — an objective, he said, 'that we're working hard to accomplish.' The effort has been supported by outside conservative voices in recent days, including Alex Epstein, a vocal opponent of wind and solar subsidies who has met with Senate Republicans in recent weeks. Epstein said Friday night that Trump is 'aware that the Senate had watered down in some significant way what the House did.' But he said moving to a placed in service standard is not a done deal and he is 'not letting up myself until I see a law with this in it.' Leading Trump officials like Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, who also chairs the National Energy Dominance Council, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, have also repeatedly criticized wind and solar energy, arguing those intermittent resources are unreliable and overly reliant on tax subsidies. In a post to X Friday night, Burgum wrote that Trump 'promised to reverse the Biden administration's disastrous energy policies, and the One Big Beautiful Bill delivers on this promise by ending the Green New Scam and investing in reliable, affordable baseload power!'

Fed Chief Kashkari's 'Wait-and-See' on Rate Cuts
Fed Chief Kashkari's 'Wait-and-See' on Rate Cuts

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fed Chief Kashkari's 'Wait-and-See' on Rate Cuts

Minneapolis Fed chief Neel Kashkari still sees room for two rate cuts this yearmaybe kicking off around Septemberbut he's urging colleagues to stay nimble, since today's tariffs could fuel tomorrow's inflation. In a Friday essay, Kashkari admitted that inflation is inching back toward the Fed's 2% goal, yet he's worried that Trump's sweeping tariffs have injected fresh uncertainty. He's kept his call for two cuts in 2025 (first one tentatively in September), but he's clear: don't pencil in an easing path now only to discover later that higher import fees have bumped up consumer prices. Most Fed speakers this weekexcept Governors Waller and Bowmanhaven't even seriously entertained a July cut. Kashkari wants the focus on actual inflation and real economic data, not a pre-set calendar commitment. If tariffs stick around, businesses will likely pass those extra costs on to you and me. By staying data-driven, Kashkari hopes to avoid a policy misstep that could let inflation creep back in. Keep an eye on incoming CPI and PCE reportsand any fresh trade headlines. If the tariff saga deepens, Kashkari's call for flexibility could push rate cuts into late 2025or beyond. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store