logo
House Passes Trump's Reconciliation Bill After Shoving In Larger Medicaid Cuts At Last Minute

House Passes Trump's Reconciliation Bill After Shoving In Larger Medicaid Cuts At Last Minute

Yahoo22-05-2025

After weeks of intraparty fighting, House Republicans passed the reconciliation package that addresses President Donald Trump's fiscal agenda in a largely party line 215-214 vote early Thursday morning.
Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Warren Davidson (R-OH) voted against the bill, joining all Democrats in opposing the package.
House Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-MD) voted 'present,' a decision that lowered the threshold for the 'yes' votes needed by Republicans in order to pass it out of the lower chamber.
'I voted to move the bill forward along the process,' Harris said, according to Punchbowl. 'I don't think it was completely where I would need it to be. But it was a vote to move along. Obviously if I voted no, it would've gone nowhere today.'
Meanwhile, Reps. David Schweikert (R-AZ) and Andrew Garbarino (R-NY) did not vote. Garbarino reportedly fell asleep and missed the vote after sitting through proceedings all night.
The massive reconciliation package — which already included massive cuts to Medicaid and the popular food assistance program SNAP, as well as tax cuts that will largely benefit wealthy Americans — got a makeover on Wednesday largely to appease the far-right members who were threatening to sink the bill.
Notably, leadership made substantial changes to the Medicaid portion of the bill overnight.
The new text moves up the start date of Medicaid work requirements from Jan. 1, 2029 to Dec. 31, 2026. That was one of the demands members of the Freedom Caucus had been pushing since last week.
The bill already included a provision that banned coverage of gender-affirming care for minors. The new text extends that ban to adults under the program as well. Republicans also expanded the criteria for a provision that could cause states to lose a portion of the funds they receive through the federal matching rate if they offer coverage to undocumented immigrants.
Another notable change is expected to incentivize states not to expand their programs under the Affordable Care Act. A newly added measure would give states a financial incentive not to expand coverage outside of the traditional enrollees, making higher payments to providers, like hospitals, for uncompensated care.
The passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act comes after two obstinate factions of the House GOP caucus spent the past several weeks refusing to come together and support the package without assurances their competing demands would be met.
A group, largely made up of members of the House Freedom Caucus, had been pushing for steeper spending cuts and calling for leadership to move up the date for when Medicaid work requirements outlined in the legislation would kick in. Simultaneously, another group of largely blue-state Republicans have been unhappy with leadership's state and local tax (SALT) offer, as well as provisions of the bill that would slash Medicaid.
House Republican leadership had been working with both sides to get everyone in line ahead of their self-imposed deadline: passing the bill out of the lower chamber by Memorial Day.
But they had to call in the real leader of the House Republican conference this week to ultimately pull that off.
On Tuesday morning, Trump attended a closed-door House Republican conference meeting in an attempt to strongarm both groups into accepting the offers they have received from leadership. He even called out a handful of Republicans by name during the meeting, telling them to get in line or else.
A handful of members came out of that meeting signaling to TPM and other reporters outside the room that the President had made significant progress with holdouts on both sides of the spectrum. But others also acknowledged more time was likely needed for negotiations.
That same night, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and the blue-state Republicans reached a tentative deal on SALT as the Speaker agreed to boost the cap on state and local tax deductions to $40,000 for taxpayers making below $500,000 in the reconciliation package.
That agreement, which was endorsed by Trump, triggered a rebellion from far-right members who had been calling for steeper cuts to lower the deficit.
Johnson and House Freedom Caucus members went to the White House on Wednesday afternoon to work through their issues with Trump. That meeting and continued negotiations led to some of the major last minute revisions.
The bill will head to the Senate next where it is expected to face its own challenges.
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) has already said he is a 'no' on the bill in its current form, as it does not do enough to address the deficit. And Senate Republican leadership is considering taking the House's package and chopping it up into pieces to make it easier to pass.
Johnson reportedly warned Senate Republicans against making major changes to the bill, as he barely whipped the votes he needed to pass it in the lower chamber. Any major changes might not withstand a second House floor vote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Ups Metals Tariff to 50% to Aid Nippon-US Steel
Trump Ups Metals Tariff to 50% to Aid Nippon-US Steel

Bloomberg

time34 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump Ups Metals Tariff to 50% to Aid Nippon-US Steel

Good morning. Steel and aluminum are set to face a 50% US tariff starting Wednesday. Australia homes are getting even more expensive. And next time you travel to Kyoto, make sure you go beyond the trends. Listen to the day's top stories. Steel and aluminum tariffs are back in focus. Donald Trump is boosting levies on the metals to 50% from 25%, saying the move will help protect American workers and benefit the operations of an expected deal between Nippon Steel and US Steel. Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he's confident the latest trade clash between Trump and Xi Jinping ' will be ironed out ' in a call 'very soon.'

Opinion - With his new prescription drug order, Trump fixes what Biden broke
Opinion - With his new prescription drug order, Trump fixes what Biden broke

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - With his new prescription drug order, Trump fixes what Biden broke

Americans have been clamoring for sensible prescription drug reform for years. With the stroke of his pen, President Donald Trump answered that call. His executive order aims to bring down drug prices while 'once again putting Americans first.' Luckily, it specifically addresses one of the serious flaws in the Biden administration's Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program — an oversight that has discouraged investment in affordable, widely used medications. This reform could deliver major savings to patients — without undermining the innovation that drives medical breakthroughs. Now it's up to Congress to finish the job. The reform in question addresses a flaw in the Medicare price-setting scheme put in place by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. That law gave the secretary of Health and Human Services sweeping new authority to impose price controls on certain drugs covered by Medicare. But it also drew an arbitrary line between different types of medicines by giving biologics, which are made from living organisms,13 years before price-setting kicks in, while small-molecule drugs, like pills and capsules, get just nine. That four-year gap makes no clinical or economic sense. Many of the most important drugs in history, from aspirin to statins to HIV treatments, are small-molecule medicines. Yet innovators are now steering investment away from them. According to a recent study, investment in small-molecule drugs has already dropped by 68 percent. And compared to pre-IRA levels, new small-molecule cancer drug development programs fell over 40 percent last year. President Trump's order calls for correcting this imbalance. The Republican-backed EPIC Act offers the clearest solution, aligning the treatment of small-molecule drugs with biologics by extending the price-setting window to 13 years. My hope is that this legislation will pass quickly with bipartisan support. Passing EPIC would protect innovation, preserve patient access and deliver on the president's promise to fix what the last administration got wrong. The order also directs the secretary of Labor to write new transparency rules to address some of the other significant issues affecting drug access and prices. That's a big win for patients and a critical step toward restoring fairness to the system and decreasing out-of-pocket costs for Americans. In addition to these transparency reforms, the order acknowledges the critical role of intellectual property rights in bringing new drugs to patients — and promises to optimize those protections in ways that improve access and lower drug costs. Patents and other intellectual property protections play a central role in pushing medical science forward. The previous administration's efforts to undermine these essential tools posed a direct threat to the foundations of America's innovation-driven economy. President Trump's unequivocal stance on this issue should come as welcome news to the nation's inventors and entrepreneurs — including those in the biotech sector. Equally encouraging is the executive order's treatment of the 340B Prescription Drug Program. The program was originally designed to help safety-net providers offer affordable medications to low-income patients. Yet today, less than 40 percent of hospitals that use the program are in underserved areas. During my time in Congress, I took up this issue — championing reforms to promote transparency, increase accountability and require participating hospitals to report patient's benefits. Now, emboldened by the White House, lawmakers should do the same. Altogether, this order is a blueprint for drug pricing reform that's patient-focused, pro-innovation and rooted in real-world solutions. Now, Congress can do its part, beginning with passing the EPIC Act. If they do, American patients could finally get the kind of affordable, innovative and equitable prescription drug sector they've long demanded. Larry Bucshon, MD, a cardiothoracic surgeon, served as the U.S. representative for Indiana's 8th District from 2011 to 2025. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Texas Legislature gives new city of Starbase authority to shut down local beach for SpaceX launches
Texas Legislature gives new city of Starbase authority to shut down local beach for SpaceX launches

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Legislature gives new city of Starbase authority to shut down local beach for SpaceX launches

Texas lawmakers agreed to give the new city of Starbase the authority to periodically close down a South Texas beach, giving more power to municipal officials with close ties to SpaceX over the objections of local activists trying to preserve access to the beach. After previous versions of the measure died earlier during the legislative session, a last-minute addition to a bill related to the Texas Space Commission successfully granted Starbase officials the authority to temporarily close down Boca Chica Beach for SpaceX launches. House Bill 5246 revises the power and duties of the Texas Space Commission and the Texas Aerospace Research and Space Economy Consortium. A conference committee report of the bill added a section that allows the Space Commission to coordinate with a city to temporarily close a highway or venue for public safety purposes. In South Texas, that will give the Starbase city commissioners the authority to approve those closures which would affect State Highway 4, a road that runs through Starbase and leads to the beach, as well as the beach itself. Rep. Greg Bonnen, a Republican from Friendswood who chaired the conference committee on the bill, said the bill would ensure Texas remained the gateway for the future in space exploration. "The future is being shaped right here in Texas,' Bonnen said. Defending the addition to the bill, Rep. Richard Peña Raymond, a Democrat from Laredo, argued that the city of Starbase would have a better idea of whether it is safe for people to be out on the beach in a similar way the Laredo manages their international bridges. However, Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, D-San Antonio, along with other Democrats, pushed back against the bill, noting that previous attempts to give Starbase this authority never made it to the House floor. Martinez Fischer also argued that the county commissioners were responsible for the beach and should get to make the call on when to shut it down. 'The question is who gets to make the call and who is in the best position to have the public interest in mind in closing a public beach?' Martinez Fischer said on the floor Sunday. 'I submit to you it's not the people in the company town that's effectively a wholly-owned subsidiary of SpaceX, and it's not the Space Commission.' Local organizations strongly opposed the measure, hosting phone banking events to urge lawmakers to vote against the bill. Their objections to the measure stemmed from concerns that the public would increasingly be shut off from Boca Chica Beach, which is affectionately known as the people's beach. It was once the most accessible beach before the Queen Isabella Causeway was built to connect Port Isabel to South Padre Island in 1954. Today, Boca Chica is beloved because it lacks the heavy commercialization of the beaches of South Padre Island. Additionally, the Esto'k Gna Tribal Nation, commonly known as the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe of Texas, view the beach as part of their ancestral land. The tribal and environmental groups have also opposed the increasing space flight activity that SpaceX is conducting on the beach over fears that the company's rocket launches are damaging nearby wildlife and polluting the gulf waters. Despite their efforts, the Federal Aviation Administration gave SpaceX the green light to increase the number rocket launches from Boca Chica Beach from five to 25 times per year. This authorization came after the FAA found through an environmental assessment that there would be no significant environmental impacts. The FAA released a draft of the environmental assessment last year for public review and held public meetings in January. Critics from the environmental and indigenous groups argued that the FAA's review was not thorough and that the agency did not consult with the Carrizo/Comecrudo tribe. The move to allow Starbase to close the beach shifts that authority away from Cameron County, a power that the county inherited in 2013 just as SpaceX was about to begin their spaceflight activities there. Now that authority lies with Starbase, a new city whose residents and elected officials are either SpaceX employees or have ties to the company. The mayor and city commissioners held their first public meetings this week, appointing key staff, adopting city codes, and approving a financial plan to seek a loan from SpaceX to help fund the city through the end of the fiscal year. Reporting in the Rio Grande Valley is supported in part by the Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas, Inc. First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store