Pentagon admits to mistakes in campaign against 'DEI' content
The Pentagon is conceding it made mistakes as it rushed to remove articles and images celebrating diversity from its social media and websites, a campaign that resulted in moves such as deleting tributes to Jackie Robinson and the flag-raising at Iwo Jima.
"Some content was archived that should not have been," the Department of Defense said in a statement Friday.
The Pentagon said it would be reviewing the material that was purged as part of a campaign to remove content celebrating diversity, equity and inclusion — an effort that has sparked widespread criticism and ridicule.
As part of the effort, the department removed articles and images of baseball legend Jackie Robinson, the Navajo Code Talkers and the Tuskegee Airmen. It also pulled pulled the historic photos of six Marines hoisting a U.S. flag on Iwo Jima in 1945 because it was on a page celebrating Army Pfc. Ira Hayes, a Pima Indian.
A biography of World War II veteran and civil rights leader Medgar Evers, who was assassinated in 1963 and whom President Donald Trump called a 'great American hero" in 2017, was erased from the Arlington National Cemetery website.
The purge followed Trump's executive order ending diversity programs across the federal government, including the Defense Department, which he has criticized as too 'woke.'
Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a video statement Thursday that 'some important content was incorrectly" removed. He blamed 'AI tools' for the errors and said purged material would be reviewed.
'When content is either mistakenly removed or if it's maliciously removed, we continue to work quickly to restore it,' Parnell said.
The Pentagon says it aims to honor service members based on merit rather than 'immutable characteristics' like race, ethnicity, or gender.
Some of the deleted tributes — such as those for Robinson and the Navajo Code Talkers — were reinstated after public backlash. But many tributes to non-white service members remain unavailable, often leading to 404 error messages.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Expat's supermarket find in China reveals quiet Aussie win: 'It's everywhere'
An expat living in China has revealed a major shift in supermarket stock after making an unexpected Aussie find. Canadian expat Emily recently discovered American beef has been replaced with Australian beef in Chinese grocery stores on the back of mammoth tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump earlier this year. It's the second time in recent weeks that residents in China have noticed American beef is no longer available, with the Australian product replacing it. Emily, who lives in Guangzhou, China, with her family, told Yahoo News Aussie beef is now "everywhere". Experts believe Australia now has a major "advantage" in the billion-dollar beef export industry, with Australia achieving a record-breaking $13.9 billion in sales in 2024–25, a 12 per cent increase from the previous record set the year prior. Emily explained she's noticed a "huge shrink" in American products in recent months after the Trump administration stunned the entire world by announcing reciprocal tariffs on just about every country on April 2, a day he called "Liberation Day". Among the hardest hit countries was China, which had a 145 per cent tariff imposed on its exports, which was countered with a 125 per cent tariff on US imports. It followed China not renewing the registration of hundreds of US beef facilities and America's $2.5 billion beef trade soon came to a grinding halt, with Australia seemingly stepping in to fill the void. While a temporary trade truce between the two economic powerhouses was struck in May at a meeting in Geneva, with the US lowering its tariff to 30 per cent and China dropping theirs to 10 per cent for three months, many consumers have seemingly continued to opt for Aussie beef. "Products like Australian beef are everywhere," Emily explained. When she filmed the supermarket video, which was viewed by millions across the world in May, she said she did a "thorough search" for US products. "I confirmed there is nothing from the US in my local supermarket," she said. 🚘 Photos shows major shift in EV race as BYD looks to topple Tesla 🥩 Expat's Aussie find in Chinese supermarket highlights major global shift ✈️ Young Aussie's 18-hour nightmare in Chinese airport after passport vanishes The fallout of the trade wars between the economic powerhouses has exposed an "advantage" for Australia in the beef market. Many viewers of Emily's video shared that they'd much rather eat Australian meat than any from the United States. Professor Vinh Thai, a leading analyst of global logistics and supply chain management, told Yahoo News that Australia has much to gain from the current tariff situation, despite an initial "setback" of a 10 per cent tariff on Australian beef exported to the US. He believes that the reduction in Australian beef exports to the US can be offset by finding alternative markets such as China and Europe. "Consumer belief is very important," he explained, adding that Australia will always be considered a high-quality product. "That is our advantage," he said. "Australian beef will still be considered as a top-quality and good reputation product compared to that from the US," he said. Emily echoed this opinion, explaining that in China, "Australian food is always associated with higher safety standards therefore Australian beef now has a better reputation than American beef as the "cleaner" meat," she said. "Now with President Trump's trade war and tariffs, Chinese people are more likely to choose Australian products over American products because of political reasons," she added. "I think this is also a situation in many countries, especially the ones that were targeted by Trump's tariff, such as Canada." She believes China hasn't been as impacted by the tariffs as the United States. "China's diversified economy and domestic market have provided significant buffers against the effects of these tariffs," she said. "I sincerely hope Australia and China can maintain and strengthen their mutually beneficial trade relationship. Both countries have so much to gain from continued economic cooperation." Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why America's aging population will be a problem for stocks — and your retirement
One reliable indicator of investor behavior suggests that stock valuations in developed markets will peak in the next decade or so and then begin a long-term decline. The measurement for this prediction is demographics — in this case, the aging population of America and other developed markets. My daughter's boyfriend, a guest in my home, offered to powerwash part of my house — then demanded money What on Earth is going on with the American consumer? My father-in-law has dementia and is moving in with us. Can we invoice him for a caregiver? 20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation Strategists forecast a sizzling summer for small-cap stocks Long-term demographic trends are of little concern if you are a short-term-focused investor. But demography becomes quite important if you're a decade or more from retirement and trying to devise an appropriate financial planning strategy for your nonworking years. Researchers have found that the ratio of a country's middle-aged population to its elderly is highly correlated with the long-term cycles of its stock market. This ratio — known among demographers as the 'M/O ratio' or 'middle-old ratio' — is plotted in the chart below. It is calculated by dividing the number of those 40-49 by the number of those 60-69. (The M/O ratio data in the chart are from Alejandra Grindal, chief economist at Ned Davis Research.) There is a distinct connection between the long-term trend shifts in the M/O ratio and the S&P 500 SPX. For example, the ratio hit a peak in 2000, coinciding with the end of the go-go years of the 1990s and the top of the internet bubble. The ratio then declined for more than a decade — a period coinciding with the global financial crisis and the 2008-09 bear market. The ratio has been in an uptrend since the mid-2010s. The correlation is not perfect. The M/O ratio didn't hit bottom until several years after the financial crisis, for example, by which point the stock market had already embarked on a new bull market. Furthermore, the ratio is of no help in predicting shorter-term bear markets, such as the one in 2022. Nevertheless, the M/O ratio's correlation with longer-term cycles is impressive, according to John Geanakoplos, an economics professor at Yale University and co-author of perhaps the topic's seminal academic paper, published in 2002. He found evidence that demography provides 'a single explanation' for the alternating 20-year periods of boom and bust since World War II. Notice that the focus of Geanakoplos' research is on the relative sizes of different population cohorts rather than the size of a country's entire population. That's important because many on Wall Street focus on overall population when making doomsday predictions about the future of the world. The chart also shows the path the M/O ratio will take through 2050, rising until the mid-2030s (though never getting to the level it did at the top of the internet bubble) and then declining through 2050. When interpreting this, Geanakoplos says it's important to focus on both the ratio's trend as well as its absolute level. He said in an email that the data suggest 'the demography effect [will be] slightly smaller going forward, but [with] stock market growth slowing in the early [20]30s.' You should plan accordingly in your retirement portfolio. Since the demographic projections aren't precise, this analysis suggests that over the coming decade, you would want to start reducing your equity exposure level to even lower levels than is suggested by the traditional glide path employed by target-date funds and financial planners. By the time you reach 65, for example, the glide path employed by Vanguard's target-date funds suggests that you should dedicate 30% of your retirement portfolio to U.S. equities. The dictates of demography would have you even less exposed to stocks at that time. The Vanguard glide path also calls for a 65-year-old investor to allocate an additional 20% to non-U.S. equities. Whether you maintain that allocation depends on the country and region of the world. The average non-U.S. country is also projected to have a lower M/O ratio in 25 years, according to the World Bank, though the decline between now and 2050 will be less than in the U.S. Many emerging market countries in Africa and Asia will have higher M/O ratios in 25 years, according to the World Bank's projections. So if you follow the demographic projections, you would want to shift some funds from U.S. equities and overweight emerging markets. Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at More: Americans are 'revenge saving' after years of splurging: 'Savings are a great way to have some certainty' Also read: What is a '996' work culture, and why are young professionals in China giving it the cold shoulder? 'You never know what might happen': How do I make sure my son-in-law doesn't get his hands on my daughter's inheritance? 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal? My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? 'I'm afraid to ask her': My stepmother won't show me my father's will. What now? Jamie Dimon's bond-market warnings put investors on alert to diversify outside U.S. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Navy ship USNS Harvey Milk to be renamed as part of Pentagon's 'warrior culture' shift
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the renaming of a U.S. Navy ship named after San Francisco gay rights activist Harvey Milk. The Military Times first reported on a memorandum issued by the Office of the Secretary of the Navy rolling out plans to rename the oiler USNS Harvey Milk. The outlet reported that a defense official said the U.s. Navy was making preparations to strip the ship of its name and that Hegseth had directed Navy Secretary John Phelan to do so. The Military Times also reported the official saying the timing of the announcement during Pride month was intentional. The memo directing the renaming of the ship said the move is meant to mark a shift in culture in the Department of Defense and U.S. Navy in "alignment with president and SECDEF [secretary of defense] objectives and SECNAV [secretary of the Navy] priorities of reestablishing the warrior culture," according to the outlet. Navy Halts Dog And Cat Experiments; Peta Writes Hegseth About Us Taxpayer-funded Animal Tests Fox News Digital reached out to the Department of Defense and U.S. Navy but did not receive a response. Read On The Fox News App In an emailed statement sent to Fox News, chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell did not deny the renaming of the ship but indicated that further name changes may be coming. "Secretary Hegseth is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos," said Parnell. Parnell said that "any potential renaming(s) will be announced after internal reviews are complete." Pentagon Eyes 50% Reduction In Permanent Changes Of Station As Military Families Brace For Moving High Season The USNS Harvey Milk was named after Milk in 2016 during the Obama administration. The ship completed its maiden voyage in 2024, arriving in San Francisco with much fanfare. According to the Harvey Milk Foundation, Milk was a "visionary civil and human rights leader who became one of the first openly gay elected officials in the United States" when he was elected to public office in San Francisco in 1977. The foundation said that Milk enlisted in the Navy in 1951 but resigned in 1955 at the rank of lieutenant junior grade "after being officially questioned about his sexual orientation." China Accuses Hegseth Of Espousing 'Cold War Mentality' For Labeling Country As A Threat: 'Vilified' The renaming has been soundly condemned by Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who called the move a "shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream." Click Here For More Immigration Coverage "As the rest of us are celebrating the joy of Pride Month, it is my hope that the Navy will reconsider this egregious decision," Pelosi said in a statement. Pelosi claimed that "this spiteful move … is a surrender of a fundamental American value: to honor the legacy of those who worked to build a better country."Original article source: Navy ship USNS Harvey Milk to be renamed as part of Pentagon's 'warrior culture' shift