What to do if you think your child is being radicalised
The spread of misinformation and dangerous content across social media has become a major concern across the world, and children are particularly vulnerable to being influenced online.
In an effort to protect children more online, a number of countries are considering, or have already implemented, laws and regulations to hold social media platforms accountable for hosting content that could be potentially harmful.
In the UK, the Online Safety Act 2023 requires platforms to prevent children from accessing "harmful and age-inappropriate content", as well as provide parents and children with "clear and accessible ways to report problems online".
However, there are still concerns that children are vulnerable to being radicalised online. Last December, Five Eyes security chiefs issued a warning about terrorist radicalisation of children online, calling for a "whole society response".
It came after figures showed a record 3,026 UK children under the age of 15, including nearly 300 children under the age of 10, were referred to the government's Prevent programme over the last year alone.
Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Matt Jukes, who is also the UK's head of counter-terrorism, warned that the internet has "globalised extremism, accelerated the spread of hateful ideologies internationally, and made it possible for anyone with an internet connection to reach into the lives of children halfway round the world".
In a recent statement, issued in response to the murders of three young girls in Southport that took place on 29 July 2024, Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned that the face of terrorism is changing, with young men in particular being more vulnerable to being radicalised online.
He said that, alongside the threat from highly organised terrorist groups, there has been a rise in "acts of extreme violence perpetrated by loners, misfits, young men in their bedroom, accessing all manner of material online".
With so many parents worried about what their children are being exposed to online, we look to experts at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) and Educate Against Hate about what you can do and how to seek help if you think your child is being radicalised.
The NSPCC says that children can be exposed to different views and receive information from a number of sources both online and offline. Some of these may be considered radical, misleading, or extreme.
Some of the signs of radicalisation that the NSPCC highlights include:
Isolating themselves from family and friends
Unwillingness or inability to discuss their views
Increased levels of anger
Talking as if from a scripted speech
Sudden disrespectful attitude towards others
Increased secretiveness, especially around internet use
Some children may be at higher risk of radicalisation than others. They may have low self-esteem, or be victims of bullying and discrimination, making them easier targets by extremists who may tell them they can be part of something special.
However, the NSPCC reassures parents that these signs don't always mean a child is being radicalised. It may be normal teenage behaviour or a sign that something else is wrong.
"We understand how difficult it can be if you are worried that your child might be experiencing radicalisation, and it is crucial that we recognise that it is a form of exploitation which can have a significant impact upon children and their future," the NSPCC says.
"A common feature of radicalisation is that the child or young person may not recognise what is happening and do not see themselves as a victim of grooming or exploitation.
"This is why it is so important that parents, carers, and other adults in their lives speak up if they notice changes in behaviour or that a child is talking about dangerous or extreme views. The sooner professionals know, the sooner they can help you and the child you are worried about."
If you see signs that are cause for concern, it's a good idea to speak to your child first to try and gauge what they're going through.
"We don't always know what our children are exposed to, so it is important to listen to what they tell us, look out for changes in their behaviour, and talk to them if we think something is wrong," the NSPCC tells Yahoo UK.
However, you may want to speak to someone else about what to do, as it can be difficult. It's not always easy to identify when it might be occurring.
The NSPCC Helpline is available for concerned parents to call, even if you're unsure. A trained Child Protection Specialist will be able to talk to you about your worries, give you advice to help you support your child, and if needed, will make a referral to other professionals for you.
According to Educate Against Hate, there are some additional steps you can take to get help and advice. You can raise the issue with your child's teachers, a friend or a close family member and explain your worries, as hearing another perspective may help you decide if something really is wrong.
Your local police force or local authority can also provide advice and support. If your child has not committed a criminal offence, this will not get them into any trouble - instead, you will be able to discuss your concerns and learn about how to best protect your child.
If a child or young person is worried about their own or someone else's views, they can get in touch with Childline for support.
The NSPCC Helpline can be contacted on 0808 800 5000 or via help@nspcc.org.uk. Childline is available on 0800 1111, or online at childline.org.uk.
Read more about parenting:
When should children be on social media? Penelope Cruz brands it a 'cruel experiment' (Yahoo Life UK, 6-min read)
Online safety rules don't go far enough, bereaved parents say (PA Media, 6-min read)
1 in 4 parents unaware if children are accessing anonymous chat rooms (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Labour MPs call for action on benefits after winter fuel U-turn
Labour MPs have broadly welcomed the government's decision to reinstate winter fuel payments for three-quarters of pensioners but some are using the U-turn to renew their calls for planned benefit cuts to be reversed. Nine million pensioners in England and Wales with an annual income of £35,000 or less will now be eligible for up to £300 to help with energy bills this winter. Labour MPs thanked the government for listening to their concerns, arguing means testing the payment was fair but that the threshold was set too low last year. However, several urged ministers to also think again on planned cuts to disability payments, while others called for the two-child benefit cap to be scrapped. Under planned changes to the benefits system it would be harder for people with less severe conditions to claim personal independence payments (Pips), while the government is promising more support to help people get into work. While the two-child benefit cap policy prevents most families from claiming means-tested benefits for any third or additional children born after April 2017, which critics say has pushed people into poverty. Ministers are considering lifting the cap, with a decision expected in the autumn, when a child poverty strategy is published. Pressure from Labour backbenchers over the issues - as well as on winter fuel payments - has been growing since the party's poor performance at local election's in May. The winter fuel payment was previously paid to all pensioners but last year the government announced only those receiving pension credit or another means-tested benefit would be eligible in England and Wales. The original cut last year was estimated to save £1.7bn, with the government arguing it was necessary because of the state of the public finances. But the move, which meant more than 10 million pensioners did not receive the payment in 2024, was criticised by charities, unions, opposition parties and many Labour MPs. Following mounting pressure, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced a U-turn last month, with the details of who will get the payment this winter set out on Monday. The chancellor said she would detail how the £1.25bn policy would be paid for in the autumn Budget. How much is the winter fuel payment and who will get it? Labour hope to put winter fuel misstep behind them At-a-glance: Key changes to benefits in welfare shake-up Imran Hussain was among the Labour MPs to call for the planned benefit cuts to be scrapped in response to a government statement in the Commons on changes to winter fuel payments. "It is clear the government has listened, so I ask them to listen again to the growing calls in this chamber and scrap their planned, devastating cuts to disability support," the MP for Bradford East said. Fellow Labour MPs Nadia Whittome and Richard Burgon also welcomed the winter fuel U-turn but urged the government to listen to backbench concerns over benefit cuts. In response, Torsten Bell, who is both a Treasury minister and pensions minister, told MPs there needed to be "a better system focusing on supporting those who can work into work". He added that the status quo - where 1,000 people a day are going onto Pips - was not "a position that anybody should support". Labour MP Rachael Maskell, who has been a leading campaigner for restoring winter fuel payments, welcomed the government's change in policy, saying it was "long overdue". She told BBC Radio 4's World at One programme the £35,000 salary threshold for the payment was a "sensible measure". However, Maskell called on the government to consider a larger payment following increases in energy prices over the past year. The MP for York Central also urged a rethink on planned benefit cuts, adding: "You can't rob disabled people in order to pay older people, that doesn't make sense." Meanwhile, she was among several MPs to reiterate their calls for the government to scrap the two-child benefit cap. In the Commons Rebecca Long Bailey, Labour MP for Salford, also asked for reassurances minsters "are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible" to bring children out of poverty. In response Bell said "all levers to reduce child poverty are on the table". The minister added: "She's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this government. "We cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty." The Conservatives have called for the government to apologise to pensioners who lost out on winter fuel payments last year. Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately described the U-turn as "the most humiliating climbdown a government has ever faced in its first year in office". She told the Commons "this rushed reversal raises as many questions as it answers", arguing the move was "totally unfunded" and could lead to tax rises. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: "Finally the chancellor has listened to the Liberal Democrats and the tireless campaigners in realising how disastrous this policy was, but the misery it has caused cannot be overstated. "Countless pensioners were forced to choose between heating and eating all whilst the government buried its head in the sand for months on end, ignoring those who were really suffering." Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The benefits system is out of control
The decision to axe the winter fuel payment for most pensioners must rank among the most ill-judged policies introduced by a Chancellor in recent times, and there is strong competition for that accolade. Rachel Reeves made the decision shortly after taking office because she said it was necessary to help plug a £22 billion 'black hole' she had discovered in the nation's finances. Her argument might have had some merit had she not then blown much of the savings on pay rises for train drivers and public sector workers. The juxtaposition of help for Labour's union allies while pensioners shivered rapidly became toxic for the Government, generating one of the fastest reversals of support for any new administration. In the end, with Reform advancing in the polls – and pledging to restore the payment – Sir Keir Starmer ordered a screeching U-turn which the Government maintains is possible because the economy is doing so well, as if anyone believes that. Now, instead of around 1.5 million older people on pensioner credit receiving the payment, it will be paid to about nine million OAPs with an income below £35,000. Why this figure has been chosen is as much a mystery as other 'cliff edge' sums that abound in our overly complex tax and benefit system. Indeed, this U-turn just makes it even more convoluted. Everyone will receive the payment but it will then be clawed back from an estimated two million people earning more than the £35,000 threshold via PAYE or a tax return. In other words, yet more red tape will be imposed to make a quarter of pensioners return an allowance that began life in 1997 as a universal benefit. Although many better-off pensioners often said they did not need the money, and many gave it to charity every Christmas, at least it was straightforward. To some extent so was limiting it to people on pensioner credit, since that is already linked to income. But what is now proposed is a dog's breakfast, with opt-outs and other implications still to be resolved. Tomorrow, Ms Reeves will unveil her spending plans for the next four years. She is being urged to get a grip on the rapidly expanding benefits budget; but if this experience is to be our guide, there is little chance that it will ever be reined in. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Body found by police confirmed to be missing Colombian woman
Police have confirmed that a body found over the weekend is that of a Colombian woman who disappeared after leaving her east London home. Yajaira Castro Mendez, 46, was reported missing to the Metropolitan Police on May 31, having left her home in Ilford on the morning of May 29. An investigation was launched and 51-year-old Juan Francisco Toledo, of Lambeth, south London, was arrested on June 4 and subsequently charged with murder. Police conducted a search for Ms Castro Mendez and found a body in the Bolderwood area of Hampshire on Saturday, which has now been formally identified as her. Acting Detective Chief Inspector Sean Beasley said: 'This is a very sad development in the investigation and our thoughts are very much with Yajaira's family and friends at this incredibly difficult time. 'Officers have been working around the clock and continue to investigate the circumstances. 'There are still crime scenes in place and we're working closely with Hampshire Police. We thank the community for their patience as we carry out our investigation and we continue to appeal to anyone with information that could assist the investigation to please come forward.' Francisco Toledo, who police have said was known to the victim, was remanded in custody after appearing at Barkingside Magistrates' Court on June 6 to attend the Old Bailey on Tuesday. Ms Castro Mendez's disappearance was initially treated as a missing person investigation led by local officers but the investigation was transferred to the Met's Specialist Crime Command on June 5, after a range of extensive further inquiries suggested she had come to harm. People are urged to contact police via 101 or @MetCC quoting CAD 3020/06JUN2, or anonymously via Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or the charity's website.