
Poor oral health is a strong indicator of disadvantage in Australia. So why aren't we doing anything about it?
An increasing number of Australians struggle to access and afford dental care, and many experience dental disease with consequences that extend well beyond the mouth. Poor oral health remains one of the strongest indicators of disadvantage in Australia, and people who rely on public dental services endure long waiting times; in some places more than two years for basic general dental care. About half of the population does not visit the dentist on a regular basis, and cost is continually cited as a major barrier to access. The cost-of-living crisis has only exacerbated this issue.
The exclusion of dentistry from Medicare more than 50 years ago has had disastrous consequences, which are now becoming more apparent. Australians can attend their general medical practitioner, be treated in a public hospital and fill their prescriptions without their financial circumstances being a major barrier to receiving care. That is because state and federal governments subsidise up to 88% of the cost of these services. Unfortunately, the majority of dental costs are paid out-of-pocket by individuals, and federal government funding subsidises private health insurance substantially, further entrenching easy access for higher income groups.
Why is the mouth treated differently to the rest of the body? We are failing through a lack of national leadership, because it is apparent that successive governments have not placed sufficient value or priority on the importance of good oral health. The Chronic Disease Dental Scheme, established by the Howard government, was later shut down by the Rudd/Gillard government with plans to introduce a Commonwealth Dental Health Plan that never materialised. However, Australia did introduce the Child Dental Benefits Scheme in 2014 to provide dental care to vulnerable children. Commonwealth funding to support public dental services was boosted and then cut and has remained at a paltry $108m annually since 2017.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
It's not hard to fund a universal public dental care system if we really cared about improving oral health. It has been estimated that a universal scheme could range in cost from $1.8bn a year for a scheme that provides only preventive care to $7.7bn for an uncapped scheme that includes general dental care. The parliamentary Budget Office recently costed the Greens' dental scheme at $14bn a year.
A universal dental scheme should be considered an investment, not a cost, because there are significant benefits to improving access to dental care. Dental diseases are the leading cause of preventable hospitalisations, costing about $1.6bn annually, and the cost to the economy from lost productivity from such disease is estimated to be in the order of $700m annually. Importantly, reducing dental disease has significant benefits in improving quality of life, including reducing the exacerbation of things such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes by dental disease.
The reason cost estimates vary so much – and why there is concern in some quarters about the budgetary implications – is that there is no consensus on what a dental scheme would look like. There are three key elements to a universal health scheme: breadth of population covered, scope of services provided, and depth of costs covered. In an ideal world, a truly universal dental scheme would provide preventive and general dental care across the whole population, with some of the costs borne by the government while allowing providers to charge a co-payment – in much the same way Medicare operates.
What is stopping this from happening? Public funding for dental care has been a political hot potato for decades, with states and the federal government pointing the finger at each other as the situation deteriorates. However, with a federal election looming, there is a window of opportunity to recalibrate. The Labor party is on record as saying that oral health is the missing element of Medicare, with a goal to provide universal access to affordable dental services for all Australians. The Aged Care royal commission in 2021 recommended the establishment of a senior dental benefits scheme, and a Senate select committee into dental services made it abundantly clear that the status quo is no longer an option.
Dental care in Australia is at a crossroad. There is an opportunity to take bold action to correct the mistakes of the past and create an equitable dental system that ensures all Australians, regardless of their background, income or where they live, can access timely dental care when they need it. Momentum is building and there is a groundswell of public support for change. We must not waste it.
Matt Hopcraft is Associate Professor in Professional Practice at the Melbourne Dental School at the University of Melbourne
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
Vaccine actions and policy positions under US Health Secretary Kennedy
June 10 (Reuters) - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a long-time vaccine skeptic, has been making sweeping changes to reshape U.S. regulation of vaccines, food and medicine. The most far-reaching of his moves culminated in the layoff of all 17 members of a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel of vaccine experts. Here are some of the policy moves under Kennedy's leadership in recent months, related to vaccines: FDA Recommendations for Influenza Vaccines Date of Announcement: March 13, 2025 Details: The FDA independently recommends virus strains for the 2025-2026 influenza vaccines, deviating from traditional advisory committee voting. This move assures no impact on the timing or availability of vaccines for the public. Environmental Toxin Studies Related to Autism Date of Announcement: April 16, 2025 Details: Kennedy plans studies on environmental contributors to autism, including vaccines, despite lacking scientific evidence. This approach aligns with his longstanding views on vaccines and environmental factors. Launch of US Autism Project Using Medicare and Medicaid Data Date of Announcement: May 7, 2025 Details: Federal agencies will create a database to research autism causes, focusing on Medicare and Medicaid data, as part of a broader effort to explore potential links between vaccines and autism. FDA Tightens Requirements for COVID Vaccine Date of Announcement: May 20, 2025 Details: The FDA plans new trials for annual COVID-19 boosters, limiting them to older adults and those at risk of severe illness. This change aligns with international perspectives on COVID vaccination strategies. US Drops COVID Vaccine Recommendation for Healthy Kids, Pregnant Women Date of Announcement: May 27, 2025 Details: The U.S. stops recommending routine COVID vaccinations for pregnant women and healthy children, bypassing the CDC's traditional advisory process. Cancellation of Moderna Bird Flu Vaccine Contract Date of Announcement: May 28, 2025 Details: The Trump administration cancels a contract with Moderna for the late-stage development of its bird flu vaccine, after determining it did not meet scientific standards. Moderna explores alternatives for its vaccine's development. Kennedy Guts Vaccine Advisory Committee Date of Announcement: June 9, 2025 Details: Kennedy fires all members of the CDC vaccine expert panel, which recommends how vaccines are used and by whom, promising to restore public trust in health agencies. Scientists and experts say the changes would undermine public confidence in health agencies.


The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
‘What if I just didn't drink this': the question that changed everything
For most of her 20s, Jamie* mastered the art of keeping things on the surface. She was the funny one, the party starter, the friend who never said no to another round of drinks. To friends and colleagues, she seemed effortlessly confident. But beneath the banter and bravado was a deep discomfort – with silence, with vulnerability, and most of all, with herself. 'I didn't even realise I was numbing anything,' she told me in one of our recent therapy sessions. 'I just thought I liked to have fun. But looking back, I was terrified of feeling anything real.' Jamie, now 39, is part of a growing number of Australians rethinking their relationship with alcohol. For her, drinking wasn't just a habit, it was a coping mechanism – although she was the last one to realise this. She was drinking to blur the edges. There wasn't a traumatic event that she could remember, but because feeling sad or lonely or anxious felt unbearable, alcohol helped her skip past that. It worked – until it didn't. Her 'bottom' wasn't dramatic; she told me in one session it was more like a slow hollowing, and she got tired of waking up feeling like a stranger to herself. The turning point came in the early months of the pandemic. Isolated from friends, stripped of distractions, she began to realise how often she reached for wine to fill the space. 'One night I was sitting alone with a glass of pinot, and I remember thinking – what would happen if I didn't drink this?' That question changed everything. Jamie decided to stop drinking 'just for a month'. But when the fog began to lift, she couldn't go back. She describes early sobriety as raw and revealing. She was suddenly face to face with everything she pushed away for years – grief, anxiety, even joy – and it became overwhelming. Alcohol addiction is often less about the substance itself, and more about what it helps a person avoid. From a clinical standpoint, we understand alcohol not just as a chemical dependency, but as an emotional anaesthetic – one that temporarily blunts the nervous system's distress signals. Many individuals who struggle with problematic drinking patterns may have started out chasing pleasure and to be social; but consistent reliance upon alcohol can result in using it to flee pain such as unprocessed grief, chronic stress, shame, anxiety or trauma. The neurobiology of addiction reveals that alcohol activates the brain's reward system while simultaneously suppressing the prefrontal cortex, impairing emotional regulation and decision-making. In this way, alcohol becomes a fast, accessible tool for short-term relief – even if it compounds emotional dysregulation in the long term. What makes this cycle so complex is that emotional numbing isn't always conscious. Clients often present in therapy describing 'overwhelm', 'flatness' or 'disconnection', without immediately recognising that these are signs of emotional avoidance – and that alcohol has become part of that equation. Therapy helps illuminate the underlying patterns: how early attachment dynamics, adverse childhood experiences or unresolved trauma may have shaped a person's tolerance for emotional discomfort. A trauma-informed approach encourages clients to build somatic awareness, develop emotional literacy and begin tolerating – rather than bypassing – their internal experience. Recovery, then, is not only about abstaining from alcohol; it's about being able to stay present with what's real and building a nervous system that can feel without needing to flee. In group therapy with professional guidance, Jamie started to see how she had numbed her emotions and buried the difficulties she had experienced in her life. 'I sat with just me,' she recalled. 'And I started crying and couldn't stop. It felt like every emotion I'd stored was finally being released.' I encouraged Jamie to begin journalling daily and start each entry with the question: 'What am I feeling today?' Sometimes she said it was anger. Sometimes relief. Sometimes nothing at all. Jamie finally allowed herself to feel – not with fear, but with curiosity. Our emotions can serve as signposts, gently pointing us toward the places where healing is needed: our blockages, our numbness and the parts of us that have gone quiet in the face of hopelessness. Recovery – from drinking, from disconnection, from self-avoidance – isn't linear, and Jamie is still in that process. But what's changed is her willingness to stay with herself, especially when things feel hard. Jamie is one of many emerging in what some call the 'sober curious' movement. But for her, it's not about labels or lifestyle – it's about presence. She's not interested in moralising alcohol use. It's not about judging drinking. It's about asking why. Why am I drinking? What am I avoiding? Can I support myself with awareness? And what might be possible if I stopped? In a culture where numbing is easy – scroll, sip, swipe – choosing to feel can feel too hard. It's important to take at least one quiet moment a day to ask yourself: What am I feeling? You might be surprised by the answer. * All clients discussed are fictional amalgams Diane Young is a trauma specialist and psychotherapist at South Pacific Private, a trauma, addiction and mental health treatment centre In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and Childline on 0800 1111. In the US, call or text Mental Health America at 988 or chat


Reuters
7 days ago
- Reuters
Humana to back curbs to Medicare Advantage billing practices, WSJ reports
June 5 (Reuters) - Humana (HUM.N), opens new tab has told congressional staffers that it will support moves that would curtail billing practices worth billions in extra payments to the industry, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing staffers and a document viewed by it. The company is willing to back new limits on lucrative payments insurers can gain from diagnoses recorded by nurse practitioners who visit millions of enrollees in their homes, according to a one-page policy overview shared with the staffers, the WSJ reported on Thursday. Humana did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Nearly half of the 65 million people covered by Medicare, the U.S. program for people aged 65 and older or with disabilities, are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans run by private insurers. Insurers are paid a set rate for each patient, but can be paid more for patients with multiple health conditions. Last fall, staff working for Senators Mike Crapo and Ron Wyden, the leaders of the Senate Finance Committee, contacted Medicare Advantage insurers for suggestions on legislative steps that would address the potential misuse of home visits described in Journal articles, the newspaper reported citing people familiar with the matter. The Journal reported in February that the U.S. Department of Justice was examining UnitedHealth's (UNH.N), opens new tab practices for recording diagnoses that trigger extra payments to its Medicare Advantage plans. The healthcare conglomerate had then said it was unaware of any new probe. The WSJ has run a series of stories over the last several months detailing how UnitedHealth profited from using Medicare billing rules to its favor.