logo
Tate Britain has unveiled designs for its leafy new Clore Garden – featuring a wildlife pond and sculptures

Tate Britain has unveiled designs for its leafy new Clore Garden – featuring a wildlife pond and sculptures

Time Out16-05-2025

The space around Tate Britain at Millbank is set to undergo a major green transformation – and now we've got a taste of how it will look, after seeing first-stage designs for the revamp of the gallery's outside area.
Developed by landscape architect Tom Stuart-Smith Studio and architects Feilden Fowles, who were selected for the project last year following an open competition, the new Clore Garden has been 'carefully designed to complement and enhance the gallery's neo-classical architecture and withstand the UK's changing climate'. It will feature pathways navigating flowers, trees and a wildlife pond, as well as a reimagined café terrace and a freestanding classroom to host school groups and adult learners, in addition to an area for outdoor programmes and activities.
The plans were made in partnership with the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) with funding from the Clore Duffield Foundation. The garden will also feature sculptures by British artists from Tate's collection as well as integrated seating, an interactive water feature and bench circle.
'These innovative designs demonstrate the role museums can play in our cities, places where contemplation and relaxation can go hand in hand with joy and creativity,' said Alex Farquharson, Director, Tate Britain. 'We hope the garden will offer new ways to engage with Tate's Collection, for both visitors and local residents alike.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brookside star joins Casualty and is already filming scenes
Brookside star joins Casualty and is already filming scenes

South Wales Argus

time26 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Brookside star joins Casualty and is already filming scenes

Michael Starke, who played the role of Thomas "Sinbad" Sweeney on the long-running show, is now a cast member for Casualty. The 67-year-old is understood to have already started filming for the medical drama, news that is sure to excite soap fans across the UK. Brookside star Michael Starke signs up for Casualty and has already started filming According to The Sun, Nicola Bolton Management, Michael's representatives, said on Instagram: "Our MICHAEL STARKE @michael_starke_ has been busy down in Cardiff filming on @bbccasualtyofficial @bbc #casualty." This isn't the first time the actor has taken part in other soaps, as he took on the role of Jerry Morton in Coronation Street all the way back in 2007. During his stint on the ITV programme, his character opened up a kebab shop, but left the show after only 18 months. He has also appeared in other shows like Hollyoaks on Channel 4. What was Brookside all about, and when was it axed? According to IMDb , Brookside was a Liverpool-based soap opera which followed the "everyday life and times of the residents, friends, and enemies who live in the fictional suburban street of Brookside Close". The show aired for a staggering 21 years from 1982 until 2003, and is widely considered a classic among fans of British drama. Channel 4 has described the drama as a "ground-breaking" show which dealt with a range of controversial issues, including child abuse, murder, suicide and adultery. Recommended Reading: Brookside came to an end after suffering from declining ratings, shifting channel policies and a perceived decline in creative quality. Many die-hard fans have also blamed this decline on constant changes to the drama's scheduling and the shift to more sensationalist stories later in its run. Casualty can be watched and streamed on BBC One and BBC iPlayer.

Starmer's plan to ‘smash the gangs' isn't serious
Starmer's plan to ‘smash the gangs' isn't serious

Spectator

time33 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Starmer's plan to ‘smash the gangs' isn't serious

Keir Starmer has repeatedly promised to smash the gangs to secure our borders. But the reality is rather different. Yesterday, the Prime Minister tweeted a short clip once again attempting to reassure British voters that the government is 'going to the source to smash the people smuggling gangs'. The video is an odd, cheap thing. Set to possibly the most generic soundtrack available and voiced over by an utterly bored-sounding young man, it shows images of small boats full of migrants, foreign police, and open water. Eye-catchingly, it promises to reveal just 'how we're controlling our borders'. Unfortunately, almost every single claim it makes is misleading or laughable. The narrator tells us that the government is 'working with our international allies to smash people smuggling gangs for good' and that 'hundreds of boats and engines have been seized'. 'Since July we have returned nearly 30,000 people with no right to be here,' he continues.

Non-voters are Nigel Farage's secret weapon
Non-voters are Nigel Farage's secret weapon

New Statesman​

time37 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Non-voters are Nigel Farage's secret weapon

Photo by Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images On Saturday (31 May) Andy Burnham launched a broad critique of the government. 'I believe you do have to take on the right,' the mayor of greater Manchester told a crowd in London, 'but what's the best way to do that?' Definitely not by aping their rhetoric' he added. 'We see from Canada and Australia that a strong, confident left, which leans into what we believe, rather than tilting the other way, can win and can win well.' He is mostly (but not entirely) right. Two things are driving voters towards Reform UK: the cost of living and immigration. The government can't compete with Reform on immigration and it shouldn't try to – that is a conversation owned by Farage right now. And this idea bubbles under the surface of Burnham's criticism of Starmer (the Prime Minister's recent speech on immigration read, at least to some, like a direct rhetorical invocation of Farage). But immigration is not even the most important electoral order of the day. The cost of living is still supreme, and if Labour can allay unrest on the issue it can recoup some lost favour. It is a shame, then, that the most recognised policy from the party's first year in post is the decision to cut winter fuel payments to pensioners. Fairly or not, the voters see a party that rallies against austerity in theory but imposes it in practice. So, Burnham's analysis is sound: Labour is getting nowhere by aping Farage on immigration and neglecting its values on the cost of living. Now, not many Brits see this Labour government as particularly different to the last Conservative one. And, more than a fifth of Labour's base is in search of a Reform, Green or Lib Dem candidate in the polling booth. But there are grounds for scepticism on the broader points. A 'strong, confident left' is one thing, but it's incorrect to assume that this will necessarily keep Farage at bay. The British left is too divided to cobble together a so-called 'left front' strong enough to resist the country's lurch Reform-wards. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The Runcorn and Helsby by-election in May was the opening salvo of this semi-doomed strategy. Labour activists took to Lib Dem, Green and Conservative areas to squeeze as many possible tactical votes in Labour's favour. The party modelled for ten thousand votes via this tactic. It ended up getting twelve. And while Tory villages came out for Labour, Labour villages came out for Reform. The Reform candidate won. Labour organisers on the ground noted that Lib Dem voters were happy to vote Labour to stop Reform, but prospective Green voters were not. Voting for Labour in the face of Farage was still too great a leap for these 2,000 Green supporters, galvanised by an active Green campaign. And I suspect that so long as Labour's profile remains unchanged, the left will remain split along these lines and Reform will keep winning. There's another hitch behind the grand strategy of a left front. In France, strategists bank on increasing turnout from the non-voting 'silent majority' as a guarantor against the far-right. And the so-called Republican front has worked in France before. But in Britain, I would not be so confident. Because, at least according to the findings of the British Election Study, non-voters are not anti-Farage progressives waiting to be activated. Instead, relative to Starmer, non-voters favour Farage. Whereas among regular voters the Farage advantage (and this is of data immediately after the General Election) is small, among non-voters it is notable. Survey their social attitudes and you find a less-than-progressive bent. They're more redistributive than the voting median, yes. (Only slightly, I grant you.) But they're markedly more conservative than the median too. Non-voters are broadly of that crude, cliched charge: 'hang the paedos, fund the NHS'. As are most voters, really. But non-voters more so. And so to rely on them to forge an alliance to keep Farage at the gates? It seems unlikely. [See more: Andy Burnham has made his leadership pitch] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store