logo
Calls for wider access to nature after Supreme Court ruling on Dartmoor camping

Calls for wider access to nature after Supreme Court ruling on Dartmoor camping

Independent21-05-2025

Campaigners and MPs have called for greater public freedom to wild camp across the UK after the Supreme Court ruled that the public has the right to camp on Dartmoor.
Five justices unanimously ruled on Wednesday that the term 'recreation' in the law governing the use of the national park in Devon – the only national park where wild camping is allowed – is used 'without qualification as to the form which it should take'.
Two landowners, Alexander and Diana Darwall, had challenged a Court of Appeal ruling, which said the law allows the public to camp on the Dartmoor commons provided bylaws are followed, at the UK's highest court.
The couple said they were 'disappointed' by the judgment, while the chief executive of the Dartmoor National Park Authority (DNPA), which opposed the challenge, said he was 'delighted and relieved'.
Following the ruling, Guy Shrubsole, co-founder of campaign group Right to Roam, said he was 'elated' and called for changes to the law around wild camping.
He said: 'What I think this case has also really highlighted is how unusual and odd it is that Dartmoor is the only place where there is a legal right to wild camp in England and Wales.
'Over in Scotland, over the border, there is a right to wild camp almost everywhere, and so that's why we are now really keen for the Government to take note of this, of a huge amount of public interest this case has stirred up, to see the public support for the right to wild camp and to extend the law.
'We want them to change the law now, so that actually people in England can enjoy the right to wild camp, the right to roam over much more of our beautiful countryside.'
He continued: 'Thousands on thousands of people wild camp every year on Dartmoor, without anybody knowing that they're there, without leaving a trace, and often picking up litter afterwards.
'Often the trace that is left is the trace on people's hearts and minds and souls when they undertake this wonderful experience of sleeping under the stars on Dartmoor and seeing the world.'
Calls for changes to the law were echoed by South Devon Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden and Bolton West Labour MP Phil Brickell, who both attended the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
Ms Voaden said she was 'absolutely thrilled' with the decision, but added that the public only have access to 8% of land in the UK.
'It just proves that the right to access is fundamental for people to be able to live a healthy, happy life,' she said.
'It's not just a nice-to-have – we need access to nature, and we've now seen that we have the right to wild camp on Dartmoor, and the stars are for everyone.'
She continued: 'The right piece of legislation now is the legislation that covers national parks, and looking at that, and looking at how we can define wild camping in law, so it's clearly defined, and then try and expand it to other national parks in the UK.'
Dartmoor National Park, designated in 1951, covers a 368-square-mile area which features 'commons' – areas of unenclosed, privately-owned moorland where locals can put livestock.
The case concerned the interpretation of the Dartmoor Commons Act 1985, which says 'the public shall have the right of access to the commons on foot and on horseback for the purpose of open-air recreation' on the commons.
In January 2023, High Court judge Sir Julian Flaux ruled that the 1985 Act did not allow people to pitch tents overnight on the Dartmoor commons without landowners' permission.
But the Court of Appeal overturned the decision in July that year after a challenge by the DNPA, with three senior judges ruling that the law 'confers on members of the public the right to rest or sleep on the Dartmoor commons, whether by day or night and whether in a tent or otherwise'.
Mr and Mrs Darwall keep cattle on Stall Moor, which forms part of their more than 3,450-acre estate in the southern part of the national park.
Their lawyers told the Supreme Court last October that some campers cause problems to livestock and the environment, and that the law only gives the public access on foot and horseback.
Timothy Morshead KC, for the couple, also said in written submissions that they were 'not motivated by a desire to stop camping on Dartmoor', but had 'concerns about the damage that wild camping can cause and, in particular, about the significant risk of fire associated with it'.
Richard Honey KC, for DNPA, said in his written submissions that the phrase 'on foot' means 'the access to the commons should be pedestrian and not vehicular'.
He also labelled the suggestion that erecting a tent could damage land and vegetation 'absurd'.
Lords Sales and Stephens ruled that the law would make 'no sense' if the right of recreation given to the public was 'limited in the manner contended for' by the Darwalls, and that the concept of 'open-air recreation' was 'wide'.
In a ruling backed by Lord Reed, Lady Rose and Lady Simler, they continued: 'It is not confined to recreation taken by means of walking or riding.'
They also said the law gives protection to landowners through 'public regulation of the use of the commons' such as bylaws, which they said are 'in practice likely to be more effective in protecting the land' than taking private legal action.
Following the Supreme Court's judgment, the Darwalls said: 'We are disappointed by the Supreme Court's judgment.
'Our aim from the outset was to protect and preserve Dartmoor, its flora and fauna.
'Landowners and farmers have always played a vital part in the conservation of Dartmoor.
'Hollowing out the role of landowners and farmers will not improve the vitality of the Dartmoor commons.'
Dr Kevin Bishop, chief executive of the DNPA, said the ruling allows the organisation to 'look forward and to work together for the good of Dartmoor'.
He said: 'The judgment reaffirms our long-held belief for the public's right to backpack camp on certain commons and, importantly, our role in regulating and managing that access.
'It is important to note that it is not a blanket right to camp wherever, or do whatever, you want.
'With the right comes a responsibility to make sure that you tread lightly and leave no trace.'
Nature minister Mary Creagh said: 'Wild camping under the stars is one of life's great pleasures, so I welcome today's ruling which upholds that right on Dartmoor's common land.
'This Government is passionate about bringing people closer to nature by creating nine national river walks and three new national forests.'
The Government has previously said it will create nine new national river walks, plant three new national forests and create a community right to buy to allow residents to create parks and green spaces.
It has also said it is completing the 2,700-mile King Charles III England Coast Path, which will be the longest waymarked and maintained coast walking route in the world, and continuing a £16.5 million fund to make landscapes more accessible.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Warning over 10% price hike trick when paying by card abroad this summer
Warning over 10% price hike trick when paying by card abroad this summer

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Warning over 10% price hike trick when paying by card abroad this summer

Holidaymakers could see costs rise by 10 per cent this summer as 'dynamic currency conversion' (DCC) provides traders with tempting opportunities to profit from people paying with plastic. DCC, also known as 'cardholder preferred currency', has been around for many years. Hotels, restaurants and shops with significant numbers of tourists often provide the option to pay at a fixed conversion rate. The appeal to the traveller is that they will know instantly how much they have spent in sterling. But they are certain to lose out on the transaction. The practice looks harmless: simply an additional choice. When you ask to pay with plastic or a card stored on a mobile phone abroad, the terminal will often display two figures: the bill in euros (EUR) or other local currency, and a figure in pounds (GBP). Some holidaymakers may fondly assume that the sterling amount is the equivalent to the local currency at current exchange rates. In fact, the cost in pounds includes a margin of up to 10 per cent. This is pocketed by the bank, which passes some of the cash back to the merchant. Anyone who avails of dynamic currency conversion is voluntarily accepting a price increase that could add £1 to every £10 spent – a fast way to lose a slice of hard-earned cash. Many holidaymakers know, when asked abroad if they would like to pay a sterling amount rather than the local currency, always to say 'No'. When offering dynamic currency conversion, merchants are supposed to follow strict guidelines: But during the course of a journey through Europe this month, it has become clear that some traders are not playing fair. Once local currency has been selected, that should be the end of it. But some card machines are programmed to come up with another screen, typically reading: 'Do you accept that if you choose not to take advantage of the guaranteed exchange rate, you will be subject to whatever rate the card company uses?' Below it, there is a box marked 'Accept' and another, 'Reject'. Customers who are paying attention will select 'Accept' because they understand that their bank will just use the appropriate prevailing rate – and that it will be better than the DCC deal. But if 'Accept' is selected, it turns out to be applied to a different question, ie 'Do you accept the DCC rate of exchange?' The correct, counter-intuitive answer is 'Reject'. Some proprietors may not even let customers get this far. After a satisfying lunch of dumplings and tea at a restaurant on the Royal Route leading south from the Old Town of Warsaw, the waiter simply selected 'GBP' on the machine, adding 10 per cent to the cost of the meal. When challenged about this scam, he claimed the machine was faulty and that nothing could be done. For holidaymakers withdrawing cash abroad, ATMs generally offer dynamic currency conversion. It should also be declined. The profitability to the bank becomes clear by noting the GBP sum, selecting local currency and afterwards checking the account online to see the actual sum debited by the bank.

Passenger moans parent lets baby's feet dangle on lap while feeding tot on flight – but who is in the right?
Passenger moans parent lets baby's feet dangle on lap while feeding tot on flight – but who is in the right?

The Sun

time27 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Passenger moans parent lets baby's feet dangle on lap while feeding tot on flight – but who is in the right?

IT'S an age-old problem every passenger is accustomed to - another flyer invading your cramped plane seat. One flyer wanted to know if he was the problem after posting a photo of someone's feet touching his leg with the caption "should I report it to the stewards?" 2 Posting on the Reddit page r/CasualUK the user adopted a somewhat satirical tone when he posted a photo of a baby's feet touching his leg. He captioned the post: "On a flight and a passenger keeps putting his bare feet on me." Fellow Reddit users took it as an opportunity to make jokes about the all-too-common situation. One wrote: "Those piggies need to go to the market" while another wrote "They need Eenie-Meanying immediately." A lot of the jokes relied on baby puns to make light of the situation as one wrote: "They need to grow up." Another said: "I believe the agreed etiquette in these situations is to blow raspberries on them." Others had some slightly more outrageous suggestions, using the opportunity to comment absurd ideas for how to handle the situation. One Reddit users commented: "I would assert dominance by picking them up and using them as a phone, putting on a stupid voice." Another similar suggestion reads: "Completely unacceptable. Have you considered threatening to put him in the overhead locker?" There was a clear divide among commenters between those who like children, and those who don't. Tyson Fury among THOUSANDS of travellers at Appleby as horse fair kicks off Child-loving users were sympathetic to the situation, commenting on how cute the tiny baby's feet were. The not-so-friendly users continued with their edgy jokes, writing: "Just yeet the baby" accompanied by an animated image of someone throwing a baby. Another suggested they post it on the popular subreddit r/PassengerShaming. This forum is a safe space for passengers to vent about their worst aeroplane experiences. It includes shaming behaviours like being barefoot, having your hair over the back of the chair, and blocking the aisle. 2 It's not the first time that travellers have been left frustrated by their fellow cabin-mates' behaviour. An EasyJet flight recently drew attention for being turned into a 'mid-air nightclub' by unruly flyers. During a trip to Ibiza, a group of drunk Brits caused havoc as they banged on luggage compartments and yelled "come on Ibiza." Other passengers on the plane were clearly uncomfortable about the situation, with one saying she felt "scared". Unlike the much more agreeable baby, these British passengers were met by police on arrival.

Princess Eugenie makes rare appearance in a backless swimsuit in sweet snap with her sons
Princess Eugenie makes rare appearance in a backless swimsuit in sweet snap with her sons

Daily Mail​

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Princess Eugenie makes rare appearance in a backless swimsuit in sweet snap with her sons

Princess Eugenie yesterday shared a series of sweet photographs with her sons to mark World Ocean Day. The eco-conscious mother-of-two, who divides her time between Portugal and London, took to Instagram to share the adorable images of herself with August, four, and Ernest, two, at the seaside to mark the annual celebration. In one image, she played with her children in the ocean while donning a backless swimsuit and a pair of white linen shorts. Eugenie, who has taken up environmentalism in the hope of helping future generations, held Ernest's hand as August went on ahead into the water. The 35-year-old captioned the post, 'The ocean is the greatest wonder of the world. Celebrating @unworldoceansdaytoday and everyday.' She has a track record of being environmentally aware and has been an ambassador for the Blue Marine Foundation since June 2021. The royal is an avid campaigner of environmental issues and even had a plastic-free wedding to her husband Jack Brooksbank in 2018. Eugenie, the daughter of the Duke and Duchess of York, also shared two stunning images of beachside scenery in the post. The final snap showed her youngest son Ernest enjoying a stroll at the shore while dressed in a warm jacket and wellington boots. Eugenie has continued to show her dedication to the environment on multiple occasions, including her 2023 trip with the Solent Seascape Project, the first attempt to actively restore the ocean in the UK. At the time, Eugenie described how being a mother made her want 'to do more' for her children and future grandchildren, adding that she hopes her son August will one day take up environmentalism too. During the trip she wasn't afraid to get stuck in and helped scientists clean hundreds of oysters before they returned them to the sea. Princess Eugenie also avoids using any single-use plastics at home and has already started educating her children about climate change. She previously said, 'My son's going to be an activist from two years old, which is in a couple of days. Everything is for them, right? Every decision we now make has to be about how August is going to be able to live his life.' It comes after Princess Eugenie opened up about the 'sense of shame' she felt when she first saw her scoliosis scar - and revealed how she 'trained her brain' to think it was a 'cool thing' instead. In a rare, wide-ranging interview, the royal mother-of-two also discussed how her Sarah Ferguson raised her to be proud of her scar after she went underwent surgery at the age of 12. In 2002, Queen Elizabeth II's granddaughter had rods inserted into her spine after she was diagnosed with scoliosis (curvature of the spine), and told that she would need corrective surgery. After the eight-hour operation, Prince Andrew's daughter spent three days in intensive care, a week on a spinal ward and six days in a wheelchair before she was able to walk again. Speaking to The Telegraph, Eugenie revealed she had a 'sense of shame' when she couldn't wash or dress herself and was shown her scar, which runs down her neck and spine. However, she claimed her mother, the Duchess of York, removed all the stigma about the scar and helped her see it in a positive light. Eugenie said, 'She was amazing. She'd ask me if she could show it to people, then she'd turn me around and say, 'my daughter is superhuman, you've got to check out her scar'. 'All of sudden it was a badge of honour – a cool thing I had. It trained my brain that it's ok, scars are cool. 'It became a positive memory, a part of me, that I could do something with in the future. I could help heal other people.' After a tumultuous few months after surgery the young Princess had to be turned gently in bed and wear a brace. Eugenie, who has since became a patron of Horatio's Garden in 2019, which helps nurture the wellbeing of people after spinal injury in beautiful gardens in NHS spinal injury centres, often speaks about the stigma surrounding scoliosis. Last year, she posted a sweet tribute to her mother on Instagram, explaining: 'My mum caught my scoliosis early and I was lucky enough to get the help I needed at 12 years old. 'I thank her so much for that and also thank her for the confidence to be proud of my scar. 'She removed all the stigma around having scoliosis for me by confidently showing people what I'd been through and it took all the fear and anxiety out of being different at such a young age. I am forever grateful and wish everyone to be proud of their scars.' Scoliosis is a sideways curvature of the spine which can cause uneven shoulders. Many people who suffer from the condition struggle to find clothes that fit due to the body shape it creates. Although treatment is not always necessary for the condition, some people who develop scoliosis can be required to wear a back brace to stop the curve worsening as they get older. In cases where surgery is required, patients may undergo a spinal fusion operation; a procedure that can last up to seven hours. Writing for the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Charity previously, Eugenie said, 'In 2002, when I was 12 years old, I was diagnosed with scoliosis (curvature of the spine), and told that I would need corrective surgery. 'This was, of course, a scary prospect for a 12-year-old; I can still vividly remember how nervous I felt in the days and weeks before the operation.' The Princess continued: 'During my operation, which took eight hours, my surgeons inserted eight-inch titanium rods into each side of my spine and one-and-a-half inch screws at the top of my neck. 'After three days in intensive care, I spent a week on a ward and six days in a wheelchair, but I was walking again after that.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store