Work withdrawn from Punjab judge after HC admin recommends his compulsory retirement
Chandigarh: Just days after the Punjab and Haryana high court administration recommended compulsory retirement of Tejwinder Singh, judicial responsibilities have been withdrawn from him.
Singh, one of Punjab's senior-most district and sessions judges, was serving as the presiding officer of the industrial tribunal in Patiala.
Sources confirmed that since the HC administration has sent the recommendations regarding his compulsory retirement to the Punjab govt, it was a routine exercise to withdraw judicial work from the concerned judicial officer. As per rules, the decision to compulsorily retire Tejwinder Singh would be notified by the Punjab govt.
Singh had first come into limelight in June 2019, when he had convicted six persons in the infamous Kathua rape and murder case. While three were awarded life sentence, other three accused were given five-year jail terms. The trial was conducted in his court after the Supreme Court had shifted the case from Kathua to Pathankot, where he was posted as the district and sessions judge.
Known for his sobriety and professional competence, Singh joined the Punjab judicial services in 1991 at the age of 23 and made it to the 1993 edition of the Limca Book of World Records for being India's youngest magistrate.
He had also served as magistrate in Chandigarh.
Singh had also practiced as an advocate at the Punjab and Haryana high court for around a year before joining the judicial services. In March 2017, he completed his doctorate in law from the Panjab University in Chandigarh on "Legislative Measures To Control Terrorism And Their Enforcement With Special Reference To The State Of Punjab: A Critique."
Singh had qualified for Punjab judiciary examination in 1989 and started his career as a magistrate in Ludhiana.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Anticipatory bail must not be given mechanically: SC
New Delhi, The Supreme Court has said anticipatory bail in cases involving serious offences should not be given in a mechanical manner. A three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol and Sandeep Mehta made the observation while setting aside an order of anticipatory bail to four accused in a murder case. "The order of the High Court does not disclose any reasoning for granting anticipatory bail in a matter involving serious offences under Sections 302 and 307 IPC," the bench said in its May 1 order. It continued, "The impugned order is cryptic and lacking in judicial analysis. In cases involving serious offences, the grant of anticipatory bail in such a mechanical manner cannot be sustained and is liable to be set aside." On a plain reading of the FIR and accompanying material, the court noted that the appellant's father was assaulted and killed in the presence of the appellant, who was also the informant. "The incident appears to have stemmed from a dispute regarding obstruction of a pathway. The specific roles attributed to the accused, as stated in the FIR, indicate that they participated in the assault even after the deceased had collapsed," the top court said. The high court, it said, "clearly failed" to appreciate the gravity and nature of the allegations in the case. The accused persons was, as a result, directed to surrender within eight weeks. The order came on a plea filed by the son of the victim, challenging the order granting them anticipatory bail. The victim was assaulted in 2023 with an iron rod and sticks during a dispute between neighbours. As a result of the head injury, he succumbed to injuries the same day and an FIR was registered on the basis of the appellant's statement against seven accused persons.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Madras high court upholds conviction of man and mother in dowry harassment case linked to suicide of wife and child
Madras high court upholds conviction of man and mother in dowry harassment case linked to suicide of wife and child HC upholds conviction of man, mother in connection with suicide of wife and child over dowry harassment Madras high court upholds conviction of man and mother in dowry harassment case linked to suicide of wife and child HC upholds conviction of man, mother in connection with suicide of wife and child over dowry harassment Madras high court upholds conviction of man and mother in dowry harassment case linked to suicide of wife and child 1 2 MADURAI: The Madras High Court confirmed the trial court order that convicted and sentenced a man and his mother in connection with the suicide of his wife and child over dowry harassment in Kanyakumari district. The court was hearing the appeal preferred by Anbarrasu, his father Asir David, and his mother Kasthuri, challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on them by the mahila court in Nagercoil in 2016. The prosecution's case is that Anbarrasu married Christilda Jane in 1994 in a church as per Christian rituals. A male child was born to them in 1995. Since Anbarrasu's brother married a woman from a wealthy family, he, along with his parents, ill-treated and harassed Jane, seeking more dowry. She also made a complaint in this regard to the Nagercoil All Women Police in 1999. Since Anbarrasu and Jane gave an undertaking that they would live in a separate house, the complaint was closed. Thereafter, the couple lived with their child in a rental house. Since Anbarrasu and his parents continued the harassment seeking dowry, Jane, along with her child, committed suicide by self-immolation in 2000. Based on the complaint of Jane's father, Vadasery Police registered a case against Anbarrasu, Asir David, and Kasthuri. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo In 2016, the trial court convicted and sentenced Anbarrasu, Asir David, and Kasthuri to undergo 10 years of rigorous imprisonment. Challenging the same, they preferred the present appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, Asir David died, due to which the charges against him were abated. Justice K K Ramakrishnan observed that the evidence of the family members about the demand for dowry and the harassment meted out to the deceased in furtherance of the demand for dowry was cogent, clear, and without any infirmities. Hence, the court had no reason to disbelieve their testimony. They were the best persons to speak about the harassment caused to the deceased. The judge observed that in the complaint lodged in 1999, the deceased narrated all the incidents and helplessly pleaded that her family was not in a position to meet the demand for dowry. Therefore, the prosecution showed circumstances and evidence to presume the continuous dowry demand, which drove the deceased to self-immolate herself along with her child. Hence, the judge confirmed the conviction and sentence imposed on Anbarrasu and Kasthuri and dismissed the appeal preferred by them. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
43 minutes ago
- Business Standard
RBI Guv flags crypto concerns, says it may hamper financial stability
RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra on Friday said the central bank is concerned about cryptocurrencies as it can hamper financial stability. Malhotra was replying to a question during a media interaction post the RBI monetary policy about the developments in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's observation on crypto currency last month. "There is no new development as far as crypto is concerned. A committee of the government is looking after this. Of course, as you are aware, we are concerned about crypto because that can hamper financial stability and monetary policy," Malhotra said. The Supreme Court has last month asked the Centre to formulate a "clear cut" policy on regulating cryptocurrency, while underlining its impact on the economy. A Supreme Court bench termed the Bitcoin trade as an illicit trade more or less like "hawala" business. India is currently working on a discussion paper for cryptocurrencies and an inter-ministerial group (IMG), comprising officials from RBI, Sebi and finance ministry, is looking into global norms. In absence of any regulation, cryptocurrency is not yet illegal in India. The discussion paper will give the stakeholders an opportunity to give their views before India decides on its policy stance on cryptocurrencies. In 2022, the government announced a flat 30 per cent tax on gains arising from cryptocurrencies. Taxing income from cryptocurrencies does not necessarily and explicitly legalise cryptocurrencies. Currently, crypto assets are unregulated in India. Here cryptocurrencies are regulated from the perspective of anti-money laundering law. Besides that, income tax and TDS is levied on earnings from trading in such virtual digital assets. Also, GST is levied on cryptocurrency exchanges. It may be noted that, on March 4, 2021, the Supreme Court had set aside an RBI circular of April 6, 2018, prohibiting banks and entities regulated by it from providing services in relation to virtual currencies.
